Paper 2026/075 Original: eprint.iacr.org/2026/075 ↗

From $\textsf{TS-SUF-2}$ to $\textsf{TS-SUF-4}$: Practical Security Enhancements for $\textsf{FROST2}$ Threshold Signatures

Abstract

Threshold signature schemes play a vital role in securing digital assets within blockchain and distributed systems. $\textsf{FROST2}$ stands out as a practical threshold Schnorr signature scheme, noted for its efficiency and compatibility with standard verification processes. However, under the one-more discrete logarithm assumption, with static corruption and centralized key generation settings, $\textsf{FROST2}$ has been shown by Bellare et al. (in CRYPTO 2022) to achieve only $\textsf{TS-SUF-2}$ security, which is a consequence of its vulnerability to $\textsf{TS-UF-3}$ attacks. In this paper, we address this security limitation by presenting an enhanced variant of $\textsf{FROST2}$, namely, $\textsf{FROST2}\texttt{+}$ which achieves the $\textsf{TS-SUF-4}$ security level under the same computational assumptions as the original $\textsf{FROST2}$. $\textsf{FROST2}\texttt{+}$ strengthens $\textsf{FROST2}$ by integrating additional pre-processing token verifications that help mitigate $\textsf{TS-UF-3}$ and $\textsf{TS-UF-4}$ vulnerabilities while maintaining practical efficiency. We show that $\textsf{FROST2}\texttt{+}$ can achieve $\textsf{TS-SUF-4}$ security not only under the same conditions as the original $\textsf{FROST2}$ analysis, but also when initialized with a distributed key generation protocol such as $\textsf{PedPoP}$. Our benchmark using ZCash's $\textsf{FROST}$ library shows that the performance of $\textsf{FROST2}\texttt{+}$ is comparable to $\textsf{FROST2}$ and about $64-79\%$ faster than \textsf{FROST} when precomputation is enabled