Determining whether an arbitrary access structure can be realized by an ideal linear secret sharing scheme is an important research topic. we use linear codes as the main tool to construct matrices $H$ and $G$ over a finite field $\mathbb{F}_q$ for a given access structure $\Gamma_{\min}$, and show that a necessary and sufficient condition for the existence of an ideal linear secret sharing scheme realizing $\Gamma_{\min}$ is that the equation $GH^{\mathsf{T}}=0$ has a solution. If this equation has a solution, then $H$ serves as the parity-check matrix of a linear code that realizes $\Gamma_{\min}$, and $G$ is the corresponding generator matrix. Furthermore, we prove that the result is equivalent to the following statement: there exists an ideal linear code for realizing the $\Gamma_{\min}$ if and only if it is the port of a matroid that is representable over $\mathbb{F}_q$.

Secret sharing is a foundational cryptographic primitive for sharing keys in distributed systems. In a classical $(n,t)$-threshold setting, it involves a dealer who has a secret, a set of $n$ users to whom shares of the secret are sent, and a threshold $t$ which is the minimum number of shares required to recover the secret. These schemes offer an all-or-nothing security approach where less than $t$ shares reveal no information about the secret. But these guarantees are threatened by side-channel attacks which can leak partial information from each share. Initiated by Benhamouda et al. (Crypto'18), the security of linear secret sharing schemes has been studied for bounded leakage attack models, which assume that the adversary can leak bounded functions of each share. However, this model does not translate into real-world attacks, as physical side-channels are inherently noisy. The $\delta$-noisy channel model, proposed by Prouff and Rivain (Eurocrypt’13), is a general leakage framework which captures the noisy behavior of side-channels. In this work, we study the security of linear secret sharing schemes with $\delta$-noisy leakage, and show bounds on the mutual information (MI) and statistical bias ($\Delta^{\mathrm{TV}}$) security metrics. Our results are based on the Fourier analytical framework, first used by Benhamouda et al. (Crypto'18), adapted to the $\delta$-noisy leakage model. To give security bounds, we introduce a security parameter $\eta\le \min{\{1,2\delta\}}$, determined by the Fourier linear biases of the posterior distributions of the leaked secret shares. Then, the Poisson summation formula enables us to bound the ratio between the observed leakage for some given secret, and leakage under independence as $(1\pm \eta^t)$. This is then used to show a) $(n,t \ge \tau (n+1))$-threshold schemes over $\mathbb{F}_q$ have at most $\mathcal{O}(q^{-t(\gamma+1-1/\tau)})$ leakage, given $\eta \le q^{-\gamma}$; and consequently b) for $(n,n)$-threshold schemes the guessing advantage is at most $(q-1) \cdot \eta^n \le (q-1)\cdot (2 \delta)^n$. This work can be viewed as a next step towards closing the gap between theory and practice in leakage resilient cryptography.

This paper introduces the structured generic-group model, an extension of Shoup’s generic-group model (from Eurocrypt 1997) to capture algorithms that take advantage of some non-generic structure of the group. We show that any discrete-log algorithm in a group of prime order $q$ that exploits the structure of at most a $\delta$ fraction of group elements, in a way that we precisely define, must run in time $\Omega(\min(\sqrt{q},1/\delta))$. As an application, we prove a tight subexponential-time lower bound against discrete-log algorithms that exploit the multiplicative structure of smooth integers, but that are otherwise generic. This lower bound applies to a broad class of index-calculus algorithms. We prove similar lower bounds against algorithms that exploit the structure of small integers, smooth polynomials, and elliptic-curve points.

Leftover Hash Lemma (LHL) states that \(\mathbf{X} \cdot \mathbf{v}\) for a Gaussian \(\mathbf{v}\) is an essentially independent Gaussian sample. It has seen numerous applications in cryptography for hiding sensitive distributions of \(\mathbf{v}\). We generalise the Gaussian LHL initially stated over \(\mathbb{Z}\) by Agrawal, Gentry, Halevi, and Sahai (2013) to modules over number fields. Our results have a sub-linear dependency on the degree of the number field and require only polynomial norm growth: \(\lVert\mathbf{v}\rVert/\lVert\mathbf{X}\rVert\). To this end, we also prove when \(\mathbf{X}\) is surjective (assuming the Generalised Riemann Hypothesis) and give bounds on the smoothing parameter of the kernel of \(\mathbf{X}\). We also establish when the resulting distribution is independent of the geometry of \(\mathbf{X}\) and establish the hardness of the \(k\)-SIS and \(k\)-LWE problems over modules (\(k\)-MSIS/\(k\)-MLWE) based on the hardness of SIS and LWE over modules (MSIS/MLWE) respectively, which was assumed without proof in prior works.

Functional commitments (FCs) enable a prover to commit to a message and later produce a succinct proof of its image under any given admissible function. Unlike succinct non-interactive arguments (SNARGs), secure FCs can be realised under falsifiable assumptions in the standard model, making them attractive alternatives when fully algebraic constructions are desired. All known algebraic constructions of FC are either lattice-based or pairing-based. While a lattice-based FC for circuits with almost optimal complexities has been recently achieved [Wee, CRYPTO'25], state-of-the-art pairing-based FCs for bounded-width $w$ [Balbás-Catalano-Fiore-Lai (BCFL), TCC'23] and bounded-size $s$ circuits [Wee-Wu, EUROCRYPT'24] require prohibitive public parameter sizes $O(\lambda w^5)$ and $O(\lambda s^5)$, respectively. In this work, we present a new algebraic pairing-based FC which achieves $O(\lambda w^3)$ public parameter size for bounded-width $w$ and unbounded depth $d$ circuits. The construction preserves all nice properties of BCFL: $O(\lambda)$ commitment size, $O(\lambda d^2)$ proof size, additive homomorphism, efficient verification, and chainability. For bounded-size $s$ circuits, we alternatively obtain $O(\lambda s^3)$ public parameters with $O(\lambda d)$ proofs. At the core of our scheme lies a new chainable FC for quadratic functions with commitments computed with respect to a power basis, as well as techniques for switching between different commitment bases.

Is it possible to publicly certify that a string was sampled from a high min-entropy distribution? Certified randomness protocols, such as Brakerski et al. (FOCS 2018) enable private certification—Alice can convince Bob—but it does not yield public certification. We construct a certified min-entropy scheme with the following properties: (1) public certification, so Alice can convince Bob, Charlie, and Dave; (2) all prover–verifier communication is classical; (3) transferability—if Bob has already been convinced, he can subsequently convince Eve and Frank; and (4) classical verification—Grace can be convinced even without a quantum computer, at the cost of losing transferability. Assuming quantum one-shot signatures (and variants), we construct quantum fire with new properties and use it to obtain our publicly certifiable min-entropy scheme. Both primitives can be instantiated from sub-exponential iO and LWE, and our quantum fire scheme is the first standard-model construction of quantum fire.

We present a novel analysis of a quantum algorithm computing the S-unit group for a number field from Eisenträger et al. [EHKS14a] and Biasse and Song [BS16]. We prove that this quantum algorithm runs within polynomial time, where we explicitly quantify the polynomials of the quantum gate and memory complexity (under GRH). We do so by carefully analyzing an implementation of an Continuous Hidden Subgroup Problem (CHSP) oracle function whose period is the (logarithm of the) S-unit group, and provide it to an CHSP-solving algorithm as in [BDF19]. Our analysis is novel due to minimizing the use of the quantum memory-inefficient LLL-reduction, by resorting to strategically chosen precomputations of approximations of high powers of prime ideals. Additionally, we provide a new quantum algorithm computing a discrete Gaussian superposition analogue of the GPV algorithm by Gentry et al. [GPV08]. Lastly, we include a full and rigorous numerical analysis of all parts of the oracle-function computing algorithm, allowing to use fixed-point precision arithmetic and thus to precisely quantify the run-time and memory.

We introduce HyperNova, a new recursive argument for proving incremental computations whose steps are expressed with CCS (Setty et al. ePrint 2023/552), a customizable constraint system that simultaneously generalizes Plonkish, R1CS, and AIR without overheads. HyperNova makes four contributions, each resolving a major problem in the area of recursive arguments. First, it provides a folding scheme for CCS where the prover's cryptographic cost is a single multi-scalar multiplication (MSM) of size equal to the number of variables in the constraint system, which is optimal when using an MSM-based commitment scheme. The folding scheme can fold multiple instances at once, making it easier to build generalizations of IVC such as PCD. Second, when proving program executions on stateful machines (e.g., EVM, RISC-V), the cost of proving a step of a program is proportional only to the size of the circuit representing the instruction invoked by the program step ("a la carte" cost profile). Third, we show how to achieve zero-knowledge for "free" and without the need to employ zero-knowledge SNARKs: we show that Nova's folding scheme has a blinding property that can be used to "randomize" IVC proofs and, more generally, to add zero-knowledge to non-ZK SNARKs, via a protocol we call NovaBlindFold. This highlights a new application of folding schemes. Fourth, we show how to efficiently instantiate HyperNova over a cycle of elliptic curves. For this, we provide a general technique, which we refer to as CycleFold, that applies to all modern folding-scheme-based recursive arguments.

The Middle Product Learning With Errors (MP-LWE) problem was introduced in 2017 by Rosca, Sakzad, Steinfeld, and Stehlé (Crypto 2017). In their work and in a follow up work by Rosca, Stehlé, and Wallet (Eurocrypt 2018), the authors proved that MP-LWE is at least as hard as the Ring-LWE problem over the field $\mathbb{Q}[x]/f(x)$, for an exponentially large class of polynomials $f$ (with fixed degree and bounded coefficients). A few years later, Peikert and Pepin gave a new reduction from Ring-LWE to MP-LWE (Journal of Cryptology 2024). This new reduction improved the results of Rosca et al. by increasing the set of polynomials $f$ for which the reduction holds. However, even though the sets of polynomials covered by both reductions have exponential size, they remain negligible among the set of all polynomials of fixed degree and bounded coefficients. In this work, we provide a refined analysis of the reduction of Rosca et al. Our new analysis shows that the reduction of Rosca et al. actually covers a much larger class of polynomials than what was known before, containing (experimentally) at least $90\%$ of all polynomials of fixed degree and bounded coefficients.

Zero-Knowledge (ZK) protocols have been a subject of intensive study due to their fundamental importance and versatility in modern cryptography. However, the inherently different nature of quantum information significantly alters the landscape, necessitating a re-examination of ZK designs. A crucial aspect of ZK protocols is their round complexity, intricately linked to $\textit{simulation}$, which forms the foundation of their formal definition and security proofs. In the $\textit{post-quantum}$ setting, where honest parties and their communication channels are all classical but the adversaries could be quantum, Chia, Chung, Liu, and Yamakawa [FOCS'21] demonstrated the non-existence of constant-round $\textit{black-box-simulatable}$ ZK arguments (BBZK) for $\mathbf{NP}$ unless $\mathbf{NP} \subseteq \mathbf{BQP}$. However, this problem remains widely open in the full-fledged quantum future that will eventually arrive, where all parties (including the honest ones) and their communication are naturally quantum. Indeed, this problem is of interest to the broader theory of quantum computing. It has been an important theme to investigate how quantum power fundamentally alters traditional computational tasks, such as the $\textit{unconditional}$ security of Quantum Key Distribution and the incorporation of Oblivious Transfers in MiniQCrypt. Moreover, quantum communication has led to round compression for commitments and interactive arguments. Along this line, the above problem is of great significance in understanding whether quantum computing could also change the nature of ZK protocols in some fundamentally manner. We resolved this problem by proving that only languages in $\mathbf{BQP}$ admit constant-round $\textit{fully-quantum}$ BBZK. This result holds significant implications. Firstly, it illuminates the nature of quantum zero-knowledge and provides valuable insights for designing future protocols in the quantum realm. Secondly, it relates ZK round complexity with the intriguing problem of $\mathbf{BQP}$ vs $\mathbf{QMA}$, which is out of the reach of previous analogue impossibility results in the classical or post-quantum setting. Lastly, it justifies the need for the $\textit{non-black-box}$ simulation techniques or the relaxed security notions employed in existing constant-round fully-quantum BBZK protocols.

Sigma protocols are fundamental cryptographic tools, serving as the foundation of many practical schemes—most notably, the Schnorr identification and signature schemes. To prove the security of Sigma protocols, one typically reduces breaking a Sigma protocol to solving a presumed hard problem (e.g., computing the discrete logarithm in a certain group). In many settings, however, these reductions are not tight: given an adversary that breaks a Sigma protocol with probability $\varepsilon$, the reduction only yields an adversary for the underlying problem with probability $\varepsilon^2$. This quadratic loss affects efficiency, as it forces choosing larger security parameters to reach a target security level. In this work, we show that this quadratic loss is inherent for two natural classes of reductions. For interactive protocols, we prove it for uniform-challenge, black-box reductions, which query the adversary using uniformly sampled challenges. For non-interactive protocols (i.e., in the random-oracle model), we prove it for weakly programmable, black-box reductions, which answer the adversary’s oracle queries with uniformly sampled outputs. Applying our bounds to the reductions from Schnorr identification and signatures to discrete logarithm yields lower bounds that match known positive results—namely, the classical worst-case reduction of Pointcheval and Stern (Journal of Cryptology, 2000) and the higher-moment reduction of Rotem and Segev (Journal of Cryptology, 2024). Our approach reduces the analysis of such reductions to the values of simple hitting games—combinatorial games that we introduce. Bounding these games is our main technical contribution, and we believe these bounds can enable more modular proofs of related results.

We study lattice enumeration in rank-$n$ modules over number fields. Building on the refined Euclidean analysis of Hanrot and Stehl\'e (CRYPTO~2007), we develop a module analogue of Kannan--Hanrot--Stehl\'e enumeration. Our approach works directly with pseudo-bases and introduces module counterparts of HKZ reduction and quasi-HKZ reduction. We also extend the notion of a lattice \emph{profile} to the module setting and prove tail-product bounds for the $\mathbb{Z}$-basis obtained from a module-HKZ-reduced pseudo-basis. These bounds yield a strictly improved asymptotic enumeration complexity compared to the naive reduction that views a rank-$n$ module as an $(nd)$-dimensional Euclidean lattice. As a representative consequence, for $K=\mathbb{Q}[x]/\langle x^d+1\rangle$ with $d$ a power of two and a rank-$n$ module $M\subset K^n$ with $n\ge 3$, we show that module-SVP can be solved in time $\Delta_K\cdot n^{\frac{nd}{2e}+o(nd)}$, where $\Delta_K$ is the discriminant of $K$. This improves over the Euclidean enumeration bound $(nd)^{\frac{nd}{2e}+o(nd)}$. As an application, for $R=\mathbb{Z}[x]/\langle x^t+1\rangle$ with $t$ a power of two and an ideal $I\subset R$, we obtain an ideal-SVP algorithm running in time $\exp\!\bigl(\frac{t}{2e}\ln\ln t + O(t)\bigr)$, improving upon the worst-case enumeration bound $\exp\!\bigl(\frac{t}{2e}\ln t + o(t)\bigr)$.

