Secure aggregation is a core primitive for privacy-preserving federated learning, enabling a server to compute aggregates of client updates without learning individual inputs. Recent protocols have explored committee-based designs to reduce client overhead and tolerate weakly connected participants. However, existing approaches still incur communication and computation costs that scale with the number of clients and/or the size of model updates. This becomes a serious bottleneck in interaction between the server and the committee, given that model updates are high-dimensional and the committee is a small set of clients. We present Lighthouse, a new secure aggregation protocol that supports one-shot client communication and achieves constant committee computation and communication overhead with the server, independent of both the number of clients and the size of the input vector. Our protocol attains the best-known round complexity of two rounds, matching OPA (CRYPTO 2025) and TACITA (ePrint 2025) and improving upon Flamingo (IEEE S&P 2023) and Willow (CRYPTO 2025). Our core technical contribution is a novel application of recent advances in batched threshold encryption, which enables succinct server–committee interaction while preserving security and correctness. Beyond asymptotic improvements over prior works, Lighthouse yields substantial concrete efficiency gains: For an aggregation with 1024 clients, we reduce server-to-committee communication by over 100× and committee-to-server communication by over 300× compared to Flamingo and Willow. Also, we present an extension that supports dynamic client participation, a critical requirement for practical deployments at scale, while preserving the asymptotic and concrete efficiency of the static protocol for clients.

Cryptographic proof systems enable a verifier to be convinced of a computation's correctness without re-executing it; common efficiency requirements include both succinct proofs and fast verification. In this work we put forth the general study of cryptographic proof systems with \textit{sublinear} proving time (after a preprocessing). Prior work has achieved sublinear proving only for limited computational settings (e.g., vector commitments and lookup arguments), relying on specific assumptions or through non-black-box use of cryptographic primitives. In this work we lift many of these limitations through the systematic study of a specific object: polynomial commitments (PC) with sublinear proving time, a choice motivated by the crucial role that PC play in the design of efficient cryptographic schemes. We show a simple construction of a PC with sublinear prover based on any vector commitment scheme (VC) and any preprocessing technique for fast polynomial evaluation. We prove that this PC satisfies \emph{evaluation binding}, which is the standard security notion for PC, but show it does not satisfy stronger notions of security. Next, we study applications of PCs with sublinear prover. The first one is to construct \emph{index-efficient} SNARKs, i.e., where the prover is sublinear, after preprocessing, in the size of the index (i.e., the NP-relation describing the proven statement). We propose a method to transform a class of standard Polynomial Interactive Oracle Proofs (PIOPs) into index-efficient PIOPs, obtaining two results that advance the state of the art: the first lookup argument for unstructured tables in which the prover is sublinear in the size of the table, while making only black-box use of a VC and thus allowing instantiations from generic assumptions such as collision-resistant hash functions, and the first transparent SNARK for circuits where the prover is sublinear in the number of addition gates. Finally, our last application is a transformation that builds \emph{UC-secure} SNARKs from simulation-extractable ones, with an approximately linear overhead in proving time (as opposed to quadratic in prior work).

Pairing-based multilinear polynomial commitments offer succinct verification for sum-check-based proof systems, but existing schemes trade prover work against proof size and verifier cost. Building on Mercury's representation of a multilinear evaluation as the constant coefficient of a (reciprocal) Laurent polynomial, we construct two schemes with different performance trade-offs. Vela uses inversion symmetry to derive a half-length auxiliary polynomial and opens two polynomials at $z$ and $z^{-1}$ with one univariate KZG proof. Vela has a $2\mathbb{G}_1+3\mathbb{F}$ proof, a two-term pairing check, and approximately $2N$ opening MSM scalars, at the cost of $O(N\log N)$ field operations on the prover side. Carina applies the same constant-term reduction once in each coordinate and jointly proves evaluation claims for the committed bivariate polynomial and two auxiliary polynomials with one opening at four bivariate points. The four points form a grid, allowing Carina to restructure the opening equation to save verifier works and proof size. Carina has a $4\mathbb{G}_1+8\mathbb{F}$ proof, a three-term pairing check, and $O(N)$ field operations plus exactly $N+2\sqrt{N}-6$ MSM works on the prover side. We prove perfect evaluation completeness, computational commitment binding, and knowledge soundness in the AGM and ROM, with explicit random-oracle error bounds under a falsifiable bilinear $q$-type DLOG assumption. Our curve-generic Rust implementation also provides common implementations of six pairing-based baselines. On BLS12-381 at $\mu=20$, Vela gives the smallest measured proof (200 bytes, 1.88x smaller than the next smallest) and the lowest verification median, 2.06 ms. Carina's opening median remains in the same leading tier as the prover-oriented mKZG and CHOPIN implementations, while its 452-byte proof and 2.67 ms verification median improve on both. Compared with the verifier-oriented Mercury, Carina's opening median is 1.96x faster at the cost of a 0.48 ms verification slowdown.

The MACsec Key Agreement protocol, defined in IEEE 802.1X, manages and distributes ephemeral Secure Association Keys for Ethernet links protected with MAC security (IEEE 802.1AE). Prior work has shown that baseline MKA may scale poorly on shared medium Ethernet multidrop links and that formal worst-case bounds significantly exceed automotive startup targets, motivating alternative solutions such as In-line Key Agreement. However, in practice, to preserve compatibility, integration effort, and alignment of standardization, automotive systems are more likely to optimize a MACsec/MKA architecture than to completely replace it. This paper presents novel automotive MKA optimizations targeting secure startup times on shared medium networks and evaluates them through detailed network simulations. Unlike previous work focused on baseline MKA or deterministic worst-case analysis, we study the full startup-time distribution of the optimized protocol under realistic startup scenarios. We quantify the effect of the proposed optimizations on Time-To-Key-Agreement and show how the resulting empirical distributions can be translated into conservative simulation-derived practical startup-time bounds suitable for OEM timing budgets. The resulting bounds are intended as simulation-derived engineering bounds under the modeled startup assumptions, complementing formal worst-case analysis with distributional information on typical, tail, and upper-end behavior.

We study hash-based polynomial commitment schemes (PCSs) over large prime fields that scale to witnesses containing billions of scalars. Such PCSs are important for emerging data-science-related applications of zero-knowledge succinct non-interactive arguments of knowledge (zkSNARKs). Our goal is to reduce prover time while preserving polylogarithmic proof size and verifier time. To this end, we seek code agnostic, succinct PCS constructions that can be instantiated with any linear code over any target field, allowing the most efficient code for the chosen field to be selected. Our SwitchFold construction achieves polylogarithmic verification by recursively applying the code-switching technique between codes of decreasing block lengths. Prior code-switching PCSs switch from an unstructured code to a foldable code; in contrast, SwitchFold requires no code foldability and thus decouples PCS design from code design. For a polynomial of size N and security parameter λ, instantiating SwitchFold with linear-time encodable codes yields O(N) prover time and O(λ log^2 N) proof size and verifier time. We instantiate SwitchFold with the Brakedown codes (Golovnev et al., CRYPTO ’23) and the recently proposed quasi-Abelian (QA) codes (Li et al., IACR ePrint ’26), yielding BrakeFold and QAFold, respectively. At N = 2^30, QAFold achieves the fastest prover time among all evaluated PCSs with succinct verification. Compared with TensorSwitch (Bünz et al., IACR ePrint ’25), the other code-agnostic PCS, QAFold reduces total and marginal prover time by factors of 2.2× and 2.7× under the same QA-code instantiation. With Brakedown codes, BrakeFold reduces the marginal prover time per additional opening by a factor of 2.9× relative to TensorSwitch.

Proof-of-stake blockchains require consensus protocols that support Dynamic Availability and Reconfiguration (which we call the DAR model). Here, Dynamic Availability means that the consensus protocol should remain live even if a large number of nodes temporarily crash, and Reconfiguration means it should be possible to change the set of operating nodes over time. State-of-the-art protocols inspired by the DAR model, such as Ethereum, Cardano's Ouroboros, or Snow White, require additional model features comprising external mechanisms or node capabilities that are difficult to justify, such as social consensus or the requirement that key evolution be performed even when nodes have crashed. The key result of this paper is the necessary and sufficient adversarial condition under which consensus can be achieved in the plain DAR model, without any extra features. We then introduce an additional feature to the model that is justified by proof-of-stake blockchain designs: honest nodes complete a sign-off procedure the moment they express intent to exit from the set of operating nodes. This additional feature reduces the power of the adversary relative to the plain DAR model and helps us obtain a bootstrapping gadget that is particularly simple and efficient in the common optimistic case of few reconfigurations and no double spending.

A long-standing question in the blockchain community is which class of computations are efficiently expressible in cryptocurrencies with limited scripting languages, such as Bitcoin Script. Such languages expose a reduced trusted computing base, thereby being less prone to hacks and vulnerabilities, but have long been believed to support only limited classes of payments. In this work, we confute this long-standing belief by showing for the first time that arbitrary computations can be encoded in today's Bitcoin Script without introducing any language modification or additional security assumptions, such as trusted hardware, trusted parties, or committees with an honest majority. We present BitVM, a two-party protocol that realizes a generic virtual machine by combining cryptographic primitives and economic incentives. We conduct a formal analysis of BitVM, characterizing its functionality, system assumptions, and security properties. We further demonstrate the practicality of our approach by implementing a prototype and performing an experimental evaluation: in the optimistic case (i.e., when parties agree), our protocol requires just three on-chain transactions, whereas in the pessimistic case, the number of transactions grows logarithmically with the size of the virtual machine. We exemplify the deployment potential of BitVM by building a Bitcoin-sidechain bridge application. This work not only solves a long-standing theoretical problem, but it also promises a strong practical impact, enabling the development of complex applications in Bitcoin.

Video conferencing software, including Zoom, Microsoft Teams, and Cisco Webex, use human-driven key verification ceremonies to protect end-to-end encrypted meetings against a potentially malicious service provider. The client software shows each participant a code that they must compare; if the codes match, the call is considered secure. Prior security analyses assumed authenticated out-of-band channels for the comparison, but this is generally unrealistic. The codes are short-lived, so the ``in-band'' channel being verified is, itself, the most natural one to use. We seek to understand the implications of this common practice, asking whether it can be secure and under what conditions. To this end, we formalize the notion of a Human-to-Human Group Key Agreement protocol, modeling an authenticated group key exchange between people, rather than their cryptographic keys. We identify that the security of these protocols relies on the pre-existing capacity of people to consistently recognize one another, avoiding any global identification scheme or trusted external infrastructure. We present a construction, prove it secure in our model, derive concrete bounds, and discuss non-examples demonstrating the definition's subtlety. Our results highlight the approach's usability issues and reliance on unforgeability of human-authenticated video streams---an assumption additionally challenged by recent advances in deepfakes.

Private information retrieval (PIR) is a fundamental cryptographic primitive that allows a client to retrieve an entry of a database from a server without revealing which entry was retrieved. PIR security is traditionally defined with a distinguishing game that ensures the clients' access patterns are kept private from a semi-honest server. Verifiable PIR (VPIR) adds another game-based property that holds against a malicious server: the server is bound to a particular database and cannot cause a client to retrieve a database entry that is inconsistent with this database. Recent work by Alon and Beimel [ITC 2025] deviated from the traditional game-based PIR definitions and contributed a definition of standalone simulation-based security for multi-server PIR. Their techniques, however, do not readily extend to single-server VPIR and do not consider concurrent protocol composition when PIR is used as a building block within a larger application. In this work, we further the study of simulation-based VPIR security. We are the first to formalize a universally composable (UC) definition of VPIR in the single-server setting by giving an ideal VPIR functionality. We motivate the need for UC security by showing how game-based VPIR properties fail under sequential and concurrent protocol composition. We also demonstrate the generality of our UC VPIR functionality by providing two realizations based on a trivial PIR and VeriSimplePIR [de Castro and Lee, USENIX Security 2024]. Additionally, we introduce a new kind of VPIR, called Updatable VPIR (UVPIR), which guarantees to clients that (1) database updates are authorized by permissioned clients and (2) responses to their queries are consistent with a specific version of the PIR database. We show that UVPIR can be constructed in a black-box manner on top of any VPIR protocol.

We present InsPIRe that is the first private information retrieval (PIR) construction simultaneously obtaining both high-throughput and low query communication while using silent preprocessing (meaning no offline communication). Prior PIR schemes with both high-throughput and low query communication required substantial offline communication of either downloading a database hint that is 10-100x larger than the communication cost of a single query (such as SimplePIR and DoublePIR [Henzinger et al., USENIX Security 2023]) or streaming the entire database (such as Piano [Zhou et al., S&P 2024]). In contrast, recent works such as YPIR [Menon and Wu, USENIX Security 2024] avoid offline communication at the cost of increasing the query size by 1.8-2x, up to 1-2 MB per query. Our new PIR protocol, InsPIRe, obtains the best of both worlds by obtaining high-throughput and low communication without requiring any offline communication. Compared to YPIR, InsPIRe requires 5x smaller cryptographic keys, requires up to 50% less online query communication while obtaining up to 25% higher throughput. We show that InsPIRe enables improvements across a wide range of applications and database shapes including the InterPlanetary File System and private device enrollment. At the core of InsPIRe, we develop a novel ring packing algorithm, InspiRING, for transforming LWE ciphertexts into RLWE ciphertexts. InspiRING is more amenable to the silent preprocessing setting that allows moving the majority of the necessary operations to offline preprocessing. InspiRING only requires two key-switching matrices whereas prior approaches needed logarithmic key-switching matrices. We also show that InspiRING has smaller noise growth and faster packing times than prior works in the setting when the total key-switching material sizes must be small. To further reduce communication costs in the PIR protocol, InsPIRe performs the second level of PIR using homomorphic polynomial evaluation, which only requires one additional ciphertext from the client.

An anonymous credential allows a user to prove that she is authorized in an anonymous and unlinkable fashion. A rate-limited token is an anonymous credential that can only be used a limited number of times in any particular context; this means that even though we do not know which users are gaining access to a resource, there is a limit to how many resources one user may consume. Such tokens are becoming an increasingly attractive way to balance privacy with authorized access. Although a general architecture for how to obtain rate-limited tokens from digital signatures, pseudorandom functions (PRFs), and non-interactive zero-knowledge proofs (NIZKs) has been known for over twenty years, efficiently instantiating it with post-quantum-secure signatures and proofs has, until now, remained an open problem. In this work, we present the first lattice-based construction of rate-limited tokens and tackle the practical challenges associated with using lattice-based building blocks in this setting. A central difficulty lies in the absence of lattice-based PRFs that support efficient NIZK proofs of correct evaluation. We show that, in the random oracle model, a weak PRF—where adversaries are restricted to querying random inputs—suffices. We further present a weak PRF construction that both admits efficient NIZK proofs and remains secure—even when adversaries have partial control over the randomness—and extend this guarantee more generally to key-homomorphic PRFs. Another contribution, which is of independent interest, is the first lattice-based construction of partially binding commitments, a primitive introduced by Goel et al. (Eurocrypt 2022) that was previously known only under discrete-log assumptions. We give a practical construction that enables succinct disjunctive proofs via a variant of the self-stacking compiler of Goel et al. Along the way, we develop a new technique for batching CNF proofs of $\Sigma$-protocols, which allows one to efficiently prove that a value is the output of a PRF on one of a set of inputs. As a direct application, this yields logarithmic-size lattice-based ring signatures based on Fiat–Shamir-with-Aborts $\Sigma$-protocols (Lyubashevsky, Eurocrypt 2012). Finally, we observe for the first time that the anonymous counting tokens of Benhamouda, Raykova, and Seth (Asiacrypt 2023) can be obtained from anonymous rate-limited tokens. This yields a construction whose communication complexity is independent of the number of tokens that need to be issued.

MEV and censorship, fuelled by public mempool visibility, remain existential threats to Ethereum and have recently started to spread to its layer-two ecosystem. Encrypted mempools promise to conceal transaction content until ordering is final. While this sounds appealing, their viability rests on cryptographic, economic, and deployment trade-offs. This paper systematises the evolution of threshold-encrypted mempools, from early schemes such as Shutter and Ferveo to the most recent research, and analyses how successive iterations have resolved bottlenecks like committee communication overhead, lack of pending transaction privacy, and position-dependent encryption. We highlight a convergence along four design axes, namely batched decryption to mitigate latency, silent setup to eliminate the complexity of distributed key generation, epochless encryption to remove position dependency, and collision-free encoding to prevent slot-collision censorship. We further survey the active Ethereum deployment debate, including EIP-8105 and the LUCID headliner submission, and map the requirements raised there onto the cryptographic corpus. We conclude by exposing a critical limitation common to all current proposals: blind ordering and binary decryption together suppress not only the toxic part of MEV that motivated encrypted mempools, but also the same-block auction mechanisms that return value to users and sustain geographic decentralisation of the network.

