Paper 2026/1648 Original: eprint.iacr.org/2026/1648 ↗
Deniability for Signed Credentials: Revisiting the Authenticated Channel vs. Signed Data Debate in the EUDI Wallet
Abstract
The European Digital Identity Wallet (EUDI Wallet) is currently adopting ECDSA-based signed credentials as part of its core architecture, which raised concerns that such designs inherently lack plausible deniability compared to authenticated-channel approaches such as the German electronic identity card. This paper revisits this perceived trade-off and argues that it is not a property of signature schemes themselves, but of the credential presentation protocol. We show that standard cryptographic techniques - specifically lightweight OR-proofs over the native ECDSA verification equation - can be used to transform signed credential presentations into non-transferable, verifier-bound transcripts. Our contribution is not a new cryptographic primitive, but a careful instantiation of well-established techniques within the EUDI context, showing that deniability can be added to signed credentials while preserving their deployment advantages.
Metadata
- Available format(s)
PDF
- Category
- Cryptographic protocols
- Publication info
- Preprint.
- History
- 2026-10-05: last updated
- 2026-08-10: published
- Short URL
- https://ia.cr/2026/1648
- License
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
BibTeX
@misc{cryptoeprint:2026/1648,
author = {Magdalena Bertram and Anja Lehmann},
title = {Deniability for Signed Credentials: Revisiting the Authenticated Channel vs. Signed Data Debate in the EUDI Wallet},
howpublished = {Cryptology {ePrint} Archive, Paper 2026/1648},
year = {2026},
url = {https://eprint.iacr.org/2026/1648}
}