Existing systems for secure computation require programmers to express the program to be securely computed as a circuit, or in some domain-specific language that can be compiled to a form suitable for applying known protocols. We propose a new system that can securely execute native MIPS code with no special annotations. Our system has the advantage of allowing programmers to use a language of their choice to express their programs, together with any off-the-shelf compiler to MIPS; it can be used for secure computation of existing “legacy” MIPS code as well. Our system uses oblivious RAM for fetching instructions and performing load/store operations in memory, and garbled universal circuits for the execution of a MIPS ALU in each instruction step. We also explore various optimizations based on an offline analysis of the MIPS code to be executed, in order to minimize the overhead of executing each instruction while still maintaining security.

We define the concept of and present provably secure constructions for Anonymous RAM (AnonRAM), a novel multi-user storage primitive that offers strong privacy and integrity guarantees. AnonRAM combines privacy features of anonymous communication and oblivious RAM (ORAM) schemes, allowing it to protect, simultaneously, the privacy of content, access patterns and user’s identity, from curious servers and from other (even adversarial) users. AnonRAM further protects integrity, i.e., it prevents malicious users from corrupting data of other users. We present two secure AnonRAM schemes, differing in design and time-complexity. The first scheme has simpler design; like efficient ORAM schemes, its time-complexity is poly-logarithmic in the number of cells (per user), however, it is linear in the number of users. The second AnonRAM scheme reduces the overall complexity to poly-logarithmic in the total number of cells (of all users), at the cost of requiring two (non-colluding) servers.

Security features are of paramount importance for IoT, and implementations are challenging given the resource-constrained IoT set-up. We have developed a lightweight identity-based cryptosystem suitable for IoT, to enable secure authentication and message exchange among the devices. Our scheme employs Physically Unclonable Function (PUF), to generate the public identity of each device, which is used as the public key for each device for message encryption. We have provided formal proofs of security in the Session Key security and Universally Composable Framework of the proposed protocol, which demonstrates the resilience of the scheme against passive as well as active attacks. We have demonstrated the set up required for the protocol implementation and shown that the proposed protocol implementation incurs low hardware and software overhead.

A private set intersection protocol consists of two parties, a Sender and a Receiver, each with a secret input set. The protocol aims to have the Receiver output an intersection of the two sets while keeping the elements in the sets secret. This thesis thoroughly analyzes four recently published set intersection protocols, where it explains each protocol and checks whether it satisfies its corresponding security definition. The first two protocols [PSZ14, PSSZ15a] use random oblivious transfer where [PSSZ15a] is an optimized version of [PSZ14]. In the optimized protocol a correctness error is identified and prevented at a minor increase in run-time. An attempt to make [PSSZ15a] secure against a malicious adversary is shown, where the resulting protocol is proven secure against a semi-honest Sender and malicious Receiver. The third protocol [DCW13] is based on Bloom filters combined with oblivious transfer, and proposes protocols for two different security levels. The semi-honestly secure protocol satisfies its definition, while their proposal for a maliciously secure protocol is insufficient. This thesis shows two attacks a malicious Sender is capable of, without finding efficient countermeasures. The last protocol [DC16] allows computing four different set operations, where five errors are identified. Each error is explained and a proposal to avoid the issue is shown.

The problem of securely outsourcing computation to an untrusted server gained momentum with the recent penetration of cloud computing services. The ultimate goal in this setting is to design efficient protocols that minimize the computational overhead of the clients and instead rely on the extended resources of the server. In this paper, we focus on the outsourced database search problem which is highly motivated in the context of delegatable computing since it offers storage alternatives for massive databases, that may contain confidential data. This functionality is described in two phases: (1) setup phase and (2) query phase. The main goal is to minimize the parties workload in the query phase so that it is proportional to the query size and its corresponding response. We study whether a trusted setup or a random oracle are necessary for protocols with minimal interaction that meet the optimal communication and computation bounds in the query phase. We answer this question positively and demonstrate a lower bound on the communication or the computational overhead in this phase.

At Crypto'15 Fuchsbauer, Hanser and Slamanig (FHS) presented the first standard-model construction of efficient round-optimal blind signatures that does not require complexity leveraging. It is conceptually simple and builds on the primitive of structure-preserving signatures on equivalence classes (SPS-EQ). FHS prove the unforgeability of their scheme assuming EUF-CMA security of the SPS-EQ scheme and hardness of a version of the DH inversion problem. Blindness under adversarially chosen keys is proven under an interactive variant of the DDH assumption. We propose a variant of their scheme whose blindness can be proven under a non-interactive assumption, namely a variant of the bilinear DDH assumption. We moreover prove its unforgeability assuming only unforgeability of the underlying SPS-EQ but no additional assumptions as needed for the FHS scheme.

Private Set Intersection (PSI) and other private set operations have many current and emerging applications. Numerous PSI techniques have been proposed that vary widely in terms of underlying cryptographic primitives, security assumptions as well as complexity. One recent strand of PSI-related research focused on an additional privacy property of hiding participants’ input sizes. Despite some interesting results, only one (comparatively) practical size-hiding PSI (SH-PSI) has been demonstrated thus far [1]. One legitimate general criticism of size-hiding private set intersection is that the party that hides its input size can attempt to enumerate the entire (and possibly limited) domain of set elements, thus learning the other party’s entire input set. Although this “attack” goes beyond the honest-but-curious model, it motivates investigation of techniques that simultaneously hide and limit a participant’s input size. To this end, this paper explores the design of bounded size-hiding PSI techniques that allow one party to hide the size of its input while allowing the other party to limit that size. Its main contribution is a reasonably efficient (quasi-quadratic in input size) bSH-PSI protocol based on bounded keyed accumulators. This paper also studies the relationships between several flavors of the “Strong Diffie-Hellman” (SDH) problem.

At Eurocrypt 2011, Lindell presented practical static and adaptively UC-secure commitment schemes based on the DDH assumption. Later, Blazy {\etal} (at ACNS 2013) improved the efficiency of the Lindell's commitment schemes. In this paper, we present static and adaptively UC-secure commitment schemes based on the same assumption and further improve the communication and computational complexity, as well as the size of the common reference string.

We present a new technique for robust secret reconstruction with $O(n)$ communication complexity. By applying this technique, we achieve $O(n)$ communication complexity per multiplication for a wide class of robust practical Multi-Party Computation (MPC) protocols. In particular our technique applies to robust threshold computationally secure protocols in the case of $t<n/2$ in the pre-processing model. Previously in the pre-processing model, $O(n)$ communication complexity per multiplication was only known in the case of computationally secure non-robust protocols in the dishonest majority setting (i.e. with $t<n$) and in the case of perfectly-secure robust protocols with $t<n/3$. A similar protocol was sketched by Damgård and Nielsen, but no details were given to enable an estimate of the communication complexity. Surprisingly our robust reconstruction protocol applies for both the synchronous and asynchronous settings.

Cryptographic accumulators are a tool for compact set representation and secure set membership proofs. When an element is added to a set by means of an accumulator, a membership witness is generated. This witness can later be used to prove the membership of the element. Typically, the membership witness has to be synchronized with the accumulator value: it has to be updated every time another element is added to the accumulator, and it cannot be used with outdated accumulator values. However, in many distributed applications (such as blockchain-based public key infrastructures), requiring strict synchronization is prohibitive. We define low update frequency, which means that a witness only needs to be updated a small number of times, and old-accumulator compatibility, which means that a witness can be used with outdated accumulator values. Finally, we propose an accumulator that achieves both of those properties.

We describe a highly optimized protocol for general-purpose secure two-party computation (2PC) in the presence of malicious adversaries. Our starting point is a protocol of Kolesnikov \etal (TCC 2015). We adapt that protocol to the online/offline setting, where two parties repeatedly evaluate the same function (on possibly different inputs each time) and perform as much of the computation as possible in an offline preprocessing phase before their inputs are known. Along the way we develop several significant simplifications and optimizations to the protocol. We have implemented a prototype of our protocol and report on its performance. When two parties on Amazon servers in the same region use our implementation to securely evaluate the AES circuit 1024 times, the amortized cost per evaluation is \emph{5.1ms offline + 1.3ms online}. The total offline+online cost of our protocol is in fact less than the \emph{online} cost of any reported protocol with malicious security. For comparison, our protocol's closest competitor (Lindell \& Riva, CCS 2015) uses 74ms offline + 7ms online in an identical setup. Our protocol can be further tuned to trade performance for leakage. As an example, the performance in the above scenario improves to \emph{2.4ms offline + 1.0ms online} if we allow an adversary to learn a single bit about the honest party's input with probability $2^{-20}$ (but not violate any other security property, e.g. correctness).