Consider the problem of merging inside a garbled circuit (GC) two arrays of $w$-bit elements, yielding a single length-$n$ array. This garbled merge problem is core to garbled random access memory (GRAM), a technique that enables efficient garbling of general-purpose programs. We present a novel symmetric-key-based garbled merge that achieves a garbling size of $(w + 1) \cdot n \cdot \lambda$ bits, providing both asymptotic and concrete improvements over the state of the art. By applying our garbled merge, we obtain a symmetric-key GRAM of size $O(n \lg^3 n \cdot \lambda) \cdot \omega(1)$ for a word RAM program that manipulates words of size $\Theta(\lg n)$ bits and halts within $n$ steps, improving over the previous best result (Heath et al., CRYPTO'23) by an $O(\lg \lg n)$ factor. This communication cost was previously only achieved under the public-key-style DDH assumption (Gu et al., CRYPTO'25). We implement our construction, and our evaluation shows that our garbled merge reduces the communication cost over the DDH-based merge by about $3\times$.

Two-server Private Information Retrieval achieves arbitrarily small polynomial communication, but relies on a strong non-collusion assumption that is difficult to justify in practice. We introduce a new variant of two-server PIR in which one server acts as a standard \emph{compute} server, while the other is a restricted \emph{retrieval-only} server. The latter stores a public encoding of the database and merely serves requested symbols or blocks of this encoding, without performing any PIR-specific computation. We argue that such a retrieval-only server can be instantiated using existing static-content or repository-hosting services, thereby grounding the non-collusion assumption in realistic architectural and deployment constraints. Assuming Learning Parity with Noise (LPN) over the ternary field with inverse-polynomial noise rate, we construct RC-PIR with arbitrarily small polynomial communication and polynomial storage. Leveraging this construction, we derive the following unexpected applications for every constant \(k\): \begin{enumerate} \item \(k\)-server PIR with arbitrarily small polynomial communication and privacy against any coalition of \(k-1\) servers. \item \(k\)-server robust PIR with arbitrarily small polynomial communication that simultaneously achieves correctness and privacy with respect to an arbitrary monotone access structure \(\mathcal{A}\). Namely, correctness is guaranteed whenever the set of online servers \(S\) satisfies \(S \in \mathcal{A}\), while privacy holds against every coalition \(S \notin \mathcal{A}\). \item A \(k\)-party secure computation protocol for size-\(n\) truth tables also known as lookup tables, with arbitrarily small polynomial communication and passive security against any coalition of \(k-1\) parties. This result extends to active security either in the honest-majority setting, or without an honest majority assuming collision-resistant hash functions. \end{enumerate} None of these results were previously known under the LPN assumption. Along the way, we uncover new relationships between different complexity measures of PIR.

Private Function Evaluation (PFE) facilitates the secure computation of private functions on private inputs in an oblivious manner, ensuring that both the function and the inputs remain confidential throughout the entire computational process. PFE has garnered significant attention due to its critical applications in various domains, such as privacy-preserving healthcare systems and privacy-preserving credit checks, where safeguarding the confidentiality of the function itself is of paramount importance. However, despite its broad applicability, existing PFE schemes often exhibit inefficiencies, even in relatively straightforward scenarios such as the evaluation of lookup tables. To mitigate these limitations, we propose a novel variant of PFE, termed Preprocessed Private Function Evaluation (PPFE), which leverages preprocessing techniques to significantly enhance the efficiency of online computations. Within this framework, we introduce a specialized construction tailored specifically for lookup table operations, achieving sublinear complexity during the online computation phase. The efficacy of the proposed approach is demonstrated through experimental evaluations. For a lookup table of size $2^{24}$, the online computation time required to process a single query is about 3 milliseconds, representing a performance improvement of more than an order of magnitude compared to existing results. Furthermore, the proposed scheme exhibits strong scalability, effectively handling thousands of adaptive queries within the same framework.

Proof-of-work (PoW) remains a fundamental mechanism for achieving decentralized consensus, most commonly instantiated using cryptographic hash functions. In such constructions, mining takes the form of an unstructured search problem over a large input space, where miners repeatedly evaluate candidate solutions until a valid one is found. While this design has proven effective in practice, it admits a quadratic quantum speedup via Grover’s algorithm, raising concerns about the long-term security of hash-based mining. Motivated by this limitation, we investigate the use of code-based cryptographic problems as an al- ternative foundation for proof-of-work. In particular, we focus on the syndrome decoding problem and examine its classical and quantum com- plexity based on current state-of-the-art information-set decoding (ISD) algorithms and their quantum variants, comparing the resulting quantum advantage with that of hash-based and lattice-based constructions. Building on this analysis, we propose a proof-of-work construction based on the Syndrome Decoding Problem (SDP) with a structured profile constraint, which enables controlled variation of solution density and difficulty. Under the standard random-instance heuristic, we derive ex- pressions for the expected number of solutions and the probability of successful mining, providing a principled basis for parameter selection.

In multi-epoch deployments, private set union~(PSU) operates in an adaptive-input loop: after observing the union at epoch $t$, the receiver may choose its next input for epoch $t+1$. Liu et al.~(EUROCRYPT 2026) formalized this multi-epoch adaptive-input setting for updatable private set intersection and provided an instantiation, but their framework does not extend to PSU. Meanwhile, existing PSU protocols are analyzed only in the single-shot setting. We present the first semi-honest, adaptive-input-secure updatable PSU protocol supporting two-sided add/delete updates in the multi-epoch adaptive-input setting of Liu et al. Our construction is built around a new primitive, the updatable oblivious key-value store (uOKVS). Its defining rule, distributional erasure, requires each refresh to be distributed identically to a fresh static encoding of the current key set, rather than merely indistinguishably. We realize uOKVS by combining the Band-OKVS of Bienstock et al. with a PRF under a persistent key. The resulting refresh reuses a cached factorization, so its per-epoch encoding cost scales linearly rather than quadratically in the band width $w$. Building on this layer, we obtain a multi-epoch PSU protocol whose leakage is limited to set and update cardinalities, even against adaptive-input adversaries. We implement the protocol and benchmark it in a single-threaded setting. At $n = 2^{20}$ with per-epoch updates $\Delta = 55$ over $10$ epochs, the online per-epoch wall-clock time is $1.41$ s on LAN, yielding a $30.9\times$--$98.9\times$ speedup over prior static PSU protocols re-executed from scratch at each epoch.

Grinding is a technique which introduces a proof of work into the Fiat-Shamir transform: by constraining the challenge to satisfy a $w$-bit condition, forging a proof requires about $2^w/\varepsilon$ evaluations of the hash function instead of $1/\varepsilon$, where $\varepsilon$ is the soundness error of the underlying protocol. This allows one to select reduced parameters, yielding shorter proofs and signatures. Grinding is used in FAEST, MQOM and SDitH, the three MPC-in-the-Head schemes selected for the third round of the NIST additional post-quantum signature standardization process, where it is instantiated with Keccak. In this short paper, we investigate grinding schemes in which the proof of work is expressed in terms of block cipher computations, specifically AES, which is significantly faster than Keccak on modern CPUs, is already a building block of these schemes, and underlies the very definition of the NIST security categories. We formalize the notion of grinding scheme together with a protocol-agnostic security notion, we propose a construction performing two cipher calls per iteration, and we prove, in the ideal cipher and random oracle models, that an adversary making $Q_E$ cipher queries breaks it with probability at most $\frac{4}{3} \cdot \varepsilon\, Q_E / 2^w$, up to negligible terms. We further generalize the scheme to use more cipher calls per iteration, which makes the constant $\frac43$ tend to $1$.

In the formal verification of complexity-theoretic properties of cryptography, researchers have traditionally attempted to capture ``overwhelming truth'' (satisfaction with all but negligible probability) via satisfaction on individual traces of probabilistic execution. However, this approach introduces significant complexity when quantification is present: satisfaction of existential quantification over traces often produces witnesses---such as nonce-guessing oracles---that, without further constraints, may not correspond to meaningful global objects like PPT algorithms respecting causal structure. This discrepancy creates significant obstacles when attempting to combine trace properties, such as reachability, with properties that are defined on non-negligible sets such as computability, or global properties, such as algorithmic indistinguishability. We resolve this by shifting from defining local satisfaction as satisfaction on individual traces to a semantics based on ever-decreasing non-negligible sets. We demonstrate that the logical key to this unification lies in first-order modal logic S4 with \emph{non-negligible sets} as possible worlds, rather than the propositional S5 fragment with \emph{traces} as possible worlds suggested in previous investigations by the Squirrel Prover team. By introducing a PPT computational first-order S4 Kripke semantics and adopting Fitting's embedding for trace properties, we provide a unified quantified treatment of overwhelming truth for trace properties and indistinguishability, together with a first-order calculus, $\mathsf{BC}^+$, whose sole modal operator is the overwhelming-truth bracket $[\,\cdot\,]$. The calculus is sound and, on its fragment, derives exactly the theorems of first-order S4 with persistence; computational completeness holds on the fragment; cut elimination holds propositionally, while at first order every cut is confined to an optimal Barcan shape. We show that Fitting's embedding naturally accommodates the higher-order quantification used in the Squirrel prover by interpreting function types as sorts in a many-sorted first-order logic; this reduces the need for the specialized \texttt{const} predicate and its associated structural restrictions. Finally, using our findings, we present a hybrid semantics for CryptoVampire that eliminates the need for bounded Skolemization.

Oblivious algorithms allow a space-constrained client program to securely outsource storage to an untrusted server. Any program can be compiled to an oblivious form via Oblivious RAM (ORAM), but this is asymptotically and concretely expensive. Recent work (Appan et al., CCS'24) proposed a weakening of ORAM called Oblivious Single Access Machine (OSAM), which offers asymptotically-improved oblivious compilation for many programs, including those that manipulate graph data structures. While of theoretical interest, OSAM graph algorithms were worse than generic ORAM, even for large graphs (tested on graphs of size up to $2^{25}$). This work improves the concrete costs of OSAM-based oblivious algorithms. In short, the original work on OSAM proposed algorithms for manipulating objects with pointers to other objects, but their management of pointers involves non-trivial and concretely-expensive algorithms. Our work greatly simplifies and improves the efficiency of OSAM-based pointer handling by co-designing (1) pointer-friendly modifications to the underlying Path ORAM algorithm and (2) new algorithms for managing pointers and building graphs from pointers. Our work provides generic and easy-to-use oblivious tools with concretely better performance than state-of-the-art generic tools. Natural graph algorithms can now be automatically compiled to an oblivious form while enjoying up to a $4$x improvement in performance as compared to generic Path ORAM (and at least $8$x as compared to the original OSAM).

We perform the first formal security analysis of the cryptographic core of Olvid, an end-to-end encrypted messaging app notably used by French government officials, including ministers. Despite its deployment in sensitive contexts and its role in critical communications infrastructure, Olvid's cryptographic security has received little independent analysis. To address this gap, we develop detailed models of Olvid's authenticated key exchange and continuous key agreement protocols. We formally verify that our protocol models achieve security properties such as mutual authentication, session-key secrecy, forward secrecy, and replay protection, under an active Dolev-Yao network adversary model that can compromise parties. While we constructively prove that the protocol design meets core security guarantees, our analysis also reveals that, contrary to its claims, the protocol does not meet strong modern security properties that are met by other state-of-the-art secure-messaging protocols, such as Signal. For example, we show in our formal analysis that Olvid is not secure in modern security models such as eCK. Along the way, we uncover a potential timing leakage, and discuss Olvid's anonymity claims.

Function secret sharing (FSS) has become a core primitive in privacy‑preserving computation. However, each FSS invocation requires a fresh pair of function keys, typically produced by a trusted dealer—a dependency that expands the system's trust boundary and hinders practical deployment. Existing dealerless protocols eliminate this dependency, but incur substantial communication and a number of interaction rounds that grows linearly with the input bit‑width, making key generation a major bottleneck. This paper presents KORD, a protocol–hardware co‑design that dramatically reduces the cost of dealerless FSS key generation. At its core is a pair of chips that establish a common root of trust through mutual attestation and, within it, reconstruct FSS keys—eliminating the need for a dealer. This root of trust further forms a security boundary within which KORD restructures the generation protocol, collapsing the interaction of prior dealerless protocols into a single round, independent of GGM depth. A cross‑key scheduling scheme then interleaves independent GGM‑tree traversals, sustaining high computational throughput. KORD reduces key‑generation communication per operation by $7{,}633$–$70{,}274\times$ over the state‑of‑the‑art distributed FSS protocol. On a ZCU102 FPGA, cross‑key interleaving lifts AES lane utilization from $8.3\%$ to a board‑measured $99.0\%$, for $11.60$ million $32$-bit DPF keys per second at $187.5\,\text{MHz}$ on a $21.5\,\text{K}$ LUT engine ($12.38\,\text{M}$ at the separately validated $200\,\text{MHz}$ operating point). On private ResNet‑18 inference, key generation's share of end‑to‑end time falls to $10.1\%$, from $82.6\%$ under a trusted dealer and over $96\%$ under the dealerless baseline.

Privacy-preserving computation over real numbers typically employs either floating-point or fixed-point arithmetic. While fixed-point methods are highly efficient, they struggle to handle wide dynamic ranges. Conversely, floating-point methods support a much larger numerical scope but incur overheads more than a hundred times higher than their fixed-point counterparts. In this paper, we propose DYNAFIX, a dynamic fixed-point computation scheme that strikes a balance between floating-point and fixed-point arithmetic. Compared to traditional fixed-point approaches, our scheme supports an arbitrary numerical range; compared to floating-point computation, it maintains performance comparable to fixed-point execution. Experimental results demonstrate that our method achieves a $24.1\times$ speedup over the state-of-the-art when evaluating high-precision functions, such as the exponential function.

Blockchains aim to provide open access and censorship resistance, but centralization of block production in blockchains like Ethereum undermines these goals. Inclusion List (IL) protocols mitigate this by requiring block proposers to include transactions selected by an IL committee to enforce the inclusion of transactions that appear to have been censored. However, protecting the confidentiality of individual committee members’ contributions is essential to prevent retaliation and ensure robust censorship resistance. We propose a lightweight, privacy-preserving inclusion list protocol that allows committees to collectively construct transaction lists while hiding individual contributions and ensuring plausible deniability. Our approach builds on multiparty computation (MPC) techniques to achieve strong privacy without relying on heavyweight cryptography or anonymous broadcast channels. We implement two variants of our protocol design: an optimistic version providing malicious security with abort (latency $\sim 4.0$s) for speed, and a robust variant (latency $\sim 124.7$s) for guaranteed output delivery in the presence of a Byzantine threshold of $t < n/3$ malicious parties.

Secure and anonymous messaging has many compelling use-cases and is becoming increasingly popular. In this paper, we consider it in the context of delay-and-disruption-prone networks, which are characterized by handicapped network access, disrupted operation, censorship, and intermittent network outages. With such settings in mind, we define and design a Private Identity-Based Bulletin Board (PIB^3) scheme, which allows users to anonymously post and retrieve messages to and from a distributed database, and supports communication between users without pre-established setup or pre-exchanged keys. Anyone can encrypt a message for an identity and public epoch, such that only the party with the decryption key for that identity can identify, retrieve, and decrypt the message. Against one corrupted non-colluding PIB^3 server, the server learns neither the recipient identity nor the retrieved record indices beyond the leakage explicitly modeled by the scheme: the public epoch, the database size, and the number of retrievals made by the receiver. If retrieval-count privacy is required, retrievals can be padded to a fixed bound. The multi-server construction extends this guarantee to larger server sets, and gives coalition privacy whenever the underlying multi-server PIR scheme is private against the corresponding coalition. Contributions of this work are: (1) formally defining functionality and security requirements for PIB^3-s, (2) defining and constructing a Hierarchical Identity-based Encryption (HIBE) scheme with searchable ciphertexts, which serves as a building block for the proposed PIB^3 scheme and may be of independent interest, (3) designing an efficient PIB^3 scheme that can be realized with $n\geq 2$ servers based on the HIBE scheme with searchable ciphertexts combined with additional primitives, and (4) implementing a functional PIB^3 prototype which demonstrates practicality of the entire concept and allows us to assess its performance empirically.