Oblivious ciphertext compression and decompression transform encrypted dense vectors of length $n$ with at most $t$ non-zero entries into compact encrypted sparse representations, and vice versa. These primitives appear in the context of efficient protocols for encrypted search, PIR, and oblivious message retrieval. Existing schemes suffer from large ciphertext sizes or high computational cost. We present new deterministic and perfectly correct constructions based on linear codes, yielding encrypted sparse representations of optimal size with near-linear compression and decompression times. Our results improve both communication and computation over prior work. A central ingredient of our work is to show that, for carefully chosen generalized Reed–Solomon codes, variants of classical decoding algorithms combined with efficient algebraic techniques enable to recover the error vector directly from the syndrome in quasi-linear time in the syndrome length, rather than in the full block length of the code.

Hybrid arguments are prevalent in cryptographic security proofs, however, existing mechanizations in proof assistants are not as general as they could be. In this paper, we prove a general theorem about the admissibility of hybrid arguments that encompasses the query-counting, multi-instance, and nested case. We present three case studies about public-key encryption, which demonstrate the generality of the theorem. The results of this paper are achieved in the setting of state-separating proofs and the theory is integrated into and the case studies are mechanized in Nominal-SSProve.

We present the first algorithm for computing class groups and unit groups of arbitrary number fields that provably runs in probabilistic subexponential time, assuming the Extended Riemann Hypothesis (ERH). Previous subexponential algorithms were either restricted to imaginary quadratic fields, or relied on several heuristic assumptions that have long resisted rigorous analysis. The heart of our method is a new general strategy to provably solve a recurring computational problem in number theory (assuming ERH): given an ideal class $[\mathfrak a]$ of a number field $K$, sample an ideal $\mathfrak b \in [\mathfrak a]$ belonging to a particular family of ideals (e.g., the family of smooth ideals, or near-prime ideals). More precisely, let $\mathcal{S}$ be an arbitrary family of ideals, and $\mathcal{S}_B$ the family of $B$-smooth ideals. We describe an efficient algorithm that samples ideals $\mathfrak b \in [\mathfrak a]$ such that $\mathfrak b \in \mathcal{S}\cdot\mathcal{S}_B$ with probability proportional to the density of $\mathcal{S}$ within the set of all ideals. The case where $\mathcal{S}$ is the set of prime ideals yields the family $\mathcal{S}\cdot\mathcal{S}_B$ of near-prime ideals, of particular interest in that it constitutes a dense family of efficiently factorable ideals. The case of smooth ideals $\mathcal{S} = \mathcal{S}_B$ regularly comes up in index-calculus algorithms (notably to compute class groups and unit groups), where it has long constituted a theoretical obstacle overcome only by heuristic arguments.

We give new algorithms for tree evaluation (S. Cook et al. TOCT 2012) in the catalytic-computing model (Buhrman et al. STOC 2014). Two existing approaches aim to solve tree evaluation in low space: on the one hand, J. Cook and Mertz (STOC 2024) give an algorithm for TreeEval running in super-logarithmic space $O(\log n\log\log n)$ and super-polynomial time $n^{O(\log\log n)}$. On the other hand, a simple reduction from TreeEval to circuit evaluation, combined with the result of Buhrman et al. (STOC 2014), gives a catalytic algorithm for TreeEval running in logarithmic $O(\log n)$ free space and polynomial time, but with polynomial catalytic space. We show that the latter result can be improved. We give a catalytic algorithm for TreeEval with logarithmic $O(\log n)$ free space, polynomial runtime, and subpolynomial $2^{\log^\epsilon n}$ catalytic space (for any $\epsilon > 0$). Our result opens a new line of attack on putting TreeEval in logspace, and immediately implies an improved simulation of time by catalytic space, by the reduction of Williams (STOC 2025). Our catalytic TreeEval algorithm is inspired by a connection to matching-vector families and private information retrieval, and improved constructions of (uniform) matching-vector families would imply improvements to our algorithm.

Classical non-interactive secure computation, despite being extensively studied, suffers from an inherent barrier: adversaries can learn the entire residual function via resetting attacks. We investigate whether quantum resources can circumvent this barrier and restrict adversarial leakage. Our results are as follows: 1. $\textbf{Definitions}$: We introduce new security definitions for the one-message MPC and 2PC settings that restrict the amount of adversarial leakage compared to prior classical definitions. 2. $\textbf{MPC}$: There exist information-theoretically secure one-message multi-party computation protocols in the oracle model in both the quantum pre-processing and classical pre-processing settings. 3. $\textbf{2PC}$: There exist semi-honest secure one-message two-party computation for (randomized) pseudorandom functionalities in the plain model based on LWE and maliciously secure one-message two-party computation for (randomized) constrained functionalities in the CRS model based on iO. Prior work by [Gupte, Liu, Raizes, Roberts and, Vaikuntanathan STOC 2025] achieved semi-honest security based on iO. Our results demonstrate the power of quantum information to circumvent barriers in classical secure computation.

Quantum one-time programs, introduced by Broadbent, Gutowski, and Stebila [CRYPTO 2013], is a compiler that takes as input a program $f$ and converts it into a quantum state $\sigma_f$ such that given $\sigma_f$, it is possible to only obtain the output of $f$ on a single input. Our goal is to investigate the class of functionalities for which we can design one-time programs in the plain model. We show the following: 1. We show that, assuming learning with errors, one-time programs for (randomized) pseudorandom functionalities exist in the plain model. In contrast, the result by Gupte, Liu, Raizes, Roberts, and Vaikuntanathan [STOC 2025] relied upon indistinguishability obfuscation. 2. We show that, assuming indistinguishability obfuscation, one-time programs for any class of randomized functionalities exist in the plain model, as long as the class of functionalities satisfy a natural security notion called constrained security. Additionally, we give constructions of one-time encryption and one-time message authentication codes based on learning with errors. Finally, we show that a novel variant of one-time programs imply one-message secure two-party computation protocols for non-trivial functionalities in the CRS model.

We study the implications of the existence of weak Zero-Knowledge (ZK) protocols for worst-case hard languages. These are protocols that have completeness, soundness, and zero-knowledge errors (denoted $\epsilon_c$, $\epsilon_s$, and $\epsilon_z$, respectively) that might not be negligible. Under the assumption that there are worst-case hard languages in NP, we show the following: 1. If all languages in NP have NIZK proofs or arguments satisfying $ \epsilon_c+\epsilon_s+\epsilon_z < 1 $, then One-Way Functions (OWFs) exist. This covers all possible non-trivial values for these error rates. It additionally implies that if all languages in NP have such NIZK proofs and ec is negligible, then they also have NIZK proofs where all errors are negligible. Previously, these results were known under the more restrictive condition $ \epsilon_c+\sqrt{\epsilon_s}+\epsilon_z < 1 $ [Chakraborty et al., CRYPTO 2025]. 2. If all languages in NP have k-round public-coin ZK proofs or arguments satisfying $ \epsilon_c+\epsilon_s+(2k-1)\epsilon_z < 1 $, then OWFs exist. 3. If, for some constant k, all languages in NP have k-round public-coin ZK proofs or arguments satisfying $ \epsilon_c+\epsilon_s+k\epsilon_z < 1 $, then infinitely-often OWFs exist.

Formal methods are becoming an important tool for ensuring correctness and security of cryptographic constructions. However, the support for certain advanced proof techniques, namely rewinding, is scarce among existing verification frameworks, which hinders their application to complex schemes such as multi-party signatures and zero-knowledge proofs. We expand the support for rewinding in EasyCrypt by implementing a version of the general forking lemma by Bellare and Neven. We demonstrate its usability by proving EUF-CMA security of Schnorr signatures.

The current standardization calls for threshold signatures have highlighted the need for appropriate security notions providing security guarantees strong enough for broad application. To address this, Bellare et al. [Crypto'22] put forward a hierarchy of unforgeability notions for threshold signatures. Recently, Navot and Tessaro [Asiacrypt'24] introduced a new game-based definition of strong (one-more) unforgeability for threshold signatures, which however does not achieve Bellare's strongest level of security. Navot and Tessaro analyzed several existing schemes w.r.t. their strong unforgeability security notion, but all positive results rely on idealized models. This is in contrast to the weaker security notion of (standard) unforgeability, for which standard-model constructions exist. This leaves open a fundamental question: is getting strong unforgeability fundamentally harder than standard unforgeability for threshold signatures? In this paper we bridge this gap, by showing a generic construction lifting any unforgeable threshold signature scheme to strong unforgeability. The building blocks of our construction can be instantiated in the standard model under standard assumptions. The achieved notion of strong unforgeability extends the definition of Navot and Tessaro to achieve the strongest level of security according to the hierarchy of Bellare et al. (following a recent classification of security notions for (blind) threshold signatures by Lehmann, Nazarian, and Özbay [Eurocrypt'25]). The starting point for our transformation is an existing construction for single-user signatures from chameleon hash functions by Steinfeld, Pieprzyk and Wang [RSA'07]. We first simplify their construction by relying on a stronger security notion for chameleon hash functions. The bulk of our technical contribution is then to translate this framework into the threshold setting. Towards this goal, we introduce a game-based definition for threshold chameleon hash functions (TCHF) and provide a construction of TCHF that is secure under DLOG in the standard model. We believe that our new notion of TCHF might also be of independent interest.

A random local function defined by a $d$-ary predicate $P$ is one where each output bit is computed by applying $P$ to $d$ randomly chosen bits of its input. These represent natural distributions of instances for constraint satisfaction problems. They were put forward by Goldreich as candidates for low-complexity one-way functions, and have subsequently been widely studied also as potential pseudo-random generators. We present a new search-to-decision reduction for random local functions defined by any predicate of constant arity. Given any efficient algorithm that can distinguish, with advantage $\epsilon$, the output of a random local function with $m$ outputs and $n$ inputs from random, our reduction produces an efficient algorithm that can invert such functions with $\tilde{O}(m(n/\epsilon)^2)$ outputs, succeeding with probability $\Omega(\epsilon)$. This implies that if a family of local functions is one-way, then a related family with shorter output length is family of pseudo-random generators. Prior to our work, all such reductions that were known required the predicate to have additional sensitivity properties, whereas our reduction works for any predicate. Our results also generalise to some super-constant values of the arity $d$, and to noisy predicates.

Language models now routinely produce text that is difficult to distinguish from human writing, raising the need for robust tools to verify content provenance. Watermarking has emerged as a promising countermeasure, with existing work largely focused on model quality preservation and robust detection. However, current schemes provide limited protection against false attribution. We strengthen the notion of soundness by introducing two novel guarantees: unforgeability and recoverability. Unforgeability prevents adversaries from crafting false positives, texts that are far from any output from the watermarked model but are nonetheless flagged as watermarked. Recoverability provides an additional layer of protection: whenever a watermark is detected, the detector identifies the source text from which the flagged content was derived. Together, these properties strengthen content ownership by linking content exclusively to its generating model, enabling secure attribution and fine-grained traceability. We construct the first undetectable watermarking scheme that is robust, unforgeable, and recoverable with respect to substitutions (i.e., perturbations in Hamming metric). The key technical ingredient is a new cryptographic primitive called robust (or recoverable) digital signatures, which allow verification of messages that are close to signed ones, while preventing forgery of messages that are far from all previously signed messages. We show that any standard digital signature scheme can be boosted to a robust one using property-preserving hash functions (Boyle, LaVigne, and Vaikuntanathan, ITCS 2019).

Secure rate-distortion-perception (RDP) trade-offs are relevant for applications such as semantic compression, where the perceptual quality needs to be maximized. We study a framework for secure RDP over an ideal public communication channel in the presence of an eavesdropper, where the legitimate parties also have access to side information correlated with the source. The exact rate region for the secure RDP trade-off is established when both the encoder and the decoder have access to the side information. We then characterize an inner bound when only the decoder has access to the side information and establish the exact region for a special case. Moreover, we provide an RDP example to illustrate remarkable gains in communication rate due to common randomness, which is not possible to obtain for rate-distortion trade-offs. Our results show that binning-based schemes can achieve high perceptual quality, low distortion, and strong secrecy simultaneously, establishing the information-theoretic limits for next-generation trustworthy semantic compression systems.

In this work, we study the pseudorandomness of the bounded Knapsack function family defined over a number ring ${R}$. We establish that if the Knapsack function family is one-way and certain related folded Knapsack function families are pseudorandom, then the original Knapsack is pseudorandom. This can be seen as a generalisation of the work of Micciancio and Mol presented at the CRYPTO-2011, for the case of Knapsack function families defined over arbitrary number ring.

Evolving secret sharing allows a dealer to share a secret message between a growing number of $n$ parties. Crucially, the dealer does not know an upper bound on $n$, neither it knows the access structure before party $n$ arrives; furthermore, the dealer is not allowed to update the shares of old parties. We construct new secret sharing schemes for so-called evolving (weighted) threshold access, in which the arrival of party $n$ determines the number of parties $t_n \le n$ that are required in order to reconstruct the secret. We also consider the more general case in which party $n$ has associated a weight $w_n$ with logarithmic size, and the authorized subsets of parties are those for which the sum of the corresponding weights exceeds the current threshold $t_n$. In particular, we obtain: - A secret sharing scheme for evolving threshold access structures with adaptive privacy in the plain model, and with share size $\mathsf{poly}(\lambda,\log n)$. This construction requires one-way functions (OWFs) and indistinguishability obfuscation (iO) for Turing machines. - A secret sharing scheme for evolving weighted threshold access structures with adaptive privacy in the plain model, and with share size $\mathsf{poly}(\lambda,\log W_n)$ where $W_n$ is the sum of the weights up to party $n$. This construction requires OWFs and iO for Turing machines, and additionally assumes that the weights are fixed (i.e., cannot change over time). - A secret sharing scheme for evolving weighted threshold access structures with static privacy in the plain model, and with share size $\mathsf{poly}(\lambda,\log W_n)$. This construction allows the weight of old parties to change over time, but it requires somewhere statistically binding hash functions and achieves only static privacy. Previous constructions of secret sharing schemes for evolving (weighted) threshold access structures achieved (much worse) share sizes linear in $W_n$ (and in the security parameter) and, when considering adaptive privacy, they require the random oracle model.