Recently, several new techniques were presented to dramatically improve key parts of secure two-party computation (2PC) protocols that use the cut-and-choose paradigm on garbled circuits for 2PC with security against malicious adversaries. These include techniques for reducing the number of garbled circuits (Lindell 13, Huang et al.~13, Lindell and Riva 14, Huang et al.~14) and techniques for reducing the overheads besides garbled circuits (Mohassel and Riva 13, Shen and Shelat~13). We design a highly optimized protocol in the offline/online setting that makes use of all state-of-the-art techniques, along with several new techniques that we introduce. A crucial part of our protocol is a new technique for enforcing consistency of the inputs used by the party who garbles the circuits. This technique has both theoretical and practical advantages over \mbox{previous methods.} We present a prototype implementation of our new protocol, which is also the first implementation of the amortized cut-and-choose technique of Lindell and Riva (Crypto 2014). Our prototype achieves a speed of just \emph{$7$ ms in the online stage} and just $74$ ms in the offline stage per 2PC invoked, for securely computing AES in the presence of malicious adversaries (using 9 threads on two 2.9GHz machines located in the same Amazon region). We note that no prior work has gone below one second overall on average for the secure computation of AES for malicious adversaries (nor below 20ms in the online stage). Our implementation securely evaluates SHA-256 (which is a \emph{much bigger circuit}) with $33$ ms online time and $206$ ms offline time, per 2PC invoked.

Oblivious transfer (OT) is a basic building block in many cryptographic protocols. In this paper, we exploit some well-known authenticated Diffie-Hellman-based key exchange protocols to build three authenticated 1-out-of-2 oblivious transfers. We show that our proposed protocols are secure in the semi-honest model. We also compare our schemes with three similar 1-out-of-2 OT protocols and show that authentication in our schemes costs only up to either two more exponentiations or one message signing, compared to those with no authentication.

Direct Anonymous Attestation (DAA) is one of the most complex cryptographic algorithms that has been deployed in practice. In spite of this, and the long body of work on the subject, there is still no fully satisfactory security definition for DAA. This was already acknowledged by Bernard et al. (IJIC'13) who showed that in existing models even fully insecure protocols may be deemed secure. Bernard et al. therefore proposed an extensive set of security games, which however aimed only at a simplified setting, termed pre-DAA. In pre-DAA the host platform that runs the TPM is assumed to be trusted too. Consequently, their notion does not guarantee any security if the TPM is embedded in a potentially corrupt host, which is a significant restriction. In this paper, we give a comprehensive security definition for full DAA in the form of an ideal functionality in the Universal Composability model. Our definition considers the host and TPM to be individual entities that can be in different corruption states. None of the existing DAA schemes immediately satisfies our strong security notion, and we therefore also propose a realization that is based on a DAA scheme supported by the TPM 2.0 standard and rigorously prove it secure in our model.

Private information retrieval (PIR) is a way for clients to query a remote database without the database holder learning the clients' query terms or the responses they generate. Compelling applications for PIR are abound in the cryptographic and privacy research literature, yet existing PIR techniques are notoriously inefficient. Consequently, no such PIR-based application to date has seen real-world at-scale deployment. This paper proposes new "batch coding" techniques to help address PIR's efficiency problem. The new techniques exploit the connection between ramp secret sharing schemes and efficient information-theoretically secure PIR (IT-PIR) protocols. This connection was previously observed by Henry, Huang, and Goldberg (NDSS 2013), who used ramp schemes to construct efficient "batch queries" with which clients can fetch several database records for the same cost as fetching a single record using a standard, non-batch query. The new techniques in this paper generalize and extend those of Henry et al. to construct "batch codes" with which clients can fetch several records for only a fraction the cost of fetching a single record using a standard non-batch query over an unencoded database. The batch codes are highly tuneable, providing a means to trade off (i) lower server-side computation cost, (ii) lower server-side storage cost, and/or (iii) lower uni- or bi-directional communication cost, in exchange for a comparatively modest decrease in resilience to Byzantine database servers.

Many information-theoretic secure protocols are known for general secure multi-party computation, in the honest majority setting, and in the dishonest majority setting with preprocessing. All known protocols that are efficient in the circuit size of the evaluated function follow the same ''gate-by-gate'' design pattern: we work through an arithmetic (boolean) circuit on secret-shared inputs, such that after we process a gate, the output of the gate is represented as a random secret sharing among the players. This approach usually allows non-interactive processing of addition gates but requires communication for every multiplication gate. Thus, while information-theoretic secure protocols are very efficient in terms of computational work, they (seem to) require more communication and more rounds than computationally secure protocols. Whether this is inherent is an open and probably very hard problem. However, in this work we show that it is indeed inherent for protocols that follow the ''gate-by-gate'' design pattern. We present the following results: -In the honest majority setting, as well as for dishonest majority with preprocessing, any gate-by-gate protocol must communicate \Omega(n) bits for every multiplication gate, where n is the number of players. -In the honest majority setting, we show that one cannot obtain a bound that also grows with the field size. Moreover, for a constant number of players, amortizing over several multiplication gates does not allow us to save on the computational work, and - in a restricted setting - we show that this also holds for communication. All our lower bounds are met up to a constant factor by known protocols that follow the typical gate-by-gate paradigm. Our results imply that a fundamentally new approach must be found in order to improve the communication complexity of known protocols, such as BGW, GMW, SPDZ etc.

We present the first one-roundtrip protocol for performing range, range-aggregate, and order-by-limit queries over encrypted data, that both provides semantic security and is efficient. We accomplish this task by chaining garbled circuits over a search tree, using branch-chained garbled circuits, as well as carefully designing garbled circuits. We then show how to build a database index that can answer order comparison queries. We implemented and evaluated our index. We demonstrate that queries as well as inserts and updates are efficient, and that our index outperforms previous interactive constructions. This index is part of the Arx database system, whose source code will be released in the near future.

We provide a garbling scheme which creates garbled circuits of a very small constant size (four bits per gate) for circuits with fan-out one (formulas). For arbitrary fan-out, we additionally need only two ciphertexts per additional connection of each gate output wire. We make use of a trapdoor permutation for which we define a generalized notion of correlation robustness. We show that our notion is implied by PRIV-security, a notion for deterministic (searchable) encryption. We prove our scheme secure in the programmable random oracle model.

We present a new scheme for quantum homomorphic encryption which is compact and allows for efficient evaluation of arbitrary polynomial-sized quantum circuits. Building on the framework of Broad- bent and Jeffery and recent results in the area of instantaneous non-local quantum computation, we show how to construct quantum gadgets that allow perfect correction of the errors which occur during the homomorphic evaluation of T gates on encrypted quantum data. Our scheme can be based on any classical (leveled) fully homomorphic encryption (FHE) scheme and requires no computational assumptions besides those already used by the classical scheme. The size of our quantum gadget depends on the space complexity of the classical decryption function - which aligns well with the current efforts to minimize the complexity of the decryption function. Our scheme (or slight variants of it) offers a number of additional advantages such as ideal compactness, the ability to supply gadgets "on demand", circuit privacy for the evaluator against passive adversaries, and a three-round scheme for blind delegated quantum computation which puts only very limited demands on the quantum abilities of the client.

Authenticated Key Exchange (AKE) is a cryptographic scheme with the aim to establish a high-entropy and secret session key over a insecure communications network. \emph{Password}-Authenticated Key Exchange (PAKE) assumes that the parties in play share a simple password, which is cheap and human-memorable and is used to achieve the authentication. PAKEs are practically relevant as these features are extremely appealing in an age where most people access sensitive personal data remotely from more-and-more pervasive hand-held devices. Theoretically, PAKEs allow the secure computation and authentication of a high-entropy piece of data using a low-entropy string as a starting point. In this paper, we apply the recently proposed technique introduced in~\cite{DXX2012} to construct two lattice-based PAKE protocols enjoying a very simple and elegant design that is an parallel extension of the class of Random Oracle Model (ROM)-based protocols \msf{PAK} and \msf{PPK}~\cite{BMP2000,M2002}, but in the lattice-based setting. The new protocol resembling \msf{PAK} is three-pass, and provides \emph{mutual explicit authentication}, while the protocol following the structure of \msf{PPK} is two-pass, and provides \emph{implicit authentication}. Our protocols rely on the Ring-Learning-with-Errors (RLWE) assumption, and exploit the additive structure of the underlying ring. They have a comparable level of efficiency to \msf{PAK} and \msf{PPK}, which makes them highly attractive. We present a preliminary implementation of our protocols to demonstrate that they are both efficient and practical. We believe they are suitable quantum safe replacements for \msf{PAK} and \msf{PPK}.