Recent advances in quantum hardware, including Google's Willow processor, have substantially narrowed the timeline to cryptographically relevant quantum computers. In the blockchain setting, where addresses and key derivation standards such as BIP32, BIP44, and SLIP-10 are the dominant infrastructure for wallet management, a quantum computer running Shor's algorithm can recover any elliptic-curve private key from the corresponding public key, threatening every wallet in production today. Migrating to post-quantum signature schemes requires changing the public key format and forcing address migration across all participating networks, a significant problem for blockchain communities. We present an orthogonal approach: keep the existing address format entirely unchanged and instead replace the classical signing step with a NIZK proof of knowledge of the seed underlying the existing address, where security against quantum adversaries reduces to the conjectured quantum hardness of the underlying hash functions and the soundness of the NIZK against quantum adversaries, requiring no address migration or key registration. We build on the observation of Baldimtsi et al. that EdDSA's deterministic seed-to-key mapping makes the seed a valid zero-knowledge witness for the public key, and extend their single-level result to the full hierarchical deterministic wallet setting. Starting from BIP32-Ed25519, we replace the classical signing step with a NIZK proof certifying knowledge of the root seed and the full derivation chain, and prove EUF-CMA security for the resulting scheme; post-quantum security is conjectured to hold since all underlying primitives depend only on the hardness of hash functions and the soundness of the NIZK against quantum adversaries. The existing schemes each derive their quantum-safe witness as an incidental artifact of a curve-specific key format, and none provides a single derivation standard that works uniformly across curves. We therefore introduce QBIP32, a new key derivation scheme based on a keyed function HASH768 (instantiated with KMAC256) that produces the signing scalar, an explicit quantum-safe witness, and the chain code in a single call. QBIP32 is defined for any elliptic curve group of prime order with a fixed generator, requiring no structural change to the derivation or proof system across curves: the same construction covers secp256k1, Ed25519, and any future curve used in blockchain infrastructure. This universality stands in contrast to the BIP32-Ed25519 approach, which relies on the Ed25519 extended key format and has no analogue for other curves. We then address the efficiency problem: a monolithic proof of the full derivation chain has cost growing linearly with derivation depth. Our main contribution is ZKPoSP (Zero-Knowledge Proof of Seed Provenance), a signature scheme conjectured secure against quantum adversaries that splits the proof into a derivation proof generated once per key pair and a signing proof generated once per message, reducing per-message proving cost to a constant independent of derivation depth. We further characterise exactly when the derivation proof itself can be shortened to cover only the last step of the derivation rather than the full chain from the root seed, and identify the existence of a private value that is bound to the seed by a one-way function and not recoverable from the public key as the precise criterion. This criterion is met by hardened keys but not by non-hardened keys, a structural distinction common to all schemes: BIP32 secp256k1, SLIP-10/Ed25519, BIP32-Ed25519, and QBIP32 all admit a last-step derivation proof for hardened keys, while non-hardened keys require a proof reaching back to the last hardened ancestor. We exploit this for BIP44 paths to prove only one hardened step plus the non-hardened suffix in a single proof, allowing the root seed to be removed from the proving device once the anchor node is generated, while remaining in secure long-term storage. Before Q-day, separating the derivation and signing proofs already reduces per-transaction cost to a constant independent of derivation depth. After Q-day, once networks reject all non-post-quantum signatures, the leaf scalar can be moved to the public statement, removing all elliptic-curve scalar multiplications from the proof circuit and reducing derivation proving time substantially. We implement all constructions in Rust using RISC Zero as the NIZK backend, instantiate HASH768 with KMAC256, and report benchmarks for monolithic proofs, ZKPoSP across full BIP44 paths, and the post-Q-day variant. Signing proving time is constant at approximately 12-13 seconds and verification time is constant at approximately 9-10 ms across all variants and depths.

Updatable vector commitments let users store and authenticate values contained within an evolving data vector. Existing work on updatable vector commitments studies how clients can store only the values and authentication proofs relevant to them, and can refresh stale opening proofs, with the help of an online maintainer that keeps the current vector and proof state. This work studies the complementary problem: how to decentralize the maintainer, in order to distribute the cost and availability requirements. We formalize this problem as extendable distributed vector commitments (EDVC). A public control plane, such as consensus or a trusted party, determines batches of updates and extensions of stored vector. Maintainers accept and apply a batch only after validating it against the current authenticated state. The resulting state is stored across many maintainer nodes, each of which holds a publicly assigned coded data fragment and updates it non-interactively. A stale client can obtain the current state, and a fresh authenticated opening, from the current maintainers (without replaying the updates history). We construct the first EDVC protocol, called Borg, from two components: a sparse vector commitment, and a coded storage layer that can be updated by linear operations. This construction applies when all active positions lie within a known growing prefix of the vector. We then construct a coded storage layer with the operations needed for this setting, including single-position openings, aligned range openings, public updates, adding new nodes, repairing failed nodes, and moving storage responsibilities between nodes. This is then used to flexibly distribute the data alongside a sparse Merkle tree for authentication. Our construction is particularly simple when the maintained data is an append-only public log (e.g., a blockchain’s block archive, or certificate transparency logs). In this setting, distributed updates to the data and its authentication structure can be made just by broadcasting the new log entries, with no coordination across maintainer nodes. We empirically evaluate maintainers’ cost for various workflows, showing that nodes can process hundreds of thousands of updates per second. We also show that node addition, repair of lost local state, and changes to the proof-serving threshold can all be supported efficiently.

A verifiable shuffle proves that output ciphertexts are a rerandomized permutation of the inputs without revealing the permutation or rerandomization factors. It is a core primitive in mix-nets for electronic voting and blockchain-based anonymization, where each mix server publishes an auditable proof. Existing deployed schemes typically have proof size $O(N)$ or $O(\sqrt{N})$ in the number of ciphertexts $N$, making shuffle proofs a major bandwidth cost. We present a logarithmic-size verifiable shuffle for ElGamal ciphertexts. The logarithmic term in our proof size is one third of that in the previously known logarithmic construction for the same shuffle relation by Hoffmann et al. (CCS 2019). Our protocol is public coin, non-interactive via the Fiat--Shamir transform, and relies on an updatable structured reference string that can be generated once in a powers-of-tau ceremony and reused across applications. We implement the protocol in Rust and provide, to our knowledge, the first benchmarks for a logarithmic-size ElGamal shuffle. At \(N=2^{20}\), the proof is 2.6 KiB. In a four-server mix-net election, the four shuffle proofs occupy approximately 10.6 KiB in total, excluding ballot-validity and decryption proofs.

General-purpose secure multiparty computation (MPC) remains bottlenecked in large part by a lack of efficient techniques for handling memory access. We demonstrate a remarkably simple and efficient 2PC instantiation of random access memory (RAM), based on distributed point functions (DPFs, Gilboa and Ishai, Eurocrypt'14). Our semi-honest 2PC protocol can be achieved from oblivious transfer (OT) and a black-box pseudorandom generator (PRG). For a memory storing large enough data words, our 2PC RAM incurs constant communication overhead per access. Like prior works using DPFs to achieve memory access, our work incurs linear computation per access, but per-access communication is lean. Our 2PC RAM is built on top of an obliviousness-friendly model of computation called the single access machine model (SAM, Appan et al., CCS'24). In the SAM model, each memory slot can be read at most once. We present a simple 2PC SAM protocol, where each single-access memory operation incurs at most $O(w + \lambda \lg n)$ bits of communication, where $w$ is the word size, $n$ is the number of memory words, and $\lambda$ is a security parameter. Of this cost, only $2w + 2\lg n$ bits are incurred in the online phase. There are now many oblivious algorithms that compile directly to SAM more efficiently than via a compilation to RAM, and our 2PC SAM can instantiate these algorithms. As one example, we can use our 2PC SAM to implement privacy-preserving graph traversal (DFS or BFS) over a secret-shared size-$n$ graph while revealing nothing beyond the runtime of the SAM program. Our construction achieves online communication $O(n \lg n)$ bits, asymptotically matching the number of bits touched in a corresponding cleartext graph traversal.

A party may participate in multiple threshold cryptosystems. For example, it may serve on multiple overlapping threshold committees in a proof-of-stake blockchain or a distributed oracle network, or act as a client of multiple cryptocurrency wallet services built on threshold cryptography. With conventional distributed key generation (DKG), each threshold system independently generates its key shares, imposing significant key-management overhead on such a repeating party. In contrast, modern key-management practice favors deriving all cryptographic material deterministically from a single master key, raising a fundamental question: Can DKG be reconciled with key derivation while preserving security and compatibility with legacy threshold systems? We present Anchor-DKG, a new DKG protocol that allows up to $t^{\mathsf{rec}}$ (the reconstruction threshold) parties to deterministically fix their secret key shares while retaining standard security guarantees. Anchor-DKG supports concurrent executions with overlapping participants across multiple DKG instances and remains fully compatible with legacy threshold schemes, including ECDSA, BLS, Schnorr, and ElGamal. At the core of Anchor DKG lies a new technique: fixed-point distributed polynomial sampling (FpDpS). FpDpS allows parties to jointly sample a random $(t^{\mathsf{rec}}-1)$-degree polynomial $f$ such that $f(i) = s_i$ at designated points $i$, where each $s_i$ can be a private input, e.g., a key derived from a master secret. The final secret key remains $f(0)$, ensuring compatibility with existing discrete-log-based threshold systems. We provide an efficient construction of Anchor DKG under standard cryptographic assumptions, which, compared to classical constructions such as Gennaro et al. (J.Cryptol. 2007), only incurs one more point-to-point round and marginal computation. Experimental results show that, for a network size of $n=128$, our protocol incurs a per-party computation cost of $1.59$ s, compared to $1.36$ s for GJKR.

Lattice-based succinct arguments allow to prove bounded-norm satisfiability of relations, such as $f(\vec{s}) = \vec{t} \bmod q$ and $\|\vec{s}\|\leq \beta$, over specific cyclotomic rings $\mathcal{O}_\mathcal{K}$, with proof size polylogarithmic in the witness size. However, state-of-the-art protocols require either 1) a super-polynomial size modulus $q$ due to a soundness gap in the security argument, or 2) a verifier which runs in time linear in the witness size. Furthermore, construction techniques often rely on specific choices of $\mathcal{K}$ which are not mutually compatible. In this work, we exhibit a diverse toolkit for constructing efficient lattice-based succinct arguments: (i) We identify new subtractive sets for general cyclotomic fields $\mathcal{K}$ and their maximal real subfields $\mathcal{K}^+$, which are useful as challenge sets, e.g. in arguments for exact norm bounds. (ii) We construct modular, verifier-succinct reductions of knowledge for the bounded-norm satisfiability of structured-linear/inner-product relations, without any soundness gap, under the vanishing SIS assumption, over any $\mathcal{K}$ which admits polynomial-size subtractive sets. (iii) We propose a framework to use twisted trace maps, i.e. maps of the form $\tau(z) = \frac{1}{N} \cdot \mathsf{Trace}_{\mathcal{K}/\mathbb{Q}}( \alpha \cdot z )$, to embed $\mathbb{Z}$-inner-products as $\mathcal{R}$-inner-products for some structured subrings $\mathcal{R} \subseteq \mathcal{O}_\mathcal{K}$ whenever the conductor has a square-free odd part. (iv) We present a simple extension of our reductions of knowledge for proving the consistency between the coefficient embedding and the Chinese Remainder Transform (CRT) encoding of $\vec{s}$ over any cyclotomic field $\mathcal{K}$ with a smooth conductor, based on a succinct decomposition of the CRT map into automorphisms, and a new, simple succinct argument for proving automorphism relations. Combining all techniques, we obtain, for example, verifier-succinct arguments for proving that $\vec{s}$ satisfying $f(\vec{s}) = \vec{t} \bmod q$ has binary coefficients, without soundness gap and with polynomial-size modulus $q$.

The problem of computing an isogeny of large prime degree from a supersingular elliptic curve of unknown endomorphism ring is assumed to be hard both for classical as well as quantum computers. In this work, we first build a two-round identification protocol whose security reduces to this problem. The challenge consists of a random large prime $q$ and the prover simply replies with an efficient representation of an isogeny of degree $q$ from its public key. Using the hash-and-sign paradigm, we then derive a signature scheme with a very simple and flexible signing procedure and prove its security in the standard model. The most efficient variant of our signature schemes features a signing which is $1.4\times$ to $1.6\times$ faster than the most recent implementaion of SQIsign, whereas verification ranges from $1.2\times$ slower to $1.01\times$ faster depending on the security level. The sizes of public key and signature are comparable to existing schemes.

Relying solely on encryption for privacy-preserving computations is prone to leakage-abuse/access-pattern attacks. TEEs, while cost-effective, are also vulnerable to side-channel attacks. Oblivious primitives, such as oblivious memory (ORAM) and data structures (ODS), are effective building blocks to mitigate these risks by concealing memory access patterns and side-channel information. Applications range from private contact discovery (Signal) to anonymous key transparency, encrypted email search, encrypted/oblivious databases, anonymous communication (Sparta/SP'25), private federated learning, LLM privacy (Compass/OSDI'25), and broader confidential computing efforts. Tree-based ORAMs (EnigMap (USENIX'23), GraphOS (PVLDB'23), Oblix (SP'18)) offer low latency but limited parallelism. Partition-based solutions like Snoopy (SOSP'21) shard data across subORAMs (which build oblivious hashtables on incoming requests, then linearly scan them), achieving high throughput by trading off latency, theoretically enabling linear scalability. In practice, Snoopy’s performance hinges on how quickly each subORAM can build the oblivious hashtable and complete its linear scan before exceeding latency targets, constraining server utilization and throughput. While supporting a TB-scale dataset with Snoopy is theoretically feasible, we estimate it would require 1000+ servers. In this work, we reconcile the fractured landscape between low-latency and high-throughput ORAM designs. We introduce SONIC: the first parallel/concurrent doubly-oblivious tree-based ORAM for TEEs. SONIC achieves 156K-3.3M req/s with a single server, tackling the core challenges of all tree-ORAM constructions: overcoming the sequential eviction bottleneck, enabling efficient batch evictions, and providing lock-free access/reshuffle/stash operations. SONIC achieves throughput 29-104$\times$ higher than EnigMap, and 158-560$\times$ higher than GraphOS, with lower latency. In the distributed, high-throughput setting, our SONIC-powered OMAP PMChain can replace Snoopy's subORAM, supporting higher throughput and $64\times$ larger datasets using the same hardware (reducing Snoopy's server requirements).

There are numerous settings in which people’s preferences are aggregated outside of formal elections, and where privacy and verification are important but the stringent coercion-resistant properties of government elections do not apply, a prime example being social media platforms. In contrast to the centrally organised, single-shot elections on which most of the literature is focused, our settings of interest often have no trusted authority and are iterative, i.e., publish partial tallies before all votes are received. In this work, we explore opinion aggregation in a decentralised, iterative setting. In our novel protocol,randomly-chosen parties take turns to decrypt aggregated votes in an incentive-driven manner. Our simple construction leverages homomorphic encryption and secret sharing in a novel manner to provide security of the tally, public and individual verifiability, as well as vote privacy and liveness guarantees. Contrary to existing voting schemes, our protocol is ideal for the iterative setting.

Recent advances in lattice-based threshold cryptography, including threshold fully homomorphic encryption (ThFHE) and threshold public key encryption (ThPKE), commonly employ Shamir secret sharing over rings. While conceptually simple, these schemes suffer from rapidly growing denominator-clearing factors required for secret reconstruction as the number of parties $N$ increases, which in turn necessitates larger ciphertext moduli and complex reconstruction procedures. In this work, we revisit the notion of subtractive sets underlying ring-based Shamir secret sharing and present a refined framework for constructing integer-reconstructible sharing over cyclotomic rings. To that end, we introduce a new geometric analysis of Lagrange coefficients and show that the resulting reconstruction factors can be made significantly smaller under specific settings. In particular, our framework enables smaller ciphertext sizes in $(t,N)$-threshold settings, and yields improved correctness and efficiency when applied to any ring-based threshold construction employing Shamir secret sharing over cyclotomic rings. Specifically, in lattice-based one-round $(t, N)$-ThFHE schemes, our approach reduces the bit-size of ciphertext moduli from $O(N)$ to $O(t\log (N/t^2))$ while ensuring efficient denominator handling. For lattice-based ThPKE, our method yields a new bound on reconstruction factors that improves upon the recent state-of-the-art result of Pilvi. Moreover, we implement ThFHE schemes over cyclotomic rings based on our framework and demonstrate their practical efficiency. Our experimental results show that each algorithm completes within $0.2$ seconds for $N=64$ and remains scalable for larger configurations with $N\geq 256$.

Proof-carrying data (PCD) is a powerful cryptographic primitive for ensuring computational integrity in distributed settings. State-of-the-art PCD constructions based on accumulation schemes achieve practical prover efficiency and support a wide range of applications. However, realizing zero-knowledge for accumulation-based PCD remains challenging, particularly for high-degree relations. Existing solutions often incur substantial overhead due to the need for zero-knowledge in both the underlying non-interactive arguments of knowledge (NARKs) and accumulation schemes. In this work, we present new theoretical and practical improvements for zero-knowledge PCD. First, we propose a novel construction that eliminates the need for zero-knowledge NARKs by separating the compliance predicate and accumulation verification, thereby reducing proof size and improving efficiency. Second, we design an efficient zero-knowledge accumulation scheme for special sound protocols, introducing techniques such as masking vectors and zero-knowledge sum-check protocols to ensure privacy with minimal overhead. The theoretical analysis demonstrates that our construction achieves logarithmic proof size and verification time for d-degree NP relations, and outperforms existing solutions in both asymptotic and concrete complexity.

Succinct non-interactive arguments of knowledge (SNARKs) enable a prover to produce a short and efficiently verifiable proof of the validity of an arbitrary NP statement. Recent constructions of efficient SNARKs have led to interest in using them for a wide range of applications, but unfortunately, deployment of SNARKs in these applications faces a key bottleneck: SNARK provers require a prohibitive amount of time and memory to generate proofs for even moderately large statements. While there has been progress in reducing prover time, prover memory remains an issue. In this work, we describe Scribe, a new low-memory SNARK that can efficiently prove large statements even on cheap consumer devices such as smartphones by leveraging a plentiful, but heretofore unutilized, resource: disk storage. Instead of storing its (large) intermediate state in RAM, Scribe's prover instead stores it on disk. To ensure that accesses to state are efficient, we design Scribe's prover in a read-write streaming model of computation that allows the prover to read and modify its state only in a streaming manner. We implement and evaluate Scribe's prover, and show that, on commodity hardware, it can easily scale to circuits of size $2^{28}$ gates while using less than 750 MB of memory and incurring only $10$% proving latency overhead compared to a state-of-the-art memory-intensive baseline (HyperPlonk [EUROCRYPT 2023]) that requires much more memory.