In this note, we improve the space-efficient variant of Regev's quantum factoring algorithm [Reg23] proposed by Ragavan and Vaikuntanathan [RV24] by constant factors in space and/or size. This allows us to bridge the significant gaps in concrete efficiency between the circuits by [Reg23] and [RV24]; [Reg23] uses far fewer gates, while [RV24] uses far fewer qubits. The main observation is that the space-efficient quantum modular exponentiation technique by [RV24] can be modified to work with more general sequences of integers than the Fibonacci numbers. We parametrize this in terms of a linear recurrence relation, and through this formulation construct three different circuits for quantum factoring: - A circuit that uses $\approx 10.4n$ qubits and $\approx 45.7n^{1/2}$ multiplications of $n$-bit integers. - A circuit that uses $(9+\epsilon)n$ qubits and $O_\epsilon(n^{1/2})$ multiplications of $n$-bit integers, for any $\epsilon > 0$. - A circuit that uses $(24+\epsilon)n^{1/2}$ multiplications of $n$-bit integers, and $O_\epsilon(n)$ qubits, for any $\epsilon > 0$. In comparison, the original circuit by [Reg23] uses at least $\approx 3n^{3/2}$ qubits and $\approx 6n^{1/2}$ multiplications of $n$-bit integers, while the space-efficient variant by [RV24] uses $\approx 10.32n$ qubits and $\approx 129.6n^{1/2}$ multiplications of $n$-bit integers (although a very simple modification of their Fibonacci-based circuit uses $\approx 11.32n$ qubits and only $\approx 86.4n^{1/2}$ multiplications of $n$-bit integers). The improvements proposed in this note take effect for sufficiently large values of $n$; it remains to be seen whether they can also provide benefits for practical problem sizes.

We provide two improvements to Regev's quantum factoring algorithm (Journal of the ACM 2025), addressing its space efficiency and its noise-tolerance. Our first contribution is to improve the quantum space efficiency of Regev's algorithm while keeping the circuit size the same. Our main result constructs a quantum factoring circuit using $O(n \log n)$ qubits and $O(n^{3/2} \log n)$ gates. We achieve the best of Shor and Regev (upto a logarithmic factor in the space complexity): on the one hand, Regev's circuit requires $O(n^{3/2})$ qubits and $O(n^{3/2} \log n)$ gates, while Shor's circuit requires $O(n^2 \log n)$ gates but only $O(n \log n)$ qubits. As with Regev, to factor an $n$-bit integer $N$, we run our circuit independently $O(\sqrt{n})$ times and apply Regev's classical postprocessing procedure. Our optimization is achieved by implementing efficient and reversible exponentiation with Fibonacci numbers in the exponent, rather than the usual powers of 2, adapting work by Kaliski (arXiv:1711.02491) from the classical reversible setting to the quantum setting. This technique also allows us to perform quantum modular exponentiation that is efficient in both space and size without requiring significant precomputation, a result that may be useful for other quantum algorithms. A key ingredient of our exponentiation implementation is an efficient circuit for a function resembling \emph{in-place} quantum-quantum modular multiplication. This implementation works with only black-box access to any quantum circuit for \emph{out-of-place} modular multiplication, which we believe is yet another result of potentially broader interest. Our second contribution is to show that Regev's classical postprocessing procedure can be modified to tolerate a constant fraction of the quantum circuit runs being corrupted by errors. In contrast, Regev's analysis of his classical postprocessing procedure requires all $O(\sqrt{n})$ runs to be successful. In a nutshell, we achieve this using lattice reduction techniques to detect and filter out corrupt samples.

Zero-knowledge virtual machines (zkVMs) must correctly model all edge cases of lowlevel machine instructions, including division and remainder, while keeping algebraic constraints simple enough for efficient STARK proving. This work presents a focused but meaningful redesign of the DivRemChip used in the SP1 zkVM (as adapted to rWasm) to implement WASM’s 32-bit division and remainder instructions (i32.div{u,s}, i32.rem{u,s}) over the BabyBear field. Our chip remains local (single-row AIR) and is purpose-built so that all “small aggregate” expressions are strictly bounded by the BabyBear modulus, allowing us to use inverses securely without ever inverting zero. We replace heavier constant-equality logic and trap gadgets with: (a) a lightweight small-aggregate zero-test for magnitudes that is sound in BabyBear, (b) a simple, byte-level mechanism for detecting the special value INT MIN using only degree-2 constraints, (c) a low-degree test for c = −1 based on checking |c| = 1 together with the sign bit, and (d) a constraint pattern ensuring that divide-by-zero and the overflow case i32.div s(INT MIN,-1) are not provable, matching WASM trap semantics. The resulting AIR has maximal degree 3, removes all “invert-zero” failure modes in BabyBear, and enforces the correct semantics for every non-trapping instruction. A malicious prover test framework based on the SP1 CPU bus shows that any incorrect witness causes constraint failure, while honest execution traces for extensive boundary tests and mixed programs produce valid proofs over BabyBear. Our design also improves efficiency: the trace width drops from 102 to 74 columns, all Mul/Add/Lt/MSB cross-chip calls are removed, and each row requires only a single CPU-bus interaction. Prover benchmarks on unsigned, signed, and mixed workloads with up to 125,000 division/remainder operations show a consistent 4–6% reduction in single-threaded proving time compared to the original SP1 DivRemChip as adapted to rWasm, with a paired t-test across program sizes confirming that the improvement is statistically significant at the 95% confidence level.

A recent “dimension padding” note proposes a structural countermeasure to linear inversion in a dual-public-key code-based encryption construction. The note argues that padding makes the private parity structure non-identifiable from the public key and suggests phrasing security in terms of this non-identifiability. This comment points out that non-identifiability of a particular trapdoor representation does not prevent message recovery. In the padded construction, the public relations used for decryption remain linear constraints. Any solution to these public constraints suffices to recover the encryption randomness and then the plaintext by linear algebra. Consequently, public-key-only decryption remains polynomial-time

We study the approximate Hermite Shortest Vector Problem (HSVP) in ideal lattices in orders of quaternion algebras. For one- and two-sided ideals respectively, we show that for almost all ideals we may solve HSVP in a sublattice of dimension at most one half (respectively, one quarter) of the original lattice dimension, with only small losses in the approximation factor. For two-sided ideals in a cryptographically-relevant family of maximal orders, we obtain approximation factors independent of the algebraic norm of the ideal. For one-sided ideals, we obtain a similar result for a large and natural family of ideal lattices. Finally, we turn our mathematical results into algorithms, and give an unconditional quantum polynomial time algorithm to solve HSVP in ideals of maximal orders of quaternion algebras, given an oracle for HSVP in ideals of maximal orders of number fields, in lower dimension.

In this note, we consider a perspective on adversary running times that fixes the adversary's running time to be $2^\kappa$, and then asks: to achieve security against such an adversary, what running time in terms of $\kappa$ do honest parties need? This perspective gives rise to a new natural class of adversary running times that we call \emph{quasi-exponential} time adversaries.

Standard definitions of Knowledge Soundness for Incrementally Verifiable Computation (IVC) are formulated to accommodate rewinding based analysis, effectively limiting their security guarantees to bounded (logarithmic) recursion depths. We demonstrate that this limitation is critical: we construct an artificial IVC scheme that satisfies this standard, bounded-depth definition but becomes efficiently forgeable when the recursion extends to a polynomial scale. This finding exposes a theoretical gap in Nova (CRYPTO '22), leaving its intended unbounded usage theoretically unfounded. We bridge this gap by establishing the Polynomial-depth Knowledge Soundness of Nova. Our analysis framework is anchored in the Extended Algebraic Group Model (EAGM). Specifically, the EAGM extends the algebraic requirement to intermediate values involved in algebraic operations, allowing the extractor to reconstruct the recursive witness directly from the representations of these internal operations to bypass the exponential overhead of rewinding. Leveraging this extraction capability, we crucially depart from standard Fiat-Shamir analyses that rely on the Random Oracle Model (ROM) to guarantee that the extracted witnesses satisfy the intended relations. While the ROM is theoretically uninstantiable and necessitates heuristic realizations, we instead enforce the validity of the extracted witnesses using the General Zero-Testing (GZT) property. This property replaces the random oracle with a targeted requirement offering a plausible pathway to standard-model instantiation, providing the first rigorous security foundation for recursive proof systems in unbounded use cases.

The celebrated work of Impagliazzo and Rudich (STOC'89) provides an oracle separation between those primitives implied by a random oracle (RO) and those that imply key agreement and public-key cryptography. For the last 36 years, this result seemed to cleanly separate two worlds: Minicrypt, which is often described as what can be achieved from only ROs, and Cryptomania, which is a world where public-key cryptography exists. This work presents a natural primitive, called an oblivious interactive hash function (OIHF), and shows the following: (1) OIHFs can be constructed from ROs. (2) OIHFs can be constructed from oblivious transfer (OT), and hence they are implied by various well-studied public-key-style assumptions. (3) The existence of an OIHF implies OT, via a non-black-box reduction. Point (1) places the primitive into Minicrypt, point (2) implies that numerous well-studied standard-model complexity assumptions imply that OIHFs exist, and point (3) shows that this primitive circumvents the barrier imposed by Impagliazzo and Rudich. Our results show that a protocol constructible in Minicrypt implies OT. However, this *does not* imply that OT can be constructed from RO; indeed, Impagliazzo/Rudich shows this is impossible. Our non-black-box reduction is well-defined only for standard-model OIHFs, i.e. ones that do not use RO, and at present we can only construct standard-model OIHF in Cryptomania. This is to say that we do not propose an OT protocol that can be constructed from a cryptographic hash function. Rather, our results call into question the value of the random oracle model as an idealization of Minicrypt, and they question where the boundaries of Minicrypt lie.

We propose a compositional shallow translation from an impredicative first-order logic with equality, into polynomials; that is, we give a direct, compositional, arithmetic notion of first-order logic validity. Arithmetisation means translating validity of some assertion φ of a model M , into some property Rₘ of a polynomial P (φ, M ), such that (to a high degree of certainty) φ is valid in M if and only if Rₘ holds of P (φ, M ). Arithmetisation is widely used in cryptography, because many cryptographic protocols work by exploiting properties of finite fields to prove assertions like “R holds of a polynomial P ” — a typical property R is ‘has roots in 1, . . . , kₘ’, where kₘ is determined by the cardinality of M . Meanwhile, first-order logic is a simple but expressive language for specifying and reasoning about computation. In particular, it is easily powerful enough to express inductive definitions, Turing-complete computation, and correctness properties thereof. We can think of first-order logic as a high-level, virtual-machine-independent model of reasoning and computation. Techniques already exist to arithmetise computation by coding it in an abstract machine whose computation has been arithmetised by hand; i.e. by a deep embedding in some preconstructed monolithic cryptographic artefact. What distinguishes our translation is its shallowness, compositionality, and uniform treatment of logical connectives: it translates logical connectives directly to operations on polynomials, without a deep encoding in an abstract machine. The translation is deceptively straightforward: truth maps to 0, false maps to any strictly positive number, conjunction and universal quantification map to +, and disjunction and existential quantification map to ∗. Yet, we shall see that the outcome is surprisingly powerful and expressive.

In this work, we propose a novel systematic approach for obtaining leftover hash lemmas (LHLs) over cyclotomic rings. Such LHLs build a fundamental tool in lattice-based cryptography, both in theoretical reductions as well as in the design of cryptographic primitives. The scattered set of prior works makes it difficult to navigate the landscape and requires a substantial effort to understand the mathematical constraints under which the LHL holds over cyclotomic rings. This is especially painful if one’s given setting does not fit exactly into prior studies. We argue that all prior approaches boil down to two different proof strategies, resulting in two main theorems. From there on, we are able to recover all previous flavours of seemingly independent LHLs as corollaries. Moreover, we showcase the power of our interpretation by providing new statements, covering mathematical settings not considered before. Our work further proves LHLs in the presence of leakage for both approaches and provides novel bounds for wide families of leakage functions.

When Nakamoto invented Bitcoin, the first generation of cryptocurrencies followed it in applying POW (Proof of Work) consensus mechanism; due to its excessive energy consumption and heavy carbon footprints, new innovations evolved like Proof of Space, POS (Proof of Stake), and a lot more with many variants for each. Furthermore, the emergence of more blockchain applications and kinds beyond just cryptocurrencies needed more consensus mechanisms that is optimized to fit requirements of each application or blockchain kind; examples range from IoT (Internet of Things) blockchains for sustainability applications that often use variants of BFT (Byzantine Fault Tolerance) algorithm, and consensus needed to relay transactions and/or assets between different blockchains in interoperability solutions. Previous studies concentrated on surveying and/or proposing different blockchain consensus rules, on a specific consensus issue like attacks, randomization, or on deriving theoretical results. Starting from discussing most important theoretical results, this paper tries to gather and organize all significant existing material about consensus in the blockchain world explaining design challenges, tradeoffs and research areas. We realize that the topic could fit for a complete textbook, so we summarize the basic concepts and support with tables and appendices. Then we highlight some case examples from interoperability solutions to show how flexible and wide the design space is to fit both general and special purpose systems. The aim is to provide researchers with a comprehensive overview of the topic, along with the links to go deeper into every detail.

Automated verification of side-channel security is essential as countermeasures and protected schemes grow in complexity, and as developers increasingly rely on LLMs to generate security-critical code. In these settings, independent verification serves as a dependable security check, assuring the absence of security vulnerabilities. However, existing verification tools support only a narrow class of masking countermeasures due to fundamental technical limitations. For example, current tools fail to verify many instances of masking countermeasures, as well as entire classes of polynomial, inner-product, or code-based masking schemes in general. These practical countermeasures and schemes are particularly interesting as many of them offer stronger resistance to practical side-channel attacks, yet they remain out of reach of formal verification. We close this gap with a sound, field-agnostic verification approach that, for the first time, automatically checks standard side-channel security notions for all common masking schemes, including polynomial, inner-product, and all variants of code-based masking. In addition to addressing the inherently distinct algebraic structure of these schemes, our method relies on a new proof rule within a general proof system for establishing the joint probabilistic independence of expressions. We implement our approach in the tool eVer and evaluate it on masked algorithms previously beyond the reach of automated verification, including BGW, LaOla, inner-product, and general code-based-masked multiplication algorithms.

