In this work, we introduce the concept of Obliviously Checkable Secret-Carrying Puzzles (OxSP) and build proof-friendly Garbled Circuits (GCs) to enable their practical implementation. OxSPs allow one to publicly pose puzzles and verify purported solutions received in response, keeping the desired parts of the puzzles and the responses hidden. We show how OxSPs can be based on Garbled Circuits (GCs). However, this requires ZK-SNARK proofs of correctness of garbling. We note that combining existing GC and ZK-SNARK constructions results in very large computational costs for the OxSP solvers. Our main technical contribution is to design a new proof-friendly GC construction which cuts down the cost of generating a proof of correct garbling to almost a third, without resorting to non-standard cryptographic assumptions. Beyond its use in OxSP, we expect our proof-friendly GCs to be of significant independent interest, as a tool for auditable secure 2-party computation.

BBS+ signatures are widely adopted in privacy-preserving systems such as anonymous credentials and Direct Anonymous Attestation (DAA). To strengthen key security and eliminate single points of failure, threshold variants of BBS+ signatures have become increasingly important. However, existing constructions suffer from notable inefficiencies: some entail excessive communication overhead (e.g., DKL+23, S&P 2023), while others impose substantial computational costs and require additional interaction rounds (e.g., WMC24, NDSS 2024). In this work, we present a novel and efficient three-round threshold BBS+ signature scheme from the Castagnos–Laguillaumie (CL) cryptosystem. Our construction achieves best communication–computation trade-offs than previous works. Specifically, compared to the four-round WMC24 scheme, our protocol reduces communication by $77.4\%$ and demonstrates faster computation, with benchmarks indicating speedups of $10.6$--$16.6\times$ in single-threading and $3.3$--$5.4\times$ in multi-threading. Against the three-round protocol DKL+23, our scheme exhibits an asymptotic slowdown factor of $4\times$, but enhances communication by two orders of magnitude. We further extend our techniques to threshold BBS signatures, Dodis-Yampolskiy verifiable random functions (DY VRFs), and multiplication protocols (DNP25 and LLZ+25, CCS'25). This yields: (1) a three-round threshold protocol for the original BBS scheme; (2) two-round threshold protocols for both DY VRFs (focusing on its oblivious variant) and the AGM-secure BBS variant; and (3) one fewer group element in broadcasts for the multiplication protocol with reduced ZKP costs via simplified relations.

The integral-resistance property provides strong arguments against integral distinguishers. Recently, Zeng and Tian proposed a new method to show this property for AES. In this paper, we provide a generalized framework and tool called intres to extend and apply this method to other ciphers with complex linear layers. We derive properties that a cipher must fulfill in order for the method to be applicable. Furthermore, we introduce a degree propagation model which helps us determine the valid key masks for the integral-resistance matrix. The degree model can also be used to upper-bound the algebraic degree of cipher constructions. This allows us to provide tighter upper bounds for the degree of Rijndael-256. We propose algorithmic improvements to substantially decrease the runtime of the offline phase with the intres framework. As a result, we are able to show the integral-resistance property for 7 rounds of PRINCE and 6 rounds of Beanie. Finally, we develop a heuristic MILP-based approach to search for lower-latency alternatives to the MixColumns matrices of PRINCE while maintaining integral resistance. After showing that using this new matrix we still achieve 7-round integral resistance, we validate our method with SAT-based trail counting. While using a MixColumns matrix only optimized for integral resistance might affect security against other types of attacks, we believe these lower-latency matrices have their place in constructions similar to ZIP-ciphers, where integral resistance is particularly critical.

MPC-in-the-Head protocols enable post-quantum digital signatures based solely on symmetric primitives, with PICNIC being a prominent example built on the LowMC block cipher. While existing analyses assume exact Boolean circuit semantics, recent advances in neural representations suggest that piecewise-linear implementations may introduce activation boundary leakage. In this work, we investigate whether such leakage can be exploited in the context of LowMC and MPC-in-the-Head transcripts. We propose a perturbation-based probing methodology that models neural leakage and reduces round-key recovery to independent binary hypothesis tests via majority voting. Exploiting the linear structure of the LowMC key schedule, we demonstrate that recovery of the first-round key enables efficient reconstruction of the master key with linear complexity. Experimental results confirm successful recovery of 128-, 192-, and 256-bit keys under the proposed model, highlighting a new dimension in symmetric cryptanalysis and the need to consider learning-based leakage in future designs.

Passwords remain the dominant authentication method despite weaknesses such as offline dictionary attacks and password reuse. Single Password Authentication (SPA) mitigates these risks by protecting high entropy secrets under one memorable password and distributing them across untrusted storage providers. However, existing SPA schemes cannot prevent preemption and overwrite attacks by storage providers, and they lack secure, efficient support for secret and password updates. We present UpSPA, an efficient, secure, and updatable threshold SPA that addresses both limitations without requiring changes on the login server. UpSPA prevents preemption through a storage provider specific high entropy identifier secret, supports secret updates via implicit authentication, and enables password updates via explicit authentication using a password protected signing key. We prove security in the ideal real paradigm, including resistance to offline dictionary attacks under standard static threshold corruption assumptions. Our evaluation shows low overhead and competitive performance compared to a prior SPA scheme that does not support updates.

Puncturable attribute-based encryption ($\mathsf{PABE}$) not only supports fine-grained access control over encrypted data, but also enables users to revoke the decryption capability for specific messages by puncturing tags, thereby achieving fine-grained forward security. It finds wide applications in scenarios such as sharing government classified documents and personal health records. However, existing $\mathsf{PABE}$ schemes only support tag-by-tag puncturing, where each puncturing operation is done through key delegation, which causes the key size to grow with the number of punctured tags. This inefficiency makes $\mathsf{PABE}$ impractical in scenarios that require frequent puncturing or mass revocations. To address this limitation, it is crucial to support batch puncturing of tags, i.e., the decryption capability for messages associated with multiple tags can be revoked simultaneously via a single puncture. In this work, we construct a ciphertext-policy attribute-based encryption ($\mathsf{CPABE}$) scheme for circuits with batch-puncturing. Notably, the size of the punctured key in our scheme is independent of the number of punctured tags, as well as the size and depth of the circuits. This is achieved by leveraging the evasive learning with errors ($\mathsf{LWE}$) and tensor $\mathsf{LWE}$ assumptions. In addition, we observe that puncturable $\mathsf{CPABE}$ can be re-stated by dual-policy $\mathsf{ABE}$ ($\mathsf{DPABE}$) with key delegation, and generalize batch-puncturing $\mathsf{CPABE}$ to provide the first lattice-based construction of $\mathsf{DPABE}$ for circuits. Moreover, inspired by the observation of Agrawal and Yamada (Eurocrypt '20), we introduce the puncturing property into optimal broadcast encryption ($\mathsf{BE}$), capturing a new primitive called puncturable $\mathsf{BE}$, which allows the receiver to securely erase sensitive messages without communicating with the authority.

We give a simple counterexample which shows that, for Reed--Solomon codes over multiplicative subgroups of prime fields, proximity gaps do not hold near capacity, at least not as conjectured by Ben-Sasson, et al., in BCIKS20. For relative distance $\theta = 1-\rho-\eta$, where $\rho$ is the rate of the code, and positive $\eta = \Theta_\rho(1/\log n)$, where $n$ is the length of the code, we construct an affine line that is not entirely $\theta$-close to the code but still contains $2^{\Omega_\rho(1/\eta)}$ such points. The same construction gives a slightly stronger list-decoding lower bound. The proof uses a new additive-combinatorics lemma on sums of roots of unity.

We present Panther, a family of six robust hybrid key encapsulation mechanism (KEM) combiners that pair FrodoKEM (unstructured LWE) with ML-KEM (module-LWE, FIPS 203) so that IND-CCA2 security holds whenever either assumption is hard. The family includes five hardened variants of the textbook combiners—parallel HKDF, SHAKE256 splitkey, sequential chaining, XOR, and nested—each made to satisfy a uniform robustness predicate (transcript binding, domain separation, implicit rejection, length normalisation, ∨-security), together with a novel structural-splicing construction Panther-SS that interleaves the constituent ciphertexts and binds the cut-positions via a structural tag. Every combiner admits a systematic Market-Theoretic Security Framework proof in which each bidding round is documented by its purpose, the scheme component it replaces, and its complexity cost; the framework extends cleanly to correctness, unbounded session security, QROM security, and quantitative side-channel resistance. We complement the theory with extensive benchmarks on liboqs-backed reference implementations, including a head-to-head comparison of Panther combiners against the keyencapsulation candidates that appeared in NIST PQC Rounds 1–4 (Kyber/ML-KEM, FrodoKEM, NTRU, SABER, NTRU Prime, Classic McEliece, BIKE, HQC). The experiments cover keygen/encaps/decaps latency, throughput, memory footprint, ciphertext and key sizes, scaling with query count, CPU-cycle counts, security-vs-performance Pareto analysis, and an attack-vsdefence matrix against published side-channel attacks on both constituents. The results confirm that hybrid robustness is essentially free over the slower constituent, that Panther-SS uniquely achieves full robustness with combiner-only overhead below half a percent of total latency, and that the Panther family sits on the Pareto frontier of post-quantum KEM candidates.

In this paper, we explore the use of Montgomery multiplication with a multi-limb redundant representation of integers, in particular in combination with signed reduction factors. We develop techniques that are particularly suited to software platforms on which carry propagation is expensive, in particular RISC-V CPUs which lack hardware support for carries. We also show how to perform a whole-primitive range analysis that demonstrates that overflows are not possible, thus allowing liberal use of unreduced limb-wise additions and subtractions, which are small and fast. The implementation and analysis techniques are illustrated in a codegolfing exercise, to produce size-optimized implementations of ECDSA signature verification over NIST curve P-256; use of a virtual CPU with a custom instruction set with byte-size encoding ("bytecode") allows the production of an implementation as small as 848 bytes on x86 CPUs (in 64-bit mode); RISC-V (984 bytes), Armv8-A (1136 bytes) and portable C implementations (about 2200 to 2800 bytes) are also provided. In the process, an AI is utterly discomfited.

The plausible threat of a Cryptographically Relevant Quantum Computer (CRQC) has rightly stimulated a move away from traditional methods of asymmetric cryptography to new post-quantum secure equivalents. Digital signature is the cryptographic primitive that authenticates an internet server’s identity by signing each certificate in an X.509 certificate chain. A suggested response to the CRQC threat is to deploy a hybrid classical/post-quantum digital signature, combining a traditional tried-and-tested scheme with a post-quantum alternative, where certificates are signed using both methods. Here we propose a fused signature scheme that adopts the same approach, but introduces minimal friction into existing TLS architectures

The transition to post-quantum cryptography (PQC) is constrained by the limited cryptanalytic history of individual PQC algorithms. Hybrid constructions, which combine several primitives so that breaking the hybrid requires breaking each component, address this concern directly. This paper presents Cobra, a hybrid Key Encapsulation Mechanism (KEM) that integrates FrodoKEM (unstructured LWE), ML-KEM (FIPS 203 module-LWE), HQC (code-based), and a Dummy KEM for agility, and analyses all 15 mathematically distinct composition methods spanning parallel, cascading, multi-stage, and nested topologies. We prove that every Cobra method achieves IND-CCA2 security within the MarketTheoretic Security Framework (MTSF), which subsumes and strictly extends both Universal Composability and the Random Oracle Model. An explicit 10-round bidding-round chain per method yields post-quantum ask prices of approximately 2−127 at NIST Level 1 together with composability under arbitrary TLS 1.3 embeddings, per-session CNF auditing, and unbounded-session security via pinging. Although all fifteen methods are security-equivalent, encapsulation latency varies by 3.2× (1.2–3.8 ms) and Theorem 7.1 reduces deployment selection to a Pareto-optimal set of five archetypes. Three real-world TLS 1.3 case studies (financial, healthcare, government) confirm the prediction, with infrastructure overhead clustering at 15–22% across sectors.

Side-channel attacks exploiting Plaintext-Checking Oracles (PCOs) instantiated thanks to the leakage of the re-encryption step taking place during decapsulation are a well-known weakness of ML-KEM. An already wide literature investigated how to efficiently exploit such oracles, leading to easy (full) key recoveries. Somewhat surprisingly, the investigation of how to best instantiate PCOs against ML-KEM's most leaking operations is less investigated, in particular when it comes to quantitative evaluations against concrete masked implementations. In this paper, we first remedy this lack by systematically instantiating PCOs against three open source masked software implementations of the Keccak function used in ML-KEM, based on different masking techniques and programming styles. We evaluate the accuracy of PCOs for increasing number of shares using state-of-the-art profiled attacks against ARM Cortex-M4 implementations, and succeed obtaining high accuracy for up to 7 shares by leveraging the leakage of approximately 50 ML-KEM executions only. Doing so, we confirm the ``computing more implies leaking more'' adage and conclude that enforcing high security levels on such platforms will not be affordable. Next, we consolidate recent solutions for exploiting PCOs. For this purpose, we start by introducing a simple, concrete and re-usable model for PCOs targeting masked implementations of Keccak. We follow by clarifying that approaches based on hard decisions are suboptimal compared to soft (probabilistic) ones. We finally open a study of how to best exploit the adversary's computational power in a security evaluation. We show that (even naive) lattice based attacks are a promising approach for this purpose, leaving the design of a generic estimator that could efficiently leverage physical (side-channel) information as an interesting research direction.

Side-channel attacks are an important class of security exploits, in which an attacker gains access to confidential data by observing information inadvertently leaked by a system. Writing constant-time code is a common defense against time-based and microarchitectural side-channel attacks. Many approaches have been proposed to automatically verify that a program is constant-time. Sound methods can detect all information leaks but, to efficiently analyze large programs, most of them rely on overapproximation which can yield false alarms (i.e., reports of non-existent information leaks). Each finding produced by such analyses therefore requires manual inspection. Additionally, most existing approaches do not perform binary-level analysis and thus miss vulnerabilities introduced by compilation. In this paper, we present a novel sound analysis for detecting information leaks under the constant-time threat model. Compared with existing work, our technique improves taint analysis by systematically tracking precision loss to determine whether a detected information leak could be caused by overapproximation. Findings for which no precision loss is detected are reported as confirmed; as long as they do not arise from dead code, confirmed findings are guaranteed to be true and thus do not require significant manual inspection. Only findings with detected precision loss need classical human verification. Our analysis operates directly on binary executables. We instantiate our technique within the abstract interpretation framework and provide a proof of correctness. We implemented our approach in a prototype tool, SCOUT-CT, and evaluated it on a benchmark of constant-time and non-constant-time programs, including real-world cryptographic implementations. Our results show that SCOUT-CT is effective: our tool detected all 98 timing leaks in the benchmark and automatically classified 97 as confirmed findings that do not require significant manual inspection.

This paper presents a comprehensive analysis of modular addition from a cryptanalytic perspective, focusing on both linear and differential cryptanalysis techniques. We examine the probability distribution of carry bits in modular addition operations and demonstrate how these probabilities affect linear approximations. The paper provides detailed algorithms for constructing Linear Approximation Tables (LAT) and Difference Distribution Tables (DDT) for modular addition operations, along with theoretical proofs and practical examples. Our analysis reveals that the probability of carry bits approaches 1/2 as the bit position increases, which significantly impacts the effectiveness of linear cryptanalysis. Furthermore, we demonstrate how to extend DDTs for larger bit sizes by leveraging smaller tables and carry bit relationships. The findings have direct implications for the cryptanalysis of ARX ciphers.