Randomly permuting secret data vectors is a core building block in many privacy-preserving protocols, including those for analytics, advertising, and communication. Existing approaches either rely on computation-heavy public key cryptography and zero-knowledge proofs or scale poorly for large vectors due to use of a quasilinear-sized permutation network. This work presents a preprocessing approach to enable fast linear-time online shuffles in the malicious-secure two-party computation (2PC) setting. We propose FLOSS, a 2PC protocol for securely computing any interactive arithmetic permutation circuit, a notion we introduce to capture how higher level protocols are built on secret-shared field arithmetic and permutations. We show how secret-shared sorting (a subprotocol in data analytics) can be described as an arithmetic permutation circuit, and can thus be compiled to an efficient online 2PC protocol using FLOSS. Our implementation and evaluation confirm FLOSS performs online shuffles fast: shuffling $2^{20}$ elements in under 500ms, greater than $800\times$ faster than state-of-the-art alternatives.

We study the communication complexity of non-interactive secure computation (NISC) protocols with security against malicious adversaries. We give a general NISC protocol for any two-party function computed by a Boolean circuit $C$ using only $O(|C|\lambda)$ bits of communication, where $\lambda$ is a computational security parameter. This protocol is unconditionally secure in the random oracle model, assuming a standard random bit OT correlations setup. Compared to Yao's semi-honest protocol, our protocol incurs only a constant communication overhead and achieves security against malicious parties with no additional interaction. Prior works achieved such constant overhead by either using a larger number of rounds or more structured correlations.

Error-correcting codes play a central role in modern cryptography, enabling efficient constructions of primitives such as zero knowledge proofs and secure multiparty computations. Among them, repeat-accumulate-accumulate (RAA) codes have recently attracted significant attention due to their linear-time encoding and good distance properties. However, prior work only established provable distance guarantees over the binary field or over finite fields whose size is smaller than the message length. The underlying techniques do not extend to larger fields. This restriction is significant, as many cryptographic constructions based on error-correcting codes operate over large finite fields. In this paper, we prove that RAA codes achieve constant relative distance $0<\delta\le \frac{1}{2}$ with high probability over large finite fields. Moreover, we resolve an open conjecture by showing for the first time that the distance of RAA codes improves over large fields. We provide both theoretical analysis and empirical evidence demonstrating that, compared to the binary case, large fields yield strictly better distance guarantees with much smaller failure probabilities. Our empirical evaluation shows that for message length $n=2^{20}$ and repetition factor $r=4$, the RAA code over a 31-bit prime field achieves relative distance $1/2$, except with failure probability $2^{-20}$. This is better than the best provable distance of $\delta = 0.2$ with failure probability $2^{-10}$ over the binary field. Leveraging our improved distance bounds, we obtain a 2.6$\times$ reduction in the proof size of a polynomial commitment scheme based on RAA codes compared to using the binary-field bound, and a 5.4$\times$ reduction compared to a prior construction based on expand-accumulate codes.

We study amortization of prover work in the multi-verifier setting, motivated by proof-as-a-service deployments in which a shared prover serves $K$ independent clients holding distinct statements. Each verifier checks only its own statement and proof, with no inter-verifier communication. The challenge is therefore to amortize prover work across many proofs while preserving local verification. We consider polynomial relations arising naturally in IOP-based proof systems, where verification reduces to polynomial identities and polynomial openings at verifier-chosen random points. Existing amortization techniques rely on shared verifier randomness, for example, to batch openings at a common evaluation point. However, under the standard Fiat--Shamir transform, independently verifiable proofs derive challenges from separate transcripts, preventing such amortization. We address this obstacle through a multi-verifier Fiat--Shamir transform that correlates verifier challenges across independently verifiable proofs while preserving locality. We further introduce promise local folding schemes, which defer polynomial-constraint checks generated during folding and amortize them later. Together, these techniques provide a generic framework for amortization under local verification. We apply this framework to the witness-independent component arising in R1CS- and CCS-based SNARK provers, which reduces to bivariate polynomial evaluation claims over the public constraint matrices. This component accounts for a substantial portion of the concrete proving cost. Applying our techniques to these claims reduces the server's cryptographic cost for this component from $O(K\cdot s)$ to $O(K\log K+s)$ group operations, where $s$ denotes the sparsity of the public constraint matrices, with each verifier performing only $O(\log K)$ cryptographic work and requiring no inter-verifier communication. Because the amortized component depends only on the public circuit description, our framework composes cleanly with collaborative zk-SNARK protocols, which target the complementary witness-dependent component.

Threshold fully homomorphic encryption (ThFHE) enables decryption by collecting decryption shares from any T-out-of-N parties. A major drawback of previous ThFHE schemes is that they require a super-polynomial modulus (or are subject to other limitations), resulting in long ciphertexts, keys, and decryption shares. Passel`egue and Stehl´e (Asiacrypt 2024) proposed a ThFHE scheme in which a semi-trusted server rounds the input ciphertexts to produce polynomially short ciphertexts and sends them to the parties, thereby making the rest of the decryption process efficient. Although the input ciphertexts are still super-polynomially large, the communication cost of sending them from the parties to the server can be reduced to polynomial size via the transciphering technique; as a result, an entirely low-communication ThFHE is achieved. However, if even a single party colludes with the server (contrary to the assumption), the secret key can be efficiently recovered. Such a risky scenario would be unsuitable for practical deployment. In this paper, we tackle this issue. We propose two serverless ThFHE schemes with polynomially short decryption shares. The core idea is to let the parties directly round the decryption shares, rather than rely on the semi-trusted server to round the ciphertexts. We can also achieve low-communication ThFHE by reducing the communication required to send input ciphertexts to the parties to polynomial size via transciphering. Our first scheme, based on binary coefficient linear secret sharing ({0,1}-LSS), strictly improves upon Boneh et al. (CRYPTO 2018), achieving short decryption shares without any trade-offs. Our second scheme, based on Shamir secret sharing, adapts the technique of Okada and Takagi (Asiacrypt 2025) to eliminate the $O(N^{4.3})$ overhead in share size of our first scheme, further reducing communication costs.

Searchable Symmetric Encryption (SSE) enables data owners to securely store encrypted data on untrusted cloud servers while retaining the ability to perform secure searches and retrieve relevant documents. However, standard SSE schemes expose search patterns (whether two queries are identical), and result patterns (which documents are returned), making them susceptible to leakage-abuse attacks that can infer sensitive information such as the queried keywords and/or document contents. While Oblivious RAM (ORAM) and Private Information Retrieval (PIR) can hide these patterns, their high computation and communication overhead often render them impractical for real-world search workloads. A more efficient alternative is to obfuscate search and result patterns using Differential Privacy (DP). Unfortunately, existing DP-based SSE schemes either provide insufficient query privacy protection, or still incur substantial performance overhead. In this paper, we propose FROST, a novel differentially private SSE scheme that efficiently obfuscates both search and result patterns, while providing strong resilience against all known statistical leakage-abuse attacks. The core component of FROST is our new rerandomized PIR (RePIR) scheme designed for private databases, which allows server-side rerandomization of encrypted PIR query responses. In FROST, we also introduce a novel method for applying DP noises to SSE for search result obfuscation using only simple arithmetic operations. An important property of FROST is that it requires only a single round of communication, with small user-side storage as an additional benefit. We fully implemented FROST and conducted extensive experiments over real-world datasets to rigorously assess its practical performance and resilience. Our experiments showed that FROST not only effectively mitigates pattern-leakage attacks while maintaining reasonable utility, but also achieves up to four orders of magnitude faster keyword search and three orders of magnitude lower bandwidth overhead than prior DP-based SSE schemes.

Commutative diagrams of isogenies between supersingular elliptic curves, which are called isogeny diamonds, have become fundamental to isogeny-based cryptography for both constructive and cryptanalytic purposes. In parallel, proofs of knowledge of isogenies have been widely studied and have found many applications. In this work, we combine these two directions and introduce zero-knowledge proofs of isogeny diamonds, namely, we prove knowledge of isogenies that form a commutative diagram between four curves. We present four constructions that work in various settings. The first, Windmill-ZKP assumes that the prover knows only two parallel isogenies in the diamond. The second, Cube-ZKP assumes the prover has knowledge of four of specified degree isogenies. Finally, Kube-ZKP and Kani-ZKP prove knowledge of isogeny diamonds whose degree sum is smooth. We also provide proof-of-concept implementations of the proposed constructions and compare their performance. Our results demonstrate the trade-offs between security, efficiency and compactness in these constructions.

Running Transformer inference and retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) over confidential data forces a choice: either expose prompts and documents to a cloud operator, or keep the data on-premises, which confines the deployment to weaker self-hosted models. Existing defenses span five mechanism families: secure computation (MPC and FHE), trusted execution environments (TEEs), static obfuscation, differential privacy, and hybrid TEE-and-obfuscation splits. No prior systematization compares them on a common footing of mechanism, threat model, and deployment cost, and none covers the RAG retrieval layer. We organize the field by deployment readiness: the likelihood a scheme is adopted in practice, scored on performance, utility, and threat-model fit. The scoring spans inference and RAG retrieval, both dense and graph. We find that no family dominates: each attains at most two of the three criteria, and which one it sacrifices is fixed by its security basis, so the deployable choice is set by the constraint an application can least afford to relax. Even trusted hardware is no exception, since every surveyed scheme ignores the side channels to which it is most exposed. We further surface hidden deployment costs, such as client reliance and a custom serving path, identify private graph-RAG as the least-served setting, and find that no design yet keeps a pipeline confidential from query to answer.

Private Set Intersection (PSI) enables parties to compute the intersection of their input item sets while preserving privacy. In many real-world applications, however, each item is accompanied by a sensitive weight, and the ability to privately compute over such weights is crucial. Existing research in this direction is fragmented and driven by application-specific goals, with representative examples including PI-Sum (computing the sum of weights over the intersection), inner-product Private Join and Compute (computing the inner product of weight vectors over the intersection), and Item with Maximum Weight Sum (identifying the intersection item with the maximum combined weight). In this work, we propose a unified framework for private computation on weighted set intersection. We formalize \textit{Private Filtering and Aggregation for Weighted Set Intersection} (PFA-WSI) as an ideal functionality parameterized by a joint scoring function $f$ and a predicate $P$, supporting two output modes: (i) \emph{predicate-filtered output}, which reveals a predicate-selected subset of intersection items, and (ii) \emph{aggregated output}, which reveals only aggregate statistics over matched items. By instantiating $f$ and $P$ appropriately, PFA-WSI captures deployed and studied tasks such as PI-Sum, inner-product PJC, and IMWS, and also accommodates richer metrics arising in practice, such as $L_1$- and $L_2$-type distance statistics on matched item weights. To realize PFA-WSI efficiently, we introduce a novel core building block, Oblivious Encrypted Weight Transfer (OEWT), which enables a receiver to obtain encryptions of the sender's weights for intersection items and random-looking ciphertexts otherwise. Building on OEWT and additively homomorphic encryption, we present modular protocol constructions for different instantiations of $f$ and for both output modes. We prove simulation-based security in the semi-honest model and provide detailed communication and computation analyses. Our experiments show that our constructions scale to million-sized sets with practical performance that matches or surpasses the state-of-the-art.

Signature-based witness encryption (SWE) schemes recently emerged as a viable alternative to instantiate timed-release cryptography in the honest majority setting. In particular, assuming threshold trust in a set of parties that release signatures at a specified time, one can ``encrypt to the future'' using an SWE scheme. It offers stateless decryption, where parties producing the signatures do not need to know the ciphertexts in advance to perform decryption. This statelessness makes SWE vastly superior to regular threshold encryption for decentralized blockchain applications such as sealed-bid auctions and voting. However, the lack of homomorphism in existing SWE schemes severely bottlenecks their throughput and limits their deployment. In this work, we formally introduce Homomorphic SWE (HSWE) to resolve these limitations. We present a systematic suite of HSWE constructions designed to scale across varying message spaces without sacrificing statelessness. We first establish foundational HSWE schemes for binary messages using Cocks IBE and standard Learning With Errors (LWE). To support polynomially-sized message spaces, we construct a pairing-based scheme that features an efficient multi-pairing optimization for cross-tag aggregation. For exponentially large message spaces, we transition to a Ring-LWE construction that achieves high-throughput polynomial packing with post-quantum security. Moreover, we address the inherent privacy limitation of public stateless aggregation by proposing a framework that perfectly hides individual plaintexts and only reveals the final aggregated result. We also present an empirical performance evaluation in Rust to highlight the impact of homomorphism in practical deployments.

Threshold signatures are a fundamental primitive in applied cryptography, primarily used to mitigate the custodial risk involved in managing keys. However, existing constructions rely on synchronous communication assumptions and fixed participant sets, limiting their applicability to real-world networks. In addition, as the committees managing those keys serve an ever-growing number of clients and assets, they become lucrative targets for attacks. This issue is often called the Honeypot Problem. A recent work proposed the 2PC-MPC paradigm, in which a client and a decentralized network jointly generate signatures, aiming to mitigate this issue. In this work, we present the first asynchronous 2PC-MPC protocol for ECDSA signatures, designed to operate over reliable broadcast channels as implemented in modern blockchains. Our protocol tolerates dynamic, post-determined quorums whose participants may change between rounds. This allows the protocol to align with asynchronous consensus layers while providing identifiable abort, public verifiability, guaranteed output delivery (assuming completeness of the broadcast channel) and censorship resistance for the client. We introduce global presigns, which are generated autonomously by the network and remain client-agnostic until signing. This enables effective background preprocessing, and results in sub-second online signing network-side latency for dozens of concurrent clients. From a technical perspective, our asynchronous design eliminates commitment rounds, yielding one-round client interaction for both key generation and signing. We also remove the need for zero-knowledge proofs toward the client. This results in a client complexity independent of network size, without proof aggregation (which is particularly challenging over asynchronous channels). Our constructions are proven UC-secure in the asynchronous setting. To achieve concrete security over 256-bit elliptic curves, we introduce the Slightly-Enhanced ECDSA Unforgeability assumption and provide a tight reduction in the EC-GGM model. Beyond theoretical analysis, we implement our protocols and evaluate them in both a local benchmark and a live permissionless deployment with dozens of validators, demonstrating practical performance and robustness under heterogeneous execution speeds.

Byzantine Agreement (BA) protocols must ensure not only agreement and termination, but also validity: the value agreed upon should meaningfully reflect the honest parties' inputs. The choice of validity condition can change the exact resilience threshold at which BA is solvable. Tight characterizations for BA with general validity conditions are known in the partially synchronous model (PODC'23), in the synchronous model (PODC'24), and in the network-agnostic model (DISC'25). We focus on general validity for synchronous BA with responsive termination. Such protocols remain secure against up to $t_s$ byzantine corruptions, but incur a running time that depends on the actual network delay $\delta$, rather than the conservative delay bound $\Delta \gg \delta$, whenever at most $t_r \leq t_s$ parties are corrupted. We present a tight characterization of the validity properties solvable in this setting. We prove that every non-trivial validity property requires $n>2 t_r+t_s$ in authenticated settings, where a public-key infrastructure and digital signatures are available, and $n>3 t_s$ in unauthenticated settings. These threshold conditions are accompanied by a validity-dependent requirement, the responsive similarity condition: roughly, for any concrete configuration of honest inputs, there is a value that is valid for any view that a protocol could obtain from this initial configuration. We then present matching protocols in both settings, showing that these conditions are sufficient. The main technical contribution is an authenticated responsive Core-Set Agreement protocol requiring $n>2 t_r+t_s$. This threshold may place the protocol in an honest-minority regime, where prior constructions for general validity do not apply and where standard Synchronous Broadcast is not responsive. Finally, we instantiate the characterization for several standard validity notions -- weak validity, strong unanimity, convex validity, and honest-input validity.