Multiscalar multiplication on elliptic curves is used in wide cryptographic domains such as digital signatures, zero knowledge proofs, and verifiable computation, where it enables efficient and secure cryptographic protocols. In this work, we present two methods for optimizing multi scalar multiplication over elliptic curves. The first method is used when $3^d - 1$ points of the target curve can be stored. The second method is suitable for large values of $d$, where storing $3^d - 1$ points becomes infeasible. Our first method achieves up to $24\%$ better performance on elliptic curves with efficient tripling, speeding up ECDSA signing by $2.88\times$ and verification by $1.67\times$. The second method achieves an efficiency improvement of $11.34\%$ compared to the similar existing approach. These improvements are supported by operation counts and practical benchmarks.

Idealized models such as the Random Oracle Model and the Generic Group Model underpin much of modern provable security. The Algebraic Group Model (AGM) of Fuchsbauer, Kiltz, and Loss (CRYPTO 2018) attempts to bridge the gap to the standard model by forcing adversaries to justify every new group element via a linear representation in its inputs, and it was leveraged in many follow-up works. Lipmaa, Parisella, and Siim (TCC 2023) strengthened this framework to the AGM with Oblivious Sampling (AGMOS), which additionally lets attackers obtain random group elements without the knowledge of their discrete logarithms, reflecting the practical availability of hashing to the group via admissible encodings. Although several works already rely on AGMOS, the security arguments are still ad hoc, and it is unclear whether an AGM proof automatically extends to this richer setting. We initiate a systematic study of this question. Our main result is a generic lifting theorem: For any assumption whose verification predicate satisfies a simple structural lifting condition, every AGM reduction remains sound in AGMOS under the Find Polynomial Representation (FPR) and Tensor Oracle Find Representation (TOFR) assumptions. The lifting condition is met by a broad class of algebraic protocols. As illustrations, we lift from the AGM to the AGMOS (i) the knowledge soundness of KZG-like polynomial commitments and (ii) the security of the multivariate Adaptive Rational Strong Diffie–Hellman (ARSDH). Our results clarify the precise relationship between AGM and AGMOS and provide a black-box recipe for future work: once a proof is obtained in the AGM, one can often inherit AGMOS security with negligible additional effort. This both streamlines the use of AGMOS in forthcoming work and reinforces the confidence that schemes proven secure in the AGM remain robust when oblivious sampling is available.

We propose a generalization of homomorphic encryption (HE) schemes from a purely geometrical and lattice-based perspective. Most of the current reference HE schemes are based on the Learning with Errors (LWE) problem or structured versions thereof. In this proposal, we first investigate LWE-based cryptosystems from a lattice point of view and present a framework that allows to obtain the same result, in geometrical terms, from any lattice - as long as it contains a sufficiently short trapdoor vector. More precisely, we generalize the classical BGV (Brakerski, Gentry and Vaikuntanathan, ITCS '12) and GSW (Gentry, Sahai and Waters, CRYPTO '14) schemes to purely lattice-based variants, which we call Lattice-BGV and Lattice-GSW. By abstracting away the particular hardness assumption, our lattice framework allows to be instantiated with a broader range of lattice families and hardness assumptions. For example, LWE gives a natural trapdoor for random $q$-ary lattices, and when plugged into our framework one obtains the original BGV and GSW schemes, while in this work we will also consider an instantiation based on the Lattice Isomorphism Problem (LIP), leading to the first more advanced cryptographic scheme build from LIP*. Our framework also gives a geometrical and natural explanation of HE procedures and generalizes some properties, such as message packing, the ability to store many messages in a single ciphertext, without relying on any particular algebraic structure. * In a concurrent work Branco, Malavolta and Maradni (TCC '25) propose an alternative LIP-based FHE construction.

We study succinct non-interactive arguments of proximity (SNAP), which allow a prover to convince a verifier that a statement is true through a short message. Moreover, the verifier reads only a sublinear number of bits of the statement, and soundness is required to hold against polynomial-time adversaries when the statement is $\epsilon$-far from any true statements. SNAPs can be seen as the natural analog of property testing in the context of succinct non-interactive arguments (SNARGs). We obtain both positive and negative results for SNAPs. - Adaptive SNAPs for P and NP: For any $\epsilon \in (0, 1)$, we construct the first adaptively sound SNAPs for P with $\epsilon$-proximity based on standard assumptions: LWE or subexponential DDH or DLIN over bilinear maps. Our proof size, verifier’s query complexity, and verification time are $n^{1/2 + o(1)}\cdot \mathsf{poly}(\lambda)$, where $n$ is the length of the statement and $\lambda$ is the security parameter. By additionally assuming sub-exponentially secure indistinguishability obfuscation, we upgrade this result to SNAPs for NP with essentially the same parameters. Previously, we only had non-adaptively sound SNAPs for P in the designated verifier setting with $O(n^{1-\delta})$ proof size, query complexity, and verification time for some constant $\delta > 0$. - Lower Bound: We show that our parameters in the adaptive soundness setting are nearly optimal, up to an $n^{o(1)} \cdot \mathsf{poly}(\lambda)$ factor: in any adaptive SNAP for P, the product of proof size and verifier query complexity must be $\Omega(n)$. Our lower bound is unconditional. - Fully Succinct Non-adaptive SNAPs for NP: For any constant $\epsilon \in (0, 1)$, we construct the first non-adaptively sound SNAPs for NP with $\epsilon$-proximity, based on learning with errors and indistinguishability obfuscation. The proof size, verifier’s query complexity, and verification time in our constructions are fixed polynomials in the security parameter. We also show that restricting such SNAPs to just P would already imply non-adaptively sound SNARGs for NP. Central to our SNAP constructions is a new notion of commitment of proximity, which enables sublinear-time verification of the commitment. To derive our unconditional lower bound, we adopt and generalize theorems from oracle-presampling techniques in the random oracle literature. Both techniques may be of independent interest.

In non-synchronous networks, partitioning arguments show that $t$-resilient protocols among $n$ processes can typically not guarantee safety when the number of malicious processes $f$ is $\geq n - 2t$. This fragility motivates augmenting such protocols with accountability schemes to deter safety violations. So far however, such schemes have been limited in their verifiability, scalability or privacy. This paper presents $\tau_{zk\text{-}scr}$, a universal compiler that circumvents such limitations. The compiler transforms any protocol $\mathcal{P}$, that is secure against semi-honest crash-failure adversaries, into a Byzantine-tolerant, accountable counterpart $\bar{\mathcal{P}}$. Essentially, we devise $\tau_{zk\text{-}scr}$ by deconstructing the celebrated CLOS compiler (STOC 2002), observing that each resulting component is ``easily accountable'', and globally propagating the accountability through the reconstruction. The guarantees provided by $\tau_{zk\text{-}scr}$ are defined with respect to a resilience threshold $t_{\epsilon} = \lceil n (\frac{1}{3}-\epsilon) \rceil - 1$, for any $\epsilon \geq 0$. $\bar{\mathcal{P}}$ preserves the hyperproperties of $\mathcal{P}$, including privacy, input-independence, correctness, and output delivery, whenever $f \leq t_{\epsilon}$. If $f > t_{\epsilon}$, then either: (1) $\bar{\mathcal{P}}$ emulates $\mathcal{P}$, in the sense that all its hypersafety properties are preserved, though output delivery may not occur; or (2) all correct processes obtain externally verifiable proofs of misbehavior involving a significant subset of faulty parties. By adjusting its parameters, $\tau_{zk\text{-}scr}$ achieves various trade-offs. Assuming a transparent setup, for any strictly positive constant $\epsilon \in \Omega(1)$, the most efficient instantiation provides security against a 1-delayed-adaptive adversary (i.e., where corruption decisions are postponed just long enough to allow messages in transit to be delivered) with $o(n^2)$ multiplicative communication overhead. Our results are formalized and proven following the Accountable Universal Composability (AUC) blueprint (S&P 2023), an extension of UC designed to support modular analysis of accountability guarantees.

In this paper, we prove that the supersingular isogeny problem (Isogeny), endomorphism ring problem (EndRing) and maximal order problem (MaxOrder) are equivalent under probabilistic polynomial time reductions, unconditionally. Isogeny-based cryptography is founded on the presumed hardness of these problems, and their interconnection is at the heart of the design and analysis of cryptosystems like the SQIsign digital signature scheme. Previously known reductions relied on unproven assumptions such as the generalized Riemann hypothesis. In this work, we present unconditional reductions, and extend this network of equivalences to the problem of computing the lattice of all isogenies between two supersingular elliptic curves (HomModule). For cryptographic applications, one requires computational problems to be hard on average for random instances. It is well-known that if Isogeny is hard (in the worst case), then it is hard for random instances. We extend this result by proving that if any of the above-mentionned classical problems is hard in the worst case, then all of them are hard on average. In particular, if there exist hard instances of Isogeny, then all of Isogeny, EndRing, MaxOrder and HomModule are hard on average.

Constrained PRFs are PRFs that allow the generation of constrained keys, which can be used to evaluate the PRF on a subset of the inputs. The PRF is still pseudorandom for an adversary who obtains multiple of these constrained keys on all inputs where none of the constrained keys allow it to evaluate the PRF. Constrained PRFs are known for some simple constraint classes (such as puncturing or intervals) from one-way functions, but for more powerful constraint classes, such as bitfixing, the only known constructions need heavy machinery, like indistinguishability obfuscation or multilinear maps. In this work we show that constrained PRFs (for any constraint class) do not imply key agreement in a black-box way with an oracle separation. The result also applies to delegatable constrained PRFs, where constrained keys can be used to generate other, more restrictive constrained keys. We show that this result has interesting implications for identity-based cryptography, where users obtain secret keys from a trusted, central authority. Namely, it shows that primitives that allow key agreement in this setting, like identity-based non-interactive key exchange and a weaker variant of identity-based encryption that we introduce in this work, do not imply key agreement and thus can exist even in a world where traditional key agreement and public-key encryption is impossible.

Arithmetic correlations represent the extension of classical correlations into the with-carry setting and serve as a critical performance criterion for pseudorandom sequences constructed via feedback with carry shift registers. The arithemetic correlation values should be as small as possible for application perspective. This paper establishes a sufficient condition for $N$-ary sequences to have ideal arithmetic correlation. Based on this characterization, it is demonstrated that $N$-ary $\ell$-sequences with a prime connection integer $p$ satisfying $p\equiv1(\textup{mod}\:N)$ exhibit ideal arithmetic correlation. Furthermore, under the condition $N^{p-1}\not\equiv1(\textup{mod}\:p^{2})$, this result is extended to the case where the connection integer is a prime power. Additionally, an upper bound is established for the arithmetic crosscorrelation of binary sequences derived from Fermat quotients with coprime periods.

One-shot signatures (OSS) were defined by Amos, Georgiou, Kiayias, and Zhandry (STOC'20). These allow for signing exactly one message, after which the signing key self-destructs, preventing a second message from ever being signed. While such an object is impossible classically, Amos et al observe that OSS may be possible using quantum signing keys by leveraging the no-cloning principle. OSS has since become an important conceptual tool with many applications in decentralized settings and for quantum cryptography with classical communication. OSS are also closely related to separations between classical-binding and collapse-binding for post-quantum hashing and commitments. Unfortunately, the only known OSS construction due to Amos et al. was only justified in a classical oracle model, and moreover their justification was ultimately found to contain a fatal bug. Thus, the existence of OSS, even in a classical idealized model, has remained open. We give the first standard-model OSS, with provable security assuming (sub-exponential) indistinguishability obfuscation (iO) and LWE. This also gives the first standard-model separation between classical and collapse-binding post-quantum commitments/hashing, solving a decade-old open problem. Along the way, we also give the first construction with unconditional security relative to a classical oracle. To achieve our standard-model construction, we develop a notion of permutable pseudorandom permutations (permutable PRPs), and show how they are useful for translating oracle proofs involving random permutations into obfuscation-based proofs. In particular, obfuscating permutable PRPs gives a trapdoor one-way permutation that is $\textit{full-domain}, solving another decade-old-problem of constructing this object from (sub-exponential) iO and one-way functions.

We show reductions and equivalences between various problems related to the computation of the endomorphism ring of principally polarised superspecial abelian surfaces. Problems considered are the computation of the Ibukiyama-Katsura-Oort matrix and computation of unpolarised isomoprhisms between superspecial abelian surfaces.

Half-$\ell$-sequences, as a extension of $\ell$-sequences, have attracted research interest over the past decade. The arithmetic correlation of half-$\ell$-sequences is known for connection integers of the form $p^r$. In this paper, we extend this result by deriving the arithmetic correlation for half-$\ell$-sequences with connection integers of the form $p^r q^s $. The results indicate that when $p\equiv -1 \pmod{8}$ and $q\equiv \pm 3 \pmod{8}$, the arithmetic autocorrelation can be determined by the number of odd integers in the cyclic subgroup generated by $2$ modulo $p$.

We present a general framework for polynomial-time lattice Gaussian sampling. Its principles revolve around a systematic study of the discrete Gaussian measure and its samplers under \emph{extensions} of lattices, a setting encompassing that of nested lattices $\Lat'\subset \Lat$. A fundamental result for Gaussian sampling is that we can sample efficiently in $\Lat$ if we know how to do so in $\Lat'$ and the quotient $\Lat/\Lat'$. This is often presented in a context-dependent manner. Our formalism provides general and unifying foundations for this idea, and also shows that this can be done \emph{regardless} of the primitivity of $\Lat'$. As direct illustrations of this unifying theme, we formally recover and extend several methods from the literature: domain restriction and extension (as, efficient sampling in a larger or smaller lattice); a lattice \emph{filtration} based sampler, which can be seen as a broad generalization of the celebrated Klein's sampler. Then, we demonstrate how to sample using a change of bases, or even switching the ambient space, even when the target lattice is not represented as full-rank in the ambient space. We show how to correct the induced distortion with the ``convolution-like'' technique of Peikert (Crypto 2010) (which we encompass as a byproduct). Since our framework aims at modularity and leverages the combinations of smaller samplers to build new ones, we also propose ad-hoc samplers for the so-called \emph{root lattices} $\An_n, \Dn_n, \mathsf{E}_n$ as base cases, extending the state-of-the-art for root lattice sampling, which was limited to $\ZZ^n$. We also show how our framework blends with the so-called $k$ing construction and provides a sampler for the remarkable Leech and Barnes-Wall lattices. As concrete applications of our methods, we obtain novel, quasi-linear samplers for prime and smooth conductor (as $2^\ell 3^k$) cyclotomic rings, achieving essentially optimal Gaussian width. In a practice-oriented application, we showcase the impact of our work on hash-and-sign signatures over \textsc{ntru} lattices. In the best case, we can decrease their sizes by around 200 bytes (which corresponds to an improvement greater than 20\%). We also improve the new gadget-based constructions (Yu, Jia, Wang, Crypto 2023) and gain up to 110 bytes for the resulting signatures. Lastly, we sprinkle our exposition with several new estimates for the smoothing parameter of lattices, stemming from our algorithmic constructions and by novel methods based on series reversion.