The Algebraic Eraser has been gaining prominence as SecureRF, the company commercializing the algorithm, increases its marketing reach. The scheme is claimed to be well-suited to IoT applications but a lack of detail in available documentation has hampered peer-review. Recently more details of the system have emerged after a tag authentication protocol built using the Algebraic Eraser was proposed for standardization in ISO/IEC SC31 and SecureRF provided an open public description of the protocol. In this paper we describe a range of attacks on this protocol that include very efficient and practical tag impersonation as well as partial, and total, tag secret key recovery. Most of these results have been practically verified, they contrast with the 80-bit security that is claimed for the protocol, and they emphasize the importance of independent public review for any cryptographic proposal.

We propose a new zero-knowledge protocol applicable to additively homomorphic functions that map integer vectors to an Abelian group. The protocol demonstrates knowledge of a short preimage and achieves amortised efficiency comparable to the approach of Cramer and Damgård from Crypto 2010, but gives a much tighter bound on what we can extract from a dishonest prover. Towards achieving this result, we develop an analysis for bins-and-balls games that might be of independent interest. We also provide a general analysis of rewinding of a cut-and-choose protocol as well as a method to use Lyubachevsky's rejection sampling technique efficiently in an interactive protocol when many proofs are given simultaneously. Our new protocol yields improved proofs of plaintext knowledge for (Ring-)LWE-based cryptosystems, where such general techniques were not known before. Moreover, they can be extended to prove preimages of homomorphic hash functions as well.

Two-Server Password Authenticated Key Exchange (2PAKE) protocols apply secret sharing techniques to achieve protection against server-compromise attacks. 2PAKE protocols eliminate the need for password hashing and remain secure as long as one of the servers remains honest. This concept has also been explored in connection with two-server password authenticated secret sharing (2PASS) protocols for which game-based and universally composable versions have been proposed. In contrast, universally composable PAKE protocols exist currently only in the single-server scenario and all proposed 2PAKE protocols use game-based security definitions. In this paper we propose the first construction of an universally composable 2PAKE protocol, alongside with its ideal functionality. The protocol is proven UC-secure in the standard model, assuming a common reference string which is a common assumption to many UC-secure PAKE and PASS protocols. The proposed protocol remains secure for arbitrary password distributions. As one of the building blocks we define and construct a new cryptographic primitive, called Trapdoor Distributed Smooth Projective Hash Function (TD-SPHF), which could be of independent interest.

Decision trees and random forests are common classifiers with widespread use. In this paper, we develop two protocols for privately evaluating decision trees and random forests. We operate in the standard two-party setting where the server holds a model (either a tree or a forest), and the client holds an input (a feature vector). At the conclusion of the protocol, the client learns only the model's output on its input and a few generic parameters concerning the model; the server learns nothing. The first protocol we develop provides security against semi-honest adversaries. We then give an extension of the semi-honest protocol that is robust against malicious adversaries. We implement both protocols and show that both variants are able to process trees with several hundred decision nodes in just a few seconds and a modest amount of bandwidth. Compared to previous semi-honest protocols for private decision tree evaluation, we demonstrate a tenfold improvement in computation and bandwidth.

Recent techniques reduce ORAM communication complexity down to constant in the number of blocks N. However, they induce expensive homomorphic encryption on both the server and the client. In this paper, we present an alternative approach CHf-ORAM. This ORAM features constant communication complexity without homomorphic encryption, in exchange for expanding the traditional ORAM setting from single-server to multiple non-colluding servers. We show that adding as few as 4 servers allows for substantially reduced client and server computation compared to existing single-server alternatives. Our approach uses techniques from information-theoretically secure Private Information Retrieval to replace homomorphic encryption with simple XOR operations. Besides O(1) communication complexity, our construction also features O(1) client memory and a block size of only Omega(log^3 N). This leads to an ORAM which is extremely lightweight and suitable for deployment even on memory and compute constrained devices. Finally, CHf-ORAM features a circuit size which is constant in the blocksize making it especially attractive for secure RAM computations.

We study secure multiparty computation (MPC) in the dishonest majority setting providing security with identifiable abort, where if the protocol aborts, the honest parties can agree upon the identity of a corrupt party. All known constructions that achieve this notion require expensive zero-knowledge techniques to obtain active security, so are not practical. In this work, we present the first efficient MPC protocol with identifiable abort. Our protocol has an information-theoretic online phase with message complexity $O(n^2)$ for each secure multiplication (where $n$ is the number of parties), similar to the BDOZ protocol (Bendlin et al., Eurocrypt 2011), and a factor in the security parameter lower than the identifiable abort protocol of Ishai et al. (Crypto 2014). A key component of our protocol is a linearly homomorphic information-theoretic signature scheme, for which we provide the first definitions and construction based on a previous non-homomorphic scheme. We then show how to implement the preprocessing for our protocol using somewhat homomorphic encryption, similarly to the SPDZ protocol (Damgård et al., Crypto 2012) and other recent works with applicable efficiency improvements.

Electronic payment (e-payment) has been widely applied to electronic commerce and has especially attracted a large number of mobile users. However, current solutions often focus on protecting users' money security without concerning the issue of users' privacy leakage. In this paper, we propose AEP-M, a practical anonymous e-payment scheme specifically designed for mobile devices using TrustZone. On account of the limited resources on mobile devices and time constraints of electronic transactions, we construct our scheme based on efficient divisible e-cash system. Precisely, AEP-M allows users to withdraw a large coin of value $2^{n}$ at once, and then spend it in several times by dividing it without revealing users' identities to others, including banks and merchants. Users' payments cannot be linked either. AEP-M utilizes bit-decomposition technique and pre-computation to further increase the flexibility and efficiency of spending phase for mobile users. As a consequence, the frequent online spending process just needs at most $n$ exponentiations on elliptic curve on mobile devices. Moreover, we elaborately adapt AEP-M to TrustZone architecture for the sake of protecting users' money and critical data. The methods about key derivation and sensitive data management relying on a root of trust from SRAM Physical Unclonable Function (PUF) are presented. We implement a prototype system and evaluate AEP-M using Barreto-Naehrig (BN) curve with 128-bit security level. The security analysis and experimental results indicate that our scheme could meet the practical requirement of mobile users in respects of security and efficiency.

Biometric authentication methods are gaining popularity due to their convenience. For an authentication without relying on trusted hardwares, biometrics or their hashed values should be stored in the server. Storing biometrics in the clear or in an encrypted form, however, raises a grave concern about biometric theft through hacking or man-in-the middle attack. Unlike ID and password, once lost biometrics cannot practically be replaced. Encryption can be a tool for protecting them from theft, but encrypted biometrics should be recovered for comparison. In this work, we propose a secure biometric authentication scheme, named Ghostshell, in which an encrypted template is stored in the server and then compared with an encrypted attempt \emph{without} decryption. The decryption key is stored only in a user's device and so biometrics can be kept secret even against a compromised server. Our solution relies on a somewhat homomorphic encryption (SHE) and a message authentication code (MAC). Because known techniques for SHE is computationally expensive, we develop a more practical scheme by devising a significantly efficient matching function exploiting SIMD operations and a one-time MAC chosen for efficient homomorphic evaluations (of multiplication depth 2). When applied to Hamming distance matching on 2400-bit irises, our implementation shows that the computation time is approximately 0.47 and 0.1 seconds for the server and the user, respectively.

The Groth-Sahai proof system (EUROCRYPT 2008, SIAM Journal of Computing 41(5)) provides efficient non-interactive witness-indistinguishable (NIWI) and zero-knowledge (NIZK) proof systems for languages over bilinear groups and is a widely-used versatile tool to design efficient cryptographic schemes and protocols. We revisit randomization of the prover in the GS proof system. We find an unnoticed bug in the ``optimized'' randomization in the symmetric bilinear setting with several assumptions, say, the DLIN assumption or the matrix-DH assumption. This bug leads to security issues of the GS NIWI proof system with ``optimized'' randomization for multi-scalar multiplication equations and the GS NIZK proof system with ``optimized'' randomization for certain cases of pairing product equations and multi-scalar multiplication equations.

