Paper 2025/1518 Original: eprint.iacr.org/2025/1518 ↗

Sequential Indifferentiability of STH and EDM

Abstract

The notion of indifferentiability was proposed by Maurer et al. to bound the distinguishing advantage of a construction built on a public primitive, from a public random function. In Indocrypt'10, Mandal et al. have shown that the sum of two independent permutations is indifferentiable from a public random function up to $2^{2n/3}$ queries. Later in ACNS'15, Mennink and Preneel identified an analytical flaw of Mandal et al's result and revised the security bound to $2^{2n/3}/n$. In Eurocrypt'18, Bhattacharya and Nandi have improved their indifferentiable bound to $2^n$ queries, which was again identified as incorrect in the analysis by Gunsing et al. In this paper, we study the indifferentiability of a few other PRF constructions, namely STH and EDM constructions. We will show that neither STH nor STH2 is indifferentiable, which led us to propose a generalized version called gSTH. We have shown that gSTH achieves a tight $l$-bit security bound, where $l$ denotes the size of the constants in terms of bits used in the construction. While we show that EDM achieves a tight $n/2$-bit indifferentiable bound with respect to our proposed simulator, single-keyed EDM is not indifferentiable from a public random function. We would like to mention that all the proofs and the attacks have been done in the sequential indifferentiability model.