A classical obfuscator for quantum circuits is a classical program that, given the classical description of a quantum circuit $Q$, outputs the classical description of a functionally equivalent quantum circuit $\widetilde{Q}$ that hides as much as possible about $Q$. Previously, the only known feasibility result for classical obfuscation of quantum circuits (Bartusek and Malavolta, ITCS 2022) was limited to "null" security, which is only meaningful for circuits that always reject. On the other hand, if the obfuscator is allowed to compile the quantum circuit $Q$ into a quantum state $\ket{\widetilde{Q}}$, there exist feasibility results for obfuscating much more expressive classes of circuits: All pseudo-deterministic quantum circuits (Bartusek, Kitagawa, Nishimaki and Yamakawa, STOC 2023, Bartusek, Brakerski and Vaikuntanathan, STOC 2024), and even all unitaries (Huang and Tang, FOCS 2025). We show that (relative to a classical oracle) there exists a classical obfuscator for all pseudo-deterministic quantum circuits. As our main technical step, we give the first construction of a compact quantum fully-homomorphic encryption (QFHE) scheme that supports public verification of (pseudo-deterministic) quantum evaluation, relative to a classical oracle. To construct our QFHE scheme, we improve on an approach introduced by Bartusek, Kitagawa, Nishimaki and Yamakawa (STOC 2023), which previously required ciphertexts that are both quantum and non-compact due to a heavy use of quantum coset states and their publicly-verifiable properties. As part of our core technical contribution, we introduce new techniques for analyzing coset states that can be generated "on the fly", by proving new cryptographic properties of the one-shot signature scheme of Shmueli and Zhandry (CRYPTO 2025). Our techniques allow us to produce QFHE ciphertexts that are purely classical, compact, and publicly-verifiable. This additionally yields the first classical verification of quantum computation protocol for BQP that simultaneously satisfies blindness and public-verifiability.

Boolean functions having only one Walsh zero (or equivalently up to a translation, balanced functions whose sums with non-constant affine Boolean functions are all unbalanced) have been constructed for every n ≥ 10, by Mesnager and the first author, twenty years ago. This same paper had checked (partly mathematically and partly thanks to computer investigations) that no such function exists for n ≤ 6 but left open the question of constructing them for 7 ≤ n ≤ 9. Since then, functions in 7, 8 and 9 variables having one Walsh zero have been found by Lou and Wang, thanks to ad hoc methods combined with computer searches, but not as elements in infinite classes of functions having this property. In the present paper, we provide such infinite classes for n ≥ 8. For n = 7, we provide one more function (found by a computer investigation thanks to an algorithm) but we leave open the possibility of finding an infinite class valid for n ≥ 7. We also provide a secondary construction of functions with one Walsh zero in n + 2 variables from such functions in n variables, which does not need particular conditions on the latter for being successful (and which provides then a systematic way to obtain functions in n + 2 variables from functions in n variables). We investigate mathematical proofs of non-existence of such functions in n ≤ 6 variables.

We revisit the question of whether it is possible to build succinct non-interactive arguments ($\mathsf{SNARG}$s) for all of $\mathsf{NP}$ under standard assumptions using non-signaling probabilistically checkable proofs [Kalai-Raz-Rothblum, STOC' 14]. In particular, we observe that using exponential-length PCPs appears to circumvent all of the existing barriers. For our main result, we give a candidate non-adaptive $\mathsf{SNARG}$ for $\mathsf{NP}$ and prove its soundness under: - the learning with errors assumption (or other standard assumptions such as bilinear maps), and - a mathematical conjecture about multivariate polynomials over the reals. In more detail, our conjecture is an upper bound on the minimum total coefficient size of Nullstellensatz proofs (Potechin-Zhang, ICALP 2024) of membership in a concrete polynomial ideal. We emphasize that this is not a cryptographic assumption or any form of computational hardness assumption. Of particular interest is the fact that our security analysis makes non-black-box use of the $\mathsf{SNARG}$ adversary, circumventing the black-box barrier of Gentry and Wichs (STOC '11). This gives a blueprint for constructing $\mathsf{SNARG}$s for $\mathsf{NP}$ that is not subject to the Gentry-Wichs barrier.

We study append-only set commitments with efficient updates and inclusion proofs, or cryptographic accumulators. In particular, we examine how often the inclusion proofs (or witnesses) for individual items must change as new items are added to the accumulated set. Using a compression argument, we show unconditionally that to accumulate a set of $n$ items, any construction with a succinct commitment ($O(\lambda \text{ polylog} \ n)$ storage) must induce at least $\omega(n)$ total witness updates as $n$ items are sequentially added. In a certain regime, we strengthen this bound to $\Omega(n \log n/\log \log n)$ total witness updates. These lower bounds hold not just in the worst case, but with overwhelming probability over a random choice of the accumulated set. Our results show that a close variant of the Merkle Mountain range, an elegant construction that has become popular in practice, is essentially optimal.

Batch arguments (BARGs) are non-interactive arguments for conjunctions of NP statements, with proof size that is sublinear in the number of statements. Several previous works studied the communication complexity of BARGs, focusing both on the CRS size and on the additive overhead of the proof, defined as the difference between the proof size and the size $m$ of a single NP witness: - Devadas et al.~[FOCS 22] constructed BARGs with additive overhead that is independent of $m$, however, their CRS size is polynomial in $m$. - Paneth and Pass [FOCS 22] constructed BARGs where the CRS size is independent of $m$, but with higher additive overhead $m^{1-\epsilon}$. Under the hardness of LWE, we construct BARGs where both the CRS size the additive overhead of the proof are independent of $m$. Such BARGs can be recursively composed an unbounded polynomial number of times without losing succinctness. Along the way, we also considerably simplify the construction of fully local somewhere extractable hash functions used in the construction of Devadas et al.

We study additive positive accumulators, which maintain a short digest of a growing set such that each value in the set can prove membership via a generated witness. Due to the compactness of the digest, previously added values may require updated witnesses as the set grows. In this paper, we establish a trade-off between the bit-length of the accumulator value and the number of witness updates. Specifically, we show that if the accumulator value has bit-length \( \mathsf{poly}(\log n) \), where \( n \) is the number of accumulated values, then some values must incur \( \Omega(\log n / \log \log n) \) witness updates. This improves upon the recent \( \omega(1) \) lower bound of [BCCK25] and matches the upper bound in [MQ23]. Building on the framework of [MQR22], we introduce a new combinatorial structure that removes the fixed-update-time assumption. Our approach also applies to Registration-based Encryption [GHMR18], thereby resolving the open problem left in [MQR22]: it shows that the tight lower bound on decryption-update frequency continues to hold even without any fixed-update-time assumption.

A dot-product proof (DPP) is a simple probabilistic proof system in which the input statement $\mathbf{x}$ and the proof $\boldsymbol{\pi}$ are vectors over a finite field $\mathbb{F}$, and the proof is verified by making a single dot-product query $\langle \mathbf{q},(\mathbf{x} \| \boldsymbol{\pi}) \rangle$ jointly to $\mathbf{x}$ and $\boldsymbol{\pi}$. A DPP can be viewed as a 1-query fully linear PCP. We study the feasibility and efficiency of DPPs, obtaining the following results: - Small-field DPP. For any finite field $\mathbb{F}$ and Boolean circuit $C$ of size $S$, there is a DPP for proving that there exists $\mathbf{w}$ such that $C(\mathbf{x}, \mathbf{w})=1$ with a proof $\boldsymbol{\pi}$ of length $S\cdot\mathsf{poly}(|\mathbb{F}|)$ and soundness error $\varepsilon=O(1 / \sqrt{|\mathbb{F}|})$. We show this error to be asymptotically optimal. In particular, and in contrast to the best known PCPs, there exist strictly linear-length DPPs over constant-size fields. - Large-field DPP. If $|\mathbb{F}|\ge\mathsf{poly}(S/\varepsilon)$, there is a similar DPP with soundness error $\varepsilon$ and proof length $O(S)$ (in field elements). The above results do not rely on the PCP theorem and their proofs are considerably simpler. We apply our DPP constructions toward two kinds of applications. - Hardness of approximation. We obtain a simple proof for the NP-hardness of approximating MAXLIN (with dense instances) over any finite field $\mathbb{F}$ up to some constant factor $c>1$, independent of $\mathbb{F}$. Unlike previous PCP-based proofs, our proof yields exponential-time hardness under the exponential time hypothesis (ETH). - Succinct arguments. We improve the concrete efficiency of succinct interactive arguments in the generic group model using input-independent preprocessing. In particular, the communication is comparable to sending two group elements and the verifier's computation is dominated by a single group exponentiation. We also show how to use DPPs together with linear-only encryption to construct succinct commit-and-prove arguments.

We study the problem of constructing Boolean garbling schemes that are both succinct$-$with garbled circuit size significantly smaller than the original circuit$-$and have low-depth garbling algorithms, where the garbling process runs in parallel time logarithmic in the circuit size. Prior schemes achieve one but not the other, unless relying on indistinguishability obfuscation ($\mathsf{iO}$), which is prohibitively inefficient, relies on a combination of multiple assumptions, and achieves only polynomial garbling depth $\mathsf{poly}(\lambda,\log |C|)$. We resolve this tension by presenting the first garbling schemes that are both succinct and admit garbling algorithms in $\mathsf{NC}^1$, based only on standard group and lattice assumptions. Our main results include: • $\textbf{One-bit-per-gate garbling}$ with logarithmic garbling depth based on DDH or RLWE and the existence of a local PRG. • $\textbf{Succinct privacy-free garbling}$ of size linear in the circuit depth $D$ (and sublinear in the circuit size $|C|$), based on DDH or RLWE. • $\textbf{Reusable, fully succinct garbling}$ with logarithmic garbling depth, based on decomposable LWE. The DDH-based one-bit-per-gate scheme has tunably small inverse polynomial correctness and privacy errors, which can be made negligible at the cost of increasing garbling depth to $\mathsf{poly}(\lambda)$. As further extension, we also obtain the first attribute-based encryption schemes with succinct keys and low-depth key generation. At a conceptual level, our constructions are derived from a unified framework that subsumes all prior approaches to succinct garbling. It identifies the common source of high-depth garbling, and provides a general methodology for reducing garbling depth without sacrificing succinctness, applicable across different techniques and assumptions.

We present the first construction of attribute-based laconic function evaluation (AB-LFE) from the decisional composite residuosity (DCR) assumption. This yields the first example of computationally succinct secure computation from a group-based assumption, avoiding reliance on noisy lattice assumptions such as LWE. Our construction builds on recent work in fully homomorphic MACs and homomorphic secret sharing by Ishai, Li and Lin (FOCS 2025) and Meyer, Orlandi, Roy, and Scholl (Crypto 2025), which we extend by constructing a fully homomorphic MAC for packed vector operations, where the evaluation time of one party is independent of the vector length. As applications, we obtain full-fledged laconic function evaluation (LFE) from the combination of DCR and standard LWE, avoiding the need for sub-exponential modulus-to-noise ratio LWE used in previous work. We also obtain the first constrained pseudorandom function whose master evaluation key is succinct in the constraint. These results highlight the unexplored power of group-based cryptography for succinct secure computation.

We disprove a range of conjectures for Reed-Solomon codes underpinning the security and efficiency of many modern proof systems, including SNARKs based on FRI (Ben-Sasson-Bentov-Horesh-Riabzev, ICALP’18), DEEP-FRI (Ben-Sasson-Goldberg-Kopparty-Saraf, ITCS’20), STIR (Arnon-Chiesa-Fenzi-Yogev, CRYPTO’24), and WHIR (Arnon-Chiesa-Fenzi-Yogev, preprint). Concretely, we prove that the following conjectures are false: 1. The correlated agreement up-to-capacity conjecture of Ben-Sasson-Carmon-Ishai-Kopparty-Saraf (J. ACM’23), 2. The mutual correlated agreement up-to-capacity conjecture of WHIR, 3. The list-decodability up-to-capacity conjecture of DEEP-FRI, which follows from existing results in the literature. We then propose minimal modifications to these conjectures up to the list-decoding capacity bound. Our second main contribution is a proof that correlated agreement with small enough error probability implies list decoding of Reed-Solomon codes. Thus, any future positive results on our correlated agreement conjectures with small enough error probability would imply similar results in classical list decoding. A reduction from proximity gaps to list-decodability was heretofore a natural open problem.

We initiate the study of lower bounding the verification time of Succinct Non-interactive ARguments of Knowledge (SNARKs) built in the Polynomial Interactive Oracle Proof + Polynomial Commitment Scheme paradigm. The verification time of these SNARKs is generally dominated by the polynomial commitment scheme, and so we want to understand if polynomial commitment schemes admit lower bounds on the verification time. By recognizing that polynomial commitment schemes are also often built by applying cryptography to some information-theoretic core protocol, we seek to separate this core from the cryptography in a way that meaningfully captures the verification time required by the polynomial commitment scheme verifier. We provide strong evidence that several polynomial commitment schemes have (nearly) optimal verifier times. Our evidence comes from connecting polynomial commitment schemes to certain information-theoretic protocols known as communication protocols from the field of communication complexity, a link which we believe to be of independent interest. Through this lens, we model the verifier work in the cryptographic protocols as information (i.e., number of bits) exchanged between parties in the communication protocols, allowing us to leverage lower bounds from communication complexity. These lower bounds give strong evidence that the verifier time in these polynomial commitment schemes must be at least the number of bits exchanged in the communication protocol. We extract the communication protocol cores of three polynomial commitment schemes and lower bound the bits exchanged in these cores. The lower bounds we obtain match (up to poly-logarithmic factors) the best-known (asymptotic) verification times of the polynomial commitment schemes we examine in this work. Specifically, we show that for univariate/multilinear polynomials of size $N=2^n$: - the communication core of Hyrax PCS (Wahby et al., S&P 2016) requires $\Omega(\sqrt{N})$ bits to be exchanged; - the communication core of Bulletproofs PCS (Bootle et al., EUROCRYPT 2016; Bünz et al., S&P 2018) requires $\Omega(N)$ bits to be exchanged; and - the communication core of Dory PCS (Lee, TCC 2021) requires $\Omega(\log(N))$ bits to be exchanged. Our results strongly suggest a negative answer to a longstanding open question on whether the Bulletproofs verifier can be made sublinear time.