We investigate nonce reuse issues with the GCM block cipher mode as used in TLS and focus in particular on AES-GCM, the most widely deployed variant. With an Internet-wide scan we identified 184 HTTPS servers repeating nonces, which fully breaks the authenticity of the connections. Affected servers include large corporations, financial institutions, and a credit card company. We present a proof of concept of our attack allowing to violate the authenticity of affected HTTPS connections which in turn can be utilized to inject seemingly valid content into encrypted sessions. Furthermore we discovered over 70,000 HTTPS servers using random nonces, which puts them at risk of nonce reuse if a large amount of data is sent over the same connection.

shared random strings are either communicated or recreated algorithmically in “pseudo” mode, thereby exhibiting innate vulnerability. Proposing a secure protocol based on unshared randomized data, which therefore can be based on ‘white noise’ or other real-world, non algorithmic randomization. Prospective use of this T-Proof protocol includes proving possession of data to a party in possession of same data. The principle: Alice wishes to prove to Bob that she is in possession of secret data s, known also to Bob. They agree on a parsing algorithm, dependent on the contents of s, resulting in breaking s into t distinct, consecutive sub-strings (letters). Alice then uses unshared randomization procedure to effect a perfectly random transposition of the t substrings, thereby generating a transposed string s’. She communicates s’ to Bob. Bob verifies that s’ is a permutation of s based on his parsing of s to the same t substrings, and he is then persuaded that Alice is in possession of s. Because s’ was generated via a perfectly randomized transposition of s, a cryptanalyst in possession of s’ faces t! s- candidates, each with a probability of 1/t! (what’s more: the value of t, and the identity of the t sub-strings is unknown to the cryptanalyst). Brute force cryptanalysis is the fastest theoretical strategy. T-Proof can be played over s, mixed with some agreed upon nonce to defend against replay options. Unlike the competitive solution of hashing, T-Proof does not stand the risk of algorithmic shortcut. Its intractability is credibly appraised

Emerging smart contract systems over decentralized cryp- tocurrencies allow mutually distrustful parties to transact safely with each other without trusting a third-party inter- mediary. In the event of contractual breaches or aborts, the decentralized blockchain ensures that other honest parties obtain commesurate remuneration. Existing systems, how- ever, lack transactional privacy. All transactions, including flow of money between pseudonyms and amount trasacted, are exposed in the clear on the blockchain. We present Hawk, a decentralized smart contract system that does not store financial transactions in the clear on the blockchain, thus retaining transactional privacy from the public’s view. A Hawk programmer can write a private smart contract in an intuitive manner without having to implement cryptography, and our compiler automatically generates an efficient cryptographic protocol where contractual parties in- teract with the blockchain, using cryptographic primitives such as succint zero-knowledge proofs. To formally define and reason about the security of our protocols, we are the first to formalize the blockchain model of secure computation. The formal modeling is of indepen- dent interest. We advocate the community to adopt such a formal model when designing interesting applications atop decentralized blockchains.

Secure communications between mobile subscribers and their associated operator networks require mutual authentication and key derivation protocols. The 3GPP standard provides the AKA protocol for just this purpose. Its structure is generic, to be instantiated with a set of seven cryptographic algorithms. The currently-used proposal instantiates these by means of a set of AES-based algorithms called MILENAGE; as an alternative, the ETSI SAGE committee submitted the TUAK algorithms, which rely on a truncation of the internal permutation of Keccak. In this paper, we provide a formal security analysis of the AKA protocol in its complete three-party setting. We formulate requirements with respect to both Man-in-the-Middle (MiM) adversaries, i.e. key-indistinguishability and impersonation security, and to local untrusted serving networks, denoted “servers”, namely state-confidentiality and soundness. We prove that the unmodified AKA protocol attains these properties as long as servers cannot be corrupted. Furthermore, adding a unique server identifier suffices to guarantee all the security statements even in in the presence of corrupted servers. We use a modular proof approach: the first step is to prove the security of (modified and unmodified) AKA with generic cryptographic algorithms that can be represented as a unitary pseudorandom function –PRF– keyed either with the client’s secret key or with the operator key. A second step proceeds to show that TUAK and MILENAGE guarantee this type of pseudorandomness, though the guarantee for MILENAGE requires a stronger assumption. Our paper provides (to our knowledge) the first complete, rigorous analysis of the original AKA protocol and these two instantiations. We stress that such an analysis is important for any protocol deployed in real-life scenarios.

We present an analysis of key wrapping APIs with generic policies. We prove that certain minimal conditions on policies are sufficient for keys to be indistinguishable from random in any execution of an API. Our result captures a large class of API policies, including both the hierarchies on keys that are common in the scientific literature and the non-linear dependencies on keys used in PKCS#11. Indeed, we use our result to propose a secure refinement of PKCS#11, assuming that the attributes of keys are transmitted as authenticated associated data when wrapping and that there is an enforced separation between keys used for wrapping and keys used for other cryptographic purposes. We use the Computationally Complete Symbolic Attacker developed by Bana and Comon. This model enables us to obtain computational guarantees using a simple proof with a high degree of modularity.

We give a survey of existing attacks against end-to-end verifiable voting systems in the academic literature. We discuss attacks on the integrity of the election, attacks on the privacy of voters, and attacks aiming at coercion of voters. For each attack, we give a brief overview of the voting system and a short description of the attack and its consequences.

We propose Blind Password Registration (BPR), a new class of cryptographic protocols that is instrumental for secure registration of client passwords at remote servers with additional protection against unwitting password disclosures on the server side that may occur due to the lack of the state-of-the-art password protection mechanisms implemented by the server or due to common server-compromise attacks. The dictionary attack resistance property of BPR protocols guarantees that the only information available to the server during and after the execution of the protocol cannot be used to reveal the client password without performing an offline dictionary attack on a password verifier (e.g. salted hash value) that is stored by the server at the end of the protocol. In particular, at no point in time the server is supposed to work with plain passwords. Our BPR model allows servers to enforce password policies and the requirement on the client to obey them during the execution of the BPR protocol is covered by the policy compliance property. We construct an efficient BPR protocol in the standard model for ASCII-based password policies using some techniques underlying the recently introduced Zero-Knowledge Password Policy Checks (ZKPPC). However, we do not rely on the full power of costly ZKPPC proofs and in fact show that BPR protocols can be modelled and realised simpler and significantly faster (as supported by our implementation) without using them as a building block. Our BPR protocol can directly be used to replace ZKPPC-based registration procedure for existing VPAKE protocols.

Proofs of storage (POR or PDP) is a cryptographic tool, which enables data owner or third party auditor to audit integrity of data stored remotely in a cloud storage server, without keeping a local copy of data or downloading data back during auditing. We observe that all existing publicly verifiable POS schemes suffer from a serious drawback: It is extremely slow to compute authentication tags for all data blocks, due to many expensive group exponentiation operations. Surprisingly, it is even much slower than typical network uploading speed, and becomes the bottleneck of the setup phase of the POS scheme. We propose a new variant formulation called "Delegatable Proofs of Storage". In this new relaxed formulation, we are able to construct POS schemes, which on one side is as efficient as private key POS schemes, and on the other side can support third party auditor and can switch auditors at any time, close to the functionalities of publicly verifiable POS schemes. Compared to traditional publicly verifiable POS schemes, we speed up the tag generation process by at least several hundred times, without sacrificing efficiency in any other aspect. Like many existing schemes, we can also speed up our tag generation process by N times using N CPU cores in parallel. We prove that our scheme is sound under Bilinear Strong Diffie-Hellman Assumption, and it is privacy preserving against auditor under Discrete Log Assumption. Both proofs are given in standard model.

In this work we extend the electronic voting scheme introduced by R. Cramer, R. Gennaro and B. Schoenmakers in [CGS97]. In the original paper the privacy of votes is based on the decisional Diffie-Hellman or respectively the higher residuosity assumption. Since both problems can be solved efficiently in the event of quantum computers, a desirable goal is to implement the voting scheme with privacy based on different assumptions. We present the framework and a concrete instantiation for an efficient solution with privacy based on learning with errors over rings. Additionally we show how to achieve privacy assuming hardness of worst-case lattice problems, which are well analyzed and conjectured to be secure against quantum computers.