Masking is a representative side-channel countermeasure that provides provable security. Among masking schemes, Boolean masking (BM) is widely adopted due to its simple sharing structure, while inner product masking (IPM) and code-based masking (CM) have been studied as alternatives that achieve a higher security order with the same number of shares---a property known as security order amplification in the bit-probing model. Recent work by Gaspoz and Dhooghe (TCHES 2025) proposed an IPM multiplication gadget and CM gadgets with provable bit-level security; however, the overhead of CM gadgets for linear operations, the overhead of IPM multiplication, and the lack of a complete provably secure implementation exploiting IPM security order amplification remain open challenges. In this paper, we address all three challenges. First, we propose BM-to-IPM and IPM-to-BM conversion gadgets satisfying bit $t$-MIMO-SNI in the bit-probing model, enabling composable and provably secure interoperation between the two masking domains. Second, we optimize the TCHES 2025 IPM multiplication gadget via Row Packing and Reduction in Rows, reducing the fresh random bit requirement from $\frac{1}{2}t(n^2-1)k^2(k+1)$ to $tk(n-1)(kn+W)$ bits with a proportional reduction in XOR gates, while maintaining bit $t$-SNI security. Third, we present a hybrid IPM-BM framework in which multiplications are performed in IPM with fewer shares and all Boolean linear operations are handled share-wise in BM at no additional randomness cost, and show that this hybrid approach requires significantly fewer gates and random bits than a pure CM approach. As a concrete instantiation, we implement a second-order masked AES-128 with a 2-share IPM / 3-share BM hybrid architecture, prove that the implementation satisfies bit 2-PINI, and evaluate its practical side-channel security via first- and second-order TVLA on an ARM Cortex-M4 with up to one million traces. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first end-to-end cryptographic implementation that provably preserves IPM's security order amplification in the bit-probing model.

Session is a decentralised secure (anonymous) messenger that combines onion routing with the Oxen Proof-of-Stake blockchain to provide metadata-private communication. Our study presents the first comprehensive analysis of Session's messaging protocol and its integration with the Oxen blockchain. In analysing Session and the underlying Oxen blockchain, we uncovered seven vulnerabilities. Most notably we discovered flaws in the Oxen consensus protocol which could allow network takeover in a realistic setting, thereby undermining the integrity guarantees on which Session's anonymity layer depends. We also discovered serious vulnerabilities in Version 1 of Session's group chat protocol. We conducted extensive simulations to analyse the impact of these vulnerabilities and provide recommendations to reinforce both the Oxen protocol and the Session client to mitigate these attacks.

Verifiable Random Functions (VRFs) provide publicly verifiable pseudorandomness uniquely determined by a secret key and an input. While widely used in decentralized protocols, standard VRF verification reveals the signer's identity, exposing them to targeted adversarial disruption once their eligibility is known. We study Ring VRFs(RVRFs), which allow a member of a public key set (a ring) to publish a VRF value along with a proof of correct generation while hiding the signer's index within the set. We formalize an algorithmic RVRF interface that binds the ring into the evaluated input to prevent cross-ring reuse and ring grinding (i.e., the malicious selection of a specific ring configuration to manipulate the pseudorandom outcome). Diverging from existing UC-based treatments, we propose a comprehensive suite of game-based security notions tailored to verifiable randomness under anonymity: correctness, anonymity, pseudorandomness, and a novel corruption-aware uniqueness notion called $T$-uniqueness. Our main technical result is a modular compiler that transforms any provable VRF into an RVRF by proving a one-out-of-many statement for the induced ring relation. We instantiate the OR layer via an optimized Fiat--Shamir OR (FS-OR) composition in the random oracle model, where the prover utilizes prover-side simulation for all non-witness branches and completes the witness branch only after a global consistency constraint is fixed. Focusing on post-quantum resilience, we provide concrete instantiations of our RVRF framework based on two state-of-the-art lattice VRFs: the long-term lattice VRF $\mathsf{LaV}$ by Esgin et al. (Crypto'23) and the few-time lattice VRF $\mathsf{LB}\text{-}\mathsf{VRF}$ by Esgin et al. (FC'19). We provide a detailed analysis of concrete parameters across various ring sizes for both constructions and perform a comprehensive side-by-side comparison of their communication costs and security trade-offs. Our instantiations are modular, with their security reducing cleanly to (i) the base VRF's correctness, pseudorandomness, and per-key uniqueness, and (ii) standard FS-OR properties (simulatability and extractability).

This paper presents vector-input keyed hashing modes that construct collision-resistant pseudorandom functions (CR PRFs) using a keyed hash function, where a vector refers to a sequence of variable-length strings. The proposed vector-input keyed hashing modes, VIM1 and VIM2, originate from the intuition that a string-input keyed hashing mode using a compression function results in a vector-input keyed hashing mode by replacing the compression function with a hash function. Combined with the recently proposed string-input keyed hashing modes KHC1 or KHC2, VIM1 and VIM2 are shown to yield CR PRFs from a compression function satisfying extended collision resistance and being a secure PRF under related-key attacks. Extended collision resistance means that it is intractable to find a distinct input pair whose output difference falls within a small set. This paper also introduces a keyed hashing mode, PVIM, which allows parallel processing of strings in a vector. However, it requires more calls to the underlying keyed hash function than VIM1 and VIM2 do. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first proposal of dedicated vector-input CR PRFs.

We give a passive attack on the Hecke-KE key-exchange scheme. The scheme proposes using products of Hecke operators on $S_k(\Gamma_0(N))$ as a one-way function. We show that the Hecke algebra acting on any fixed $S_k(\Gamma_0(N))$ is simultaneously diagonalizable over an explicit number field computable from the public parameters alone, and that this diagonalization reduces shared-key recovery to $d$ scalar divisions over that number field, where $d=\dim S_k(\Gamma_0(N))$. Our main theorem shows that enlarging $d$ does not rescue the scheme. The precomputation is a one-time public computation (eigenbasis of $S_k(\Gamma_0(N))$, costing $\widetilde{O}(B\cdot d^3)$ rational operations, where $B=O(N)$ is the Sturm bound); the per-session attack cost is then $O(d^2)$ field operations, entirely independent of the pool size $r$ and the number of Hecke factors $s$. We verify the attack in SageMath 10.7 against all parameter sets from the paper; in every case the recovered key satisfies $K'=K$. Furthermore, we prove that the attack runs in time polynomial in $d=\dim S_k(\Gamma_0(N))$ for every level $N$ (prime or composite) and every weight $k$, while the honest protocol's public-key size is $\Omega(d)$ rationals. Consequently there is no choice of $(N,k)$ for which Hecke-KE is secure and implementable: the scheme is unfixable within its design framework.

This paper presents the first high-order fully-shared masking construction for MQOM v2.1, a candidate in NIST's additional digital signature standardization process. We provide a baseline high-order masked signing design for MQOM v2.1, prove its security in the standard probing leakage model, and validate the implementation through a comprehensive TVLA campaign. To mitigate the online-time bottleneck in masked signing, we further introduce an optional Rijndael LUT-based acceleration mode that decouples offline precomputation from online signing. Although this accelerated mode incurs higher offline time and memory costs, it can run during idle periods and significantly reduce online signing latency. We implement and benchmark all 36 MQOM v2.1 signing variants over GF(2), GF(16), and GF(256), and report comprehensive performance and leakage-evaluation results for both the baseline and accelerated designs.

Registration-based encryption (RBE) effectively addresses the key escrow problem in identity-based encryption. However, existing post-quantum RBE schemes suffer from prohibitive ciphertext sizes in the gigabyte range for systems with $2^{10}$ registered users. This poor scalability is a major obstacle to the large-scale implementation of RBE in society. In this work, we propose a framework for constructing efficient RBE schemes that can be instantiated from the learning with errors (LWE) assumption. Specifically, the ciphertext size remains around 221 MB even as the number of registered users increases. The core techniques involve introducing decomposable laconic encryption and integrating it with a refined snapshotting trick. Our work represents an important milestone towards achieving practical post-quantum RBEs.

This paper is devoted to the study of the Ring-LWE-based digital signature scheme proposed by Sharafi and Daghigh, especially, the cryptanalysis of this scheme. The Sharafi and Daghigh’s scheme is inspired by the Lindner–Peikert encryption paradigm and adopts a hash-and-sign approach via the Fiat–Shamir transformation. The security claims rely on the assumed hardness of the Ring LWE and Ring-SIS problems, whose definitions and properties are well studied in last two decades. We demonstrate that this scheme is not secure and generalise our analysis to the analogous scheme in the plain-LWE setting.

Group time-based one-time passwords (GTOTP) is a novel lightweight cryptographic primitive for achieving anonymous client authentication, which enables the efficient generation of time-based one-time passwords on behalf of a group without revealing any information about the actual client's identity beyond their group membership. The security properties of GTOTP regarding anonymity and traceability have been formulated in a static group management setting (where all group members should be determined during the group initialization phase), yet, a formal treatment for real-world dynamic groups (i.e., group members may join and leave at any time) is still an open question. It is non-trivial to construct an efficient GTOTP scheme that can provide a lightweight password generation procedure run by group members and support dynamic group management, allowing group members to join and leave without affecting other members' states (non-disruptively). To address the above challenge, we first define the notion and the security model of dynamic group time-based one-time passwords (DGTOTP) in this work. We then present an efficient DGTOTP construction that can generically transform an asymmetric time-based one-time passwords scheme into a DGTOTP scheme utilizing a chameleon hash function family and a Merkle tree scheme. Within our construction, we particularly tailor an outsourcing solution realizing an issue-first-and-join-later (IFJL) strategy, enabling smooth joining and revocation without disrupting other group members. Moreover, our scheme minimizes symmetric cryptographic operations and maintains constant storage for group members, compared to the linear storage cost that grows rapidly with respect to the lifetime of the GTOTP instance in the previous static GTOTP scheme. Our DGTOTP scheme satisfies stronger security guarantees in a dynamic group management setting without random oracles. Our experimental results confirm the efficiency of our DGTOTP scheme.

After more than four decades of research, multi-party computation (MPC) has achieved remarkable success in handling 2-variable multiplication and comparison-based functions (e.g., ReLU) with practical efficiency. However, for general non-linear functions—such as multiplication of many variables, power, exponential, trigonometric functions, sigmoid, softmax, and GeLU—no native MPC algorithm exists as Beaver-based mutiplication that is constant-round, scalable and exact. Existing solutions rely on either polynomial approximations (trading precision for efficiency), iterative multi-round protocols like Multiplication-to-Addition (M2A) conversion (requiring \(\log_2 k\) rounds for \(k\) parties), or Function Secret Sharing (FSS) with lookup tables (introducing quantization errors and large storage, mainly limited to 2-4 parties). These approaches suffer from fundamental trade-offs among accuracy, communication rounds, and scalability. In this work, we propose a unified \emph{mask-broadcast-unmask} design pattern that enables constant-round, scalable and \emph{approximation-free} evaluation of a wide range of non-linear functions. Our contributions include: \begin{itemize} \item A \textbf{general multiplication} protocol for \(k\) variables in \emph{one round} with optimal \(O(kn)\) communication. When \(k=2\), it reduces to the classic Beaver triple multiplication; when each secret has only one non-zero share and \(k=2\), it becomes the well-known M2A protocol. \item \textbf{Power functions} (\(x^k\)) in one round. \item \textbf{Trigonometric functions} (\(\sin x, \cos x\)) and \textbf{exponential functions} (\(a^x\)) in 4 rounds. \item \textbf{Sigmoid, softmax} in 6 rounds. \end{itemize} All these protocols are provably secure in the semi-honest model, support arbitrary number of parties, introduce \textbf{no approximation error} beyond plaintext floating-point rounding, and require only constant communication rounds (1–6) independent of function complexity. Furthermore, by restricting the random mask to a suitable range (e.g., $0 \le r <2^l-2^{l_x}$), we can reduce the rounds from 1-6 to 1-3. This work fills the long-standing gap for general non-linear functions in standard MPC settings, making privacy-preserving machine learning more practical for modern DNNs.

The rapid development of quantum computing has driven a new wave of cryptographic innovation: Post-Quantum Cryptography (PQC), a class of algorithms that resist quantum attacks. In particular, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has initiated the PQC standardization process, selecting five algorithms. Notably, HQC (the newest selection) is a code-based PQC scheme that has not been widely studied in the literature, especially with respect to its hardware acceleration. This paper follows the current trend to design CEDAR, a Compact and Efficient Decoder Architecture for Reed-Solomon Reed-Muller (RS-RM) code in HQC. We have proposed three layers of contributions in total: (i) an optimized RM decoder is designed; (ii) an efficient low-complexity RS decoder is also presented; (iii) a complete HQC decoder is implemented, along with a comprehensive evaluation (it is shown that CEDAR outperforms the existing approach). We hope this outcome will facilitate a more efficient hardware acceleration of HQC and impact the ongoing NIST PQC standardization process.

The advent of quantum computing poses a significant threat to modern cryptography. To address this challenge, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has initiated the Post-Quantum Cryptography (PQC) standardization process, with several algorithms being selected for standardization, including the recent code-based scheme HQC (Hamming Quasi-Cyclic). Meanwhile, a good number of research works in the field have switched to efficient hardware acceleration for PQC schemes. Following this trend, in this paper, we present a novel PQC hardware acceleration work, i.e., a Lightweight and Efficient hardware Accelerator for HQC (LEAH). Our design consists of three innovative hardware architectures for Key Generation, Encapsulation, and Decapsulation of HQC, respectively, while supporting all security levels. In total, we have proposed three layers of contributions, including: (i) dedicated design processes to obtain highly optimized major components for HQC, i.e., sparse polynomial multiplier, sampler, encoder, and decoder; (ii) novel data flow arrangement to design three operational phases of HQC that supports all parameter sets; (iii) a detailed comparison based on Field-Programmable Gate Array (FPGA) implementation to showcase the significant efficiency of the proposed design over the competing ones, e.g., Decapsulation architecture has at least 13.66\% (at most 49.87\%) less Equivalent Area-Delay Product (EADP) than the existing ones. We hope this outcome can facilitate the deployment of HQC in various applications and impact the ongoing NIST PQC standardization.

The sum-check protocol underpins SNARKs with the fastest known provers. For an $n$-variate polynomial $g$ defined over a finite field $\mathbb{F}$, the protocol enables an untrusted prover to convince a verifier of the sum of all evaluations of $g$ over a product set $H^n$ with $H \subset \mathbb{F}$. The standard choice for $H^n$ is the Boolean hypercube $\{0,1\}^n$, which serves as a natural interpolating set for multilinear polynomials. We propose a projective variant of the sum-check protocol, obtained by changing the interpolating set from $\{0,1\}^n$ to the infinity hypercube $\{0,\infty\}^n$. Under a suitable notion of evaluation at $\infty$, evaluating a multilinear polynomial at a point in $\{0,\infty\}^n$ directly extracts its corresponding monomial coefficient. This projective viewpoint is a near-drop-in replacement for applications of sum-check, requiring only local changes to polynomial representations, round identities, and evaluation formulas. It yields a ${\approx}\,10\%$ end-to-end speedup for the sum-check prover on BN254 and on a pseudo-Mersenne 128-bit prime field, against a fair baseline. It eliminates all field subtractions when binding a multilinear polynomial, and for structured polynomials such as equality and less-than, the projective interpolants admit evaluation procedures with fewer field operations. Moreover, the monomial-coefficient form aligns naturally with polynomial commitment schemes like WHIR, removing a basis mismatch that these schemes otherwise need to work around. Finally, we describe an optimization for sum-check over $\approx 256$-bit prime fields. When targeting $\approx 128$ bits of security, it suffices to sample challenges from a subset of size $\approx 2^{128}$. We show that a suitable choice of this subset, interpreted as upper-limb values in Montgomery form, yields a $1.92\times$ speedup for field multiplication. Combined with the projective binding formula, this gives a $1.82\times$ speedup for sum-check binding (a key component of fast sum-check proving).