The emergence of quantum computing has provided new paradigms for cryptography. On the one hand, it poses significant new threats to existing classically cryptographic systems, requiring the community to define new security models that capture what a quantum adversary can do. On the other hand, it gives us new tools to design cryptographic protocols, with weaker assumptions than in the classical world, or even protocols that are impossible classically. In this survey, we first give an overview of new security definitions for classical cryptography, considering quantum adversaries who can either only use local quantum computation (post-quantum security), or even send quantum messages and in particular have access to oracle in superposition (quantum security). We explore these new notions through the examples of commitments, zero-knowledge proofs, encryption, and signatures. Then, we present what is arguably the most famous application of quantum cryptography: quantum key distribution (QKD) protocols that take advantage of unique properties of quantum mechanics to provide secure communication unconditionally. We also explore cryptography beyond QKD, focusing on unclonable cryptography: a family of cryptographic functionalities, built with quantum states, and designed to be resistant to counterfeit by leveraging the “no-cloning” theorem. We examine in particular quantum money, but also the recent notions of unclonable encryption and copy-protection, including related variants. By presenting a comprehensive survey of these topics, this paper aims to provide a thorough understanding of the current landscape and future potential of quantum cryptography.

We propose a Pairing-based Polynomial Consistency Protocol (PPCP) that verifies the equivalence of polynomial commitments generated under different basis representations, such as the coefficient and Lagrange bases. By leveraging pairing relations, PPCP proves that two commitments correspond to an identical underlying polynomial vector without revealing the polynomial itself. This enables efficient proof aggregation and recursive composition across heterogeneous SNARK systems that adopt distinct polynomial encodings.

A distribution is k-incompressible, Yao [FOCS ’82], if no efficient compression scheme compresses it to less than k bits. While being a natural measure, its relation to other computational analogs of entropy such as pseudoentropy, Hastad, Impagliazzo, Levin, and Luby [SICOMP 99], and to other cryptographic hardness assumptions, was unclear. We advance towards a better understating of this notion, showing that a k-incompressible distribution has (k−2) bits of next-block pseudoentropy, a refinement of pseudoentropy introduced by Haitner, Reingold, and Vadhan [SICOMP ’13]. We deduce that a samplable distribution X that is (H(X) + 2)-incompressible, implies the existence of one-way functions.

We give new constructions of cycles of pairing-friendly elliptic curves with a view towards unbounded recursive pairing-based proof systems. Unlike the only known prior cycle of elliptic curves - the ordinary MNT cycle - our construction uses elliptic curves that are supersingular. A trade-off of our approach is that the supersingular cycles are defined over extension fields (quadratic extensions in the optimal case), which makes elements and computations in $\mathbb{G}_1$ less compact and efficient than those in the MNT cycle. On the other hand, the supersingular cycles in this paper offer a key advantage over their MNT counterpart: every instance of our infinite family of supersingular curves can be efficiently constructed via Broker's algorithm, whereas it is only feasible to construct a relatively small, bounded number of MNT instances via the CM method. In other words, while both constructions give infinite families of pairing-friendly curves in theory, only the supersingular construction gives rise to infinite numbers of cycles that can be realised in practice. Supersingular cycles offer benefits that are relevant in the context of recursive pairing-based proof systems. They afford flexibility in the choices of underlying finite fields; one can choose primes $p$ for which the underlying field arithmetic is efficient and for which $p-1$ is divisible by a large power of 2. Or, as we study in detail, using supersingular cycles unlocks the possibility of connecting the cycle with other pairing-friendly elliptic curves that are defined over much smaller finite fields, where proof system arithmetic is much more efficient. Indeed, constructing these so-called lollipops of pairing-friendly curves was the motivating problem (posed by researchers back in 2019) that inspired the present work.

The rapid growth of quantum technologies highlights the need for scalable models of computation that go beyond qubits and exploit the richer structure of Qudits. This paper introduces a novel and efficient approach for defining universal gate sets specifically designed for higher-dimensional Qudit systems (N ≥ 2), addressing the limitations of traditional qubit-based approaches. We present a systematic methodology for constructing fundamental Qudit gates through the inherent structure of Qudit operators, providing a robust theoretical foundation for universal quantum computation with Qudits. Our rigorously proven universal and minimal gate set enables more efficient quantum circuit design. We demonstrate the construction of multidimensional extensions of controlled operations from these fundamental elements. To facilitate practical application, we provide a Python-based algorithm for decomposing arbitrary multi-Qudit operations, accompanied by detailed time- and space-complexity analyses. The framework is further validated through end-to-end implementations of Grover’s algorithm and QKD, comparing traditional gate constructions with circuits entirely synthesized from the proposed universal gate set. These validations demonstrate not only the functional equivalence of the decomposed circuits, but also their direct relevance to the advancement of cryptographic protocols, paving the way for more efficient and secure Qudit-based quantum cryptography.

We introduce the notion of non-interactive zero-knowledge (NIZK) arguments with certified deletion, a new primitive that enables the recipient of a (quantum) NIZK argument to delete it and obtain a (classical) certificate proving such deletion. We formalize this notion and propose two candidate constructions from standard cryptographic assumptions. Our first construction is based on classical NIZK arguments and quantum-hard one-way functions, but requires both the prover and verifier to run quantum algorithms. We then present an extension based on the learning with errors problem that allows the prover to be classical. Our results have applications to signatures of knowledge and anonymous credentials with certified deletion, which we also define and construct.

We study a new variant of the $k$-sum problem. In the classical formulation, one is given $k$ lists of binary vectors and must find one vector from each list such that their sum is the zero vector. In our variant, vectors are instead chosen from the set $\{-1,1\}^m$. First, we analyse how the complexity of the original problem changes when one use $\pm 1$ vectors. We show that this variant achieves better than square-root complexity when using more than two lists, although its overall complexity for $k \geq 4$ is worse than that for the binary case. As an application of our algorithms, we present a combinatorial attack strategy for a recently proposed variant of the Inhomogeneous Short Integer Solution (ISIS) problem known as the randomised one-more ISIS assumption. Our combinatorial attack is more effective than previous combinatorial attacks on this problem. We further consider a generalised setting of the $k$-sum problem in which the target sum is not the zero vector, but a given integer vector $Y \in \mathbb{Z}_p^m$ that is known to be a sum of $\pm 1$ vectors. We study the complexity of reconstructing such a decomposition of $Y$ using $k$ lists of candidate vectors. Our analysis shows that, as the number of lists increases, the problem becomes solvable in approximately cube-root time.

Polynomial secret sharing schemes generalize the linear ones by adding more expressivity and giving room for efficiency improvements. In these schemes, the secret is an element of a finite field, and the shares are obtained by evaluating polynomials on the secret and some random field elements, i.e., for every party there is a set of polynomials that computes the share of the party. Notably, for general access structures, the best known polynomial schemes have better share size than the best known linear ones. This work investigates the properties of the polynomials and the fields that allow these efficiency gains and aims to characterize the access structures that benefit from them. We focus first on ideal schemes, which are optimal in the sense that the size of each share is the size of the secret. We prove that, under some restrictions, if the degrees of the sharing polynomials are not too big compared to the size of the field, then its access structure is a port of an algebraic matroid. This result establishes a new connection between ideal schemes and matroids, extending the known connection between ideal linear schemes and linearly representable matroids. For general polynomial schemes, we extend these results and analyze their privacy and correctness. Additionally, we show that given a set of polynomials over a field of large characteristic, one can construct linear schemes that realize the access structure determined by these polynomials; as a consequence, polynomial secret sharing schemes over these fields are not stronger than linear schemes. While there exist ports of algebraic matroids that do not admit ideal schemes, we demonstrate that they always admit schemes with statistical security and information ratio tending to one. This is achieved by considering schemes where the sharings are points in algebraic varieties.

We revisit the question of whether worst-case hardness of the time-bounded Kolmogorov complexity problem, $\KpolyA$---that is, determining whether a string is ``structured" (i.e., $K^t(x) < n-1$) or ``random" (i.e., $K^{\poly(t)} \geq n-1$)---suffices to imply the existence of one-way functions (OWF). Liu-Pass (CRYPTO'25) recently showed that worst-case hardness of a \emph{boundary} version of $\KpolyA$---where, roughly speaking, the goal is to decide whether given an instance $x$, (a) $x$ is $K^\poly$-random (i.e., $K^{\poly(t)}(x) \geq n-1$), or just close to $K^\poly$-random (i.e., $K^{t}(x) < n-1$ \emph{but} $K^{\poly(t)}> n - \log n$)---characterizes OWF, but with either of the following caveats (1) considering a non-standard notion of \emph{probabilistic $K^t$}, as opposed to the standard notion of $K^t$, or (2) assuming somewhat strong, and non-standard, derandomization assumptions. In this paper, we present an alternative method for establishing their result which enables significantly weakening the caveats. First, we show that boundary hardness of the more standard \emph{randomized} $K^t$ problem suffices (where randomized $K^t(x)$ is defined just like $K^t(x)$ except that the program generating the string $x$ may be randomized). As a consequence of this result, we can provide a characterization also in terms of just ``plain" $K^t$ under the most standard derandomization assumption (used to derandomize just $\BPP$ into $\P$)---namely $\E \not\subseteq {\sf ioSIZE}[2^{o(n)}]$. Our proof relies on language compression schemes of Goldberg-Sipser (STOC'85); using the same technique, we also present the the first worst-case to average-case reduction for the \emph{exact} $\KpolyA$ problem (under the same standard derandomization assumption), improving upon Hirahara's celebrated results (STOC'18, STOC'21) that only applied to a \emph{gap} version of the $\KpolyA$ problem, referred to as $\GapKpolyA$, where the goal is to decide whether $K^t(x) \leq n-O(\log n))$ or $K^{\poly(t)}(x) \geq n-1$ and under the same derandomization assumption.

We prove that SVP$_p$ is NP-hard to approximate within a factor of $2^{\log^{1 - \varepsilon} n}$, for all constants $\varepsilon > 0$ and $p > 2$, under standard deterministic Karp reductions. This result is also the first proof that \emph{exact} SVP$_p$ is NP-hard in a finite $\ell_p$ norm. Hardness for SVP$_p$ with $p$ finite was previously only known if NP $\not \subseteq$ RP, and under that assumption, hardness of approximation was only known for all constant factors. As a corollary to our main theorem, we show that under the Sliding Scale Conjecture, SVP$_p$ is NP-hard to approximate within a small polynomial factor, for all constants $p > 2$. Our proof techniques are surprisingly elementary; we reduce from a regularized PCP instance directly to the shortest vector problem by using simple gadgets related to Vandermonde matrices and Hadamard matrices.

We introduce a novel class of equations defined over Euclidean domains. These abstract equations establish a unified framework for deriving new, concrete computational problems useful for cryptography. We prove that solving a single such equation is NP-hard. For systems of these equations, we further prove NP-hardness, average-case hardness, random self-reducibility, search-to-decision reducibility, and trapdoorizability. Based on the hardness of solving these systems, we construct various cryptographic primitives. Our results are proved in an abstract, domain-agnostic manner and hold for a wide range of Euclidean domains. This generality allows the framework to accommodate rich mathematical structures, providing both theoretical depth and flexibility for diverse cryptographic applications.

A message authentication code (MAC) ensures authenticity and integrity in symmetric-key settings. The Carter–Wegman–Shoup (CWS) paradigm establishes that MACs for arbitrary-length messages can be built in a black-box way using a single call to a pseudorandom function (PRF) on a random input. More than a decade ago, Dodis, Kiltz, Pietrzak, and Wichs left open whether weak pseudorandom functions (wPRFs) would suffice in this construction. This work establishes tight upper and lower bounds that precisely characterize the minimal computational assumptions needed for the security of the CWS paradigm. On the negative side, we prove that weak PRFs are insufficient to instantiate the CWS paradigm. On the positive side, we introduce a new primitive, the 1-adaptive weak pseudorandom function (1-awPRF), which guarantees pseudorandomness for polynomially many non-adaptive queries followed by one adaptive query. We show that 1-awPRFs are sufficient to secure CWS in a black-box manner. Finally, we construct 1-adaptive weak pseudorandom functions in a black-box way from standard cryptographic assumptions, using a new randomized design paradigm that treats randomization as a fundamental structural element. Instantiating our generic construction under the Decisional Diffie Hellman and Learning with Errors assumptions yields concrete and efficient realizations. These lead to more efficient MAC schemes and illustrate how weak and abstract building blocks can be transformed into stronger and practically useful cryptographic constructions.

Let f be an arbitrary positive integer valued function. The goal of this note is to show that one can construct a finitely generated group in which the discrete log problem is polynomially equivalent to computing the function f. In particular, we provide infinite, but finitely generated groups, in which the discrete logarithm problem is arbitrarily hard. As another application, we construct a family of two-generated groups that have polynomial time word problem and NP-complete discrete log problem. Additionally, using our framework, we propose a generic scheme of cryptographic protocols, which might be of independent interest.

Robust (fuzzy) extractors are very useful for, e.g., authenticated exchange from shared weak secret and remote biometric authentication against active adversaries. They enable two parties to extract the same uniform randomness with the ``helper'' string. More importantly, they have an authentication mechanism built in that tampering of the ``helper'' string will be detected. Unfortunately, as shown by Dodis and Wichs, in the information-theoretic setting, a robust extractor for an $(n,k)$-source requires $k>n/2$, which is in sharp contrast with randomness extractors which only require $k=\omega(\log n)$. Existing work either relies on random oracles or introduces CRS and works only for CRS-independent sources (even in the computational setting). In this work, we give a systematic study of robust (fuzzy) extractors for general CRS-dependent sources. We show in the information-theoretic setting, the same entropy lower bound holds even in the CRS model; we then show we can have robust extractors in the computational setting for general CRS-dependent source that is only with minimal entropy. At the heart of our construction lies a new primitive called $\kappa$-MAC that is unforgeable with a weak key and hides all partial information about the key (both against auxiliary input), by which we can compile any conventional randomness extractor into a robust one. We further augment $\kappa$-MAC to defend against ``key manipulation" attacks, which yields a robust fuzzy extractor for CRS-dependent sources.

In this paper we present two reductions between variants of the Code Equivalence problem. We give polynomial-time Karp reductions from Permutation Code Equivalence (PCE) to both Linear Code Equivalence (LCE) and Signed Permutation Code Equivalence (SPCE). Along with a Karp reduction from SPCE to the Lattice Isomorphism Problem (LIP) proved in a paper by Bennett and Win (2024), our second result implies a reduction from PCE to LIP.