We introduce Lether, the first practical account-based private block-chain payment protocol based on post-quantum lattice assumptions, following the paradigm of Anonymous Zether (FC '19, IEEE S&P '21). The main challenge in building such a protocol from lattices lies in the absence of core building blocks: unbounded-level additively-homomorphic multi-message multi-recipient public key encryption (mmPKE), and event-oriented linkable ring signatures with support for multiple tags (events). To address these issues, we propose a verifiable refreshable additively-homomorphic mmPKE scheme and a plug-and-play event-oriented linkable tag scheme from lattices. We believe both to be of independent interest To achieve unbounded-level homomorphic evaluation in the lattice-based setting without relying on heavy techniques such as bootstrapping or large moduli (e.g., over 60 bits) in fully homomorphic encryption (FHE), we introduce a simple yet blockchain-friendly mechanism called refresh. Namely, each user is required to verifiably refresh their account after a certain number of transactions. With our tailored parameter settings, the amortized per-refresh costs of communication and computation are only about 1.3% and 1.5%, respectively, of the cost of a transaction. We also optimize the implementations of LNP22 lattice-based zero-knowledge proof system (Crypto '22) in the LaZer library (CCS ’24), to support efficient batching of various proof components.Overall, for a typical transaction, the total communication cost becomes about 68 KB, with the associated zero-knowledge proof accounting for about 51 KB of this total. Each of proof generation and verification take a fraction of a second on a standard PC. As an additional contribution, we formalize new definitions for Anonymous Zether-like protocols that more accurately capture real-world blockchain settings. These definitions are generic and are expected to benefit the broader development of account-based private blockchain payment protocols, beyond just lattice settings.

Succinct non-interactive arguments of knowledge (SNARKs) based on lattice assumptions offer a promising post-quantum alternative to pairing-based systems, but have until now suffered from inherently quadratic proof sizes in the security parameter. We introduce RoK and Roll, the first lattice-based SNARK that breaks the quadratic barrier, achieving communication complexity of $\tilde{O}(\lambda)$ together with a succinct verification time. The protocol significantly improves upon the state of the art of fully-succinct argument systems established by ``RoK, Paper, SISsors'' (RPS) [ASIACRYPT'24] and hinges on two key innovations, presented as reductions of knowledge (RoKs): - Structured random projections: We introduce a new technique for structured random projections that allows us to reduce the witness dimensions while approximately preserving its $\ell_2$ norm and maintaining the desired tensor structure. In order to maintain succinct communication and verification, the projected image is further committed and adjoined to the original relation. This procedure is recursively repeated until dimension of the intermediate witness becomes $\mathsf{poly}(\lambda)$, i.e. independent of the original witness length. - Unstructured random projection: When the witness is sufficiently small, we let the unstructured projection (over coefficients $\mathbb{Z}_q$) be sent in plain, as in LaBRADOR [CRYPTO'23]. We observe, however, that the strategy from prior works to immediately lift the projection claim to $\mathcal{R}_q$, and into our relation, would impose a quadratic communication cost. Instead, we gradually batch-and-lift the projection a the tower of intermediate ring extensions. This reduces the communication cost to $\tilde{O}(\lambda)$ while maintaining a succinct verification time. These two techniques, combined with existing RoKs from RPS, yield a succinct argument system with communication complexity $\tilde{O}(\lambda)$ and succinct verification for structured linear relations.

This paper gives a modular and unified framework within which to derive fast protocols for Private Set Intersection (PSI). At the core of this is a new primitive, that we define, and that we call a Just-In-Time OPRF (JIT-OPRF). We show how to obtain PSI generically from any JIT-OPRF, and then how to obtain JIT-OPRFs from Oblivious Transfer (OT) and Vector Oblivious Linear Evaluation (VOLE). We recover as special cases PSI protocols in the literature based on these two assumptions. Our results and proofs throughout are concrete rather than asymptotic, with explicit bounds that allow one to determine security parameters to achieve a desired level (e.g.~128 bits) of proven security in practice. Our results show interesting differences in the concrete security of OT and VOLE based PSI. Beyond the practical contribution of concrete-security, our work adds conceptual simplicity to this area, and opens the door to new PSI protocols via the construction of new JIT-OPRFs.

A blind signature scheme is an interactive protocol that enables a user to obtain a signature on a message without revealing any information about the message–signature pair to the signer. Despite more than 40 years of research, all existing constructions suffer from at least two of the following limitations. 1. The protocol is not round-optimal, requiring more than two messages to be exchanged during the signature phase. 2. There is only game-based security and/or lack of composability with global and observable setup (i.e., there is a need for trusted parameters or to program random oracles). 3. Security (unlike regular signatures) is based on demanding hardness assumptions, especially when considering quantum attacks. In this work, we show how to blindly sign a message, simultaneously overcoming all of the above three limitations. Specifically, we construct a Universally Composable (UC), two-round (optimal) blind signature protocol that relies only on one-way functions (optimal), without trusted parameters. The only deviation from the plain model is the need for a global non-programmable random oracle (NPRO). Nicely, our scheme can be instantiated from a variety of assumptions believed to be post-quantum secure (e.g., AES). A central technical component of our scheme is the construction of a novel commitment scheme that enjoys a special (mild) form of composability, which may be of independent interest. We also discuss a concrete instantiation of our scheme that is suitable for practical applications.

Public blockchains expose all state and computation by default, which is incompatible with financial applications that require confidentiality. Solana achieves high throughput and sub-second confirmation, making it an attractive settlement layer, yet it offers no general mechanism for computing over encrypted state: fully homomorphic encryption (FHE) remains orders of magnitude too slow for interactive use, secure multi-party computation (MPC) incurs heavy communication, and Solana’s native confidential-transfer extension hides only token amounts and supports no programmable logic. We present Encifher, a confidentiality coprocessor for Solana that brings general, programmable computation over encrypted state to a high-throughput chain. Encifher adopts the ciphertext-handle and symbolic-execution interface of confidential-computing coprocessors (e.g., Zama’s fhEVM), but resolves it inside a Trusted Execution Environment (TEE) rather than with a fully homomorphic evaluator: on-chain Solana programs manipulate only 128-bit handles to ciphertexts, while an off-chain coprocessor running inside a hardware enclave fetches the corresponding ciphertexts from a public data availability layer, decrypts and computes on plaintext within the enclave, re-encrypts, and commits attested, Merkle-anchored results back on chain. A key observation is that Solana’s account model and parallel (Sealevel) scheduler turn the transaction’s declared read/write set into the dependency graph of the confidential computation, yielding parallel, correctly-ordered execution of encrypted operations without a bespoke scheduler. To avoid the single-point-of-failure of an enclave holding a master decryption key, Encifher distributes trust across a threshold-decryption committee and verifies enclave attestation on chain. Encifher is deployed in production, powering confidential payments, swaps, and a cross-chain bridge. In production, a confidential swap settles in a single Solana transaction costing 157,000 compute units; the AES-256-GCM symmetric-encryption layer runs at over a million operations per second and threshold decryption completes in single-digit to tens of milliseconds (near-plaintext speed, against the many-orders-of-magnitude overhead of FHE), and Encifher has served over 5,000 users and 50,000 confidential operations. We are explicit about the cost of this design point: Encifher reduces the trust base to TEE integrity, honest threshold key management, and the cloud attestation root, rather than to cryptographic hardness alone.

In this work, we construct a new and highly efficient blind polynomial commitment scheme (PCS) over non-binary fields. Our scheme is specifically designed to handle encrypted coefficients without requiring expensive bootstrapping operations, achieving a breakthrough in the "complexity-depth" trade-off. The proposed scheme features an extremely efficient prover both asymptotically and concretely. The commitment and evaluation phases are dominated by a strictly linear $O(n)$ number of field operations. Furthermore, the construction maintains a constant multiplicative depth, which is a critical requirement for efficiency in homomorphic encryption settings. Concretely, for large-scale circuit sizes, our prover is significantly faster than prior state-of-the-art schemes such as phalanx and laminate. Our underlying technique is the Generalized RAA code, an extremely efficient error-correcting code that extends the binary RAA code structure to arbitrary non-binary prime fields $\mathbb{F}_{p}$. We analyze the bounds over non-binary fields, which demonstrate that this code maintains a linear minimum distance property with high probability. By combining Ligero’s IOPP framework, we obtain the first asymptotically and concretely good blind PCS that achieves strictly linear $O(n)$ encoding complexity for the prover while avoiding the expensive bootstrapping operations.

A $t$-out-of-$n$ threshold decryption scheme distributes decryption key shares among $n$ parties so that any $t$ of them can jointly decrypt a ciphertext, while fewer than $t$ learn nothing about the plaintext. Traditional threshold schemes provide no accountability: a coalition of $t$ or more parties can combine their key shares and construct a pirate decoder that decrypts arbitrary well-formed ciphertexts, without any risk of being traced. To address this, Boneh, Partap, and Rotem [CRYPTO '24] introduced the notion of threshold traitor tracing (TTT), where a tracing algorithm that is given black-box access to the pirate decoder can identify at least one of the colluding parties. Many subsequent threshold traitor tracing schemes similarly find only a single traitor, even though the decoder must have been constructed using at least $t$ keys. While some constructions can find multiple traitors, they do so at the cost of large ciphertexts or only achieving a weak form of correctness. In this work, we make the following contributions: - Lower bounds: We show that for all existing traitor tracing techniques, the ciphertext must be large to allow tracing close to $t$ traitors. In particular, to trace $t-O(1)$ traitors, the ciphertext size must be at least $\Omega(t)$. To trace $a \leq t- \omega(1)$ traitors, the ciphertext size must scale with $\Omega(\frac{a-1}{t-a+1})$. For schemes that rely on fingerprinting codes, we show an even stronger lower bound. - Upper bounds: We present two generic compilers that construct traitor tracing for general access structures (beyond threshold) from two building blocks: attribute based encryption for general access structures and sufficiently-expressive policies and mixed functional-encryption. We also present two concrete instantiations. Under exponential security assumptions, we construct a pairings-based threshold traitor tracing scheme that can trace $t$ traitors with ciphertext size $O(t^2)$. We also construct an LWE-based traitor tracing scheme for a DNF access structure, that can trace an authorized subset of traitors with ciphertext size $O(\hat{t}^2)$, where $\hat{t}$ denotes the size of the largest unauthorized subset in the access structure. - A Candidate Theoretical Instantiation: We present a new tracing mechanism that can trace $t(1-1/\lambda^c)$ traitors with $\mathsf{poly}(\lambda)$ size ciphertext, public key, and secret keys. We prove security assuming ideal (black box) obfuscation. Our work raises several open questions in the context of tracing multiple parties in a threshold traitor tracing scheme.

Maintaining a decentralized system requires a collective governance mechanism that allows participants to agree on changes to the system. In particular, the governance mechanism should offer a voting functionality for casting, collecting, and tallying votes in a confidential yet verifiable manner. Scaling this functionality for millions of participants in a cost-effective manner is a critical requirement for permissionless blockchains that remains unmet. We put forward a "layer-2" approach to meet this requirement in a setting where a permissionless blockchain acts as the fallback "layer-1" mechanism. Specifically, our approach to scalability realizes the protocol in a layer-2 fashion: the bulk of the protocol is executed off-chain, but secured on the blockchain with a minimal footprint. We prove our protocol secure in the Universal Composability (UC) framework. First, we formalize a governance ideal functionality $\mathcal{F}_{\mathsf{L2Gov}}$. Our definition offers high levels of confidentiality and verifiability. Moreover, in the case of misbehavior, it allows faults to be attributed so that appropriate action (such as the slashing of on-chain funds) can be taken. Second, we demonstrate that our protocol UC-realizes the $\mathcal{F}_{\mathsf{L2Gov}}$ functionality based on a blockchain, an off-chain bulletin board, a distributed homomorphic encryption functionality ($\mathcal{F}_{\mathsf{DHE}}$), and other standard hybrids. To the best of our knowledge, this work presents the first layer-2 blockchain voting protocol with a rigorous security analysis. We also point out some challenges that arise when applying the UC framework to layer-2 protocols.

The Sumcheck protocol is a cornerstone of modern proof systems, yet its prover remains a performance bottleneck. Even in the multilinear case, the repeated construction of round polynomials leads to significant overhead, limiting scalability in practice. We take a different approach: instead of modifying the protocol, we rethink the representation of multilinear polynomials. We show that any multilinear polynomial admits a simple and structured binary-tree circuit representation, where each node follows a clean recursive rule. This perspective is not merely conceptual; it directly translates into faster algorithms. Our circuit view unifies three core operations: evaluation, summation over the Boolean hypercube, and Sumcheck round generation within a single framework. Construction from the coefficient vector costs exactly nN field operations, and evaluation via bottom-up folding requires exactly N − 1 multiplications — optimal for this class of algorithms. A key structural property of the circuit is its regularity: fixed depth, local recurrences, and no data-dependent branching. This is not incidental — it is a direct consequence of the recursive decomposition, and it is precisely what makes the representation amenable to parallel execution and hardware acceleration. We implement our approach in Rust on the BN254 scalar field and benchmark it against ark-poly with parallelism enabled on both sides. At n = 20, our parallel evaluation kernel achieves a 3.4× speedup over ark-poly (14 ms vs 48 ms). The verifier completes in under 1 μs across all tested dimensions, yielding a prover-to-verifier ratio exceeding 105 at n = 20. Our results suggest that revisiting polynomial representations is a promising direction for accelerating fundamental primitives in proof systems.

Sender untraceability hides the account spent by a cryptocurrency transfer among a set of candidates, its masking set. What a transfer does to that set separates two designs: classical schemes retain the whole set and append a nullifier marking the spent account, so the ledger grows with every transfer; constant-state schemes instead consume and replace the entire set. We ask how this choice affects synchronization. We formalize the two designs as the linear and constant untraceable asset transfer objects (LUAT and CUAT) and locate them in the consensus hierarchy. In LUAT, transfers from distinct accounts commute. Its consensus number is 2, compared with 1 for standard asset transfer, independently of the masking-set size and of the untraceability notion, and LUAT is starvation-free. Partitioning the accounts into fixed masking sets lets exhausted sets be garbage-collected without increasing that number. In CUAT, a transfer consumes and replaces every account of its masking set, so two transfers whose sets intersect cannot both take effect. We formalize this with the conflict graph on masking sets, whose edges join sets sharing an account. Under weak untraceability, which protects a transaction in isolation, the consensus number is unbounded already for one-round protocols. Under strong untraceability, which protects against an observer of the complete history, untraceability holds on a history exactly when any two accounts sharing a masking set occur in the same number of the masking sets in it. This uniform incidence bounds the conflict graph, and matching constructions attain it, so the consensus number is determined exactly and grows quadratically in the masking-set size. Finally, CUAT is not starvation-free. The two objects therefore pay for the same privacy differently: LUAT in storage, CUAT in synchronization and fairness.

We present \(\mathsf{Pancake}\), a linear-time SNARK with a circuit-specific setup that eliminates the explicit representation and separate verification of addition gates in Plonkish constraint systems. Specifically, we consolidate wiring constraints and addition-gate constraints into a single family of general linear constraints, which can be enforced efficiently via a single sumcheck protocol. As a result, \(\mathsf{Pancake}\) achieves ``almost-free'' addition gates, which significantly reduces the witness size and directly improves prover efficiency while preserving full support for high-degree custom gates. Our implementation shows that \(\mathsf{Pancake}\) outperforms the state-of-the-art Plonkish SNARK \(\mathsf{HyperPlonk}\) (Chen et al., EUROCRYPT 2023) in terms of prover efficiency. For a circuit size of $2^{24}$ where half the gates are additions, \(\mathsf{Pancake}\) achieves prover speedups of $1.67\times$ (single-threaded) and $2.43\times$ (32-threaded), while also generating smaller proofs and maintaining comparable verification time.

We propose a novel mechanism for garbling wires and gates of a logical circuit in a privacy-free environment, focusing on the authenticity of the protocol. It is based on one-hot encodings, tensor products and elliptic curve arithmetic. This scheme is designed to work with arithmetic gates, but we also show gadgets to implement transitions from binary inputs to arithmetic outputs and vice versa. For our scheme, each arithmetic gate takes at most one cyphertext of material to execute its functionality (assuming knowledge of the garbled inputs and their cleartexts). We show an application to blockchain transactions. The security of the scheme is proved in the UC setting.

Privacy-preserving technologies are a well-established area of research for modern digital systems, driven by regulatory mandates, such as the GDPR, and growing demand for the user privacy. A notable example of such technologies is blind signatures: a primitive that supports a creation of privacy-sensitive applications, ranging from secure e-voting and anonymous digital cash to privacy-preserving credentials and identity management systems. In this work, we introduce Coppercloud, a blind server-supported RSA signature scheme designed to enhance privacy in digital identity systems. Coppercloud enables a user to obtain a signature on a message, without revealing its content to the supporting server, while distributing the signing key between the user's device and the supporting server. We formalize the security requirements for blind server-supported signing by defining an ideal functionality ${\mathcal{F}^{\textsf{BlindSpl}}}$, and prove that Coppercloud securely realizes this functionality in the Universal Composability (UC) model.

Private set union~(PSU) allows two parties to compute the union of their private sets without revealing their intersection. In many real-world applications, parties' datasets undergo frequent updates as elements are added or removed over time. Existing PSU protocols, however, must recompute the entire union from scratch whenever either party's set changes. This becomes highly inefficient when updates are small or frequent relative to the original set sizes. In this paper, we introduce the first updatable PSU~(uPSU) protocol for the standard two-party setting, which supports efficient incremental updates. We present a systematic classification of all possible update scenarios, which shows that only a small subset of updated elements actually modify the union, and establish the leakage baseline for uPSU. Based on these classification and leakage baseline, we provide a generic construction for uPSU that uses existing PSI and a tagged variant of PSU as building blocks. We prove security against semi-honest adversaries in the simulation-based model, and guarantee that incremental updates reveal no more information than a fresh execution of a standard PSU protocol on the updated sets. We instantiate and implement our generic construction using Kim et al.'s PSU protocol~(ACM SAC 2026) and Raghuraman and Rindal's PSI protocol~(ACM CCS 2022), demonstrating significant performance improvements over full recomputation of the union, even though its cost still depends on the original set size rather than purely on the update size. For set size $n = 2^{20}$ and update size $t = 2^{12}$, our protocol achieves a 14.1--45.4$\times$ speedup with a 4.8--59.1$\times$ communication reduction over full recomputation using baseline PSU protocols.