Reputation systems are a major feature of every modern e-commerce website, helping buyers carefully choose their service providers and products. However, most websites use centralized reputation systems, where the security of the system rests entirely upon a single Trusted Third Party. Moreover, they often disclose the identities of the raters, which may discourage honest users from posting frank reviews due to the fear of retaliation from the ratees. We present a reputation system that is decentralized yet secure and efficient, and could therefore be applied in a practical context. In fact, users are able to retrieve the reputation score of a service provider directly from it in constant time, with assurance regarding the correctness of the information obtained. Additionally, the reputation system is anonymity-preserving, which ensures that users can submit feedback without their identities being associated to it. Despite this anonymity, the system still offers robustness against attacks such as ballot-stuffing and Sybil attacks.

Data stored in cloud storage sometimes requires long-term security due to its sensitivity (e.g., genome data), and therefore, it also requires flexible access control for handling entities who can use the data. Broadcast encryption can partially provide such flexibility by specifying privileged receivers so that only they can decrypt a ciphertext. However, once privileged receivers are specified, they can be no longer dynamically added and/or removed. In this paper, we propose a new type of broadcast encryption which provides long-term security and appropriate access control, which we call unconditionally secure revocable-storage broadcast encryption (RS-BE). In RS-BE, privileged receivers of a ciphertext can be dynamically updated without revealing any information on the underlying plaintext. Specifically, we define a model and security of RS-BE, derive tight lower bounds on sizes of secret keys required for secure RS-BE, and propose a construction of RS-BE which meets all of these bounds. Our lower bounds can be applied to traditional broadcast encryption. Furthermore, to detect an improper update, we consider security against modification attacks to a ciphertext, and present a concrete construction secure against this type of attacks.

The Fiat-Shamir (FS) transform uses a hash function to generate, without any further overhead, non-interactive zero-knowledge (NIZK) argument systems from constant-round public-coin honest-verifier zero-knowledge (public-coin HVZK) proof systems. In the proof of zero knowledge, the hash function is modeled as a programmable random oracle (PRO). In TCC 2015, Lindell embarked on the challenging task of obtaining a similar transform with improved heuristic security. Lindell showed that, for several interesting and practical languages, there exists an efficient transform in the non-programmable random oracle (NPRO) model that also uses a common reference string (CRS). A major contribution of Lindell's transform is that zero knowledge is proved without random oracles and this is an important step towards achieving efficient NIZK arguments in the CRS model without random oracles. In this work, we analyze the efficiency and generality of Lindell's transform and notice a significant gap when compared with the FS transform. We then propose a new transform that aims at filling this gap. Indeed our transform is almost as efficient as the FS transform and can be applied to a broad class of public-coin HVZK proof systems. Our transform requires a CRS and an NPRO in the proof of soundness, similarly to Lindell's transform.

Key-exchange protocols such as TLS, SSH, IPsec, and ZRTP are highly configurable, with typical deployments supporting multiple protocol versions, cryptographic algorithms and parameters. In the first messages of the protocol, the peers negotiate one specific combination: the protocol mode, based on their local configurations. With few notable exceptions, most cryptographic analyses of configurable protocols consider a single mode at a time. In contrast, downgrade attacks, where a network adversary forces peers to use a mode weaker than the one they would normally negotiate, are a recurrent problem in practice. How to support configurability while at the same time guaranteeing the preferred mode is negotiated? We set to answer this question by designing a formal framework to study downgrade resilience and its relation to other security properties of key-exchange protocols. First, we study the causes of downgrade attacks by dissecting and classifying known and novel attacks against widely used protocols. Second, we survey what is known about the downgrade resilience of existing standards. Third, we combine these findings to define downgrade security, and analyze the conditions under which several protocols achieve it. Finally, we discuss patterns that guarantee downgrade security by design, and explain how to use them to strengthen the security of existing protocols, including a newly proposed draft of TLS 1.3.

The term "Internet of Things (IoT)" expresses a huge network of smart and connected objects which can interact with other devices without our interposition. Radio frequency identification (RFID) is a great technology and an interesting candidate to provide communications for IoT networks, but numerous security and privacy issues need to be considered. In this paper, we analyze the security and the privacy of a new RFID authentication protocol proposed by Shi et al. in 2014. We prove that although Shi et al. have tried to present a secure and untraceable authentication protocol, their protocol still suffers from several security and privacy weaknesses which make it vulnerable to various security and privacy attacks. We present our privacy analysis based on a well-known formal privacy model which is presented by Ouafi and Phan in 2008. Moreover, to stop such attacks on the protocol and increase the performance of Shi et al.’s scheme, we present some modifications and propound an improved version of the protocol. Finally, the security and the privacy of the proposed protocol were analyzed against various attacks.

Obfuscation is challenging; we currently have practical candidates with rather vague security guarantees on the one side, and theoretical constructions which have recently experienced jeopardizing attacks against the underlying cryptographic assumptions on the other side. This motivates us to study and present robust combiners for obfuscators, which integrate several candidate obfuscators into a single obfuscator which is secure as long as a quorum of the candidates is indeed secure. We give several results about building obfuscation combiners, with matching upper and lower bounds for the precise quorum of secure candidates. Namely, we show that one can build 3-out-of-4 obfuscation combiners where at least three of the four combiners are secure, whereas 2-out-of-3 structural combiners (which combine the obfuscator candidates in a black-box sense) with only two secure candidates, are impossible. Our results generalize to (2c+1)-out-of-(3c+1) combiners for the positive result, and to 2c-out-of-3c results for the negative result, for any integer c. To reduce overhead, we define detecting combiners, where the combined obfuscator may sometimes produce an error-indication instead of the desired output, indicating that some of the component obfuscators is faulty. We present a (c+1)-out-of-(2c+1) detecting combiner for any integer c, bypassing the previous lower bound. We further show that c-out-of-2c structural detecting combiners are again impossible. Since our approach can be used for practical obfuscators, as well as for obfuscators proven secure (based on assumptions), we also briefly report on implementation results for some applied obfuscator programs.

In this paper we address the problem of large space consumption for protocols in the Bounded Retrieval Model (BRM), which require users to store large secret keys subject to adversarial leakage. We propose a method to derive keys for such protocols on-the-fly from weakly random private data (like text documents or photos, users keep on their disks anyway for non-cryptographic purposes) in such a way that no extra storage is needed. We prove that any leakage-resilient protocol (belonging to a certain, arguably quite broad class) when run with a key obtained this way retains a similar level of security as the original protocol had. Additionally, we guarantee privacy of the data the actual keys are derived from. That is, an adversary can hardly gain any knowledge about the private data except that he could otherwise obtain via leakage. Our reduction works in the Random Oracle model. As an important tool in the proof we use a newly established bound for min-entropy, which can be of independent interest. It may be viewed as an analogue of the chain rule -- a weaker form of the well-known formula $\mathbf{H}(X \vert Y) = \mathbf{H}(X, Y) - \mathbf{H}(Y)$ for random variables $X$, $Y$, and Shannon entropy, which our result originates from. For min-entropy only a much more limited version of this relation is known to hold. Namely, the min-entropy of $X$ may decrease by up to the bitlength of $Y$ when $X$ is conditioned on $Y$, in short: $\widetilde{\mathbf{H}(X \vert Y) \geq \mathbf{H}_\infty(X) - \lvert Y\rvert$. In many cases this inequality does not offer tight bounds, and such significant entropy loss makes it inadequate for our particular application. In the quasi chain rule we propose, we inject some carefully crafted side information (spoiling knowledge) to show that with large probability the average min-entropy of $X$ conditioned on both: $Y$ and this side information can be almost lower bounded by the min-entropy of $(X, Y)$ decreased by the min-entropy of $Y$ conditioned on the side information.

Recently, the password-authenticated key exchange protocol J-PAKE of Hao and Ryan (Workshop on Security Protocols 2008) was formally proven secure in the algebraic adversary model by Abdalla et al.(IEEE S&P 2015). In this paper, we propose and examine two variants of J-PAKE - which we call RO-J-PAKE and CRS-J-PAKE - that each makes the use of two less zero-knowledge proofs than the original protocol. We show that they are provably secure following a similar strategy to that of Abdalla et al. We also study their efficiency as compared to J-PAKE's, also taking into account how the groups are chosen. Namely, we treat the cases of subgroups of the finite fields and elliptic curves. Our work reveals that, for subgroups of finite fields, CRS-J-PAKE is indeed more efficient than J-PAKE, while RO-J-PAKE is much less efficient. On the other hand, when instantiated with elliptic curves, both RO-J-PAKE and CRS-J-PAKE are more efficient than J-PAKE, with CRS-J-PAKE being the best of the three. We illustrate this experimentally, making use of recent research by Brier et al. (CRYPTO 2010). Regardless of implementation, we note that RO-J-PAKE enjoys a looser security reduction than both J-PAKE and CRS-J-PAKE. CRS-J-PAKE has the tightest security proof, but relies on an additional trust assumption at setup time. We believe our results can be useful to anyone interested in implementing J-PAKE, as perhaps either of these two new protocols may also be options, depending on the deployment context.