Homomorphic encryption allows for computations on encrypted data without exposing the underlying plaintext, enabling secure and private data processing in various applications such as cloud computing and machine learning. This paper presents a comprehensive mathematical foundation for three prominent homomorphic encryption schemes: Brakerski-Gentry-Vaikuntanathan (BGV), Brakerski-Fan-Vercauteren (BFV), and Cheon-Kim-Kim-Song (CKKS), all based on the Ring Learning with Errors (RLWE) problem. We align our discussion with the functionalities proposed in the recent homomorphic encryption standard, providing detailed algorithms and correctness proofs for each scheme. Additionally, we propose improvements to the current schemes focusing on noise management and optimization of public key encryption and leveled homomorphic computation. Our modifications ensure that the noise bound remains within a fixed function for all levels of computation, guaranteeing correct decryption and maintaining efficiency comparable to existing methods. The proposed enhancements reduce ciphertext expansion and storage requirements, making these schemes more practical for real-world applications.

The study of cryptographic criteria for Boolean functions with restricted domains has been an important topic over the last 20 years. A revived interest has sparked after the work of Carlet, Méaux and Rotella in 2017, where the authors studied cryptographic properties of restricted-domain functions and introduced the concept of weightwise perfectly balanced functions as part of the analysis of the FLIP stream cipher. Weightwise (almost) perfectly balanced functions are defined as Boolean functions that are (almost) balanced on each of the sets of vectors of the same Hamming weight. Several approaches have been considered to build new families of such functions. In this article, we present some new constructions of weightwise (almost) perfectly balanced functions via two approaches, the first class is constructed using the $t$-concatenation of Boolean functions, whereas the second one draws certain functions from the so-called general Maiorana-McFarland class. A generic analysis of these two classes is given, as well as explicit examples in both classes. Namely, we provide instances of functions in both classes attaining high overall nonlinearities, as well as slice nonlinearities. Notably, we present examples in 16 variables that attain some of the best overall nonlinearities, and more importantly, the highest slice nonlinearities among all of the constructions presented in the literature.

The Fuchsbauer, Kiltz, and Loss (CRYPTO 2018) claim that (some) hardness results in the algebraic group model imply the same hardness results in the generic group model was recently called into question by Katz, Zhang, and Zhou (ASIACRYPT 2022). The latter gave an interpretation of the claim under which it is incorrect. We give an alternate interpretation under which it is correct, using natural frameworks for capturing generic and algebraic models for arbitrary algebraic structures. Most algebraic analyses in the literature can be captured by our frameworks, making the claim correct for them.

An important proof technique in the random oracle model involves reprogramming it on hard to predict inputs and arguing that an attacker cannot detect that this occurred. In the quantum setting, a particularly challenging version of this considers adaptive reprogramming wherein the points to be reprogrammed (or the output values they should be programmed to) are dependent on choices made by the adversary. Some quantum frameworks for analyzing adaptive reprogramming were given by Unruh (CRYPTO 2014, EUROCRYPT 2015), Grilo-Hövelmanns-Hülsing-Majenz (ASIACRYPT 2021), and Pan-Zeng (PKC 2024). We show, counterintuitively, that these adaptive results follow from the nonadaptive one-way to hiding theorem of Ambainis-Hamburg-Unruh (CRYPTO 2019). These implications contradict beliefs (whether stated explicitly or implicitly) that some properties of the adaptive frameworks cannot be provided by the Ambainis-Hamburg-Unruh result. We show, counterintuitively, that these adaptive results follow directly from the non-adaptive one-way to hiding theorem of Ambainis-Hamburg-Unruh (CRYPTO 2019). These implications contradict beliefs (whether stated explicitly or implicitly) that some properties of the adaptive frameworks cannot be provided by the Ambainis-Hamburg-Unruh result.

Given a circuit $G: \{0, 1\}^n \to \{0, 1\}^m$ with $m > n$, the *range avoidance* problem ($\text{Avoid}$) asks to output a string $y\in \{0, 1\}^m$ that is not in the range of $G$. Besides its profound connection to circuit complexity and explicit construction problems, this problem is also related to the existence of *proof complexity generators* --- circuits $G: \{0, 1\}^n \to \{0, 1\}^m$ where $m > n$ but for every $y\in \{0, 1\}^m$, it is infeasible to prove the statement "$y\not\in\mathrm{Range}(G)$" in a given propositional proof system. This paper connects these two problems with the existence of *demi-bits generators*, a fundamental cryptographic primitive against nondeterministic adversaries introduced by Rudich (RANDOM '97). $\bullet$ We show that the existence of demi-bits generators implies $\text{Avoid}$ is hard for nondeterministic algorithms. This resolves an open problem raised by Chen and Li (STOC '24). Furthermore, assuming the demi-hardness of certain LPN-style generators or Goldreich's PRG, we prove the hardness of $\text{Avoid}$ even when the instances are constant-degree polynomials over $\mathbb{F}_2$. $\bullet$ We show that the dual weak pigeonhole principle is unprovable in Cook's theory $\mathsf{PV}_1$ under the existence of demi-bits generators secure against $\mathbf{AM}/_{O(1)}$, thereby separating Jeřábek's theory $\mathsf{APC}_1$ from $\mathsf{PV}_1$. Previously, Ilango, Li, and Williams (STOC '23) obtained the same separation under different (and arguably stronger) cryptographic assumptions. $\bullet$ We transform demi-bits generators to proof complexity generators that are *pseudo-surjective* in certain parameter regime. Pseudo-surjectivity is the strongest form of hardness considered in the literature for proof complexity generators. Our constructions are inspired by the recent breakthroughs on the hardness of $\text{Avoid}$ by Ilango, Li, and Williams (STOC '23) and Chen and Li (STOC '24). We use *randomness extractors* to significantly simplify the construction and the proof.

We outline how to generalize the Guruswami-Sudan list decoder anal- ysis from Ben–Sasson, Carmon, Ishai, Kopparty and Saraf [BCI+20] in order to obtain a “global” proximity gap, called mutual correlated agree- ment in Arnon, Chiesa, Fenzi and Yogev [WHIR 2024], or strong correlated agreement in Zeilberger [Khatam 24].

Threshold cryptography is typically based on the idea of secret-sharing a private-key $s\in F$ ``in the exponent'' of some cryptographic group $G$, or more generally, encoding $s$ in some linearly homomorphic domain. In each invocation of the threshold system (e.g., for signing or decrypting) an ``encoding'' of the secret is being recovered and so the complexity, measured as the number of group multiplications over $G$, is equal to the number of $F$-additions that are needed to reconstruct the secret. Motivated by this scenario, we initiate the study of $n$-party secret-sharing schemes whose reconstruction algorithm makes a minimal number of \emph{additions}. The complexity of existing schemes either scales linearly with $n\log |F|$ (e.g., Shamir, CACM'79) or, at least, quadratically with $n$ independently of the size of the domain $F$ (e.g., Cramer-Xing, EUROCRYPT '20). This leaves open the existence of a secret sharing whose recovery algorithm can be computed by performing only $O(n)$ additions. We resolve the question in the affirmative and present such a near-threshold secret sharing scheme that provides privacy against unauthorized sets of density at most $\tau_p$, and correctness for authorized sets of density at least $\tau_c$, for any given arbitrarily close constants $\tau_p<\tau_c$. Reconstruction can be computed by making at most $O(n)$ additions and, in addition, (1) the share size is constant, (2) the sharing procedure also makes only $O(n)$ additions, and (3) the scheme is a blackbox secret-sharing scheme, i.e., the sharing and reconstruction algorithms work universally for all finite abelian groups $F$. Prior to our work, no such scheme was known even without features (1)--(3) and even for the ramp setting where $\tau_p$ and $\tau_c$ are far apart. As a by-product, we derive the first blackbox near-threshold secret-sharing scheme with linear-time sharing. We also present several concrete instantiations of our approach that seem practically efficient (e.g., for threshold discrete-log-based signatures). Our constructions are combinatorial in nature. We combine graph-based erasure codes that support ``peeling-based'' decoding with a new randomness extraction method that is based on inner-product with a small-integer vector. We also introduce a general concatenation-like transform for secret-sharing schemes that allows us to arbitrarily shrink the privacy-correctness gap with only a minor overhead. Our techniques enrich the secret-sharing toolbox and, in the context of blackbox secret sharing, offer a new randomized combinatorial alternative to existing deterministic number-theoretic approaches.

One-more problems like One-More Discrete Logarithm (OMDL) and One-More Diffie--Hellman (OMDH) have found wide use in cryptography, due to their ability to naturally model security definitions for interactive primitives like blind signatures and oblivious PRF. Furthermore, a generalization of OMDH called Threshold OMDH (TOMDH) has proven useful for building threshold versions of interactive protocols. However, due to their complexity it is often unclear how hard such problems actually are, leading cryptographers to analyze them in idealized models like the Generic Group Model (GGM) and Algebraic Group Model (AGM). In this work we give a complete characterization of known group-based one-more problems in the AGM, using the $Q$-DL hierarchy of assumptions defined in the work of Bauer, Fuchsbauer and Loss (CRYPTO '20). 1. Regarding (T)OMDH, we show (T)OMDH is part of the $Q$-DL hierarchy in the AGM; in particular, $Q$-OMDH is equivalent to $Q$-DL. Along the way we find and repair a flaw in the original GGM hardness proof of TOMDH, thereby giving the first correct proof that TOMDH is hard in the GGM. 2. Regarding OMDL, we show the $Q$-OMDL problems constitute an infinite hierarchy of problems in the AGM incomparable to the $Q$-DL hierarchy; that is, $Q$-OMDL is separate from $Q'$-OMDL if $Q' \neq Q$, and also separate from $Q'$-DL unless $Q = Q' = 0$. We give two practical applications of the above results. 1. We give formal evidence for a folklore conjecture that the best known attack on the widely used OPAQUE asymmetric PAKE protocol is due to Cheon (EUROCRYPT '06). 2. We show that threshold schemes reliant on TOMDH have the same level of concrete security as non-threshold versions, thus achieving threshold security "for free".

Truncation of cryptographic outputs is a technique that was recently introduced in Baldimtsi et al. [BCCK22]. The general idea is to try out many inputs to some cryptographic algorithm until the output (e.g. a public-key or some hash value) falls into some sparse set and thus can be compressed: by trying out an expected $2^k$ different inputs one will find an output that starts with $k$ zeros. Using such truncation one can for example save substantial gas fees on Blockchains where storing values is very expensive. While [BCCK22] show that truncation preserves the security of the underlying primitive, they only consider a setting without preprocessing. In this work we show that lower bounds on the time-space tradeoff for inverting random functions and permutations also hold with truncation, except for parameters ranges where the bound fails to hold for ''trivial'' reasons. Concretely, it's known that any algorithm that inverts a random function or permutation with range $N$ making $T$ queries and using $S$ bits of auxiliary input must satisfy $S\cdot T\ge N\log N$. This lower bound no longer holds in the truncated setting where one must only invert a challenge from a range of size $N/2^k$, as now one can simply save the replies to all $N/2^k$ challenges, which requires $S=\log N\cdot N /2^k$ bits and allows to invert with $T=1$ query. We show that with truncation, whenever $S$ is somewhat smaller than the $\log N\cdot N /2^k$ bits required to store the entire truncated function table, the known $S\cdot T\ge N\log N$ lower bound applies.

One of the most fundamental problems in the field of hypothesis testing is the identity testing problem: whether samples from some unknown distribution $\mathcal{G}$ are actually from some explicit distribution $\mathcal{D}$. It is known that when the distribution $\mathcal{D}$ has support $[N]$, the optimal sample complexity for the identity testing problem is roughly $O(\sqrt{N})$. However, many distributions of interest, including those which can be sampled efficiently, have exponential support size, and therefore the optimal identity tester also requires exponential samples. In this paper, we bypass this lower bound by considering restricted settings. The above $O(\sqrt{N})$ sample complexity identity tester is constructed so that it is not fooled by any (even inefficiently-sampled) distributions. However, in most applications, the distributions under consideration are efficiently samplable, and therefore it is enough to consider only identity testers that are not fooled by efficiently-sampled distributions. In this setting we can hope to construct efficient identity testers. We investigate relations between efficient verification of classical/quantum distributions with classical/quantum cryptography, showing the following results: \begin{itemize} \item Classically efficiently samplable distributions are verifiable if and only if one-way functions do not exist. \item Quantumly efficiently samplable distributions are verifiable by $\mathbf{P}^\mathbf{PP}$ with a polynomial number of samples. \item Sampling-based quantum advantage can be verified quantumly (with a polynomial number of samples) if one-way puzzles do not exist. \item If QEFID pairs exist, then some quantumly efficiently samplable distributions are not verifiable. \end{itemize}

This paper is about the proximity gaps phenomenon for Reed-Solomon codes. Very roughly, the proximity gaps phenomenon for a code $\mathcal C \subseteq \mathbb F_q^n$ says that for two vectors $f,g \in \mathbb F_q^n$, if sufficiently many linear combinations $f + z \cdot g$ (with $z \in \mathbb F_q$) are close to $\mathcal C$ in Hamming distance, then so are both $f$ and $g$, up to a proximity loss of $\varepsilon^*$. Determining the optimal quantitative form of proximity gaps for Reed--Solomon codes has recently become of great interest because of applications to interactive proofs and cryptography, and in particular, to scalable transparent arguments of knowledge (STARKs) and other modern hash based argument systems used on blockchains today. Our main results show improved positive and negative results for proximity gaps for Reed-Solomon codes of constant relative distance $\delta \in (0,1)$. 1. For proximity gaps up to the unique decoding radius $\delta/2$, we show that arbitrarily small proximity loss $\varepsilon^* > 0$ can be achieved with only $O_{\varepsilon^*}(1)$ exceptional $z$'s (improving the previous bound of $O(n)$ exceptions). 2. For proximity gaps up to the Johnson radius $J(\delta)$, we show that proximity loss $\varepsilon^* = 0$ can be achieved with only $O(n)$ exceptional $z$'s (improving the previous bound of $O(n^2)$ exceptions). This significantly reduces the soundness error in the aforementioned arguments systems. 3. In the other direction, we show that for some Reed--Solomon codes and some $\delta$, proximity gaps at or beyond the Johnson radius $J(\delta)$ with arbitrarily small proximity loss $\varepsilon^*$ needs to have at least $\Omega(n^{1.99})$ exceptional $z$'s. 4. More generally, for all constants $\tau$, we show that for some Reed-Solomon codes and some $\delta = \delta(\tau)$, proximity gaps at radius $\delta - \Omega_{\tau}(1)$ with arbitrarily small proximity loss $\varepsilon^*$ needs to have $n^{\tau}$ exceptional $z$'s. 5. Finally, for all Reed-Solomon codes, we show that improved proximity gaps imply improved bounds for their list-decodability. This shows that improved bounds on the list-decoding radius of Reed-Solomon codes is a prerequisite for any new proximity gaps results beyond the Johnson radius.