Consider the problem of merging inside a garbled circuit (GC) two arrays of $w$-bit elements, yielding a single length-$n$ array. This garbled merge problem is core to garbled random access memory (GRAM), a technique that enables efficient garbling of general-purpose programs. We present a novel symmetric-key-based garbled merge that achieves a garbling size of $(w + 1) \cdot n \cdot \lambda$ bits, providing both asymptotic and concrete improvements over the state of the art. By applying our garbled merge, we obtain a symmetric-key GRAM of size $O(n \lg^3 n \cdot \lambda) \cdot \omega(1)$ for a word RAM program that manipulates words of size $\Theta(\lg n)$ bits and halts within $n$ steps, improving over the previous best result (Heath et al., CRYPTO'23) by an $O(\lg \lg n)$ factor. This communication cost was previously only achieved under the public-key-style DDH assumption (Gu et al., CRYPTO'25). We implement our construction, and our evaluation shows that our garbled merge reduces the communication cost over the DDH-based merge by about $3\times$.

Batched threshold encryption allows any $t$-out-of-$N$ parties in a committee to decrypt a batch of $B$ ciphertexts using sub-linear $o(NB)$ communication, while ensuring that any subset of $<t$ colluding parties learns no information about the underlying plaintext. Our first result is a simple batched threshold encryption scheme that is censorship resistant, avoids epoch restrictions, and achieves quasi-linear $O(B\log B)$ decryption complexity in the batch size $B$. Our scheme has the shortest ciphertext among all known constructions: $|\mathbb{G}_1| + |\mathbb{G}_T|$ for CPA security, with CCA security adding only $2|\mathbb{F}|$ via a simulation-extractable NIZK. However, our scheme requires an interactive setup phase (involving secure multiplications) and secret keys held by the committee grow linearly with the batch size. We prove security under the Decisional Bilinear $B$-Power Diffie-Hellman assumption in asymmetric pairing groups and provide an implementation in Rust to show that our scheme outperforms prior work. We also construct a variant of simple BTE, which allows for a tradeoff between secret-key size and censorship resistance. For any $\delta \leq B$, this variant reduces the size of the secret key held by each party from $O(B) \to O(\delta)$, and the decryption key from $O(BN) \to O(B + \delta N)$, but this comes at the cost of restricting a ciphertext encrypted with index $\mathsf{idx}$ to batch positions $i\in[B]$ satisfying $|i-\mathsf{idx}|<\delta$. Our second result is a new approach for verifying decryption in batched threshold encryption which enables a helper party (that carries out decryption) to provide hints that allow a verifier to check that decryption was carried out correctly using only MSMs and hashes. Concretely, we observe a $114.1\times$ speedup when verifying decryption of 2048 ciphertexts when compared against local decryption. Our approach is quite general and can be applied to other pairing-based advanced encryption schemes such as Timelock Encryption and Silent Threshold Encryption that can be cast as witness encryption schemes.

We introduce compressed caching, a scalable and parameterizable countermeasure against grafting tree fault attacks on SLH-DSA. Unlike standard caching, which entails fully caching the WOTS+ signatures and public keys, compressed caching achieves significant memory savings while maintaining strong fault detection capabilities. It can be tuned to achieve a trade-off between caching memory size, fault resilience, and performance, making it well-suited for deployment across devices with varying resource and security constraints. We provide a security and performance analysis of compressed caching and show that it can be configured to achieve high fault detection probability and outperform standard caching, mainly in terms of memory but also in terms of performance. Additionally, we explore granular variants of both standard and compressed caching and study on a finer scale the memory-performance trade-off of both standard and compressed caching. Our results demonstrate that compressed caching is especially advantageous for constrained devices, outperforming standard caching when less than approximately 256 kB of caching memory is available.

Permissionless Decentralized networks, such as blockchains, are typified by self-determined participation. Unfortunately, this has resulted in lack of geographic diversity in several blockchains due to benefits emanating from network proximity between nodes and the higher availability of computing infrastructure in certain areas. Lack of diversity in the resulting network can make it susceptible to eopolitical events, blockchain or cryptocurrency-adverse law-making, and natural disasters. While there exists a growing body of work in verifiable localization in distributed systems, very little exists on mechanisms promoting geographic diversity in distributed systems. Our work sets out to initiate the study of the incentivization of geographic diversity in permissionless distributed systems. We design a family of mechanisms that incentivize network nodes to truthfully declare and diversify their locations. In particular, we provide a game theoretic analysis to derive the conditions under which truthful location reporting is an equilibrium. The conditions relate the offered rewards (for geo-diversity) and the success probability of the underlying localization protocol to detect falsely claimed locations. Our proposed mechanisms assume an underlying secure node localization protocol based solely on round-trip times (RTT) measurements from participants of the protocol. We initiate a formal model to reason about such localization protocols and identify network topologies that are ideal for resisting location spoofing attempts. We evaluate effectiveness of our incentive mechanisms in different scenarios of node placement and underlying network structure. Our validation is based on two RTT data sets we use to derive maximal spoofing distance and attack success rates that adversarial nodes can achieve when operating alone or in collusion with other nodes.

Kuznyechik is a 128-bit block cipher standardized in GOST~R~34.12--2015. In this paper We study Kuznyechik from the viewpoint of integral cryptanalysis, i.e., we track how structured multisets of chosen plaintexts propagate through the round functions. Starting from a first-order structure of $2^8$ plaintexts (one byte takes all $256$ values while the remaining bytes are fixed), we obtain a 2-round distinguisher: after two rounds, every byte position is balanced, meaning that the XOR-sum over the $256$ texts equals zero. Next, in the setting without initial key-whitening, we extend this distinguisher to three rounds by applying one inverse round to the original structure to construct a new input set. Finally, we turn the 3-round balanced property into a 4-round key-recovery attack by partially inverting the last round and filtering last-round key-byte guesses using the balanced test; multiple independent structures remove false candidates.

We study integral cryptanalysis of the Ukrainian block cipher Kalyna and focus on constructing reduced-round distinguishers and key-recovery attacks with low data, time, and memory complexities. Although Kalyna has an SPN-type round structure, its pre-whitening and post-whitening layers use column-wise addition modulo $2^{64}$, which makes the propagation of integral properties more delicate than in XOR-only designs. By combining carefully chosen input multisets with backward extension through inverse round transformations, we obtain integral distinguishers for Kalyna-128, Kalyna-256, and Kalyna-512 in the standard setting, under weak-key assumptions, and in variants without pre-whitening. These distinguishers require as few as $2^8$ or $2^{16}$ chosen texts, substantially improving the data complexity of previously reported public integral results on Kalyna. We further extend them to key-recovery attacks on reduced-round Kalyna by partial decryption and balancedness tests on suitable intermediate states. For example, we obtain a $5$-round key-recovery attack on Kalyna-128/128 with data complexity $2^9$ chosen plaintexts, time complexity $2^{74}$ encryptions, and negligible memory. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work to provide integral cryptanalysis of Kalyna-256/256 and Kalyna-512/512. Overall, our results give a unified integral analysis of Kalyna across its standard block sizes and clarify the effect of modular whitening on reduced-round distinguishers and key-recovery attacks.

An essential requirement for the large-scale adoption of Web3 is enabling users to benefit from their data even within already deployed systems. This raises an important open question: how can existing, widely adopted software verify that a user has retrieved specific data from a TLS server? Impressive scientific results (e.g., DECO [CCS20] and the work of Xie et al. [USENIX24]) and industrial products (TLSNotary) have recently made progress in the above challenging direction. However, while they nicely leave TLS servers untouched, the retrieved data is then used in computations with verifiers that are required to run some advanced non-standardized cryptographic schemes (e.g., ZK-SNARKs), which clearly limit the large-scale adoption of the proposed technologies. In this paper, building on top of previous approaches and relying on the recent concept of Predicate Blind Signatures of Fuchsbauer and Wolf [Eurocrypt24], we bypass the limits of prior work by presenting ACTS, a distributed architecture that, while still leaving TLS servers untouched, it allows a user to show possession of data retrieved from TLS servers simply requiring that the software of the verifier can check a standard signature. Our contributions include a round-optimal predicate blind signature protocol that produces standard RSA-PSS signatures. We show how this primitive can be integrated into the DECO architecture (and its successors) to certify data retrieved from TLS servers. Furthermore, we have optimized our construction to make it practical on commodity hardware for a large and significant class of policies implemented by the notary (i.e., the actor that is in charge of obliviously certifying TLS data, therefore preserving data confidentiality). We provide an experimental evaluation on the simple but powerful enough use case of a PDF document downloaded from a TLS server and encoded into an AES-GCM ciphertext. The user will then get a certified PDF through a standard PADES signature added obliviously to the PDF along with some metadata by a notary service. The resulting standard signed PDF document can be transparently verified using off-the-shelf PDF readers. Our experimental validation demonstrates that our architecture is suitable for real-world deployment in concrete scenarios.

Batched threshold encryption (BTE) enables a committee of servers to jointly decrypt any chosen subset of ciphertexts from a large pool, while all remaining ciphertexts stay private. BTE is a key building block for encrypted mempools, where transactions are encrypted until block inclusion to mitigate maximal extractable value (MEV). Existing epochless BTE constructions either require user-chosen ciphertext indices that create coordination and censorship concerns or are computationally inefficient. In this paper, we present BTX, a simple and concretely efficient BTE construction that is both epochless and collision-free: encryption does not require a user-chosen batch index. Our scheme achieves the shortest ciphertext size among all known BTE constructions having the same size as a standard elgamal ciphertext. By making the scheme amenable to FFT, we reduce the decryption cost to $O(B\log B)$ group exponentiations and $O(B)$ pairings, where $B$ is the size of the dynamically chosen batch of ciphertexts. We implement BTX and two baselines in a shared, aggressively optimized C++ codebase over BLS12-381 with AVX-512 vectorization, FFT-based backends where applicable, and additional low-level engineering throughout. At batch size $B = 512$, using a single core, BTX requires approximately $598$ ms total for decryption, compared with $1197$ ms for the FFT optimized version of partial-fraction evaluation baseline of Boneh et al., an overall $2.0\times$ improvement.

Searchable Symmetric Encryption (SSE) schemes enable efficient keyword searches over encrypted documents at the cost of some leakage. An SSE scheme is said to be system-wide secure if it resists cryptanalysis by an adversary with access to leakage from retrieval of both encrypted indices and encrypted documents. The vast majority of state-of-the-art SSE schemes are, in fact, not system-wide secure (Gui et al., IEEE S&P 2023). Currently, the only efficient system-wide secure SSE scheme is SWiSSSE (Gui et al., PoPETS 2024). However, SWiSSSE requires a client state that is updated per query (which hinders adoption in various practical settings), and its leakage is hard to characterize precisely (thus making security analysis harder). In this paper, we present DDR-SSE – a practically efficient, system-wide secure SSE scheme that only requires a static client state, and has a simple leakage profile. Technically, we introduce a novel encrypted document retrieval scheme that uses duplicated document storage and randomized document retrieval to suppress access pattern leakage without compromising on practical efficiency. A remarkable feature of our scheme is its conceptual simplicity (unlike SWiSSSE, which uses an extremely involved document retrieval mechanism). We present a simulation-based security proof for DDR-SSE with respect to a rigorously formal system-wide leakage profile. Through extensive leakage cryptanalysis, we establish that DDR-SSE is resilient to query reconstruction attacks (even under “unrealistically” strong attack assumptions). Finally, we benchmark a prototype implementation of DDR-SSE and show that it scales smoothly to large databases of the size seen in real-world applications.

Voltage glitching is one of the most prominent fault injection techniques due to its effectiveness and simplicity. Although it is generally regarded as a spatially global fault method, in which the injected glitch uniformly affects all circuits on the die, several studies have observed that specific locations may be affected more than others. To characterize this phenomenon, we draw inspiration from methods used in electromagnetic interference (EMI) analysis. In this paper, we demonstrate that voltage attacks can be modeled as the transfer of conducted electromagnetic energy through the power delivery network (PDN) to the chip’s die. By analyzing voltage glitches in the frequency domain and modeling the PDN as a communication channel, we demonstrate that different frequency components of an injected glitch signal propagate through the network in distinct patterns. In this context, we further show that modulating the supply voltage with a single-frequency sinusoidal signal, rather than injecting a pulse-shaped glitch, enables an adversary to influence transistors in specific regions of the chip and thus induce localized faults. To validate these claims, we first propose a post-silicon profiling framework that identifies the frequency bands in which the system’s PDN is most vulnerable and maps the spatial regions of the chip affected by each frequency component. To this end, we perform extensive profiling on several FPGAs using distributed time-to-digital converters (TDCs) to measure the impact of injected signals across a range of frequencies. As a proof-of-concept, we also demonstrate successful localized voltage attacks on simple FSMs and AES-128 implementations with various placements, to further show the sensitivity of chip locations to injected energy at different frequencies. Our results reveal that even minor changes in design placement can significantly affect a circuit’s susceptibility to voltage-based fault attacks, either weakening or strengthening its resilience.

Polynomial commitment schemes (PCS) are a fundamental building block of modern proof systems. As proof system applications scale to increasingly large workloads, distributed PCS become essential for reducing prover time and memory pressure. Among existing PCS constructions, code-based PCS achieve significantly better concrete prover performance than group-based schemes by avoiding expensive elliptic-curve operations and operating over small-characteristic fields. However, despite these advantages, code-based PCS are notoriously difficult to distribute. In this work, we present LigeSIS, the first distribution-friendly code-based multilinear PCS. LigeSIS achieves sublinear cross-node communication while keeping the final proof size independent of the number of machines. Our key insight is to replace Merkle-tree hashing with a homomorphic subset-sum hash over Goldilocks64, enabling algebraic aggregation of partial commitments produced by different nodes. To make this approach practical, we further introduce a preprocessing-accelerated subset-sum hash that reduces hashing overhead by up to $8\times$. Our evaluation shows that, on a single node, LigeSIS achieves performance comparable to the state-of-the-art RS-based PCS WHIR (Eurocrypt’25). In distributed settings, LigeSIS exhibits near-linear scalability in prover time. Compared with distributed MKZG (S\&P’25), LigeSIS achieves a $24 \times$ improvement in prover time. Compared with PIP (Security’26), LigeSIS reduces cross-node communication by up to $20\times$.