Security of a key exchange protocol is formally established through an abstract game between a challenger and an adversary. In this game the adversary can get various information which are modeled by giving the adversary access to appropriate oracle queries. Empowered with all these information, the adversary will try to break the protocol. This is modeled by a test query which asks the adversary to distinguish between a session key of a fresh session from a random session key; properly guessing which correctly leads the adversary to win the game. In this traditional model of security the adversary sees nothing apart from the input/ output relationship of the algorithms. However, in recent past an adversary could obtain several additional information beyond what he gets to learn in these black box models of computation, thanks to the availability of powerful malwares. This data exfiltration due to the attacks of Memory Scraper/Ram-Scraper-type malwares is an emerging threat. In order to realistically capture these advanced classes of threats posed by such malwares we propose a new security model for identity-based authenticated key exchange (ID-AKE) which we call the Identity based Strong Extended Canetti Krawzyck (ID-seCK) model. Our security model captures leakages of intermediate values by appropriate oracle queries given to the adversary. Following this, we propose a round optimal (i.e., single round) ID-AKE protocol for two-party settings. Our design assumes a hybrid system equipped with a bare minimal Trusted Platform Module (TPM) that can only perform group exponentiations. One of the major advantages of our construction is that it does not involve any pairing operations, works in prime order group and have a tight security reduction to the Gap Diffie Hellman (GDH) problem under our new ID-seCK model. Our scheme also has the capability to handle active adversaries while most of the previous ID-AKE protocols are secure only against passive adversaries. The security of our protocol is proved in the Random Oracle (RO) model.

Instant Messaging has gained popularity by users for both private and business communication as low-cost short message replacement on mobile devices. However, until recently, most mobile messaging apps did not protect confidentiality or integrity of the messages. Press releases about mass surveillance performed by intelligence services such as NSA and GCHQ motivated many people to use alternative messaging solutions to preserve the security and privacy of their communication on the Internet. Initially fueled by Facebook's acquisition of the hugely popular mobile messaging app WhatsApp, alternatives claiming to provide secure communication experienced a significant increase of new users. A messaging app that claims to provide secure instant messaging and has attracted a lot of attention is TextSecure. Besides numerous direct installations, its protocol is part of Android's most popular aftermarket firmware CyanogenMod. TextSecure's successor Signal continues to use the underlying protocol for text messaging. In this paper, we present the first complete description of TextSecure's complex cryptographic protocol, provide a security analysis of its three main components (key exchange, key derivation and authenticated encryption), and discuss the main security claims of TextSecure. Furthermore, we formally prove that - if key registration is assumed to be secure - TextSecure's push messaging can indeed achieve most of the claimed security goals.

Many online services adopt a password-based user authentication system because of its usability. However, several problems have been pointed out on it, and one of the well-known problems is that a user forgets his/her password and cannot login the services. To solve this problem, most online services support a mechanism with which a user can reset a password. In this paper, we consider a provable security treatment for a password reset protocol. We formalize a model and security definitions, propose a generic construction based on a pseudorandom function and public key encryption. In addition, we implement a prototype of our protocol to evaluate its efficiency.

Electronic financial transactions in the US, even those enabled by Bitcoin, have relatively high transaction costs. As a result, it becomes infeasible to make \emph{micropayments}, i.e. payments that are pennies or fractions of a penny. To circumvent the cost of recording all transactions, Wheeler (1996) and Rivest (1997) suggested the notion of a \emph{probabilistic payment}, that is, one implements payments that have \emph{expected} value on the order of micro pennies by running an appropriately biased lottery for a larger payment. While there have been quite a few proposed solutions to such lottery-based micropayment schemes, all these solutions rely on a trusted third party to coordinate the transactions; furthermore, to implement these systems in today's economy would require a a global change to how either banks or electronic payment companies (e.g., Visa and Mastercard) handle transactions. We put forth a new lottery-based micropayment scheme for any ledger-based transaction system, that can be used today without any change to the current infrastructure. We implement our scheme in a sample web application and show how a single server can handle thousands of micropayment requests per second. We analyze how the scheme can work at Internet scale.

Oblivious transfer is a fundamental building block for multiparty computation protocols. In this paper, we present a generally realizable framework for fully-simulatable $t$-out-of-$n$ oblivious transfer ($\mbox{OT}^{n}_{t}$) with security against non-adaptive malicious adversaries in the plain mode. Our construction relies on a single cryptographic primitive which is a variant of smooth projective hashing (SPH). A direct consequence of our work is that the existence of protocols for $\mbox{OT}^{n}_{t}$ is reduced to the existence of this SPH variant. Before this paper, the only known reductions provided half-simulatable security and every known efficient protocol involved at least two distinct cryptographic primitives. We show how to instantiate this new SPH variant under not only the decisional Diffie-Hellman assumption, the decisional $N$-th residuosity assumption and the decisional quadratic residuosity assumption as currently existing SPH constructions, but also the learning with errors problem. Our framework only needs $4$ communication rounds, which implies that it is more round-efficient than known protocols holding identical features.

We present two practical frameworks for $h$-out-of-$n$ oblivious transfer ($OT^{n}_{h}$). The first one is secure against covert adversaries who are not always willing to cheat at any price. The security is proven under the ideal/real simulation paradigm (call such security fully simulatable security). The second one is secure against malicious adversaries who are always willing to cheat. It provides fully simulatable security and privacy respectively for the sender and the receiver (call such security one-sided simulatable security). The two frameworks can be implemented from the decisional Diffie-Hellman (DDH) assumption, the decisional $N$-th residuosity assumption, the decisional quadratic residuosity assumption and so on. The DDH-based instantiation of our first framework costs the minimum communication rounds and the minimum computational overhead, compared with existing practical protocols for oblivious transfer with fully simulatable security against covert adversaries or malicious adversaries. Though our second framework is not efficient, compared with existing practical protocols with one-sided simulatable security against malicious adversaries. However, it first provides a way to deal with general $OT^{n}_{h}$ on this security level. What is more, its DDH-based instantiation is more efficient than the existing practical protocols for oblivious transfer with fully simulatable security against malicious adversaries.

Authenticated Key Exchange (AKE) protocols have been widely deployed in many real-world applications for securing communication channels. In this paper, we make the following contributions. First, we revisit the security modelling of leakage-resilient AKE protocols, and show that the existing models either impose some unnatural restrictions or do not sufficiently capture leakage attacks in reality. We then introduce a new strong yet meaningful security model, named challenge-dependent leakage-resilient eCK (CLR-eCK) model, to capture challenge-dependent leakage attacks on both long-term secret key and ephemeral secret key (i.e., randomness). Second, we propose a general framework for constructing one-round CLR-eCK-secure AKE protocols based on smooth projective hash functions (SPHFs). This framework ensures the session key is private and authentic even if the adversary learns a large fraction of both long-term secret key and ephemeral secret key, and hence provides stronger security guarantee than existing AKE protocols which become insecure if the adversary can perform leakage attacks during the execution of a session. Finally, we also present a practical instantiation of the general framework based on the Decisional Diffie-Hellman assumption without random oracle. Our result shows that the instantiation is efficient in terms of the communication and computation overhead and captures more general leakage attacks.

An aggregate signature scheme is the aggregation of multiple signatures into a single compact signature of short string that can convince to any arbitrary verifier participating in the scheme. The aggregate signature scheme is very useful for real-world cryptographic applications such as secure routing, database outsourcing, etc. where the signatures on several distinct messages generated by many distinct users requires to be compact. In this paper, we presented an aggregate signature scheme using Certificateless Public Key Cryptography(CL-PKC). The scheme is provably secure with strongest security and shortest length. We have proven the scheme is existentially unforgeable under adaptive chosen message attack, assuming the hardness of computational Diffie-Hellman(CDH) Problem.

