Paper 2017/459 Original: eprint.iacr.org/2017/459 ↗

Security Analysis of Arbiter PUF and Its Lightweight Compositions Under Predictability Test

Abstract

Unpredictability is an important security property of Physically Unclonable Function (PUF) in the context of statistical attacks, where the correlation between challenge-response pairs is explicitly exploited. In existing literature on PUFs, Hamming Distance test, denoted by $\mathrm{HDT}(t)$, was proposed to evaluate the unpredictability of PUFs, which is a simplified case of the Propagation Criterion test $\mathrm{PC}(t)$. The objective of these testing schemes is to estimate the output transition probability when there are $t$ or less than $t$ bits flips, and ideally, this probability value should be 0.5. In this work, we show that aforementioned two testing schemes are not enough to ensure the unpredictability of a PUF design. We propose a new test which is denoted as $\mathrm{HDT}(\mathbf{e},t)$. This testing scheme is a fine-tuned version of the previous schemes, as it considers the flipping bit pattern vector $\mathbf{e}$ along with parameter $t$. As a contribution, we provide a comprehensive discussion and analytic interpretation of $\mathrm{HDT}(t)$, $\mathrm{PC}(t)$ and $\mathrm{HDT}(\mathbf{e},t)$ test schemes for Arbiter PUF (APUF), XOR PUF and Lightweight Secure PUF (LSPUF). Our analysis establishes that $\mathrm{HDT}(\mathbf{e},t)$ test is more general in comparison with $\mathrm{HDT}(t)$ and $\mathrm{PC}(t)$ tests. In addition, we demonstrate a few scenarios where the adversary can exploit the information obtained from the analysis of $\mathrm{HDT}(\mathbf{e},t)$ properties of APUF, XOR PUF and LSPUF to develop statistical attacks on them, if the ideal value of $\mathrm{HDT}(\mathbf{e},t)=0.5$ is not achieved for a given PUF. We validate our theoretical observations using the simulated and FPGA implemented APUF, XOR PUF and LSPUF designs.