The rapid proliferation of privacy-sensitive machine learning and scientific computing applications has intensified the demand for secure multi-party computation (MPC) protocols that can efficiently evaluate complex nonlinear functions. Despite four decades of research, MPC systems face two fundamental barriers: heavy offline preprocessing and limited support for transcendental functions. Existing preprocessing-free frameworks are confined to comparison-related functions (e.g., Bicoptor) and cannot handle exponentials or trigonometric functions. In this paper, we propose MCU (Mask-Compute-Unmask), a novel MPC architecture that directly supports a broad class of algebraic and transcendental functions without any offline preprocessing. MCU introduces a semi-honest, non-colluding helper party (HP) as an active computational engine: parties additively mask their inputs, the HP computes the target function on the aggregated masked data, and the parties then unmask using locally known masks. This paradigm enables constant-round, scalable protocols for general multiplication (2 rounds), power functions (2 rounds), exponentials (8 rounds), and trigonometric functions (2 rounds). All protocols achieve simulation-based security and rely solely on synchronized pseudorandom generators—no preprocessing, no polynomial approximations. To the best of our knowledge, MCU is the first MPC framework that simultaneously achieves preprocessing-free, constant-round, exact evaluation of exponentials and trigonometric functions—functions essential for scientific computing, differential privacy mechanisms, and advanced neural network architectures. Our multiplication protocol scales better than Beaver-based multiplication in multi-party settings, and our exponential and trigonometric protocols achieve sub-ULP accuracy. The rapid proliferation of privacy-sensitive machine learning and scientific computing applications has intensified the demand for secure multi-party computation (MPC) protocols that can efficiently evaluate complex nonlinear functions. Despite four decades of research, MPC systems face two fundamental barriers: heavy offline preprocessing and limited support for transcendental functions. Existing preprocessing-free frameworks are confined to comparison-related functions (e.g., Bicoptor) and cannot handle exponentials or trigonometric functions. In this paper, we propose MCU (Mask-Compute-Unmask), a novel MPC architecture that directly supports a broad class of algebraic and transcendental functions without any offline preprocessing. MCU introduces a semi-honest, non-colluding helper party (HP) as an active computational engine: parties additively mask their inputs, the HP computes the target function on the aggregated masked data, and the parties then unmask using locally known masks. This paradigm enables constant-round, scalable protocols for general multiplication (2 rounds), power functions (2 rounds), exponentials (8 rounds), and trigonometric functions (2 rounds). All protocols achieve simulation-based security and rely solely on synchronized pseudorandom generators—no preprocessing, no polynomial approximations. To the best of our knowledge, MCU is the first MPC framework that simultaneously achieves preprocessing-free, constant-round, exact evaluation of exponentials and trigonometric functions—functions essential for scientific computing, differential privacy mechanisms, and advanced neural network architectures. Our multiplication protocol scales better than Beaver-based multiplication in multi-party settings, and our exponential and trigonometric protocols achieve sub-ULP accuracy. To the best of our knowledge, MCU is the first MPC framework that simultaneously achieves preprocessing-free, constant-round, exact evaluation of exponentials and trigonometric functions—functions essential for scientific computing, differential privacy mechanisms, and advanced neural network architectures. Our multiplication protocol scales better than Beaver-based multiplication in multi-party settings, and our exponential and trigonometric protocols achieve sub-ULP accuracy.

Subgroup membership testing (SMT) on an elliptic curve with non-trivial cofactor is essential to prevent small-subgroup attacks in cryptographic protocols. In the existing literature, there exist two non-trivial methods for SMT on elliptic curves with modest cofactor (typically a power of $2$): Pornin's approach tests membership by repeatedly dividing by prime divisors of the cofactor (mostly halving), finishing with a Legendre symbol; Koshelev's approach replaces all divisions with Tate pairings (possibly in the quadratic extension of the base field), but requires non-degeneracy conditions that are not always met. In this paper, we observe that both approaches sit at the extremes of a single division-pairing trade-off. The resulting method, \mainalgorithm, is always at least as fast as either Pornin's or Koshelev's method and strictly faster in many cases. We instantiate \mainalgorithm on five curves in widespread use, including Curve25519, Curve448, GC256A, Four$\mathbb{Q}$ and Jubjub. Our Go implementation, built on the open-source \texttt{gnark-crypto} library, achieves significant speedups over state-of-the-art tests, namely of $1.6\times$ on Curve25519, $1.3\times$ on Curve448, $1.4\times$ on GC256A, $10.8\times$ on Four$\mathbb{Q}$ and $7\times$ on Jubjub.

Neural differential cryptanalysis has recently been extended to related-key and multi-pair settings, enabling neural distinguishers to aggregate weak statistical biases across multiple ciphertext pairs. However, the statistical origin of the exploited signal remains insufficiently understood. In this work, we present a signal-centric analysis of related-key, multi-pair neural distinguishers across four block ciphers: PRESENT-80, SIMECK-32/64, LEA-128, and HIGHT. We characterize ciphertext distributions using model-independent geometric metrics derived from Principal Component Analysis (PCA) embeddings and silhouette scores, and relate these data-level measurements to neural distinguishing performance under varying levels of aggregation. Across all evaluated ciphers, multi-pair aggregation amplifies weak ciphertext-level statistical biases through variance reduction, thereby extending distinguishability beyond the single-pair setting. However, this effect is inherently limited by the progressive decay of ciphertext-level signal as the number of rounds increases, leading to well-defined difficulty boundaries where both geometric separability and neural performance collapse. In low-signal regimes, aggregation enables measurable, albeit limited, accuracy, indicating the presence of residual statistical structure. Generalization experiments further show that neural distinguishers fail to maintain predictive capability beyond the empirical boundary, with performance rapidly converging to the random baseline. These findings suggest that neural distinguishing performance is fundamentally constrained by the underlying ciphertext-level signal rather than model capacity. Overall, this study provides a unified interpretation of the capabilities and limitations of multi-pair neural cryptanalysis.

We propose a new private telemetry system for computing t-heavy hitters in the STAR (Davidson et al., CCS 2022) and POPSTAR (Li et al., USENIX 2024) model. In this setting, each client generates a report with the assistance of a lightweight Randomness Server and submits it to a central Aggregation Server, which can then locally compute only the heavy hitters. As compared to STAR and POPSTAR---which reveal either the full (pseudonymized) frequency histogram or a complex function of it---our protocol reduces leakage: the Aggregation Server learns non-heavy-hitter values only if their frequency exceeds a well-defined threshold. Additionally, while STAR and POPSTAR are insecure in the face of an Aggregation Server that colludes with clients, our protocol provides optimal security against such a colluding server. To achieve these privacy guarantees, our protocol efficiently adapts multi-dealer secret sharing (Eldridge et al., USENIX 2024) to the STAR/POPSTAR model and introduces a novel oblivious secret-share sampling protocol to ensure security against a colluding Aggregation Server. We implement and benchmark the performance of our protocol and find that it is practical for a number of use cases. Moreover, we show that it supports a tunable three-way tradeoff between correctness, efficiency and privacy.

Atomic swaps allow two parties to exchange coins across blockchains without trust. Most existing solutions support a 1-to-1 transaction; however, the value ratio of two cryptocurrencies is usually not 1-to-1. In addition, these solutions often rely on blockchains with explicit support structures for atomic swaps, typically hashed timelocks (HTLCs) or smart-contract scripting. Thyagarajan et al. (SP'22) provide a solution for n-to-m swaps utilizing adaptor signatures instead, which offer better privacy for the participants. Significantly, all these approaches need timed transactions or a similar substitute on both sides, but not every blockchain supports timed transactions. Hoenisch et al. (ESORICS'22) demonstrate a concrete swap procedure between Bitcoin and Monero, where only one side needs timed transactions. We build upon both of these ideas to provide a generic solution for any blockchain, where only one side needs timed transactions. We introduce a generic adaptor-signature protocol for n-to-m swaps. In doing so, we minimize assumptions compared to current solutions. Both sides lock their coins in shared (two-party signature) addresses, where they can only access the coins together. To prevent deadlocks, both parties are able to refund their coins from these addresses with pre-signed transactions. Our solution works with all relevant blockchains because it needs only standard signatures and a joint public key. Further, only one side needs timed transactions, and if each party acts in its best interest, there are two possible outcomes: If progress stalls, the side with timelocks refunds after a certain time, and the other side refunds immediately. Otherwise, one party redeems the other party's coins with pre-signed transactions, and the other party completes the swap after a timeout to prevent race conditions. We prove security in the universal composability framework and show privacy preservation via unlinkability and fungibility.

Several modern applications, such as Signal or WireGuard, use efficient Noise-like implicit authentication key exchanges that require only a small number of exponentiations and two interactions. These protocols have been proven to be secure under the 'strong Diffie–Hellman' (SDH) assumption in the random oracle model (ROM). At ESORICS 2021, Ramacher, Slamanig and Weninger presented an extension to the implicit authenticated key exchange security model, which enables strong privacy properties to be captured in addition to key-secrecy, including man-in-the-middle privacy (ensuring privacy even if a session is interrupted) and forward privacy. They also proposed a protocol to instantiate their model. In this paper, we present an efficient Noise-like protocol that achieve privacy in this model. Our protocol is as efficient as Noise-like protocols that do not guarantee privacy in terms of exponentiations. Moreover, our protocol requires three interactions, which is optimal for this privacy model. It is also more efficient than the ESORICS 2021 protocol in terms of both exponentiations and interactions. Finally, we propose another round-optimal protocol, slightly less efficient in terms of exponentiations, but secure under the CDH assumption in the ROM.

Searchable encryption enables efficient querying over outsourced data while limiting server-side leakage. Existing methods for associative aggregation queries on multidimensional array data suffer from significant limitations: * Use range structures that precompute ranges yielding either: ** Storage size proportional to the total domain size (Demertzis et al., TODS 2018/Falzon et al., PVLDB2022). ** Or linear-time search in the worst case (Chang et al., IEEE TKDE 2021). * Bucket-based methods (Espiritu, Markatou, Tamassia, PoPETS 2022) are only practical when the largest bucket is small. Fully homomorphic encryption (FHE) approaches (Kushnir, Moskowich, Shaul, PoPETS 2024) remain computationally impractical. Due to strong attacks on range schemes with access pattern leakage (Falzon et al., CCS 2020), we consider the task of oblivious search. We propose oblivious segment trees, which offer efficient storage and search. Our approach achieves polylogarithmic query complexity. Storage depends on the number of distinct values per dimension, not on the domain size. Under typical data distributions, segment trees are provably shorter than standard alternatives. We evaluate performance on datasets with 1–3 dimensions and up to $5$ million entries. Across multidimensional datasets, our method reduces the number of stored items by $10$ to $10^{10}$ compared to prior non-FHE approaches. On a 32-thread machine, server-side query processing remains under $1.2$ seconds.

Non-malleable codes allow a sender to transmit a message to a receiver, while providing a ``best-possible'' integrity guarantee to ensure that no attacker---who cannot already decode the message---can meaningfully tamper the message in transit. If tampered, the received message should either be invalid or unrelated to the original message. Non-malleable time-lock puzzles (TLPs) are a special case of non-malleable codes for bounded polynomial-depth tampering with very efficient encoding. In this work, we give generic techniques for constructing non-malleable codes and non-malleable TLPs with improved rate, which captures the ratio of a message's length to its encoding length. A key contribution of our work is identifying a security notion for non-malleability, which we term ``CCA-hiding'', sufficient for our compilers. CCA-hiding is a relaxation of CCA-security for encryption or commitments to the fine-grained setting of codes, and requires that the encoded message remains hidden, even given a decoding oracle for any other codeword. Intriguingly, CCA-hiding does not imply non-malleability in the fine-grained setting, as is the case for encryption and commitments. Using our new techniques, we give the following constructions: -- Rate-1 CCA-hiding TLPs in the plain model. -- Rate-1 non-malleable codes for bounded polynomial-depth tampering in the auxiliary-input random oracle model (AI-ROM). -- Rate-(1/2) non-malleable TLPs in the AI-ROM.

Designing dynamic searchable symmetric encryption (DSSE) supporting conjunctive keyword queries over encrypted document collections is an important research area. Unfortunately, state-of-the-art conjunctive DSSE schemes such as ODXT (Patranabis et al., NDSS '21), and SDSSE-CQ and its variants (Zuo et al., PoPETS '25) either fail to achieve the desired levels of security (in particular, forward and/or backward privacy), or incur prohibitively large communication requirements and client-side computational overheads, which is undesirable for practical applications. In addition, all known conjunctive DSSE schemes that are both forward and backward private are quantum-broken due to their inherent reliance on discrete log-hard, prime-order cyclic groups. In this paper, we address the open question of designing practically efficient, low-leakage, forward and backward private conjunctive DSSE with small communication requirements and small client-side overheads. Towards this goal, we introduce the first systematic and rigorously formal notions of backward privacy for conjunctive queries that naturally extend the corresponding notions of backward privacy for single-keyword DSSE. Next, as our main contribution, we propose a new framework for conjunctive DSSE called fp-GA-ODXT that improves upon both ODXT and SDSSE-CQ-variants by achieving full-fledged forward privacy and strong backward privacy guarantees, while incurring small client-side computation and low communication overheads. We then demonstrate two instantiations of our fp-GA-ODXT framework: 1) A concretely efficient, classically secure instance based on discrete log-hard groups and an RSA-based trapdoor permutation, which we implement and benchmark. Our experiments demonstrate that we achieve smaller communication overheads and client-side computation for both updates and conjunctive searches as compared to both ODXT and SDSSE-CQ-variants. These come at the cost of a mild increase in server computation (which we view as an acceptable tradeoff in practice). 2) A post-quantum instantiation based on lattices and isogenies of supersingular elliptic curves, thus solving the longstanding open question of designing asymptotically efficient, forward and backward private conjunctive DSSE schemes with post-quantum security.

We propose a new method to construct homomorphic authentication codes for truth tables of read-once matrix branching programs, extending the celebrated homomorphic lattice encodings [Boneh et al., Eurocrypt 2014]. Our approach relies on the hardness of the decomposed learning with errors problem (DLWE), a recently introduced modification of Regev's LWE assumption. We then use this new technical tool to make progress on several open problems in the literature. Specifically, we obtain: 1. A constrained pseudorandom function (PRF), where the evaluation of the PRF on the master key does not depend on the complexity of the constraint, except for its circuit depth. 2. A way to securely compress and re-expand LWE samples in the plain model. 3. An adaptively secure broadcast encryption scheme, with ciphertext and secret keys growing poly-logarithmically with the size of the encrypted set. 4. A pseudorandom obfuscation for all puncturable PRFs, additionally assuming the existence of sub-exponentially secure indistinguishability obfuscation (iO). None of the above mentioned primitives was known to exist from lattice assumptions. As a bonus result, we also obtain a conceptually simple and direct heuristic construction of iO based on lattice techniques, which is not based on the functional encryption-to-iO paradigm. We provide evidence that this approach can be used to build provably secure obfuscation for simple functionalities such as sampling lattice preimages using a hidden trapdoor.