The Plonky3 Merkle tree implementation has become one of the most widely deployed Merkle tree constructions due to its high efficiency, and—through its integration into numerous succinct-argument systems—it currently helps secure an estimated \$4 billion in assets. Somewhat paradoxically, however, the underlying 2-to-1 compression function is not collision-resistant, nor even one-way, which at first glance appears to undermine the security of the entire Merkle tree. The prevailing ad-hoc countermeasure is to pre-hash data before using them as leaves in this otherwise insecure Merkle tree. In this work, we provide the first rigorous security analysis of this Merkle tree design and show that the Plonky3 approach is, in fact, sound. Concretely, we show (strong) position-binding and extractability.

Batched threshold encryption allows any $t$-out-of-$N$ parties in a committee to decrypt a batch of $B$ ciphertexts using sub-linear $o(NB)$ communication, while ensuring that any subset of $<t$ colluding parties learns no information about the underlying plaintext. Our first result is a simple batched threshold encryption scheme that is censorship resistant, avoids epoch restrictions, and achieves quasi-linear $O(B\log B)$ decryption complexity in the batch size $B$. Our scheme has the shortest ciphertext among all known constructions: $|\mathbb{G}_1| + |\mathbb{G}_T|$ for CPA security, with CCA security adding only $2|\mathbb{F}|$ via a simulation-extractable NIZK. However, our scheme requires an interactive setup phase (involving secure multiplications) and secret keys held by the committee grow linearly with the batch size. We prove security under the Decisional Bilinear $B$-Power Diffie-Hellman assumption in asymmetric pairing groups and provide an implementation in Rust to show that our scheme outperforms prior work. We also construct a variant of simple BTE, which allows for a tradeoff between secret-key size and censorship resistance. For any $\delta \leq B$, this variant reduces the size of the secret key held by each party from $O(B) \to O(\delta)$, and the decryption key from $O(BN) \to O(B + \delta N)$, but this comes at the cost of restricting a ciphertext encrypted with index $\mathsf{idx}$ to batch positions $i\in[B]$ satisfying $|i-\mathsf{idx}|<\delta$. Our second result is a new approach for verifying decryption in batched threshold encryption which enables a helper party (that carries out decryption) to provide hints that allow a verifier to check that decryption was carried out correctly using only MSMs and hashes. Concretely, we observe a $114.1\times$ speedup when verifying decryption of 2048 ciphertexts when compared against local decryption. Our approach is quite general and can be applied to other pairing-based advanced encryption schemes such as Timelock Encryption and Silent Threshold Encryption that can be cast as witness encryption schemes.

Lookup arguments are designed to prove that all elements in a query vector appear in a lookup table. These arguments are critical for efficiently proving ZK-unfriendly statements, such as range checks and the evaluation of complex functions. Most existing lookup arguments are optimized for scenarios where the query size is smaller than the table size. However, in many real-world applications, the query size $m$ is often much larger than $n$, the table size. This disparity leads to inefficiencies in such schemes. To overcome this limitation, we propose Celer, a novel lookup argument in which the prover's runtime increases slowly with $m$, thereby providing improved scalability. The efficiency of our lookup PIOP stems from reducing the number of commitments to be sublinear in the query size $m$, while maintaining field operations linear in $m$. Experimental results demonstrate that our lookup scheme significantly outperforms state-of-the-art lookup schemes. For the workload of query size $m=2^{28}$ and table size $n=2^{16}$ (a real world case in proving Llama language model inference), our scheme achieves a 25.9$\times$ prover-time speedup over plookup and is 9.4$\times$ faster than LogUp.

We formalize the notion of polynomial commitment schemes (PCSs) in the proof assistant Isabelle/HOL and formally verify the security proofs of two variants of the widely popular Kate, Zaverucha, and Goldberg (KZG) construction. Moreover, we formalize the Algebraic Group Model (AGM) by Fuchsbauer, Kiltz, and Loss using a novel constraint-programming-inspired approach. We formalize a reusable abstract definition of polynomial commitment schemes and define games for correctness, binding, hiding, and knowledge soundness/extractability. Based on this, we verify all applicable security proofs for two concrete PCS constructions: the standard (DL-)KZG and a batched KZG, using our AGM formalization in the knowledge-soundness proofs. Our proofs follow Shoup’s sequence-of-games approach, with machine-checked transitions, and are carried out in the CryptHOL framework for formal verification of cryptography in Isabelle. To our knowledge, this work is the first formalization of polynomial commitment schemes, the first formalization of the AGM, and the first formal verification of the security proofs for any concrete polynomial commitment scheme. This work lays the foundation for the formal verification of advanced cryptographic constructions, such as pairing-based zero-knowledge proofs (ZKPs) and succinct arguments.

Recently, Shark (S\&P'25) considered the problem of actively two-party secure machine learning inference using an authenticated distributed comparison function (DCF). This is the state-of-the-art work in this setting. On the other hand, Grotto (CCS'23) built a variant DCF with the key size half that of classic DCF. Unfortunately, as Shark states, \textit{it is not known how to extend Grotto to the malicious setting}. In this paper, we present the first actively secure Grotto-style DCF scheme. Our authenticated DCF is deliberately designed on the correlated GGM tree and maintains the key-size advantage of semi-honest Grotto. We further implement an actively secure ML inference framework, named LightShark, which supports efficient primitives (e.g., ReLU, spline, and truncation) and ML models (e.g., VGG-16, GPT, BERT). Compared with Shark, our LightShark outperforms by $1.49 \times \sim 2.69\times$ and reduces communication costs by $66.7\%$ for Bert-base inference. Surprisingly, for larger LLM models, the experimental evaluation demonstrates that our framework works vastly well.

Public blockchains like Ethereum deliver transparency, but adding anonymity remains a fundamental challenge. Existing proposals either offer limited anonymity guarantees or rely on heavy cryptographic machinery, e.g., zero-knowledge proofs. We introduce \emph{Blockchain Anonymous Tokens} (BAT), a system for efficient \emph{sender}-anonymous transactions on transparent blockchains. Building on the observation that \emph{one-time-spendable tokens suffice for many applications}, BAT has a lightweight design using classic anonymous tokens due to Chaum (1983). Unlike such tokens, though, BAT is designed to work in a transparent decentralized setting, where issuers are untrusted (i.e., any single potentially malicious entity can be the issuer) and spends happen publicly. BAT issuance is compact: A client can receive $\ell$ tokens with just $\mathcal{O}(1)$ on-chain communication and computation. We formalize the notion for BAT, and provide a concretely efficient construction. Our BAT construction requires no on-chain verification of expensive zero-knowledge proofs; just a signature verification during spends and a single exponentiation on-chain during issuance. We present several applications of BAT in various blockchain contexts. We implement and evaluate BAT and show that compared to the closest baseline, Zcash transactions, BAT tokens are 50$\times$ shorter, 9$\times$ faster to verify, and 7,000$\times$ faster to generate.

Adaptor signatures allow a signer to publish a pre‑signature that can be transformed into a valid signature by anyone once a secret witness is learned. Poelstra first suggested this primitive to bypass the limited scripting capabilities of Bitcoin. These schemes were later formalized by Aumayr et al. (ASIACRYPT 2021) and refined by Dai et al. (INDOCRYPT 2022) and Gerhart et al. (EUROCRYPT 2024). In this work, we revisit the constructions of adaptor signatures deployed in practice without any formal proof of security. First, we demonstrate that the current security model does not capture the ECDSA adaptor signature that underlies most real‑world systems. Second, we propose a relaxed definition and prove that it is satisfied by the ECDSA adaptor construction under the strong unforgeability of ECDSA. Finally, focusing on oracle‑based conditional payments, we formulate the first security model for adaptor‑based Discreet Log Contracts (DLCs) and show that our relaxed notion suffices for their security.

In secret-key private information retrieval, a client with a short secret key retrieves a database item while hiding the requested index, and possibly also the database, from the server. The server answers using an encoded version of the database, generated via one-time preprocessing. Secret-key PIR provides an attractive "stateless" alternative to stateful PIR and oblivious RAM, and can be viewed as strengthening the standard notion of searchable symmetric encryption by not allowing any access pattern leakage. We give the first candidate doubly-efficient secret-key PIR schemes that achieve a constant multiplicative storage overhead, asymptotically approaching 1 in natural regimes, together with $k^{o(1)}$ communication and online server work for a database of size $k$. The best previous online server work with constant storage overhead was $k/\textrm{polylog}(k)$. Our constructions follow the permuted-code blueprint for doubly efficient sk-PIR (Boyle-Ishai-Pass-Wootters and Canetti-Holmgren-Richelson, TCC 2017), and are based on similar assumptions. The main novelty is that we instantiate this blueprint using new families of "$t$-smooth" locally decodable codes with improved tradeoffs between rate, locality, and smoothness. This includes a new $t$-smooth local decoder for Reed-Muller codes using concatenated curves, as well as a construction based on curve-lifted codes that has attractive concrete efficiency features. We perform extensive cryptanalysis of the underlying assumptions and benchmark performance under realistic parameters, demonstrating the practicality of our schemes. A representative instantiation encodes a $37$ GB database of $18$-bit records with only $4.2$× storage overhead, while requiring the server to read less than $600$ KB from the encoded database per query.

Numerous private decision tree evaluation (PDTE) protocols based on secure multi-party computation (MPC) have been proposed to protect sensitive data during evaluation. However, existing MPC-based PDTE protocols primarily focus on the two or three-party setting. Moreover, their core building block, secure threshold comparison, typically incurs logarithmic-round communication and dominates the online cost of tree evaluation. These limitations motivate the design of scalable and efficient secure comparison protocols for large-scale PDTE. In this paper, inspired by Falcon (PETs’2020), we propose a scalable constant round secure comparison protocol based on Shamir secret sharing in the honest-majority setting. Concretely, we leverage random shuffle to achieve zero detection with constant-round communication. Furthermore, we reduce random shuffle to random shift, thereby significantly decreasing the offline communication overhead. Besides, we reformulate feature selection and path selection in PDTE as private lookup table functionalities and integrate PLUT with our scalable comparison protocol to achieve scalable PDTE. Finally, we extend the above Shamir secret sharing-based protocols to the packed secret sharing variants and further optimize the online communication efficiency of these packed variants. We instantiate the above protocols as a framework SC-DT and report their improved performance: i) For secure comparison, our packed secure comparison achieves a speedup of $1.7-2.3\times$ and reduce communication by $1.7-2.5\times$ in the online phase compared with Helix (Cryptology ePrint’2025). ii) For large-scale PDTE, our packed secret sharing-based protocol improves online communication efficiency by up to $1.9\times$ over our Shamir-based protocol. In a 21-party WAN setting, it evaluates a 50-tree random forest with 42,550 nodes at an amortized latency of about one second per tree.

Many data types, such as video and audio, consist of sequential elements where both integrity and order are essential for authenticity. In practice, verifiers often access only partial sequences due to privacy or bandwidth constraints, motivating the use of vector commitments (VCs) for verifiable partial disclosure. However, VC construction requires a trusted committer, typically within a secure module on the device, and maintaining such commitments is challenging for resource-constrained hardware. For example, in CCTV pipelines, a trusted module processing continuous streams must store and update large VC structures, leading to prohibitive memory and computational overhead. This work addresses this deployment bottleneck by introducing an efficient pipeline for verifiable VC construction that offloads computation from constrained devices while preserving trust. The source device computes and signs a cumulative hash over the data stream, requiring only constant memory. Later, an untrusted prover reconstructs the VC from the raw data and produces a zero-knowledge proof that the construction is consistent with the signed hash chain. This design eliminates the need for trusted storage of intermediate VC state and enables verifiable partial disclosures from the reconstructed VC. A key challenge is the high cost of proving the full VC construction. We address this by designing a folding-based zkSNARKs system tailored to streaming workloads. We implement and evaluate the system on a constrained device (Raspberry Pi Zero) as the source and a consumer-grade prover (midrange laptop). Our results show that direct VC maintenance on the source device requires hundreds of megabytes of memory and is computationally infeasible on trusted platform standards for even moderate workloads (e.g., 30 minutes of video). In contrast, our approach reduces the trusted device's memory footprint to constant size, while the midrange laptop can generate the proof of full VC construction in approximately 2 minutes for the same workload. Furthermore, the proof size is around 10 KB regardless of the original size of data and verification time is sub-second. Our implementation is available open source at: https://github.com/zero-savvy/proven-view.

Confidential virtual machines (CVMs) provide hardware-rooted attestation and isolation, protecting data in use from untrusted cloud infrastructure. However, current CVM attestation frameworks are limited to a two-party trust model between the cloud provider and the CVM owner, and primarily guarantee only the boot-time state. As CVMs increasingly host public-facing workloads (e.g., LLM inference APIs, web applications) that process end-user data, this creates a three-party trust mismatch among the cloud provider, the CVM owner, and end users. Once a workload is deployed, end-users lack cryptographic assurance of runtime integrity and must implicitly trust the CVM owner for any post-launch modifications. Furthermore, extending continuous runtime attestation to a large number of end users introduces severe scalability bottlenecks and is vulnerable to co-location-based attacks. Existing methods either enforce static post-launch lockdown or rely on CVM owner-maintained software logs that are not hardware-anchored. We present Vordr, a framework that removes the CVM owners from the end-user's trust domain across the full CVM lifecycle while still allowing workload-level updates/installations with auditability. We introduce a novel architecture that establishes an exclusive administrative binding between a process-based TEE (Warden Enclave (WEN)) and the CVM. This binding strictly blocks the CVM owners (or cloud) from directly manipulating the CVM. Vordr continuously tracks runtime integrity via a hardware-rooted Linux IMA event log anchored to PCR 10, serving time-bounded, platform-unlinkable cached or audit-ready quotes for independent end-user auditing. We optimize the costly IMA-log extraction via a novel incremental attestation design leveraging the IMA log's append-only structure and the WEN's sealed state. We implement Vordr, validate it across several workloads, and show that it provides up to 60.8x speedup for runtime monitoring with huge communication reductions in steady-state incremental rounds compared to prior methods. Vordr delivers highly scalable and verifiable runtime attestation, providing substantially stronger guarantees for runtime integrity and platform unlinkability.

Offline finding (OF) protocols---such as Apple's Find My, Google's Find Hub, Samsung’s SmartThingsFind, and Tile---enable hundreds of millions of users to track their belongings via Bluetooth-based tracker tags. However, their scale and tracking capabilities give rise to privacy risks for tag owners and bystanders, as well as safety risks for victims of tag-facilitated stalking. In response, academics and practitioners have suggested cryptographic and non-cryptographic mitigations to improve privacy and anti-stalking protections, working to navigate complex and subtle tensions between these goals. The result is a large landscape of privacy goals, threat models, protocol designs, implementations, and analyses. In this work, we systematize the OF protocol landscape. We gather and analyze a corpus of 49 research papers and OF protocol technical specifications, and use it to develop a taxonomy capturing the functionality, security, and privacy goals of OF protocols. We use the taxonomy to guide a focused assessment of the four major OF deployments along with six academic constructions, comparing design choices, consolidating known attacks, and analyzing the designs' trade-offs between privacy, security, abusability, and efficiency. We provide a simple OF protocol that achieves most security goals, and which clarifies the essential cryptographic components underlying OF protocols. We also provide a survey of physical layer attacks and usability issues that undermine protections in practice. Finally, we discuss open problems and potential research directions towards secure, interoperable, and abuse-resistant OF systems.

A Proof of Space, PoS, as introduced by Dziembowski et al. [CRYPTO'15], is a two-phase protocol that enables a Prover to convince an efficient Verifier that it has allocated a large amount of persistent memory to storing some information. To our knowledge, all existing PoS protocols are only known to be secure in the random oracle model (or under ad hoc assumptions about cryptographic assumptions). We provide an elementary framework for constructing PoS from a combination of derandomization assumptions and cryptographic assumptions. We provide a few simple instantiations of the framework. We show that non-trivial PoS follow from (a) $\mathsf{E}=\mathsf{DTIME[2^{O(n)}]}$ is hard for exponential-size nondeterministic circuits (an assumption introduced to show $\mathsf{AM}=\mathsf{NP}$), and (b) collision-resistant hash functions. We also show that PoS with nearly optimal parameters and interaction pattern follows from assumption (a) above and (c) SNARGs for $\mathsf{P}$.