In p-noisy coin-tossing, Alice and Bob obtain fair coins which are of opposite values with probability p. Its Oblivious-Transfer (OT) complexity refers to the least number of OTs required by a semi-honest perfectly secure 2-party protocol for this task. We show a tight bound of Θ(log 1/p) for the OT complexity of p-noisy coin-tossing. This is the first instance of a lower bound for OT complexity that is independent of the input/output length of the function. We obtain our result by providing a general connection between the OT complexity of randomized functions and the complexity of Secure Zero Communication Reductions (SZCR), as recently de- fined by Narayanan et al. (TCC 2020), and then showing a lower bound for the complexity of an SZCR from noisy coin-tossing to (a predicate corresponding to) OT.

We investigate shift-invariant transformations, also known as rotation-symmetric vectorial Boolean functions, on $n$ bits that are induced from Boolean functions on $k$ bits, for $k\leq n$. We consider such transformations that are not necessarily permutations, but are, in some sense, almost bijective, and study their cryptographic properties. In this context, we define an almost lifting as a Boolean function for which there is an upper bound on the number of collisions of its induced transformation that does not depend on $n$. We show that if a Boolean function with diameter $k$ is an almost lifting, then the maximum number of collisions of its induced transformation is $2^{k-1}$ for any $n$. Moreover, we search for functions in the class of almost liftings that have good cryptographic properties and for which the non-bijectivity does not cause major security weaknesses. These functions generalize the well-known map $\chi$ used in the Keccak hash function.

This paper establishes the computational complexity of the Quasi-Cyclic Syndrome Decoding Problem (QC-SDP). We introduce a novel characterization of Quasi-Cyclic (QC) codes that generalizes their structure and reveals connections to random codes. Building on this characterization, we prove that QC-SDP is NP-hard and that its decision variant is NP-complete. These results provide the first formal complexity treatment of QC-SDP in its general form, addressing a fundamental open question in code-based cryptography. We also discuss the practical implications and limitations of these theoretical findings for cryptographic applications.

Efficient implementation of pairing-based cryptosystems relies on high-performance arithmetic in finite fields $\mathbb{F}_{p}$ and their extensions $\mathbb{F}_{p^k}$, where $k$ denotes the embedding degree. A small embedding degree is crucial since a part of the arithmetic for pairing computation occurs in $\mathbb{F}_{{p}^k}$, including squaring, multiplication, and Frobenius operations. In this paper, we present a fast and efficient method for computing the Frobenius endomorphism in the finite field $\mathbb{F}_{p^k}$, along with an analysis of its computational complexity. Furthermore, we introduce an optimization for cyclotomic cubing operations tailored to several pairing-friendly elliptic curves, which are essential for the calculation of Tate pairing and its derivatives.

We analyze the post-quantum security of succinct interactive arguments constructed from interactive oracle proofs (IOPs) and vector commitment schemes. Specifically, we prove that an interactive variant of the *BCS transformation* is secure in the standard model against quantum adversaries when the vector commitment scheme is collapse binding. Prior work established the post-quantum security of Kilian's succinct interactive argument, a special case of the BCS transformation for one-message IOPs (i.e., PCPs). That analysis is inherently limited to one message because the reduction, like all prior quantum rewinding reductions, aims to extract classical information (a PCP string) from the quantum argument adversary. Our reduction overcomes this limitation by instead extracting a *quantum algorithm* that implements an IOP adversary; representing such an adversary classically may in general require exponential complexity. Along the way we define *collapse position binding*, which we propose as the ``correct'' definition of collapse binding for vector commitment schemes, eliminating shortcomings of prior definitions. As an application of our results, we obtain post-quantum secure succinct arguments, in the standard model (no oracles), with the *best asymptotic complexity known*.

In a secret sharing scheme for a monotone access structure $\mathcal{A}:\{0,1\}^n\rightarrow \{0,1\}$, a dealer can share a secret $s$ to $n$ parties such that any authorized subset of parties $A\in\mathcal{A}$ can recover $s$ while all other subsets learn nothing about $s$. In this work, we study fully anonymous secret sharing (FASS), which strengthens standard secret sharing by requiring the following properties: - Share Anonymity. The shares belonging to any unauthorized set of parties not only hide the secret, but also all identifiable information such as party identities and whether or not the shares were generated together. In particular, it suffices that such shares be uniform and independent. - Anonymous Reconstruction. The reconstruction algorithm does not need to know the reconstructing set of parties. Efficient FASS exists for threshold access structures. For general access structures, the only known construction relies on a monotone DNF representation of $\mathcal{A}$ and has per-party share size $\Omega(\ell n)$ where $\ell$ is the number of minterms of $\mathcal{A}$. This leaves an exponential gap between standard secret sharing and FASS even for simple access structures. Moreover, even in the threshold case, known schemes could not achieve optimal robust reconstruction when mixing shares of multiple secrets. Motivated by a recent work of Eldridge et al. [USENIX'24], who demonstrated an application of FASS to stalker detection, we initiate a systematic study of FASS, obtaining the following main results. - Near-Optimal Information-Theoretic FASS. We obtain strong lower bounds, showing that the dependence on the DNF size is generally inherent. In particular, the share size can be exponential in the number of parties or even in the minimum CNF size. This stands in sharp contrast to standard secret sharing, where no super-polynomial lower bounds are known, and where the share size is upper bounded by the CNF size. For DNF with $\ell$ small minterms, we improve the previous upper bound to $\tilde O(\ell)$, matching our lower bound up to a polylogarithmic factor. - Computational FASS. We show that the above negative results can be circumvented in the computational setting, obtaining FASS schemes with succinct shares. Under the learning with errors (LWE) assumption, we present a general compiler from standard secret sharing to FASS that preserves the share size of the underlying scheme. For natural graph access structures, we directly construct succinct FASS from either one-way functions or bilinear maps. - Robust FASS. We show that simple modifications of our computational FASS schemes can allow for robust reconstruction of a polynomially unbounded number of secrets from any mixture of their authorized shares.

The European Commission's 2022 proposal for a regulation on child sexual abuse material, popularly labelled ChatControl, obliges online services to detect, report, and remove prohibited content, through client-side scanning. This paper examines the proposal as a case of undone science in computer security ethics: a domain where technical feasibility and rights-compatibility questions remain systematically underexplored. Combining legal analysis with philosophy of technology, the paper argues that client-side scanning transforms end-to-end encryption from a right to secrecy into a conditional privilege of use. By integrating Isaiah Berlin's concept of negative liberty, Langdon Winner’s account of the politics of artifacts, and David Hess’s notion of undone science, the analysis traces how design choices become moral constraints. The discussion situates the European debate within broader concerns about proportionality, epistemic selectivity, and the governance of digital infrastructures. Ultimately, the study shows that the controversy over ChatControl is not only about privacy or child protection but about the epistemic norms that define what counts as legitimate technological knowledge.

We consider reversely-degraded wiretap channels, for which the secrecy capacity is zero if there is no channel feedback. This work focuses on a seeded modular code design for the Gaussian wiretap channel with channel output feedback, combining universal hash functions for security and learned feedback-based codes for reliability to achieve positive secrecy rates. We study the trade-off between communication reliability and information leakage, illustrating that feedback enables agreeing on a secret key shared between legitimate parties, overcoming the security advantage of the wiretapper. Our findings also motivate code designs for sensing-assisted secure communication, to be used in next-generation integrated sensing and communication methods.

Prange's information set algorithm is a decoding algorithm for arbitrary linear codes. It decodes corrupted codewords of any $\mathbb{F}_2$-linear code $C$ of message length $n$ up to relative error rate $O(\log n / n)$ in $\mathsf{poly}(n)$ time. We show that the error rate can be improved to $O((\log n)^2 / n)$, provided: (1) the decoder has access to a polynomial-length advice string that depends on $C$ only, and (2) $C$ is $n^{-\Omega(1)}$-balanced. As a consequence we improve the error tolerance in decoding random linear codes if inefficient preprocessing of the code is allowed. This reveals potential vulnerabilities in cryptographic applications of Learning Noisy Parities with low noise rate. Our main technical result is that the Hamming weight of $Hw$, where $H$ is a random sample of *short dual* codewords, measures the proximity of a word $w$ to the code in the regime of interest. Given such $H$ as advice, our algorithm corrects errors by locally minimizing this measure. We show that for most codes, the error rate tolerated by our decoder is asymptotically optimal among all algorithms whose decision is based on thresholding $Hw$ for an arbitrary polynomial-size advice matrix $H$.

Lattice-based key-homomorphic encodings introduced by Boneh et al.~(Eurocrypt'14)---known as BGG+ encodings---underpin many primitives, including key-policy attribute-based encryption (KP-ABE). Many applications beyond KP-ABE require simulating the homomorphic evaluation of FHE ciphertexts over BGG+ encodings, which involves nonlinear operations on integers of magnitude up to the ciphertext modulus $q$. However, due to noise growth incurred by multiplication, the encodable integers must be kept small, typically bits, thereby forcing nonlinear operations to be simulated by Boolean circuits and incurring a circuit-size blow-up polynomial in $\log_2 q$. Apart from resorting to costly bootstrapping for BGG+ encodings, no method is known to beat this baseline. We propose a method to evaluate lookup tables~(LUTs) over BGG+ encodings that operates directly on base-$B$ digit representations for $2<B<\sqrt{q}$, with noise growth independent of the magnitudes of the encoded integers. Consequently, this replaces the $\log_2 q$ factor in the circuit-size blow-up with $\log_{B} q$, yielding a reduction in evaluation time by a factor polynomial in $\log_2 B$. We obtain: (i) small-integer arithmetic with base-$B$ outputs in constant size; (ii) modulo-$q$ multiplication with circuit size quadratic in $\log_{B} q$; and (iii) homomorphic ciphertext multiplication in the Gentry--Sahai--Waters FHE scheme~(Crypto'13) with circuit size approximately cubic in $\log_{B} q$. As an application, we build a KP-ABE scheme that is selectively secure under the Ring-LWE assumption and compatible with our LUT evaluation method. This reduces decryption cost by a factor polynomial in $\log_2 B$ at the expense of a polynomial-in-$B$ increase in decryption-key generation cost and decryption-key size, which is an attractive trade-off because decryption is invoked far more frequently than key generation in ABE applications.

The generic group model (GGM) is fundamental for evaluating the feasibility and limitations of group-based cryptosystems. Two prominent versions of the GGM exist in the literature: Shoup's GGM and Maurer's GGM. Zhandry (CRYPTO 2022) points out inherent limitations in Maurer's GGM by demonstrating that several textbook cryptographic primitives, which are provably secure in Shoup's GGM, cannot be proven secure in Maurer's model. In this work, we further investigate Shoup's GGM and identify novel limitations that have been previously overlooked. Specifically, to prevent generic algorithms from generating valid group elements without querying the oracle, the model typically employs sufficiently large encoding lengths. This leads to sparse encodings, a setting referred to as the sparse generic group model (sparse GGM). We emphasize that this sparseness introduces several constraints: --Groups with AE and Black-Box Separation: Shoup's GGM is typically instantiated with elliptic curve groups, which admit admissible encodings (AE)—functions mapping from Z_N to elliptic curve points. We establish a black-box separation, showing that the sparse GGM fails to capture cryptographic groups that are both (1) computational Diffie-Hellman (CDH) secure and (2) compatible with admissible encodings. --Comparison with EC-GGM: We examine the relationship between the sparse GGM and the Elliptic Curve Generic Group Model (EC-GGM) introduced by Groth and Shoup (EUROCRYPT 2022), which inherently yields CDH-secure groups with admissible encodings. Within the framework of indifferentiability, we prove that EC-GGM is strictly stronger than sparse GGM. --Dense Groups and Black-Box Separation: We revisit groups with dense encodings and establish a black-box separation between CDH-secure dense groups and the sparse GGM. --Extension to Bilinear Settings: Our results naturally extend to the sparse Generic Bilinear Group Model (GBM), demonstrating that the aforementioned constraints still hold. In conclusion, our findings indicate that both feasibility and impossibility results in Shoup's GGM should be reinterpreted in a fine-grained manner, encouraging further exploration of cryptographic constructions and black-box separations in EC-GGM or dense GGM.

Assuming the hardness of LWE and the existence of IO, we construct a public-key encryption scheme that is IND-CCA secure but fails to satisfy even a weak notion of indistinguishability security with respect to selective opening attacks. Prior to our work, such a separation was known only from stronger assumptions such as differing inputs obfuscation (Hofheinz, Rao, and Wichs, PKC 2016). Central to our separation is a new hash family, which may be of independent interest. Specifically, for any $S(k) = k^{O(1)}$, any $n(k) = k^{O(1)}$, and any $m(k) = k^{\Theta(1)}$, we construct a hash family mapping $n(k)$ bits to $m(k)$ bits that is somewhere statistically correlation intractable (SS-CI) for all relations $R_k \subseteq \{0,1\}^{n(k)} \times \{0,1\}^{m(k)}$ that are enumerable by circuits of size $S(k)$. We give two constructions of such a hash family. Our first construction uses IO, and generically ``boosts'' any hash family that is SS-CI for the smaller class of functions that are computable by circuits of size $S(k)$. This weaker hash variant can be constructed based solely on LWE (Peikert and Shiehian, CRYPTO 2019). Our second construction is based on the existence of a circular secure FHE scheme, and follows the construction of Canetti et al. (STOC 2019).

Unclonable cryptography leverages the quantum no-cloning principle to copy-protect cryptographic functionalities. While most existing works address the basic single-copy security, the stronger notion of multi-copy security remains largely unexplored. We introduce a generic compiler that upgrades collusion-resistant unclonable primitives to achieve multi-copy security, assuming only one-way functions. Using this framework, we obtain the first multi-copy secure constructions of public-key quantum money (termed quantum coins), single-decryptor encryption, unclonable encryption, and more. We also introduce an extended notion of quantum coins, called upgradable quantum coins, which allow weak (almost-public) verification under weaker assumptions and can be upgraded to full public verification under stronger assumptions by the bank simply publishing additional classical information. Along the way, we give a generic compiler that upgrades single-copy secure single-decryptor encryption to a collusion-resistant one, assuming the existence of functional encryption, and construct the first multi-challenge secure unclonable encryption scheme, which we believe are of independent interest.