This paper presents an optimized implementation of the Hamming Quasi-Cyclic (HQC) key encapsulation mechanism, leveraging the additive fast Fourier transform (FFT) for polynomial multiplication. A primary challenge in applying FFT-based multiplication to HQC is that the polynomial degrees slightly exceed powers of two, making standard FFT approaches inefficient. To address this, we propose a new method combining the Frobenius additive FFT (FAFFT) with the Chinese Remainder Theorem (CRT) to efficiently multiply polynomials of these specific degrees. Such a combination is made possible by our new interpretation of FAFFT's Encode step as ring isomorphisms, from which we derive an exact formula for the modulus of any FAFFT-based polynomial multiplier. In addition to the multiplication algorithm, we replace the Berlekamp-Massey decoder with an Extended Euclidean Algorithm (EEA) based method. The regular data flow of EEA facilitates the use of our highly optimized GF(256) SIMD arithmetic, leading to a faster execution speed. Benchmarks demonstrate that our FFT-based approach significantly outperforms traditional Toom-Karatsuba methods, even at lower degrees, on the Arm Cortex-M4 platform. Our integrated optimizations result in a 19.5% and 20.4% speedups for the encapsulation and the decapsulation processes compared to the current state-of-the-art HQC-1 implementation.

A proof of knowledge certifies that the prover “knows” a secret. This property is established by the existence of an extractor that, given access to the prover, can extract the secret. Unfortunately, this does not imply that a single entity has access to the secret in the clear, as it may be secret-shared among several parties and the proof computed using multiparty computation (MPC), or the secret may be embedded in a trusted execution environment (TEE) that only allows limited access to it. Often, the ability to encumber a secret in this way breaks the security of a system; vote selling in e-voting schemes is one example. To address this, two recent papers introduced the notions of “Proofs of Complete Knowledge” (PoCK) [Kelkar et al., CCS’24] and “Individual Cryptography” [Dziembowski et al., CRYPTO’23]. While the goals and constructions in those works differ, both rely on the same key idea to prevent encumbrance. To compute a proof, the prover must evaluate a hash function on a huge number of inputs. One then assumes that only a fraction of those can be encumbered, while for the rest the prover must know the inputs in the clear, and these clear inputs are sufficient to extract the secret. Computing a huge number of hashes is a challenge even for an honest prover (who has the secret in the clear), so those works suggest using outdated Bitcoin mining hardware to make the scheme practical. By forcing the prover to evaluate the hashes in a sequential manner, we could get meaningful security against encumbrance with far fewer hashes, especially against MPC, where round complexity is a major bottleneck. As a concrete instantiation of this idea, we define and construct Sequential Proofs of Complete Knowledge (SPoCK). Our construction uses the PoCK of Kelkar et al. (which are based on Fischlin’s straight-line extractable proofs of knowledge). The computation of this PoCK is then embedded into the computation of the Proof of Sequential Work from [Cohen&Pietrzak, EUROCRYPT’18]. SPoCK thus have the potential to enable complete-knowledge or individual-cryptography primitives where honest parties can use standard hardware. We also propose a variant of this scheme that requires a large amount of memory throughout the evaluation, providing better security also against TEEs.

A verifiable delay function (VDF), introduced by Boneh et al. [CRYPTO’18], on input $(x,T)$ produces an output $(y,\pi)$ where computing $y$ requires $T$ inherently sequential steps, and $\pi$ is a proof certifying correctness. VDFs have found numerous applications, and many of these rely on the assumption that honest parties can evaluate the VDF nearly as fast as adversaries. To support this assumption, significant effort has been invested in developing dedicated VDF hardware (ASICs). However, such devices are expensive and produced in limited quantities, leaving only a small number of parties with access to fast VDF evaluation. A natural workaround is to offer “VDFs as a service,” where a server equipped with specialized hardware evaluates instances on behalf of clients. This approach, however, is unsuitable when the VDF input must remain private. In this work, we introduce and construct blind VDFs, enabling secure VDF outsourcing without revealing the input. Inspired by blind signatures, our protocol allows a client to transform an input $x$ into a blinded instance $\alpha$, which is evaluated by the server. The server returns a result $\beta$, from this and its local state, the client can unblind to recover the correct output $(y,\pi)$, while the server learns nothing about $x$. We realize this notion by constructing a blinded version of Pietrzak’s VDF [ITCS’19]. In the original scheme, computing $y$ requires $T$ sequential steps, while generating the proof $\pi$ can be done in $O(T/S)$ parallel time using $O(S)$ space (e.g., $O(\sqrt{T})$ time and space). In our blind variant, the server performs the $T$ sequential steps and sends $O(S)$ data to the client, who completes the unblinding in $O(T/S)$ time. By allowing slightly more interaction, we obtain a protocol where the client’s work is small, while the server performs essentially the same computation as in the unblinded VDF.

In this work, we propose the first code-based $\mathsf{uPKE}$ from the hamming quasi-cyclic public key encryption scheme $(\mathsf{hqcPKE})$ of Gaborit et al. by integrating an efficient key-update mechanism utilizing a carefully designed deterministic sampling algorithm. Our sampling algorithm exploits a structured permutation set preserving Hamming weight and satisfying specific algebraic properties that is of independent interest. More positively, our protocol allows unbounded key updates free from the cumulative error issues inheriant to lattice based designs and supports asynchronous key updates, authorizing senders to update the public key independently. We formally establish the security of the proposed construction against indistinguishability under chosen-randomness and chosen-plaintext attack $(\mathsf{IND}\text{-}\mathsf{CR}\text{-}\mathsf{CPA})$ in standard model considering decisional quasi-cyclic syndrome decoding with parity $(\mathsf{DQCSDP})$ assumption. We emphasize that in comparison with existing post-quantum secure asynchronous schemes supporting unbounded updates, our construction achieves in the standard model instead of random oracle model significantly improved storage and communication efficiency, particularly in terms of public key size, ciphertext size and update ciphertext size. From a computational perspective, our design enables a more efficient public key update procedure and exhibits comparable performance for key generation, encryption, decryption and secret key update.

We present CLAASP-MP, a monomial prediction (MP) tool based on the three-subset division property without unknown subset (3SDP-woU), integrated into CLAASP, a library for automated analysis of symmetric key cryptographic primitives. The propagation rules of 3SDP-woU are encoded as a Mixed Integer Linear Programming (MILP) model generated directly from the CLAASP component graph, covering the main building blocks used in modern symmetric designs, including S-boxes, linear layers, Boolean word operations, modular addition and multiplication, and linear and nonlinear feedback shift register updates. Using this model for selected output bits, CLAASP-MP computes algebraic normal form (ANF) (for a small number of rounds), derives superpolies for a chosen cube, and computes a tight upper bound on the algebraic degree with respect to plaintext, key, or IV variables. A monomial is absent if its ANF coefficient is zero, if it does not appear in the superpoly, or if the algebraic degree is too small for it to occur; in all such cases, the output is balanced and yields an integral distinguisher. We evaluate \name{} on block ciphers, permutations, and stream ciphers implemented in \claasp{}. We introduce an exact bit-level MILP modeling technique for modular multiplication and apply it to provide the first independent algebraic analysis of the MSX block cipher, identifying integral properties that persist up to 7 rounds for MSX-128. Furthermore, we reproduce known distinguishers and identify new cubes for several block ciphers and extend the best-known integral distinguishers of ChaCha and Salsa permutations from 6 and 5 rounds, respectively, to 6.75 rounds. We also discovered new integral distinguishers for Bivium using several 36-dimensional cubes and extended the exact computation of the algebraic degree of Trivium to later initialization clocks while reproducing many published superpolies. These results show that CLAASP-MP provides a unified and practical MILP-based framework for monomial prediction and algebraic analysis across a wide range of symmetric primitives.

We investigate the security of AES-128/192/256 when implemented as ReLU-based neural networks via the natural sum-of-corners construction. Although these implementations are bit-exact on Boolean inputs, they extend AES into a continuous piecewise-linear function over $\mathbb{R}^{128}$. We show that under real-valued oracle access, such neural realizations admit deterministic linear-time master-key recovery. The attack exploits a geometric property of the natural XOR (AddRoundKey) layer: for corner parameter c < 1, ReLU activations partition the input space into key-dependent linear regions. Using symmetric perturbations, exactly one key hypothesis preserves linear-region membership, enabling bitwise recovery through simple output-equality tests. We formalize this phenomenon via a local separability lemma and obtain attack complexity O(128R) neural queries for R rounds. Experiments over 1,000 independent random keys for AES-128, AES-192, and AES-256 achieve 100% recovery success. The vulnerability is independent of key size and round count; it stems solely from exposing a key-dependent XOR layer inside a continuous neural architecture. Our results reveal a fundamental gap between Boolean security and geometric security in neural implementations of cryptographic primitives.

The security of multivariate public-key cryptography, a major approach to post-quantum cryptography, is based on the computational hardness of solving systems of multivariate quadratic equations over finite fields (the MQ problem). The MQ problem consists of solving a system of quadratic equations over a finite field of size $q$, with $n$ variables and $m$ polynomials. The existence probability of solutions to the MQ problem plays a central role in analyzing the security of multivariate cryptography. However, explicit bounds for fixed parameters $(q,n,m)$ have not been sufficiently studied. In this work, we evaluate the existence probability for randomly generated MQ systems with fixed parameters by analyzing the coefficient space arising from the MQ system. Using the inclusion--exclusion principle, we obtain a lower bound (approximately $0.625$) and an upper bound (approximately $0.667$) on the existence probability, focusing on the case $m=n$. We also derive upper and lower bounds on the probability that the number of solutions is exactly one in the case $m=n$. Finally, we analyze the existence probability of solutions to the MQ problem in the case $m \neq n$.

We study efficient non-arithmetic operations in (G)BFV with arbitrary plaintext modulus. We design scheme conversions between (G)BFV and Discrete CKKS, allowing (G)BFV ciphertexts to use radix-based integer computation in the Discrete CKKS setting. This gives asymptotically faster logical operations: for plaintext modulus $p$, homomorphic comparison runs in $O(\log p \log\log p)$ for BFV and $O(\log\log p)$ for GBFV.

The rapid adoption of Transformer-based AI has been driven by accessible models such as ChatGPT, which provide API-based services for developers and businesses. However, as these online inference services increasingly handle sensitive inputs, privacy concerns have emerged as a significant challenge. To address this, secure inference frameworks have been proposed, but their high computational and communication overhead often limit practical deployment. In plaintext settings, token drop is an effective technique for reducing inference cost; however, our analysis reveals that directly applying such methods to ciphertext scenarios is suboptimal due to distinct cost distributions in secure computation. We propose SecDTD, a dynamic token drop scheme tailored for secure Transformer inference. SecDTD advances token drop by shifting the dropping to earlier inference stages, effectively reducing the cost of key components such as Softmax. To support this, we introduce two core techniques. Max-Centric Normalization (MCN): A novel, Softmax-independent scoring method that enables early token drop with minimal overhead and improved normalization, supporting more aggressive dropping without accuracy loss. OMSel: A faster, oblivious median selection protocol that securely identifies the median of importance scores to support token drop. Compared to existing sorting-based methods, OMSel achieves a 16.9 times speedup while maintaining security, obliviousness and randomness. We evaluate SecDTD through 48 experiments across eight GLUE datasets under various network settings using the BOLT and BumbleBee frameworks. SecDTD achieves 4.47 times end-to-end inference acceleration without degradation in accuracy.

Privacy-preserving deep learning addresses privacy concerns in Machine Learning as a Service (MLaaS) using Homomorphic Encryption (HE) for linear computations. Nevertheless, the high computational cost remains a challenge. While prior work has attempted to improve the efficiency, most are built upon models originally designed for plaintext inference. These models are inherently limited by architectural inefficiencies when adapted to HE settings. We argue that substantial efficiency improvements can be achieved by designing networks specifically tailored to the unique computational characteristics of HE, rather than retrofitting existing plaintext models. Our design comprises two main components: the building block and the overall architecture. The first, StriaBlock, targets the most expensive HE operation—Rotation. It integrates ExRot-Free Convolution and a novel Cross Kernel, completely eliminating the need for external Rotation and requiring only 19% of the internal Rotation operations compared to plaintext models. The second component, the architectural principle, includes the Focused Constraint Principle, which limits cost-sensitive factors while preserving flexibility in others, and the Channel Packing-Aware Scaling Principle, which dynamically adapts bottleneck ratios based on ciphertext channel capacity that varies with network depth. These strategies efficiently control the local and overall HE cost, enabling a balanced architecture for HE settings. The resulting network, StriaNet, is comprehensively evaluated. While prior works primarily focus on small-scale datasets such as CIFAR-10, we conduct an extensive evaluation of StriaNet across datasets of varying scales, including large-scale (ImageNet), medium-scale (Tiny ImageNet), and small-scale (CIFAR-10) benchmarks. At comparable accuracy levels, StriaNet achieves speedups of 9.78 times, 6.01 times, and 9.24 times on ImageNet, Tiny ImageNet, and CIFAR-10, respectively.

We propose the first collaborative SNARK based on error-correcting codes that is scalable, i.e., the proof computation overhead is distributed among the $N$ provers. As a starting point, we introduce the notion of $(t,l)$-zero-knowledge collaborative codes that ensure that, when collaboratively computing a codeword over a distributed message, no coalition of up to $t$ corrupted parties learns any additional information about the message, even having queried up to $l$ codeword positions. We show that tensor codes consisting of the composition of two Reed-Solomon codes satisfy our definition, while also being foldable. We then propose a collaborative interactive oracle proof of proximity (coIOPP) for testing codeword closeness in our code, show how it can be made a zero-knowledge IOPP using randomness logarithmic in the size of the message (as opposed to linear with prior approaches), and we use it to construct a coIOPP for multi-linear polynomial evaluation. To compile our coIOPPs into non-interactive arguments, we prove that a natural extension of the compiler of Ben-Sasson-Chiesa-Spooner~(TCC 2016) in the collaborative setting preserves round-by-round (knowledge) soundness against quantum adversaries, which may be of independent interest for future work in collaborative SNARKs. Finally, we use an optimized collaborative version of the Spartan PIOP to build the first transparent and post-quantum secure scalable collaborative SNARK. Our experimental evaluation demonstrates that our scheme consistently outperforms the best existing (non-post-quantum secure) scalable collaborative SNARKs, both in end-to-end prover time and in total communication among provers, for all tested configurations.

Discrete Gaussian sampling (DGS) is a fundamental method for generating random noise in various post-quantum cryptographic key generation and signature schemes. However, DGS has been shown to be highly susceptible to side-channel analysis, and several countermeasures have been developed. Masking, a robust countermeasure, is widely employed to secure these schemes against side-channel attacks. Due to the non-linear arithmetic operations involved, DGS has traditionally been considered unsuitable for efficient masked implementations. In this work, we propose $\textsf{MAGNET}$: an efficient masking design for the novel discrete Gaussian sampler based on Boolean circuits introduced by Wei et al. at ACM CCS 2023. With $\textsf{MAGNET}$, we demonstrate that DGS can be implemented in a masking-friendly manner. Previous masked DGS approaches in the literature have relied on computation-intensive floating point operations or table-lookup-based techniques using Cumulative Distribution Tables (CDT). In contrast, we show that DGS can be efficiently masked for moderate orders without relying on heavy computation or precomputed large lookup tables. In addition to delivering good performance at a small standard deviation $\sigma$, the efficiency of $\textsf{MAGNET}$ becomes increasingly significant in large $\sigma$ settings. $\textsf{MAGNET}$ achieves up to $17\times$ speed-up at $\sigma = 256$, and $56\times$ speed-up at $\sigma = 1024$ over the CDT-based sampler of Gérard and Rossi (2019). We provide an arbitrary-order C implementation and a first-order ARM Cortex-M4 implementation of $\textsf{MAGNET}$. We validate the practical security of the first-order implementation through Test Vector Leakage Assessment (TVLA) and systematic hardening of gadgets that exhibit side-channel leakage.