There have been intensive research efforts in the last two decades or so to design and deploy electronic voting (e-voting) protocols/systems which allow voters and/or external auditors to check that the votes were counted correctly. This security property, which not least was motivated by numerous problems in even national elections, is called \emph{verifiability}. It is meant to defend against voting devices and servers that have programming errors or are outright malicious. In order to properly evaluate and analyze e-voting protocols w.r.t.~verifiability, one fundamental challenge has been to formally capture the meaning of this security property. While the first formal definitions of verifiability were devised in the late 1980s already, new verifiability definitions are still being proposed. The definitions differ in various aspects, including the classes of protocols they capture and even their formulations of the very core of the meaning of verifiability. This is an unsatisfying state of affairs, leaving the research on the verifiability of e-voting protocols in a fuzzy state. In this paper, we review all formal definitions of verifiability proposed in the literature and cast them in a framework proposed by Küsters, Truderung, and Vogt (the KTV framework), yielding a uniform treatment of verifiability. This enables us to provide a detailed comparison of the various definitions of verifiability from the literature. We thoroughly discuss advantages and disadvantages, and point to limitations and problems. Finally, from these discussions and based on the KTV framework, we distill a general definition of verifiability, which can be instantiated in various ways, and provide precise guidelines for its instantiation. The concepts for verifiability we develop should be widely applicable also beyond the framework used here. Altogether, our work offers a well-founded reference point for future research on the verifiability of e-voting systems.

While DNSSEC securely provides authenticity and integrity to the domain name system (DNS), it also creates a new security vulnerability called zone enumeration that allows an adversary that asks a small number of targeted DNS queries to learn the IP addresses of all domain names in a zone. An enumerated zone can be used as ''a source of probable e-mail addresses for spam, or as a key for multiple WHOIS queries to reveal registrant data that many registries may have legal obligations to protect'' [RFC 5155] (e.g., per EU data protection laws), or to create a toehold for more complex attacks. As the Internet of things becomes increasingly ubiquitous, it also becomes increasingly important to keep the names and addresses of these ''things'' (e.g., thermostats, fridges, baby monitors) away from remote attackers. In previous work we solved DNSSEC's zone enumeration problem by introducing NSEC5, a cryptographic construction based on RSA digital signatures. NSEC5 provides authenticated denial of existence, i.e., it is used to answer DNS queries that have negative responses (e.g., NXDOMAIN). RSA-based NSEC5 was recently submitted for specification in an Internet draft [draft-vcelak-nsec5-01], and a working implementation of a nameserver that supports RSA-based NSEC5 is also available [https://github.com/dipapado/nsec5-implementation]. However, recent years have seen the DNSSEC community aiming to replace RSA with elliptic curve cryptography (EC), in order to shorten the length of DNSSEC responses. Therefore, in this paper we present a new variant of NSEC5 that uses elliptic curve cryptography (ECC) to produce shorter NSEC5 responses. If a zone is signed with ECDSA at the 128-bit security level and also uses our new ECC-based NSEC5 scheme, its denial-of-existence responses (response code NXDOMAIN) will be about 2 times shorter than that a zone signed with 2048-bit RSA and RSA-based NSEC5. Moreover, our ECC-based NSEC5 has responses lengths that are comparable to NSEC3, DNSSEC's current authenticated-denial-of-existence mechanism that is vulnerable to zone enumeration via offline dictionary attacks. In fact, if a zone signed with ECDSA at the 128-bit security level also uses our new ECC-based NSEC5 scheme, it will have responses that are shorter than a zone using NSEC3 with 1024-bit RSA and SHA1 (for an 80-bit security level), which is today's dominant deployment configuration.

We study the question of how much interaction is needed for unconditionally secure multiparty computation. We first consider the number of messages that need to be sent to compute a Boolean function with semi-honest security, where all $n$ parties learn the result. We consider two classes of functions called $t$-difficult and $t$-very difficult functions, here $t$ refers to the number of corrupted players. One class is contained in the other. For instance, the AND of an input bit from each player is $t$-very difficult while the XOR is $t$-difficult but not $t$-very difficult. We show lower bounds on the message complexity of both types of functions, considering two notions of message complexity called conservative and liberal, where the conservative one is the more standard one. In all cases the bounds are $\Omega(nt)$. We also show upper bounds for $t=1$ and functions in deterministic log-space, as well as a stronger upper bound for the XOR function. This matches the lower bound for conservative complexity, so we find that the conservative message complexity of $1$-very difficult functions in deterministic log space is $2n$, while the conservative message complexity for XOR (and $t=1$) is $2n-1$. Next, we consider round complexity. It is a long-standing open problem to determine whether all efficiently computable functions can also be efficiently computed in constant-round with {\em unconditional} security. Motivated by this, we consider the question of whether we can compute any function securely, while minimizing the interaction of {\em some of} the players? And if so, how many players can this apply to? Note that we still want the standard security guarantees (correctness, privacy, termination) and we consider the standard communication model with secure point-to-point channels. We answer the questions as follows: for passive security, with $n=2t+1$ players and $t$ corruptions, up to $t$ players can have minimal interaction, i.e., they send 1 message in the first round to each of the $t+1$ remaining players and receive one message from each of them in the last round. Using our result on message complexity, we show that this is (unconditionally) optimal. For malicious security with $n=3t+1$ players and $t$ corruptions, up to $t$ players can have minimal interaction, and we show that this is also optimal.

The most widely accepted models in the security proofs of Authenticated Key Exchange protocols are the Canetti-Krawczyk and extended Canetti-Krawczyk models that admit different adversarial queries with ambiguities and incomparable strength. It is desirable to incorporate specific and powerful adversarial queries into a single unified security model and establish a more practical-oriented security notion. Concerning the security of one-round implicitly authenticated Diffie-Hellman key exchange protocols, we present a unified security model that has many advantages over the previous ones. In the model, a system environment is set up, all of adversarial queries are practically interpreted and definitely characterized through physical environment, and some rigorous rules of secret leakage are also specified. To demonstrate usability of our model, a new protocol based on the OAKE protocol is proposed, which satisfies the presented strong security notion and attains high efficiency. The protocol is proven secure in random oracle model under gap Diffie-Hellman assumption.

A redactable signature scheme (RSS) allows removing parts of a signed message by any party without invalidating the respective signature. State-of-the-art constructions thereby focus on messages represented by one specific data structure, e.g., lists, sets or trees, and adjust the security model accordingly. To overcome the necessity for this myriad of models, we present a general framework covering arbitrary data-structures and even more sophisticated possibilities. For example, we cover fixed elements which must not be redactable and dependencies between elements. Moreover, we introduce the notion of designated redactors, i.e., the signer can give some extra information to selected entities which become redactors. In practice, this often allows to obtain more efficient schemes. We then present two RSSs; one for sets and one for lists, both constructed from any EUF-CMA secure signature scheme and indistinguishable cryptographic accumulators in a black-box way and show how the concept of designated redactors can be used to increase the efficiency of these schemes. Finally, we present a black-box construction of a designated redactor RSS by combining an RSS for sets with non-interactive zero knowledge proof systems. All the three constructions presented in this paper provide transparency, which is an important property, but quite hard to achieve, as we also conceal the length of the original message and the positions of the redactions.

We provide a zero-knowledge argument for arithmetic circuit satisfiability with a communication complexity that grows logarithmically in the size of the circuit. The round complexity is also logarithmic and for an arithmetic circuit with fan-in 2 gates the computation of the prover and verifier is linear in the size of the circuit. The soundness of our argument relies solely on the well-established discrete logarithm assumption in prime order groups. At the heart of our new argument system is an efficient zero-knowledge argument of knowledge of openings of two Pedersen multicommitments satisfying an inner product relation, which is of independent interest. The inner product argument requires logarithmic communication, logarithmic interaction and linear computation for both the prover and the verifier. We also develop a scheme to commit to a polynomial and later reveal the evaluation at an arbitrary point, in a verifiable manner. This is used to build an optimized version of the constant round square root complexity argument of Groth (CRYPTO 2009), which reduces both communication and round complexity.