A zero-evading generator with error parameter $\lambda$ is a distribution $Z$ on $\mathbb{F}^n$ such that for any non-zero vector $x\in \mathbb{F}^n$ the probability that $<a,x>=0$ is at most $2^{-\lambda}$, when $a$ is chosen according to $Z$. We investigate the number of additions required to compute $<a,x>$ given $x$. The traditional construction chooses a vector $a$ with random $\lambda$-bit elements. Pippenger's algorithm gives an additive complexity of at least $\Omega(\lambda n/\log n)$ for this approach. We give a construction requiring only $O(n+\lambda)$ additions. We highlight the impact of reducing the number of additions on aggregation of group-based commitments, such as KZG commitments[KZG10].

We present Trout++, a complete threshold signing suite for ECDSA signatures. Trout++ descends from the recent Trout protocol (Dahari-Garbian, Nof, and Parker, ACM CCS 2025) and inherits its transparent setup, two-round structure, and strong security guarantees, while introducing several significant improvements. Unlike Trout, Trout++ offers pre-signing, where the first round is key-, signing-set-, and message- independent. This property is not only important in its own right but also enables us to apply the ROAST transformation (Ruffing, Ronge, Jin, Schneider-Bensch, and Schröder, ACM CCS 2022) to our protocol, yielding the \textit{first} arbitrary-threshold (including with a dishonest majority), robust, asynchronous signing protocol for ECDSA signatures. Furthermore, we introduce several optimizations to the building blocks in Trout that reduce both bandwidth and computation. Our benchmark results show that our implementation of Trout++ is approximately twice as fast \emph{and} twice as small compared to the prior implementation of Trout. We also present a constant-time implementation with running time that is \textit{ten times faster} than Trout's constant-time implementation. Finally, we show how Trout++ can be composed with an account derivation scheme that does not require additional setups per derivation, enabling more practical solutions for managing key material. In total, we achieve complexities and functionality comparable to, and closing the gap with, leading solutions for Schnorr signatures (such as FROST).

Batched identity-based encryption (batched IBE), introduced by Agarwal, Fernando, and Pinkas (CRYPTO 2025), enables a key authority to issue a single succinct key that decrypts an entire batch of ciphertexts. However, existing batched encryption protocols support only identity-based access control and do not accommodate expressive attribute-based policies. We are the first to introduce Batched Attribute-Based Encryption (B-ABE), a generalization of batched encryption to the attribute-based setting. In B-ABE, ciphertexts are associated with attribute sets and batch labels, while a single batch key is bound to an access policy and a public digest of the batch. The key decrypts exactly those ciphertexts in the batch whose attributes satisfy the policy, and its size is independent of the batch size. We construct B-ABE in asymmetric bilinear groups and prove security under the standard Decisional Bilinear Diffie-Hellman (DBDH) assumption in the random oracle model. We further introduce the first Threshold Batched Attribute-Based Encryption (TB-ABE), in which the master secret is distributed among L authorities via Shamir secret sharing. Any subset of at least T authorities can non-interactively generate publicly verifiable key shares that aggregate into a succinct batch key of the same asymptotic size as in the single-authority setting. We formalize security against static corruptions of up to (T-1) authorities and adaptive key-share queries and prove security under the DBDH assumption in the random oracle model.

We study Batched IBE through the lens of Multi-Message Signatures -- a natural extension of standard digital signatures in which a single signing operation signs an entire vector of messages at once. A public open algorithm then derives an opening for each message, allowing anyone to verify that an individual message was signed. First we show that Multi-Message Signatures are essential by constructing a Multi-Message Signature scheme from every Batched IBE scheme with a sufficiently large plaintext space. We then show how to construct a Batched IBE scheme from a Multi-Message Signature with deterministic verification given an extractable witness encryption for the verification relation, similar to the duality between IBE and digital signatures. Such a witness encryption scheme can be instantiated efficiently for the special case of linearly-verifiable pairing based multi-message signatures. Next we analyze existing constructions of Batched IBE and extract linearly-verifiable Multi-Message Signatures which provide us with valuable insight into the inner workings of various Batched IBE schemes. Leveraging these insights, we construct the first Batched IBE scheme supporting $q$ key queries per label with an $O(qB)$ CRS size and constant size ciphertexts.

In this work we analyse the qualitative memory and bandwidth efficiency properties of the currently standardised post-quantum signatures as such and of their protocol integrations mainly in the X.509 context. The term “qualitative” in this respect refers to how memory and bandwidth requirements scale with the size of the signed message. Specifically, we address the question in how far the algorithms support online-computations, a.k.a streaming, with respect to the signed message in the signing and verification operations. Further, we review the possibilities for the pre-computation of a short message representative outside the cryptographic module responsible for the signing or verification operation of the different signature schemes. We also give a preview on the corresponding cryptographic API of the PKCS#11 standard which introduces numerous PQC signature algorithms in the upcoming version 3.2. We demonstrate that for specific realistic use cases, the qualitative memory and bandwidth efficiency of the PQC signature schemes in protocol use is widely varied and by tendency substantially degraded compared to the traditional signature schemes based on RSA and elliptic curves, which always allow for the pre-computation of a short message representative in the form of a hash value. Our results are relevant to PQC migrations of existing applications using traditional RSA or elliptic curve schemes.

Public-key authenticated encryption with keyword search (PAEKS), introduced by Huang and Li (Information Sciences 2017), was proposed to provide trapdoor privacy, whereby keyword information is protected from being revealed through trapdoors. To prevent the keyword guessing attack, however, a trapdoor needs to be generated separately for each sender, and the search complexity linearly grows with the number of senders even when searching for a single keyword. To address this inefficiency, we propose a generic construction of search-efficient PAEKS. We revisit the group-oriented approach of Wang et al. (IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security 2024), in which senders are organized into sender groups. Our construction is simple yet effective where all senders belonging to the same group share a single public-secret key pair, and the search complexity depends only on the number of sender groups rather than the number of individual senders. We further introduce ciphertext indistinguishability against insiders, which ensures that no keyword information is revealed from ciphertexts, even if they are generated by other members of the same sender group. We also take into account an impossibility result by Yoshida and Emura (IEICE Transactions on Fundamentals of Electronics, Communications and Computer Sciences, 2026), which shows that trapdoor privacy against sender-group members cannot be achieved in the scheme of Wang et al. To address this limitation, we introduce trapdoor indistinguishability against outsiders, which guarantees that no keyword information is revealed from trapdoors generated for non-group members. Our generic construction yields search-efficient group-oriented PAEKS schemes from pairings and lattices.

Unbiased and unpredictable randomness is a cornerstone of Web3 security, underpinning everything from consensus protocols to DeFi logic. Although Distributed Verifiable Random Functions (DVRFs) eliminate central points of failure, current designs often have to compromise performance. Most existing protocols are hindered by one of three limitations: proofs that scale linearly with the number of participants, high computational cost of bilinear pairings, or latency introduced by mandatory interactive steps during generation. In this work, we present Icy-DVRF, a protocol that improves DVRFwCP by employing a preprocessing scheme similar to FROST to reduce the number of interaction rounds among participants and lowering the additional communication cost from $O(n^2 t)$ to $O(t)$ while maintaining constant-size proofs. The downside of our construction is that, relative to DDH-DVRF and GLOW-DVRF, this approach incurs an additional off-chain communication round due to the threshold structure of our non-interactive zero-knowledge proof. This architecture ensures that verification costs remain low, regardless of the set of participants. While theoretical estimates suggest verification costs of approximately one quarter of those of standard designs, our empirical benchmarks on the Sepolia testnet, utilizing the EIP-2537: Precompile for BLS12-381 curve operations, confirm that Icy-DVRF requires only 88,803 gas for full execution. This represents a significant 43.02\% reduction in total gas consumption compared to existing pairing-based constructions, saving 67,035 gas per on-chain verification. Off-chain, eliminating DVRFwCP's Augmented Secure-DKG round yields a per-node speedup ranging from a factor of $1.46$ at $(n,t)=(5,3)$ to a factor of $4.43$ at $(n,t)=(50,34)$.

Cryptographic primitives involving multiple participants, such as secure multiparty computation (MPC), threshold signatures, and threshold encryption, are typically designed under the assumption that at least a threshold number of participants remain honest and non-colluding. However, many real-world applications require more expressive access structures beyond simple thresholds. A prominent example is the weighted threshold access structure, where each party is assigned a weight and security holds as long as the total weight of corrupted parties does not exceed a specified threshold. Despite the practical relevance of such access structures, our understanding of efficient constructions supporting them remains limited. For instance, existing approaches for weighted MPC and weighted threshold encryption incur costs that scale with the total assigned weights to all parties or rely on non-black-box use of cryptography. In this work, we present the first black-box constructions of the following weighted cryptosystems with weight-independent complexity in the trusted setup model: (i) a weighted MPC protocol with guaranteed output delivery, (ii) a semi-honest weighted threshold encryption scheme and (iii) a semi-honest weighted threshold Schnorr signature scheme. At the heart of our constructions is a new succinct computational secret sharing scheme with linear homomorphism for weighted threshold access structures. We provide two concrete instantiations of this primitive, based on the Decisional Composite Residuosity (DCR) assumption and the Learning With Errors (LWE) assumption, respectively. Furthermore, our constructions extend to any general access structure that can be represented efficiently as a monotone Boolean circuit.

Range proofs enable a prover to convince a verifier that a committed value lies within a specific interval without revealing additional information. They are fundamental to privacy-preserving systems including anonymous credentials, e-voting, e-cash, and cryptocurrencies like Monero and Grin. A critical challenge is efficiently proving that multiple committed values simultaneously satisfy range constraints while minimizing communication overhead. Vector commitment schemes provide a promising approach to this problem. Missileproof (CCS'24) recently proposed a range proof for vector commitments achieving $O(1)$ proof size and verifier time, but with prover complexity of $O(N\ell \log(N\ell))$ for proving $\ell$ values in $[0, 2^N)$. We present \textbf{Rarus}, an efficient range proof for polynomial-based vector commitments that achieves optimal asymptotic complexity across all metrics. Our key innovation is replacing binary decomposition with optimized $b$-ary decomposition, coupled with Bi-variate Zero-Test and accelerated Uni-variate Sum-Check protocols. Rarus achieves $O(1)$ proof size and verifier time, while reducing prover time to $O\left(\frac{N\ell}{\log(N\ell)}\right)\mathbb{G} + O(N\ell)\mathbb{F}$, where $\mathbb{G}$ and $\mathbb{F}$ denote group and field operations respectively. In addition, our protocol supports arbitrary ranges $[0,R)$ beyond powers of two. Experimental results demonstrate that Rarus achieves a $20\times$ speedup over both Bulletproofs and Missileproof when proving 16,384 values in $[0, 2^{64})$.

In zero-knowledge machine learning (zkML), the dominant cost is generating the proof, not running the model, and it concentrates in the nonlinearities a transformer must evaluate inside the proof system. It is tempting to exploit a nonlinearity's mathematical structure (low degree, parity, or kernel form) to prove it more cheaply. We show this hope is misplaced for the dominant cost: in a Shout-style (one-hot) lookup argument the per-lookup proving work is a function of the access pattern alone, never of the table values, so function structure has zero leverage on it. This is a separation principle; structure can cheapen only a secondary, once-per-proof table term. That table term stays subordinate as models get deeper because the only data-dependent amplifier of per-layer error in a pre-LN transformer is the LayerNorm gain 1/σ: a σ-floor on typical inputs lets a single fixed proving precision suffice at every depth, keeping proof cost near-linear in the number of layers. Whether a fixed precision survives depth is a property of the network, shared by FHE and integer-quantized inference; what is paradigm-specific is the pricing: the leverage of structure inverts between FHE’s multiplicative-depth metric and the lookup address metric. We measure this depth-to-cost scaling on two independent proving systems (EZKL/halo2 and Jolt Atlas), and turn the one dial the separation leaves open, the committed address width, into a bit-exact, upstreamed reduction in prover time.

Vote privacy and verifiability are two fundamental properties which must be maintained for elections. Studies in e-voting technology have demonstrated how elections may be secured through cryptographic techniques including mix-nets, homomorphic encryption, and Zero Knowledge Proofs (ZKPs). The implications and trade-offs that must be considered when designing an e-voting system using multiple cryptographic techniques for simple majority or plurality voting are well understood in the literature. However, it is less clear how these techniques affect the design process for complex e-voting systems such as those based on ranked voting. Examples include Borda count, Condorcet voting, Instant Runoff Voting (IRV), and Single Transferable Vote (STV). In this paper, we systematically analyse the cryptographic design of ranking-based e-voting systems in the literature and explore how the cryptographic techniques utilised by such systems affect the strength of their security guarantees including vote privacy and verifiability. In addition, we explore how their cryptographic designs impact social choice properties including support for various counting functions as well as flexibility in vote casting. Our findings demonstrate that ranked e-voting systems may be largely classified according to the degree of information leakage present in each solution, and that systems belonging to each of these categories share similar properties and usage of cryptographic techniques. We then discuss an overview of our findings and identify a number of open problems following our analysis. Overall, this paper serves as a comprehensive study on the state-of-the-art for secure ranked e-voting systems in the literature.

Private set intersection (PSI) and, more broadly, private set operations (PSO) are fundamental primitives for secure multiparty computation (SMC), enabling participants to jointly compute set relations while revealing no information beyond the prescribed output. As quantum technologies advance, PSI have correspondingly evolved toward quantum secure phase. Existing quantum PSI (QPSI) solutions are limited in their threat models and collusion behavior between third party (TP) and participants. In this work, we present a multi-party QPSI (MP-QPSI) protocol that integrates verifiable quantum fully homomorphic encryption (vQFHE) as the verifiable outsourced quantum-evaluation layer and threshold fully homomorphic encryption (TFHE) as the threshold key-management mechanism. We instantiate the intersection computation via a \(C^{\mathsf{AND}}\) circuit accompanied by simulations on IBM Quantum Platform. We analyze correctness and participant privacy against TP, external eavesdroppers, and collusive behaviors, and we further prove verifiability against a malicious TP under the semantic security model. Finally, we present a modular framework perspective with several realizations, show how to extend the construction to quantum private set union (QPSU) via open-controlled operations. Compared with prior schemes, our protocol provides flexible set operations and stronger resilience under the TP model, including TP-participant collusion, thereby offering enhanced security and broader applicability.

In the line of the SPDZ protocol for secure multi-party computation, the generation of Beaver triples is the most expensive task. Silentium (Rieder, PrivCryp 25) is the implementation of a Pseudorandom Correlation Generator (PCG) for Beaver triples (Boyle et al., Crypto 20). PCGs focus on low-communication costs., e.g. their PCG reduces the communication by one order of magnitude compared to protocols in MP-SPDZ. Silentium is an implementation of their PCG, achieving similar running times than MP-SPDZ. We make three theoretical contributions to Silentium, including an implementation. First, we make a practical proposal how to generate Beaver triples over binary fields F2λ, which extends the previous setting over prime fields. For this, we propose a suitable instantiation of the Number Theoretic Transform. Second, we show how to use the binary triples to construct what we call a Beaver triple expansion scheme, that is we construct a scheme that expands a small batch of Beaver triples into a large batch of Beaver triples, in the sense of recently established oblivious transfer extension schemes. This feature enables an efficient preprocessing stage for the PCG, closing a practical issue of Silentium. Finally, we provide details about the Silentium implementation, by clearing a technical bug in the initial theoretical protocol description.

Blockchain provides public verifiability for access control in Internet of Things (IoT) data sharing, but its transparency can expose requester attributes, access policies, and their satisfaction relations. Existing privacy-preserving approaches often protect only one side of the authorization decision or rely on pairing-based ABE/HVE, interactive homomorphic computation, or circuit-specific proof parameters. This paper proposes a blockchain-based access control scheme that verifies authorization over hidden, authenticated inputs using commitments and non-interactive zero-knowledge proofs. Requester attributes and access policies are encoded as vectors. Multiple attribute authorities sign requester-bound local commitments, while the data provider independently commits to the policy vector. The requester proves that the committed vectors satisfy the required inner-product relation through a linked commit-and-prove protocol using a Bulletproof inner-product argument. A smart contract verifies the authority evidence, commitment aggregation, and access proof while learning only the authorization result. We formally establish policy hiding, attribute hiding, and authenticated attribute integrity. The recursive inner-product argument makes the dominant per-request access-verification communication grow logarithmically with the vector dimension. We implement a Rust experimental prototype and make the source code, benchmark configurations, results, and plotting scripts publicly available. Experiments over vector dimensions from 16 to 512 quantify the communication and computation costs. At the largest evaluated dimension, the modeled access-verification record remains below 1 KB, while final decryption takes 0.103 ms. These results indicate that the scheme supports bilateral authorization privacy and public verifiability without pairing-based authorization or circuit-specific trusted setup.

Internet voting can increase voter turnout and reduce operational costs; however, it also facilitates voter coercion. One compelling approach to address this issue is deniable vote updating, which allows voters to cast multiple ballots while counting only their final vote. Despite its intuitive appeal, achieving deniable vote updating together with verifiability and scalability has proven challenging. Therefore, we present FiltrumVote, a scalable, publicly verifiable, and coercion-resistant Internet voting system based on deniable vote updating. It has a quasi-linear cleansing phase, and it is built mainly from zero-knowledge proofs with standard $\Sigma-$protocol techniques. As a result, FiltrumVote is highly scalable: a standard computer takes less than 5 hours to prove all zero-knowledge proofs for one million votes.