The Double Ratchet (DR) protocol is a core security component of several end-to-end encrypted communications services, primarily Signal Messenger, WhatsApp, and Facebook Messenger, servicing billions of users. In this work, we provide the first formal analysis of the DR covering all of its features, including out-of-order message arrivals. This analysis is highly automated, allows for all possible key compromises and notably proves Post-Compromise Security (PCS). We also provide partial results for the security of more complex protocol variants, these being the extension of the DR with encrypted headers, and composition with PQXDH as the initial key-exchange. Our analysis uncovered three attacks on the protocol, two of which we confirmed to be present in the main implementation, and a third which exists in the specification. Each of these attacks weakened or broke Forward Secrecy, and are to the best of our knowledge the first such known attacks. In each case, the issues were reported to the Signal developers and subsequently fixed. Overall, our analysis provides new guarantees of the security of Signal Messenger, and demonstrates the high level of security provided by the DR under a variety of strong threat models.

In this paper, we propose a new widely applicable technique for constructing low-depth S-box circuits, which we call SLICE (Segmented Low‑depth Iterative Circuit Exploration). SLICE reduces circuit depth by partitioning circuits into subcircuits and applying bit-level optimizations. To mitigate the optimization cost of subcircuits with large bit-widths or high AND depth, SLICE temporarily reduces their bit-width during the search, making low-depth circuit construction feasible for various S-box sizes. Furthermore, we refine the eBPD algorithm with the aim of minimizing XOR gate count in terms of area, and apply it to the constructed circuits to achieve an additional reduction. Our proposed method is simple yet powerful, especially in practical applications. This work focuses on three practically deployed cases, namely the AES, Ascon S-box circuits and Dillon’s 6-bit APN S-box used in FIDES, and additionally considers the cube $x^3$ S-box. For the AES S-box, we present 14-, 13- and 12-depth circuits, whereas the previous lowest depth was 14. Notably, the 12-depth design sets a new overall depth record for AES S-box circuits, while the 13-depth design records the most hardware-efficient circuit in terms of the area$\times$delay metric (ADP). For the Ascon S-box, we present the first 4-depth circuit. For Dillon's S-box and the cube $x^3$ S-box, we also derive new low-depth circuits that improve upon the best previously known depths. All of our proposed S-box circuits achieve better ADPs than previous designs. We believe that SLICE will be useful for evaluating both existing and novel S-box designs.

Secure multi-party computation (MPC) enables mutually distrustful parties to jointly evaluate a function on their private inputs. Classic MPC protocols, however, assume a static set of participants in which every party must remain online throughout the entire computation. Recent advances have introduced MPC models with dynamic participation, such as Fluid MPC, in which computation steps are delegated to a sequence of committees that change across epochs. This approach improves robustness, enabling parties to go offline once their roles are complete. Yet, this flexibility comes at a cost: the most efficient dynamic-participation MPC protocols still incur communication overheads exceeding traditional MPC by more than an order of magnitude. In this work, we formalize the communication complexity of $(d,n)$-threshold secret-sharing-based Fluid MPC. We prove a tight trade-off between communication cost and the adversary's corruption threshold, showing that linear communication complexity $O(n)$ is impossible when the corruption threshold $t$ exceeds a proportion of $d$. Matching this bound, we construct a protocol with a communication cost of $9.3n$ elements per multiplication gate against a semi-honest adversary and $37.3n$ elements against a malicious adversary. A C++ implementation confirms that our approach brings the cost of fluidity within practical limits.

TFHE is one of the most promising scheme in the literature for an adoption of Fully Homomorphic Encryption (FHE) in practice. The core reason of its good performances is the powerful Programmable Bootstrapping (PBS) operation, that enables to homomorphically evaluate a Look-Up Table (LUT) on a ciphertext while simultaneously reducing its noise. However, the computational cost of running a PBS degrades severely when the size of the plaintext space increases, making it intractable for precision larger than 8 bits. So, evaluating a LUT larger than 2^8 is not considered possible with the "vanilla'' TFHE scheme. In this paper, we propose a technique to accelerate LUT evaluation at high precision, that significantly enhances the state of the art. Our method beats the original PBS for spaces larger than 6 bits, and is competitive with the WoP-PBS (the reference of the state of art) while being conceptually simpler. Moreover, our method relies on the standard PBS of TFHE, and therefore does not require the design of new advanced homomorphic operators, which facilitates its integration into larger homomorphic compilation systems.

In a (non-interactive) multi-signature scheme, parties independently generate keys and produce signatures on a common message, which can be aggregated into a single signature verifiable with respect to the set of public keys. Existing multi-signature constructions, however, suffer from at least one of two limitations: either (1) aggregate signatures cannot be further aggregated, or (2) verification requires auxiliary information beyond the set of public keys, such as the aggregation topology. We argue that these limitations significantly restrict the applicability of multi-signatures in large-scale distributed systems, such as proof-of-stake blockchains. To address this gap, we initiate the formal study of hint-free multi-signatures, which support multi-hop aggregation while allowing verification using only the set of public keys. To the best of our knowledge, the only previously known (folklore) construction that is fully hint-free relies on recursive SNARKs, which introduces unclear heuristics for security (e.g., proving statements about random oracle relations) or inherently limits the depth of the aggregation topology. We show that hint-free multi-signatures can be realized without proof recursion, in the standard model. At a high level, we show how to publicly normalize BLS multi-signatures so that verification depends only on the set of public keys rather than a multi-set. While our scheme is not practical (it uses indistinguishability obfuscation), it establishes the feasibility of the primitive provides a foundation for future work on practical constructions.

We explore the design of blind schemes based on the Lattice Isomorphism Problem (LIP), a recently proposed group-action-based assumption for post-quantum cryptography. Our work highlights both the potential and the limitations of LIP-based constructions. In particular, we analyze the Abe–Okamoto framework and demonstrate that it does not yield a secure instantiation under LIP. We further present an attack on the double LIP problem, allowing from two generic distinct instances of a LIP problem to recover the secret unimodular matrix. Finally, we propose a new blind signature scheme that combines LIP with the Closest Vector Problem (CVP) and a modular version of the Short Integer Solution (SIS) problem, offering a fresh direction for lattice-based blind constructions.

Folding schemes enable incremental proving by compressing many relation instances into a small accumulator. Recent lattice-based constructions such as LatticeFold+ [CRYPTO '25] achieve post-quantum security, but prover performance is still dominated by expensive $\ell_\infty$ range checks used to control witness growth during folding and extraction. We present a final $\ell_2$-norm-check design that combines random-projection constraints (in the spirit of Rok and Roll [ASIACRYPT '25]) with an exact shortening step (in the spirit of SALSAA [ePrint 2025/2124]) to recover the original witness $\ell_2$-norm bound at extraction time. Integrated into the LatticeFold+ composition, this gives iterative folding with controlled norm growth, preserved binding and knowledge-soundness goals, and substantially lower prover cost on the dominant norm-check path, while maintaining a similar proof size and verification cost. Our approach is modular and can be applied to other lattice-based folding schemes, providing a practical path for efficient post-quantum folding constructions.

In a paper presented at CRYPTO18, Reparaz et al. introduce a new model called the ``Tile-Probe-and-Fault-Model''. This model proposes to cover more realistic side-channel attacks by considering so-called ``combined'' attacks, in other words attacks using both side-channel leakage and fault injection. In addition, they introduce CAPA, a combined ``Countermeasure Against Physical Attacks'', which is inspired by an MPC protocol called SPDZ. In this paper, by attacking the original Beaver triples generation described in CAPA, we demonstrate that the CAPA countermeasure is not secure in its model, by breaking the countermeasures with a simple resolution of a linear system.

Graph neural network parameters are valuable intellectual property, and high-fidelity extraction enables model stealing, evasion, and downstream abuse. Prior cryptanalytic extraction can recover exact parameters in hard-label settings, yet existing methods focus on feedforward models and do not extend to message-passing graph neural networks. The obstacles include coupled queried nodes, hidden aggregation operators, and sign and scale ambiguities created by message passing. To our knowledge, this is the first cryptanalytic extraction framework for message-passing ReLU graph neural networks in hard-label settings where the oracle returns only the predicted class. We locate dual-point constraints on class-pair decision boundaries and activation hyperplanes, then recover hidden signatures with SVD-based extraction under a fixed ordered two-node query interface. We use ON/OFF distance comparisons to resolve hidden signs, then prove that diagonal scale factors propagate through the recovered prefix and cancel at the output layer. This four-stage recovery chain avoids explicit scale fitting while using only hard-label local queries. On ogbn-arxiv targets with up to 10,660 parameters, the attack achieves 100% prediction fidelity on 8,171 evaluated nodes with 48.68M node queries.

Existing Capture-the-Flag (CTF) platforms trust a single organizer, offer limited auditability, and are vulnerable to infrastructure-level manipulation. We propose zk–MPSFV, a zk-SNARK-based, multi-phase sub-flag verification scheme that replaces centralized scoring with an on-chain, zero-knowledge, publicly verifiable scoreboard. Challenges are decomposed into sub-challenges arranged as a directed acyclic graph (DAG): a team unlocks the next step only after proving completion of all parent nodes. Sub-flags and decryption keys are jointly generated by n organizers and released via an off-chain (t, n) Shamir–BLS threshold signature produced through multi-party computation (MPC), preventing any single organizer from leaking oraltering keys. Teams submit zk-PLONK proofs that the contract verifies, timestamps, and records immutably. Under standard assumptions (collision-resistant hashing, SNARK soundness/zero-knowledge, IND-CCA2 ECIES, and at least t honest organizers), we prove that zk–MPSFV achieves the stated security goals, including DAG-gated progress, anti-replay, and threshold-robust organizer security, while out-of-band flag sharing remains out of scope. On a three-organizer testbed with 30 simulated teams, setup costs 0.45 ms per sub-flag, proof generation averages 5.34 s on an 8 core system, and on-chain verification costs ≈ 170k L2 gas on zkSync Era with a median fee of 1.33 × 10−6 ETH (about $0.0046 at $3,435 ETH). Stress replays sustain ≈ 7 proof transactions/s up to 5000 proofs; extrapolating to 50,000 proofs (1000 teams × 50 submissions) yields ≈ 0.0665 ETH (about $200–$228) and ≈ 2 hours of settlement time. Overall, zk–MPSFV is practical for small- to mid-scale, audit-ready progression CTFs.

Registration-Based Encryption (RBE) is a public-key encryption mechanism which allows a user to register their identity (e.g. email address) and self-generated public key with a key curator (e.g. an organisation). The key curator aggregates these keys into a compact digest. Using only this digest and the recipient’s identity, anyone can encrypt messages to any registered user. As the key curator is not entrusted with any secrets, RBE presents a solution to the key escrow problem, which impedes the adoption of Identity-Based Encryption. This makes RBE an attractive solution for secure communication with and among members of an organisation while preserving user privacy. Despite recent advances [Döttling-Kolonelos-Lai-Lin-Malavolta-Rahimi, EUROCRYPT’23; Fiore-Kolonelos-de-Perthuis, ASIACRYPT’23], practical constructions of RBE are still limited to a small number of registered users (e.g. 1024), lack post-quantum security, or have ciphertext sizes scaling in the order of GB. The predominant way towards constructing practical RBE is a generic transformation from Laconic Encryption (LE). In this work, we identify an efficiency bottleneck in this transformation and present a new primitive called Batched Laconic Encryption (BLE) which admits a more succinct transformation to RBE. Our resulting RBE scheme is the first post-quantum construction that simultaneously supports a large number of registered users and asymptotically outperforms all comparable RBE schemes. Concretely, for at most $2^{30}$ registered users at 128-bit security, our scheme achieves a ciphertext size of 7 MB, improving on previously reported results by three orders of magnitude. We confirm our results through an open-source prototype implementation demonstrating that all algorithms execute within a few milliseconds. The post-quantum security of our construction is based on the standard Learning with Errors assumption, and our analysis enables several tweaks to significantly reduce ciphertext sizes in practical deployments.

Careful management of shares stored in the architectural, general-purpose register file is an important aspect of software-based implementations of masking, because it can impact the associated side-channel leakage. The erasure of residual shares, i.e., shares whose useful lifetime has expired, is one component of such management: erasing them can, for example, prevent subsequent, unintended share recombination. To support effective share erasure, this work makes two contributions. First, we present an analysis of the underlying problem, systematising associated concepts and terminology, and offering a concrete, motivating example. Second, we present the design, implementation, and evaluation of two components which can support solutions of said problem. These are 1) a policy, namely an extended ABI which provides clear semantics regarding the responsibility of caller and/or callee functions to erase shares, and 2) a mechanism for realising said policy, namely an extended ISA (or ISE) which allows more efficient erasure of shares than via the ISA alone. Although generic in nature, we present both components using the RISC-V base ISA; an associated prototype ISE implementation uses Ibex as a base core. Our evaluation results confirm that combined use of the components can eliminate leakage related to residual shares both effectively and efficiently.

End-to-end encrypted applications protect user data by ensuring that user secrets are only available on client devices. However, if a user loses all of their devices, they need a way to recover their data using only a short password. To realize a password-based secret recovery system resilient to brute-force attacks, prior works relied on secure hardware or a few non-colluding servers. In this work, we take a conceptually different approach that distributes trust across the many clients already in the system, while using the server only as an orchestrator without relying on it for privacy. To achieve this, we design and implement Chorus, a secret recovery system that employs ephemeral committees, each consisting of approximately a thousand clients, to provide strong privacy with high scalability. Committees change frequently in Chorus, typically on the order of a few minutes, to severely limit an attacker's ability to compromise clients on a committee. We design Chorus for unreliable, resource-constrained clients and show that the per-client overhead decreases as more clients join the system. Assuming each user performs recovery once a year, the expected per-client overhead in Chorus is under $30$ s of computation on a mobile device and $13.2$ MB of communication, both incurred only once every four months in a configuration with $100$M clients, up to $50$M of which may be offline and at most $10$M may be compromised. To achieve this performance, we contribute two key techniques: (i) a password-based secret recovery scheme that confines expensive committee interactions to infrequent, latency-tolerant operations, and (ii) a non-interactive verifiable secret-sharing scheme that reduces client overhead by two orders of magnitude by delegating computation to the server.

