Paper 2026/1660 Original: eprint.iacr.org/2026/1660 ↗

Transient Quantum Resistance, with Application to Ethereum Consensus

Abstract

Candidates for post-quantum migration carry additional costs compared to their pre-quantum counterparts, especially for signatures, and they lose attractive properties of schemes such as BLS: homomorphism, and hence direct signature aggregation. We propose a methodology through which a pre-quantum primitive may still be securely used past Q-day (the advent of quantum computers) in settings where forgery of signatures or cryptographic proofs need only be prevented for a bounded lifespan (transient quantum security). The idea is to bind a fresh, ephemeral, ordinary pre-quantum key to a long-term post-quantum identity once per lifespan window, so a forgery under the fresh key is useful only for that window, and to derive the fresh key so that its exposure never leaks the long-term secret. Our main case study is an application to Ethereum consensus, conditional on stated registration, inclusion, and slashing-evidence rules. The construction keeps ordinary BLS aggregation and needs no SNARK prover. Each same-message aggregate is a single 96-byte signature, and each validator publishes 592-688 bytes of reveal data per epoch. Each epoch key is bound to a seed derived from a checkpoint finalized before that epoch, so a committed key is opened under exactly one seed. We reduce unforgeability in the public-tag game to co-CDH' in the ROM and QROM, with explicit probability and resource costs. Transient quantum security requires hardness at the resulting budget; later checkpoint-derived seeds also require the stated public-environment condition. Transient security requires forgery resistance for the whole interval in which an exposed key can affect the chain. Under Ethereum's attestation inclusion rules, that interval is nominally two epochs plus the reveal lead time under prompt processing. Historical slashing and delayed-fork acceptance need additional rules, which we state as preconditions. Published quantum attack costs inform the resource discussion. They do not establish a security lower bound for this construction. We also provide a formal model and security analysis for the construction, and, of independent interest, a new analysis of BLS where the secret key is sampled similarly to the Dodis-Yampolskiy VRF (IACR PKC 2005) and the adversary is given a related group element as leakage.