Group key agreement protocols are essential for modern secure messaging. Most existing group key agreement protocols assume a centralized model with a semi-trusted service that mediates the communication. This is efficient, but problematic for some important applications, since a central service can be a choke point for surveillance and censorship. There is a nascent literature on decentralized group key agreement that avoids such reliance, but existing proposals either do not scale, with update costs linear or quadratic in the group size, or lack proofs of security. Centralized protocols can offer much lower (logarithmic) cost. We present BeeKEM, the first decentralized group key agreement protocol with logarithmic update cost in the common case (degrading to linear in the worst case) and proofs of security. We provide an open-source implementation and demonstrate that it is competitive with OpenMLS. BeeKEM opens the door for a range of communication and collaboration applications offering not only end-to-end encryption, but also metadata privacy and censorship resistance.

Verifying Groth16 proofs on Bitcoin enables a broad class of trust-minimised applications, bridges, light clients, validity rollups, but Bitcoin script lacks the pairing operations required to evaluate the verification equation natively. A recent line of work on Bitcoin-side garbled-circuit SNARK verification (Delbrag, BitVM3, BitVMX-GC, Glock, Argo MAC) has produced practical constructions but does not provide formal universal-composability analysis. We present $\Pi_{\mathsf{DV\text{-}Groth16}}$, a protocol for designated evaluation of Groth16 proofs on Bitcoin. The prover holds a standard Groth16 proof $\pi_{\mathsf{in}}$ under a public, one-time ceremony SRS. The verifier generates, from a secret seed, a compact per-session trapdoor SRS for a fixed outer circuit, the inner Groth16 verifier, computed natively over a one-layer 2-chain (BLS12-377 inside BW6-761), and proves it well-formed. The prover produces an outer Groth16 proof that her inner proof verifies, and garbles a small circuit that checks the outer proof in scalar form: after the verifier reveals his seed, the prover signs the discrete logarithms of her pre-committed outer proof elements, and the circuit checks them against the commitments together with the scalarized verification identity, releasing a slashing key on failure. Cut-and-choose enforces garbling correctness; deposits and commitments are locked in Bitcoin UTXOs with a three-tier settlement (refund, slash-fast, slash-commit). The per-session SRS has fixed size, independent of the assertion circuit, and all elliptic-curve computation inside the garbled circuit reduces to three fixed-base scalar multiplications. We prove that $\Pi_{\mathsf{DV\text{-}Groth16}}$ GUC-emulates an ideal functionality $\mathcal{F}_{\mathsf{DV\text{-}Groth16}}$ capturing the three-tier behaviour against static corruption in the GUC-hybrid model, with a concrete bound assembled from named primitive advantages. We make precise how designated evaluation and enforcement differs from designated-verifier deniability, and exhibit a variant achieving the latter at the cost of a per-proof SRS for the assertion circuit itself.

Self-sovereign identity (SSI) systems empower users to (anonymously) establish and verify their identity when accessing both digital and real-world resources, emerging as a promising privacy-preserving solution for user-centric identity management. Recent work by Maram et al. proposes the privacy-preserving Sybil-resistant decentralized SSI system CanDID (IEEE S&P 2021). While this is an important step, notable shortcomings undermine its efficacy. The two most significant among them being the following: First, unlinkability breaks in the presence of a single malicious issuer. Second, it introduces interactiveness, as the users are required to communicate each time with issuers to collect credentials intended for use in interactions with applications. This contradicts the goal of SSI, whose aim is to give users full control over their identities. This paper first introduces the concept of publicly verifiable attribute-based threshold anonymous counting tokens (tACT). Unlike recent approaches confined to centralized settings (Benhamouda et al., ASIACRYPT 2023), tACT operates in a distributed-trust environment. Accompanied by a formal security model and a provably secure instantiation, tACT introduces a novel dimension to token issuance, which, we believe, holds independent interest. Next, the paper leverages the proposed tACT scheme to construct an efficient Sybil-resistant SSI system. This system supports various functionalities, including threshold issuance, unlinkable multi-show selective disclosure, and non-interactive, non-transferable credentials that offer constant-size credentials. Finally, our benchmark results show an efficiency improvement in our construction when compared to CanDID all while accommodating a greater number of issuers and additionally reducing to a one-round protocol that can be run in parallel with all issuers.

Digital contact tracing systems play a pivotal role in mitigating the spread of infectious diseases during pandemics by identifying individuals exposed to confirmed cases. In decentralized privacy-preserving contact tracing protocols, users broadcast pseudo-random IDs and, upon infection, upload the relevant IDs to a cloud server. Other users can then download these IDs to determine if they have been in proximity to infected individuals. However, existing protocols often lack verifiability, implicitly assuming honest user behavior when uploading data to the server. This gap creates vulnerabilities, including false positives and false negatives, which hinder the widespread adoption crucial for the effectiveness of contact tracing apps. This paper introduces SPiRiT, a secure and privacy-preserving verifiable contact tracing protocol, designed to address these shortcomings by introducing verifiability, ensuring the legitimacy of uploaded IDs, while still maintaining user privacy. Verifiability ensures whether an upload contains a valid set of pseudo-random IDs with respect to the contagious period of the infected individual, and that the individual claiming those IDs is the legitimate owner, in a privacy-preserving manner. The goal of our design is to maintain a balance between the competing objectives of privacy, security, and decentralization while fostering greater public trust and adoption by addressing the aforementioned vulnerabilities. Through rigorous evaluation using a face-to-face individual interaction dataset, we demonstrate that SPiRiT not only reduces false alarms but also can be on par with or even outperform existing protocols in detecting high-risk contacts.

Designated Verifier zero-knowledge Succinct Non-Interactive Arguments of Knowledge (DV-zkSNARKs) are cryptographic argument systems in which the ability to verify proofs is restricted to a designated verifier. Unlike publicly verifiable zkSNARKs, these constructions ensure that only an authorized party can validate the correctness of the proof. Existing lattice-based DV-zkSNARK constructions typically rely either on linear-only encryption or on the Linear Targeted Malleability (LTM) assumption. The former has been cryptanalytically broken and therefore no longer provides a credible basis for post-quantum security. The latter is a non-standard and comparatively less established assumption and, moreover, restricts knowledge soundness to the non-adaptive setting. To overcome these limitations, we propose an inner-product argument system whose security relies solely on the well-established hardness of the Module Short Integer Solution (MSIS) problem and that achieves adaptive knowledge soundness in the random oracle model. This construction enables a designated verifier, holding a secret key, to succinctly verify inner product of a committed witness with an arbitrary vector. By combining our argument system with a linear probabilistic checkable proof (LPCP) compiler, to the best of our knowledge, we obtain the first DV-zkSNARK construction based on standard assumptions. Our implementation achieves prover and verification times comparable to the state of the art, while reducing public parameter size by a factor of 10, at the cost of a 2.5x increase in proof size.

Recently, Boyle, Jain, Servan-Schreiber, and Srinivasan (EUROCRYPT 2025) introduced the notion of simultaneous-message and succinct (SMS) secure computation. In an SMS protocol, after an initial sampling of a common reference string (CRS), two parties—Alice (with a large input) and Bob (with a small input)—can simultaneously exchange encodings of their private inputs and obtain additive shares of the output of a function evaluated over their inputs. The key requirement is succinctness: namely, the sizes of the CRS and each input encoding grow only polylogarithmically in the size of Alice's input and the function output. Boyle et al., and independently Abram, Malavolta, and Roy (STOC 2025), constructed SMS for all bounded-depth Boolean circuits from the plain learning with errors (LWE) assumption. In this work, we extend the study of SMS along two new dimensions: Reusable SMS: In this setting, the same input encodings can be reused to compute multiple functions. Multiparty SMS: In the multiparty setting, we consider computations over one large input and multiple small inputs. Succinctness in this case means the size of the CRS and input encodings can grow with the total length of the small inputs (but polylogarithmically with the length of the long input and the size of the function output). Assuming polynomial hardness of LWE (with a sub-exponential modulus-to-noise ratio), we construct reusable two-party SMS for all bounded-depth Boolean circuits with polylogarithmic communication. By additionally assuming indistinguishability obfuscation, we present a generic compiler from reusable two-party SMS to reusable multiparty SMS. Our construction of reusable two-party SMS from LWE relies on a new "dual-use" technique where we reuse an LWE secret key between a lattice-based algebraic homomorphic MAC and a lattice-based homomorphic encryption scheme. This dual-use technique allows us to bootstrap a reusable SMS protocol for quadratic functions into one that supports arbitrary (bounded-depth) Boolean circuits. Along the way, we also show how to adapt a previous lattice-based algebraic homomorphic MAC based on ring LWE to obtain one based on the plain LWE assumption.

This paper formalizes the Deterministic State Machine, or DSM, as a guarded, linear, forward only, constraint based computation model. DSM does not require a blockchain, validator set, sequencer, gas market, mempool, clock based ordering rule, or global consensus layer for ordinary state evolution. State validity is determined by local verification of cryptographically precommitted candidate futures, deterministic fulfillment guards, explicit resource consumption keys, canonical encodings, signatures, and Sparse Merkle Tree commitments. The architectural shift is that finality moves from a network decision to a state property. Instead of requiring some external party, committee, sequencer, validator set, or global clock to agree that a transition happened, DSM asks whether the proposed transition consumes the committed state resource and advances it deterministically. If it does, the successor is locally realized. If it does not, it is not state. Finality is therefore not provided as a service by an ordering network; it is a consequence of the consumed resource itself. This is global realization without global ordering: local acceptance composes into a coherent realized history because incompatible histories cannot merge. The central claim is not that DSM forbids all branching at the level of precommitment. DSM explicitly permits precommitment forking. Multiple candidate futures may be prepared for a common parent, including Deterministic Limbo Vault release paths, refund paths, hash fulfillment paths, recovery paths, abort paths, contingent payment paths, CPTA token operations, offline bearer steps, and other mutually exclusive branches. The invariant is: multiple futures may be described, but for a fixed consumed resource, at most one may be realized. A resource is the thing that produces exactly one realized successor. A relationship parent, spendable object, vault generation, token balance object, source vault generation, recovery generation, or offline anchor step is a resource in this sense. Candidate branches are only possible futures. Realization consumes the resource. A generation is a logical version of a resource family. It is not a time period, not a clock interval, not a scheduling unit, and not an external ordering coordinate. Generations are ordered only by DSM derivability and resource consumption. This paper makes explicit the machinery required for that statement. Guard exclusivity is not left as convention. A DSM precommit set is valid only if its guard family is well formed. A well formed guard family gives either a deterministic branch selector, a mechanically proven exclusive guard class, or a set of branch predicates that are structurally tied to the same consumed resource. Parent consumption is modeled through canonical resource consumption keys and a consumed parent set committed by the DSM root. Branch local keys may exist for indexing or audit, but the shared resource key is what enforces linear exclusion. A hardened form of the model is also stated: for any conflict class, all conflicting candidates must resolve to an identical canonical resource consumption set, and those keys must be derived from the committed parent state rather than supplied as discretionary branch data. This removes the implementation hazard where release, refund, recovery, or policy branches accidentally consume different keys. The role of guard exclusivity is clarified. Pairwise guard exclusivity is useful and required for guard classes that claim exclusive fulfillment, but it is not the only safety mechanism. When conflicting branches share the same derived resource consumption key set, linearity alone prevents co realization even if several guards are simultaneously fulfilled. Thus the load bearing safety rule is not merely that guards should not overlap. The load bearing safety rule is that conflicting futures must fight over the same derived resource. Tripwire is formalized as the theorem that two conflicting realized successors from the same consumed resource cannot both be derivable. More precisely, conflicting candidates may be constructed or transmitted as bytes, but they cannot both validate under the DSM step predicate and cannot both go through as accepted state transitions for the same consumed resource. Forks are therefore not selected against by consensus. They are excluded by guarded realization and exposed by reconciliation if conflicting invalid bytes are presented outside the valid model. Offline bearer mode is treated as an optional mode predicate, and this revision states its corrected form. Transfer uniqueness, including offline transfer uniqueness, is a software theorem of the guarded linear kernel. An SMT committed anchor counter makes the offline origin an explicit coordinate of the committed state, every offline candidate from that origin consumes the same derived anchor step resource key, and realized history uniqueness applies without a hardware term. Hardware is thereby demoted to the one job software cannot perform: uniqueness of the physical device instance. Every offline release carries a three factor identity witness, a seed rooted DSM signature, a PUF rooted non exportable chip signature, and a partition sealed host signature over the same root advance message, and the physical monotonic counter survives only as a tracker of the SMT counter: a non rewind floor, a stale image tripwire, and an offline exposure cap. The receiver witnessed counter positioned commit of earlier drafts is superseded: a scalar counter read never binds the transition it brackets, and the binding was never needed. The safety theorems of this paper are supported by machine checked artifacts. The general key scoped fork exclusion theorems are proved in Lean 4 over an abstract guarded model, with the uniqueness and Tripwire core depending on no axioms. A companion TLA${}^{+}$ development model checks the same statements in both a per state form and a realized history form on concrete guard families, and by deliberate falsification of a malformed family confirms that guard family well formedness is load bearing. A relationship scoped model checks that same parent multi receiver forks are unconstructible in online DSM. Appendices A and B point to these artifacts. Their exact scope and boundary are stated in the Claim Boundary section.

Password-authenticated key exchange (PAKE) remains central to WPA3-Personal, the personal mode of the latest Wi-Fi security standard, where the Simultaneous Authentication of Equals (SAE) protocol enables secure Wi-Fi access via a low-entropy password. However, SAE’s symmetric password authentication makes all associated stations (STAs) vulnerable once the network-edge access point (AP) is compromised. Although SAE+ (IEEE TIFS 2024) addresses this issue in the client–server model with verifier-based asymmetric authentication, its weak binding of the password-derived verifier, ephemeral randomness, and protocol transcripts still enables key-compromise impersonation (KCI) attacks and offline dictionary attacks. Therefore, designing a verifier-based asymmetric SAE protocol that preserves the SAE workflow while resisting these attacks remains challenging. To address this challenge, we propose AsymSAE, a verifier-based asymmetric SAE protocol tailored for personal Wi-Fi networks. Following the SAE workflow in IEEE Std 802.11-2024, AsymSAE realizes asymmetric authentication by allowing the STA and AP to use the user password and the password-derived verifier, respectively. We further formulate a verifier-based security model to capture the asymmetric structure, and prove the security of AsymSAE in this model. Heuristic security analysis and ProVerif verification demonstrate that AsymSAE provides forward secrecy, transcript-based offline dictionary attack resistance, AP-side KCI resistance, session-key confidentiality, and mutual authentication. Our performance evaluation, including ns-3-based network simulation, demonstrates that AsymSAE can achieve significant verifier-based security enhancement without incurring extra communication overhead, while introducing minimal additional computational overhead and authentication latency.

This works introduces Basefold, a new $\textit{field-agnostic}$ Polynomial Commitment Scheme (PCS) for multilinear polynomials that has $O(\log^{2}(n))$ verifier costs and $O(n \log n)$ prover time. An important application of a multilinear PCS is constructing Succinct Non-interactive Arguments (SNARKs) from multilinear polynomial interactive oracle proofs (PIOPs). Furthermore, field-agnosticism is a major boon to SNARK efficiency in applications that require (or benefit from) a certain field choice. Our inspiration for Basefold is the Fast Reed-Solomon Interactive-Oracle Proof of Proximity (FRI IOPP), which leverages two properties of Reed-Solomon (RS) codes defined over "FFT-friendly'' fields: $O(n \log n)$ encoding time, and a second property that we call foldability. We first introduce a generalization of the FRI IOPP that works over any foldable linear code in linear time. Second, we construct a new family of linear codes which we call $\textit{random foldable codes}$, that are a special type of punctured Reed-Muller codes, and prove tight bounds on their minimum distance. Unlike RS codes, our new codes are foldable and have $O(n \log n)$ encoding time over ${any}$ sufficiently large field. Finally, we construct a new multilinear PCS by carefully interleaving our IOPP with the classical sumcheck protocol, which also gives a new multilinear PCS from FRI. Basefold is 2-3 times faster than prior multilinear PCS constructions from FRI when defined over the same finite field. More significantly, using Hyperplonk (Eurocrypt, 2022) as a multilinear PIOP backend for apples-to-apples comparison, we show that Basefold results in a SNARK that has better concrete efficiency across a range of field choices than with any prior multilinear PCS in the literature. Hyperplonk with Basefold has a proof size that is more than $10$ times smaller than Hyperplonk with Brakedown and its verifier is over $30$ times faster for circuits with more than $2^{20}$ gates. Compared to FRI, Hyperplonk with Basefold retains efficiency over any sufficiently large field. For illustration, with Basefold we can prove ECDSA signature verification over the secp256k1 curve more than $20$ times faster than Hyperplonk with FRI and the verifier is also twice as fast. Proofs of signature verification have many useful applications, including offloading blockchain transactions and enabling anonymous credentials over the web.