Polynomial commitment schemes (PCSs) are a fundamental cryptographic primitive that allows a prover to reveal evaluations for a committed polynomial. Motivated by the inefficiency of proof generation for large-scale computations as well as the concerns regarding third-party reliance and quantum threats, a line of recent works has focused on distributing code-based PCS, where the proving workload is distributed among multiple sub-provers to accelerate proof generation, while preserving transparent setup and plausible quantum resilience. However, for $M$ sub-provers generating an evaluation proof for a polynomial of size $N$, existing solutions either require $O(N)$ total communication among sub-provers, or incur an $O(M)$ overhead in proof size. In this paper, we introduce $\mathsf{Veloz}$, a novel distribution framework for code-based multilinear PCS, which for the first time achieves communication cost sublinear in $N$, and eliminates the dependence of proof size on the number of sub-provers, without compromising proving speed or security. At its core is a customized proof aggregation method from interleaved code that efficiently combines sub-proofs via minimum communication. We further present two instantiations of $\mathsf{Veloz}$: one based on Reed-Solomon code, $\mathsf{Veloz}_{\text{RS}}$, achieves $O(\frac{N}{M}\log{\frac{N}{\log{N}}})$ proving time, $O(\lambda \cdot \frac{\log^{2}{N}}{\log\log{N}} + M\cdot\frac{N}{\log{N}})$ communication, and $O(\lambda \cdot \frac{\log^{2}{N}}{\log\log{N}})$ proof size; the other based on the fast linear code from Brakedown (Golovnev et al., CRYPTO 2023), $\mathsf{Veloz}_{\text{Lin}}$, features $O(\frac{N}{M})$ proving time, $O(\lambda \cdot K + M\cdot\frac{N}{K})$ communication, and $O(\lambda \cdot K)$ proof size for $K \in [\sqrt[3]{N}, \sqrt{N}]$, while enjoying field agnosticity. We also implement both schemes in Rust and conduct a comprehensive performance evaluation. The experimental results demonstrate their linear scalability with increasing $M$. More specifically, for $N = 2^{30}$ and $M = 8$, $\mathsf{Veloz}_{\text{RS}}$ takes 74.8s for proof generation, achieving a 5.18 $\times$ speedup compared to running a single prover, while $\mathsf{Veloz}_{\text{Lin}}$ generates a proof in 26.9s and achieves a 7.02 $\times$ speedup.

Designing cryptographic hash functions that simultaneously achieve high throughput and strong provable security remains a fundamental challenge in symmetric cryptography. Traditional constructions, such as the Merkle-Damg\aa rd (MD) and SPONGE paradigms, inherently suffer from structural limitations: they either expose internal chaining values to length-extension attacks or impose a rigid trade-off between security (capacity) and efficiency (rate), bounding their architectural potential. In this paper, we introduce the \textbf{Compress-then-Randomize} paradigm, a modular design principle that structurally decouples a hash function into two independent components with distinct security objectives: (1) a \emph{variable-input-length} (VIL) compression component optimized for high-speed message absorption, requiring only collision resistance and multiple-preimage resistance; and (2) a \emph{fixed-input-length} (FIL) finalization component utilizing independent random permutations to ensure indifferentiability from a random oracle. This separation enables the VIL component to maximize processing throughput (approaching the full primitive width) while the FIL component provides robust randomness extraction, effectively mitigating length-extension attacks and achieving tight security bounds. Leveraging this paradigm, we propose the \textbf{Rocket hash family}, comprising two instantiations: \emph{Rocket-JH} (based on the JH iteration structure with wide-pipe design) and \emph{Rocket-DoubleCBC} (utilizing dual parallel Cipher-Block-Chaining lanes). Both constructions employ pairwise distinct round permutations and achieve superior message processing rates compared to conventional SPONGE-based designs, with Rocket-2 delivering more than $2\times$ the throughput of SHA3-512 for large messages. For practical instantiation without requiring multiple independent cryptographic primitives, we present \textbf{CTR-Perm}, a novel domain-separation technique that derives $2^w$ effectively independent round functions from a single large permutation using a counter-based input diversification. While backward queries introduce a heuristic assumption regarding preimage multiplicity (bounded by a negligible failure probability $\leq 2^{-526}$ for counter size $w \geq 64$ and hash length 512 bits), we prove the construction remains sound for practical message lengths up to $2^{w-8}$ blocks. Finally, to formalize the security-efficiency trade-off, we propose \textbf{Hash Effectiveness} (H.E.), a scale-invariant heuristic metric defined as the product of normalized security level and normalized processing rate. We demonstrate that conventional Merkle-Damg\aa rd and SPONGE constructions exhibit H.E. values fundamentally bounded by $1/8$, whereas the Rocket constructions achieve H.E. values approaching $1/4$ (specifically, $0.227$ for Rocket-2 with Keccak-$p$[1600]), thereby establishing a new Pareto frontier in hash function design.

We give a public key encryption scheme with plausible quasi-exponential security based on the conjectured intractability of two constraint satisfaction problems (CSPs), both of which are instantiated with a corruption rate of $1 - o(1)$. First, we conjecture the hardness of a new large alphabet random predicate CSP (LARP-CSP) defined over an arbitrary but strongly expanding factor graph, where the vast majority of predicate outputs are replaced with random outputs. Second, we conjecture the hardness of the standard $k$XOR problem defined over a random factor graph, again where the vast majority of parity computations are replaced with random bits. In support of our hardness conjecture for LARP-CSPs, we give a variety of lower bounds, ruling out many natural attacks including all known attacks that exploit non-random factor graphs. Our public key encryption scheme is the first to leverage high corruption CSPs while simultaneously achieving a plausible security level far above quasi-polynomial. At the heart of our work is a new method for planting cryptographic trapdoors based on the label extended factor graph for a CSP. Along the way to achieving our result, we give the first uniform construction of an error-correcting code that has an expanding, low density generator matrix while simultaneously allowing for efficient decoding from a $1 - o(1)$ fraction of corruptions.

Masking is an effective defense against side-channel attacks, yet it remains costly under hardware constraints. The Caliptra Root-of-Trust is a representative case, where its masked ML-DSA implementation incurs about 6× area overhead. We propose a novel first-order masking solution that optimizes Caliptra, achieving significant improvements in area–delay efficiency. Compared to Caliptra’s ML-DSA reduction, our design achieves a 12.1× speedup, reducing LUTs by 86.7% and FFs by 94.5%, while improving area–delay efficiency by 91×. TVLA, with over 1,000,000 traces, shows no first-order leakage, satisfies Caliptra’s security requirements, and significantly improves implementation efficiency.

Threshold signatures distribute trust across multiple parties, eliminating single points of failure and reducing insider and key-exfiltration risks—properties that are increasingly important for high-assurance deployments and recently emphasized by NIST’s Multi-Party Threshold Cryptography (MPTC) initiative. We present a practical t-out-of-n threshold variant and emulation of MAYO, a post-quantum signature candidate to NIST’s call for additional signatures. Our proposal builds upon the threshold MAYO design of Celi, Escudero and Niot (PQCrypto2025), which we significantly refine to achieve practical performance. To this end, we introduce two algorithmic modifications to MAYO tailored for the distributed setting: (1) Explicit-Salt MAYO, which allows for pre-determined salts to enable a single-round online phase; and (2) Depth-Reduced MAYO, which restructures the signing algorithm to minimize the depth of secret-dependent operations. We then propose a unified protocol framework that integrate these techniques, plus other MPC specific optimizations, with the goal of minimizing online latency. Finally, we provide a concrete instantiation and local emulation in the dishonest majority setting, secure against active adversaries. Our emulation shows that threshold signing is practical at typical threshold sizes and amenable to deployment. By releasing an open-source implementation and reporting end-to-end performance, this work offers a concrete reference for the thresholdization of post-quantum signatures. Clearly the aforementioned framework is not limited to MAYO, and can be applied to the UOV family of signatures more generally.

Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems critically depend on a vector-retrieval stage that selects relevant documents from a large embedding database. In a RAG-as-a-Service setting, however, clients have no visibility into the server's proprietary embeddings and index structures, and thus cannot distinguish faithful execution from arbitrary deviations. This motivates service consistency for retrieval: the returned results must be consistent with executing an agreed approximate nearest neighbor search (ANNS) algorithm on a fixed, committed database together with a fixed, committed ANNS index, while revealing nothing beyond the outputs themselves. We present the first polynomial interactive oracle proof (PIOP) tailored to the widely deployed HNSW ANNS algorithm. Building on this PIOP, we introduce zkRAG, a zero-knowledge, succinct, non-interactive argument for RAG retrieval that enables practical verification. Our design achieves asymptotically optimal online prover efficiency, with prover time linear in the HNSW search trace length, while keeping verification succinct. We introduce several new techniques that may be of independent interest, including a hybrid lookup argument, a highly efficient checker-based PIOP for checking priority-queue updates, and an efficient checker for membership selector vectors. For a benchmark with $10^6$ vectors of dimension $128$, single-thread zkRAG proves a typical HNSW query in $50$ seconds-over $1000\times$ faster than existing baselines--while keeping verification lightweight, demonstrating the feasibility of efficient zero-knowledge service-consistent RAG retrieval.

In this report, we describe how block circulant (BC) codes can serve as an alternative to one-dimensional (1D) and two-dimensional (2D) Reed–Solomon (RS) codes in the Ethereum PeerDAS protocol. We begin by reviewing the implementation of 1D RS codes in PeerDAS and then present efficient encoding and reconstruction algorithms for BC codes, developed within the same implementation framework as the respective 1D RS algorithms. The proposed encoding algorithm also permits a graceful integration of KZG commitment scheme. Finally, we evaluate and compare the performance of BC codes in terms of code rate, stopping rate, and the size of the local codes they contain, against both 1D and 2D RS codes.

We propose the \emph{Alternating Sponge} (ASP), a permutation-based hashing mode that explores how to obtain beyond-birthday-bound security without duplicating the full capacity state. The main design idea is to replace spatial state duplication by temporal alternation: ASP keeps two \(r\)-bit rate branches but lets them share a single \(c\)-bit capacity chain, and updates the two branches through alternating calls to two independent \((r+c)\)-bit permutations. This yields a state size of \(2r+c\) bits and outputs \(2r\) bits per mode-level squeezing round. We prove that ASP is indifferentiable from a random oracle in the ideal permutation model. For the base primitive-call budget \(q=q_P+\lambda\), the bound gives a capacity-driven term of order \(O(q^3/2^{2c})\), together with a primitive-space term of order \(O(q^2/2^{r+c})\). This yields the asymptotic security level \(\min\{\frac{2c}{3},\frac{r+c}{2}\}\). In particular, for \(r\ge \frac{c}{3}\), ASP reaches the \(\frac{2c}{3}\) capacity-driven exponent while saving one \(c\)-bit capacity component compared with a fully duplicated two-branch design. We also discuss generic distinguishing attacks, including a construction-level state-merging birthday attack and a simulator-specific attack, which clarify the current proof--attack gap.

The Permuted Kernel Problem (PKP), introduced by Shamir, is a computationally hard problem underlying recent post-quantum signature schemes such as PERK, SUSHSYFISH and PKP-DSS. Among these, PERK is a second-round candidate in NIST's Additional Digital Signature Schemes post-quantum standardization process, SUSHSYFISH appeared at EUROCRYPT~2020, and PKP-DSS was one of the finalists in the CACR competition. The best known attacks on PKP rely on combinatorial meet-in-the-middle techniques, notably the algorithms of Koussa, Macario-Rat, and Patarin (KMP) and Santini, Baldi, and Chiaraluce (SBC), whose complexities remain super-exponential, with memory requirements of the same order as their time complexities. In this work, we obtain improved cryptanalytic results for PKP that strictly outperform all previously known attacks. In particular, although no parameter sets of PERK~v2.2.0 fall below the NIST security levels, we provide the first evidence that secret vector recovery for all PERK~v2.2.0 parameter sets can be achieved with complexity below their estimated bit-security levels. We additionally obtain improved bit-complexity estimates for the SUSHSYFISH and PKP-DSS parameter sets. We further introduce a Schroeppel--Shamir style time–memory trade-off in the PKP setting. Although PKP does not admit square-root memory as in the classical subset-sum problem, our adaptation achieves substantial memory reductions while keeping the time complexity close to the best known attacks. Overall, our results provide improved cryptanalytic insight into PKP and refine the current understanding of the concrete security of PKP-based signature schemes.

Restricted Syndrome Decoding (ResSD) is a variant of linear code decoding problem where each of the error's entries must belong to a fixed small set of values. This problem underlies the security of CROSS, a post-quantum signature scheme that is one of the Round~2 candidates of NIST's ongoing additional signatures call. We show that solutions to this problem can be deduced from vectors of a particular structure and a small norm in newly constructed codes, in both Hamming and Euclidean metrics. This allows us to reduce Restricted Syndrome Decoding to both code-based (Regular Syndrome Decoding) and lattice-based problems (Closest Vector Problem, List of Short/Close Vectors), increasing the attack surface and providing new insights into the security of ResSD. We evaluate our attacks on CROSS instances both theoretically and experimentally on reduced parameters.

We give efficient formulas to evaluate isogenies of ordinary elliptic curves over finite fields of characteristic $2$, extending the odd-characteristic techniques of Hisil--Costello and Renes to binary fields. For odd prime degree $\ell = 2s+1$, our affine product evaluation computes the image $x$-coordinate using $5s\mathbf{M}$ field multiplications, or $4s\mathbf{M}$ when the kernel points are normalized. We derive an inversion-free variant that evaluates the $x$-map in projective and twisted Kummer coordinates, allowing carried points to remain projective across successive isogeny steps. Over $\mathbb{F}_{2^{511}}$, microbenchmarks show that the inversion-free projective and twisted variants are faster than Vélu-style $x$-evaluation when outputs are kept in projective/twisted form, while the affine one-inversion variant is about $4.2\times$ faster.

Basically, public-key searchable encryption schemes require a linear search time with respect to the total number of ciphertexts. Xu, Wu, Wang, Susilo, Domingo-Ferrer, and Jin (IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security, 2015) introduced Searchable Public-Key Ciphertexts with Hidden Structure (SPCHS). In SPCHS, ciphertexts associated with the same keyword are linked through a hidden structure that can be revealed using a trapdoor. This enables efficient extraction of matching ciphertexts and achieves optimal asymptotic search efficiency by traversing only the result set. However, a drawback of the SPCHS scheme and its subsequent works is that they are all pairing-based or rely on identity-based encryption (IBE) as a foundational component. To improve efficiency, this paper proposes a generic construction of SPCHS. Our core building block is Non-Interactive Key Exchange (NIKE), and the remaining components are symmetric-key primitives, namely secret-key encryption and a pseudorandom function (PRF). In particular, our search algorithm depends solely on these symmetric-key primitives and is independent of any public-key primitives. We implement the most efficient instantiation of the generic construction using Diffie-Hellman NIKE, an HMAC-based PRF, and AES. Our evaluation demonstrates that the search time of the DH-based instantiation is over 250 times faster than that of the asymmetric pairing-based scheme by Wang et al. (IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 2020). Moreover, we reduce the ciphertext size by a factor of approximately 10. In addition to this practical contribution of significantly improving efficiency, the proposed generic construction also makes a theoretical contribution by enabling the realization of the first set of post-quantum SPCHS schemes based on lattices, isogenies, and codes.

We review the traditional techniques of message authentication from the perspective of Constructive Cryptography, one of the major composable security frameworks. For each of the 'textbook' means of message authentication, known results are compiled, and various gaps are addressed. We also point out areas of remaining study, and obstacles to demonstrating composability in those cases. The results can be thought of as a toolkit showing how to realise composable authentication with various cryptographic primitives, with precise statements on the security guarantees and set-up requirements.

This paper studies efficient realizations of arithmetic over the binary field $\mathbb{F}_2$ in nonabelian groups using only intrinsic group operations, namely multiplication and inversion. The constructions rely on commutators to implement Boolean computation within the group structure. Two complementary approaches are presented: a realization of a universal Boolean gate (NAND) and direct realizations of the field operations XOR and AND. These approaches apply to finite nonabelian simple groups and can be implemented using a small number of group operations. Explicit realizations are provided in the alternating groups $A_5$ and $A_6$. For the smallest nonabelian simple group $A_5$, these constructions achieve state-of-the-art efficiency in the number of group operations.

GRAFHEN is a recently proposed noise-free fully homomorphic encryption scheme based on rewriting systems in symmetric groups. We show that GRAFHEN is not IND-CPA secure by constructing a polynomial-time cross-reduction distinguisher whose advantage can be amplified to overwhelming via d! scrambled cross-evaluations. We prove an unconditional information-theoretic lower bound using the near-uniformity of word maps on symmetric groups. We further prove structural barriers to repair: for G= Sn, any semidirect product action compatible with decryption reduces to conjugation, collapsing back to the original attack.

We investigate how partial physical leakage can be amplified through public algebraic relations, using HAWK as a concrete case study of implementation security in an algebraically structured post-quantum signature scheme. HAWK is a lightweight, floating-point-free lattice-based signature scheme whose discrete Gaussian sampler can expose side-channel information during signing. We formalize such leakage as HAWK with Hint and study full-coefficient, exact-sign, and noisy-sign leakage. Our polynomial-time recovery algorithms combine sampler hints with public signing information and HAWK's Gram-matrix public-key structure, showing that complete sampler-output recovery is not necessary for full key recovery. For HAWK-1024, we obtain the following results under the stated threat models. With full coefficient leakage, a single signature suffices for secret-key recovery by directly solving the induced linear system. On the HAWK-1024 reference implementation, we identify all 2,048 coefficient-sampler invocations in each of 14 measured signing traces, extract all 28,672 coefficient signs without error, and recover the fixed key using the Category II attack. In separate controlled experiments over 100 independently generated keys, Category II achieves 100% success using 14 exact-sign signatures in approximately 157 seconds. Under the independent sign-error model, Category III achieves 100% success using 420 signatures at a 10% error rate and 13,397 signatures at a 40% error rate. The latter setting requires approximately 178 seconds. These results show that coarse and even erroneous sampler leakage can become sufficient for full key recovery when combined with HAWK's public algebraic structure.

Deduplication for encrypted data reduces the storage costs of server while keeping the sensitive data secure. Fuzzy deduplication is developing for the multimedia data for its similarity not exact equality, hence it has better storage space saving capabilities than exact deduplication. However, the most of existing works face the security threat such as brute-force guessing attacks, key recovery attacks and so on. We conduct research on fuzzy deduplication from the fundamental layer for these security goals. In this work, the data similarity is novelty defined based on information entropy theory so that the similarity verification by cloud is without online clients assistance. Moreover, the parameter robustness verification is firstly proposed to be against the key recovery attacks and guessing attacks fundamentally. The simulation experiments show that our scheme can save approximately 87% of storage space while maintaining a tamper detection success rate of no less than 97%.

Ring signatures are cryptographic primitives that enable a user to sign a message on behalf of a group of users in an anonymous manner. The anonymity of the signer is the fundamental security property of ring signatures. However, unrestricted anonymity can be misused, as a malicious signer could use it to send spam or excessive messages. To address this issue, a controlled restriction on signer anonymity is required, which makes such schemes more practical. In this paper, we propose a k-times traceable ring signature scheme that allows the public key of the signer to be traced publicly if the signer exceeds a predetermined signing limit k. The novelty of our construction lies in its reliance on lattice-based assumptions, which ensure post-quantum security. Consequently, the proposed scheme is well-suited for practical deployment in the presence of emerging quantum threats. Our approach achieves competitive performance while providing stronger security guarantees, making it an appropriate candidate for modern cryptographic applications. We also present efficiency analysis and compare our scheme with existing constructions.

We study key-schedule design under boundary round-key leakage, namely leakage of the first round key, the last round key, or both end round keys. We propose the nonlinear key-schedule $\mathrm{RK}_i = K \oplus F\bigl(K \oplus T(i)\bigr)$, where $K$ is the master key, $T(i)$ is a public domain separation value, and $F$ is a public SPN-based permutation parameterized by its round count $N_F$. Under the boundary-leakage model considered in this paper, leakage of one end round key yields an instance of the equation $Z=U\oplus F(U)$, whereas leakage of both end round keys yields a differential constraint of the form $F(U)\oplus F(U\oplus\Delta)=\Gamma$, where $\Delta$ is determined by the two end indices and $\Gamma$ is derived from the two leaked round-key values. These reductions clarify the nonlinear systems induced by boundary leakage and the absence of a linear elimination route to the master key. We also evaluate reduced variants of the resulting systems through Gr\"obner basis experiments, and further examine them by SAT-based key-recovery experiments and right-censored runtime analysis via a Weibull AFT model. Within the tested range, we do not observe degree collapse or unusually strong linear bias. These results provide heuristic support for the view that, under the boundary-leakage model considered here, the tested instantiations of the proposed key-schedule family do not admit an obvious efficient inversion route.

Multi-scalar multiplication (MSM), $MSM(\vec{P},\vec{x})=\sum_{i=1}^n x_i P_i$, is a dominant computational kernel in discrete-logarithm–based cryptography and often becomes a bottleneck for verifiers and other resource-constrained clients. We present 2G2T, a simple protocol for verifiably outsourcing MSM to an untrusted server. 2G2T is efficient for both parties: the server performs only two MSM computations and returns only two group elements to the client, namely the claimed result $A=MSM(\vec{P},\vec{x})$ and an auxiliary group element $B$. Client-side verification consists of a single length-$n$ field inner product and only three group operations (two scalar multiplications and one group addition). In our Ristretto255 implementation, verification is up to $\sim 300\times$ faster than computing the MSM locally using a highly optimized MSM routine (for $n$ up to $2^{18}$). Moreover, 2G2T enables latency-hiding verification: nearly all verifier work can be performed while waiting for the server's response, so once $(A,B)$ arrives the verifier completes the check with only one scalar multiplication and one group addition (both independent of $n$). Finally, despite its simplicity and efficiency, we prove that 2G2T achieves statistical soundness: for any (even unbounded) adversarial server, the probability of accepting an incorrect result is at most $1/q$ per query, and at most $e/q$ over $e$ adaptive executions, in a prime-order group of size $q$.

In this note we introduce the concept of proximity signatures, where verifiers who can only access a small part of some data would like a guarantee that (a) this data is “close” to a uniquely decodable message (so the message can be decoded from the data via error decoding) and (b) the uniquely decodable message is signed by an associated secret key. This is useful in situations where the message is very large but the verifiers are small devices who only need the guarantee that the message was signed by some specific secret key or set of keys. As a motivating example, we consider the data availability problem. There, users submit large signed pieces of data that together form a larger data matrix. The signatures and integrity of this data must then be checked by nodes who can only download a small proportion of this matrix. We present a construction inspired by linear subspace signatures.

Hamming Quasi-Cyclic (HQC) has been selected by NIST for standardization in the post-quantum landscape. As deployment approaches, implementation security becomes as critical as mathematical hardness. In this work, we demonstrate that source-level constant-time coding is not a standalone guarantee: the compiled binary must inherently preserve this behavior. We identify a severe compiler-induced vulnerability within the official AVX2-optimized implementation of HQC, despite its claims of being constant-time. Although the C source code relies on secure, mask-based conditional selection, certain compiler optimizations rewrite this logic systematically. This transformation silently introduces secret-dependent control flow into the inner Reed-Muller decoding process, resulting in secret-dependent cache access patterns. Exploiting this vulnerability, we mount, to the best of our knowledge, the first cache-timing Full-Decryption-style oracle attack against a post-quantum cryptosystem. Using Flush+Reload on shared libraries, an unprivileged co-located adversary can extract fine-grained predicates of the decoder's internal state. To achieve full key recovery, we develop a novel, reliability-aware Soft Information Set Decoding (Soft-ISD) post-processing framework. Leveraging a GPU-accelerated meet-in-the-middle strategy optimized for heterogeneous platforms (including Apple Silicon), we demonstrate end-to-end secret key recovery for hqc-1 with less than 10 seconds of online trace collection.

(Partially) blind signatures are foundational cryptographic primitives that enable privacy-preserving authentication in digital systems. Blind signatures allow a user to obtain a signature on a message without revealing its content, while partially blind signatures permit the controlled inclusion of agreed-upon public information into the signed message. These primitives are central to applications such as electronic voting, anonymous credentials, and digital cash. The first isogeny-based construction of (partially) blind signatures, CSIOtter, were proposed by Katsumata et al. at CRYPTO'23. However, its concurrent security was later broken by Katsumata et al. (CRYPTO'24) and Do et al. (EUROCRYPT'24). These findings imply that CSI-Otter is secure only in sequential settings. Recently, Hanzlik et al. (ASIACRYPT'25) has proposed a novel framework for concurrently secure blind signatures which can be instantiated from isogenies with smaller signature size (but larger public key and secret key size). It is not known yet whether their construction can be extended to partially blind signatures. In this paper, we present a new and efficient construction of partially blind signatures based on isogenies with substantially smaller signature and public key sizes than CSI-Otter. This makes our construction the most compact post-quantum partially blind signature scheme known to date. As similar to CSIOtter, our scheme uses small challenge space resulting in only achieving sequential concurrent security. Our design follows the Abe-Okamoto paradigm in the group action setting, building upon the framework introduced by Tessaro and Zhu (EUROCRYPT'22), whose security is based on the Discrete Logarithm Problem. We rigorously prove the security of our scheme in the Algebraic Group Action Model and the Random Oracle Model, under the hardness assumption of the Group Action Discrete Logarithm Problem.

Zero-knowledge Succinct Non-interactive Arguments of Knowledge (zk-SNARKs) are cryptographic protocols that allow a prover to convince verifiers of the correctness of a statement without revealing any additional information. Recent zk-SNARK constructions have shifted from univariate to multivariate polynomial-based designs, reducing the proving complexity from quasilinear to linear by avoiding costly univariate polynomial interpolation. This shift, however, makes the sumcheck protocol—a core primitive for verifying polynomial relations over the Boolean hypercube—the dominant component in the prover’s workload. Consequently, the iterative nature and intensive intermediate data movement of the sumcheck protocol introduce severe performance bottlenecks in CPU- and GPU-based implementations, especially for large-scale multivariate polynomials. In this paper, we present PipeSC, a resource-efficient, ASIC-based accelerator for sumcheck. PipeSC combines deep pipelining, modular-multiplier reuse, and a finite-state machine-based dependency scheduler to sustain high utilization of computational resources across phases of the protocol. In addition, we introduce an Equality-MLE generation module that employs hierarchical scheduling and multiplier reuse, yielding a unified hardware substrate shared by multiple proving subroutines. Against state-of-the-art CPU, GPU, and ASIC implementations, PipeSC delivers up to \textbf{5.02$\times$} speedup over the GPU implementation and up to \textbf{2756.2$\times$} speedup over the CPU implementation, while improving the area–time product (ATP) by up to \textbf{3.68$\times$} compared with the ASIC design. These results show that careful hardware–algorithm co-design and conflict-free scheduling substantially accelerate sumcheck, paving the way for fully integrated zk-SNARK hardware pipelines.

Adaptor signatures extend digital signatures with conditional disclosure capabilities, enabling atomic swaps, payment channels, and other advanced blockchain protocols. Although post-quantum adaptor signatures have been explored under lattice, isogeny, and coding-theoretic assumptions, no constructions have yet been realised from the multivariate quadratic (MQ) family of signatures. Classical algebraic adaptor techniques rely on embedding the witness into signing randomness, which is natural for discrete-log-based schemes but does not apply to MQ signatures such as UOV and MAYO: to the best of our knowledge, MQ signing randomness lacks the algebraic structure needed for witness embedding, and no such algebraic adaptor construction is currently known. This motivates a different approach. We propose MWAS, the first commitment-based adaptor-style construction for MQ signatures, specifically UOV and MAYO from the NIST PQC process, implemented via the Open Quantum Safe library. Our construction uses a lightweight HMAC-SHA256 commitment and a concatenation-based adaptation, supporting a hash-preimage witness relation. We prove correctness, witness hiding, and witness extractability in the ROM under MQ-hardness and PRF assumptions. A prototype implementation on a Raspberry Pi~5 shows pre-signature generation under 0.4~ms for UOV and 0.5--3.3~ms for MAYO across 128--256-bit security levels, with throughput up to 710~ops/s and public key sizes of 1.4~KB (MAYO) to 1.2~MB (UOV). These results indicate that commitment-based MQ adaptor signatures are a viable post-quantum option for settings where hash-preimage witness relations are appropriate.

Ensuring ciphertext indistinguishability is fundamental to cryptographic security, but empirically validating this property in real implementations and hybrid settings presents practical challenges. The transition to post-quantum cryptography (PQC), with its hybrid constructions combining classical and quantum-resistant primitives, makes empirical validation approaches increasingly valuable. By modeling indistinguishability under chosen-plaintext attack (IND-CPA) games as binary classification tasks and training on labeled ciphertext data with binary cross-entropy loss, we study deep neural network (DNN) distinguishers for ciphertext indistinguishability. We apply this methodology to PQC key encapsulation mechanisms (KEMs). We specifically test the public-key encryption (PKE) schemes used to construct examples such as ML-KEM, BIKE, and HQC. Moreover, a novel extension of this DNN modeling for empirical distinguishability testing of hybrid KEMs is presented. We implement and test this on combinations of PQC KEMs with unpadded RSA, RSA-OAEP, and plaintext. Finally, methodological generality is illustrated by applying the DNN IND-CPA classification framework to cascade symmetric encryption, where we test combinations of AES-CTR, AES-CBC, AES-ECB, ChaCha20, and DES-ECB. In our experiments on PQC algorithms, KEM combiners, and cascade encryption, no algorithm or combination of algorithms demonstrates a significant advantage (evaluated via two-sided binomial tests with significance level $\alpha = 0.01$), consistent with theoretical guarantees that hybrids including at least one IND-CPA-secure component preserve indistinguishability, and with the absence of exploitable patterns under the considered DNN adversary model. These illustrate the potential of using deep learning as an adaptive, practical, and versatile empirical estimator for indistinguishability in more general IND-CPA settings, allowing data-driven validation of implementations and compositions and complementing the analytical security analysis.

The Learning with Errors (LWE) problem forms the foundation for numerous post-quantum cryptographic schemes, such as the NIST-selected CRYSTALS-KYBER and CRYSTALS-DILITHIUM. Algebraic analysis of LWE traditionally relies on solving the Arora-Ge system via Gröbner bases, yet its performance is far from satisfactory when only a limited number of samples is available. Meanwhile, recent dual attacks have proven highly effective against concrete LWE-based algorithms. This gap motivates us to investigate whether integrating techniques from dual attacks into algebraic analysis can have a positive effect. We propose a novel, two-stage algebraic algorithm for LWE. First, dual lattice reduction is applied to transform the original samples into lower-dimensional samples. From an algebraic perspective, this stage reduces the number of variables at the cost of increasing the noise. Second, instead of solving the classic Arora-Ge system, we introduce a new polynomial construction that exploits the error distribution and solves it via a resultant-based method. When given \(m = n\) samples, our two-stage algorithm yields better complexity estimates for CRYSTALS-KYBER than the Gröbner-basis estimates reported in Steiner's work (Eurocrypt~2024). As an independent contribution, we show that for LWE with a small secret, applying the resultant-based method directly to the Arora-Ge system provides a provable complexity estimate that achieves an exponential speed-up over the proven bounds established by Steiner. Finally, we show how various forms of side information---namely, perfect hints, modular hints, and approximate hints---can be systematically incorporated into our two-stage algorithm.