Oblivious RAM (ORAM) is a security-provable approach for protecting clients' access patterns to remote cloud storage. Recently, numerous ORAM constructions have been proposed to improve the communication efficiency of the ORAM model, but little attention has been paid to the storage efficiency. The state-of-the-art ORAM constructions have the storage overhead of $O(N)$ or $O(N\log N)$ blocks at the server, when $N$ data blocks are hosted. To fill the blank, this paper proposes a storage-efficient ORAM (SE-ORAM) construction with configurable security parameter $\lambda$ and zero storage overhead at the server. Extensive analysis has also been conducted and the results show that, SE-ORAM achieves the configured level of security, introduces zero storage overhead to the storage server (i.e., the storage server only storages $N$ data blocks), and incurs $O(\log N)$ blocks storage overhead at the client, as long as $\lambda\geq 2$ and each node on the storage tree stores $4\log N$ or more data blocks.

Recommendation systems become popular in our daily life. It is well known that the more the release of users’ personal data, the better the quality of recommendation. However, such services raise serious privacy concerns for users. In this paper, focusing on matrix factorization-based recommendation systems, we propose the first privacy-preserving matrix factorization using fully homomorphic encryption. On inputs of encrypted users' ratings, our protocol performs matrix factorization over the encrypted data and returns encrypted outputs so that the recommendation system knows nothing on rating values and resulting user/item profiles. It provides a way to obfuscate the number and list of items a user rated without harming the accuracy of recommendation, and additionally protects recommender's tuning parameters for business benefit and allows the recommender to optimize the parameters for quality of service. To overcome performance degradation caused by the use of fully homomorphic encryption, we introduce a novel data structure to perform computations over encrypted vectors, which are essential operations for matrix factorization, through secure 2-party computation in part. With the data structure, the proposed protocol requires dozens of times less computation cost over those of previous works. Our experiments on a personal computer with 3.4 GHz 6-cores 64 GB RAM show that the proposed protocol runs in 1.5 minutes per iteration. It is more efficient than Nikolaenko et al.'s work proposed in CCS 2013, in which it took about 170 minutes on two servers with 1.9 GHz 16-cores 128 GB RAM.

Kerberos is one of the most important cryptographic protocols, first because it is the basisc authentication protocol in Microsoft's Active Directory and shipped with every major operating system, and second because it served as a model for all Single-Sign-On protocols (e.g. SAML, OpenID, MS Cardspace, OpenID Connect). Its security has been confirmed with several Dolev-Yao style proofs, and attacks on certain versions of the protocol have been described. However despite its importance, despite its longevity, and despite the wealth of Dolev-Yao-style security proofs, no reduction based security proof has been published until now. This has two reasons: (1) All widely accepted formal models either deal with two-party protocols, or group key agreement protocols (where all entities have the same role), but not with 3-party protocols where each party has a different role. (2) Kerberos uses timestamps and nonces, and formal security models for timestamps are not well understood up to now. As a step towards a full security proof of Kerberos, we target problem (1) here: We propose a variant of the Kerberos protocol, where nonces are used instead of timestamps. This requires one additional protocol message, but enables a proof in the standard Bellare-Rogaway (BR) model. The key setup and the roles of the different parties are identical to the original Kerberos protocol. For our proof, we only require that the authenticated encryption and the message authentication code (MAC) schemes are secure. Under these assumptions we show that the probability that a client or server process oracle accepts maliciously, and the advantage of an adversary trying to distinguish a real Kerberos session key from a random value, are both negligible. One main idea in the proof is to model the Kerberos server a a public oracle, so that we do not have to consider the security of the connection client--Kerberos. This idea is only applicable to the communication pattern adapted by Kerberos, and not to other 3-party patterns (e.g. EAP protocols).

Secure two-party computation based on cut-and-choose has made great strides in recent years, with a significant reduction in the total number of garbled circuits required. Nevertheless, the overhead of cut-and-choose can still be significant for large circuits (i.e., a factor of $\rho$ in both communication and computation for statistical security $2^{-\rho}$). We show that for a particular class of computation it is possible to do better. Namely, consider the case where a function on the parties' inputs is computed only if each party's input satisfies some publicly checkable predicate (e.g., is signed by a third party, or lies in some desired domain). Using existing cut-and-choose-based protocols, both the predicate checks and the function would need to be garbled $\rho$ times. Here we show a protocol in which only the underlying function is garbled $\rho$ times, and the predicate checks are each garbled only \emph{once}. For certain natural examples (e.g., signature verification followed by evaluation of a million-gate circuit), this can lead to huge savings in communication (up to 80$\times$) and computation (up to 56$\times$). We provide detailed estimates using realistic examples to validate our claims.

The Algebraic Eraser Diffie-Hellman (AEDH) protocol, first introduced in 2005 as a key agreement and authentication protocol, has been proposed as a standard in ISO JTC-1/SC-31 (29167-20) to protect various communication protocols like RFID, NFC, or Bluetooth for devices associated with ISO-18000 and the Internet of Things. A recent paper by M.J.B. Robshaw and Simon R Blackburn claims to recover sufficient data to impersonate a device or, with a bit more work, recover the private keys of a device if an attacker uses the draft 29167-20 protocol and gains direct access to the resulting shared secret computation. This paper shows that simply adding a Hash or a Message Authentication Code (MAC) to the proposed authentication protocol overcomes the purported attacks. These simple standard enhancements thwart all of these attacks; that is, attacks of this nature fail. As the 29167-20 draft is currently a work item under active development within the ISO process, all these attacks would normally have been addressed in the working group, and no AEDH protocol in the public domain currently transmits the computed shared secret. Therefore, contrary to the conclusion of Robshaw and Blackburn, a simple addition to the draft protocol, similar in nature to protections in other protocols like TLS, makes the AEDH protocol perfectly suitable for authentication of passive tags and other low-power, constrained devices.

Universally composable multi-party computation is impossible without setup assumptions. Motivated by the ubiquitous use of secure hardware in many real world security applications, Katz (EUROCRYPT 2007) proposed a model of tamper-proof hardware as a UC-setup assumption. An important aspect of this model is whether the hardware token is allowed to hold a state or not. Real world examples of tamper-proof hardware that can hold a state are expensive hardware security modules commonly used in mainframes. Stateless, or resettable hardware tokens model cheaper devices such as smartcards, where an adversarial user can cut off the power supply, thus resetting the card's internal state. A natural question is how the stateful and the resettable hardware model compare in their cryptographic power, given that either the receiver or the sender of the token (and thus the token itself) might be malicious. In this work we show that any UC-functionality that can be implemented by a protocol using a single untrusted stateful hardware token can likewise be implemented using a single untrusted resettable hardware token, assuming only the existence of one-way functions. We present two compilers that transform UC-secure protocols in the stateful hardware model into UC-secure protocols in the resettable hardware model. The first compiler can be proven secure assuming merely the existence of one-way functions. However, it (necessarily) makes use of computationally rather expensive non-black-box techniques. We provide an alternative second compiler that replaces the expensive non-black-box component of the first compiler by few additional seed OTs. While this second compiler introduces the seed OTs as additional setup assumptions, it is computationally very efficient.

We present the first two-round, two-party general function evaluation protocol that is secure against honest-but-curious adaptive corruption of both parties. In addition, the protocol is incoercible for one of the parties, and fully leakage tolerant. It requires a global (non-programmable) reference string and is based on one way functions and general-purpose indistinguishability obfuscation with sub-exponential security, as well as augmented non-committing encryption. A Byzantine version of the protocol, obtained by applying the Canetti et al. [STOC 02] compiler, achieves UC security with comparable efficiency parameters, but is no longer incoercible.

Universal circuits (UCs) can be programmed to evaluate any circuit of a given size $k$. They provide elegant solutions in various application scenarios, e.g. for private function evaluation (PFE) and for improving the flexibility of attribute-based encryption (ABE) schemes. The optimal size of a universal circuit is proven to be $\Omega(k\log k)$. Valiant (STOC'76) proposed a size-optimized UC construction, which has not been put in practice ever since. The only implementation of universal circuits was provided by Kolesnikov and Schneider (FC'08), with size $\mathcal{O}(k\log^2 k)$. In this paper, we refine the size of Valiant's UC and further improve the construction by (at least) $2k$. We show that due to recent optimizations and our improvements, it is the best solution to apply in the case for circuits with a constant number of inputs and outputs. When the number of inputs or outputs is linear in the number of gates, we propose a more efficient hybrid solution based on the two existing constructions. We validate the practicality of Valiant's UC, by giving an example implementation for PFE using these size-optimized UCs.

Suppose Alice wishes to send a message to Bob privately over an untrusted channel. Cryptographers have developed a whole suite of tools to accomplish this task, with a wide variety of notions of security, setup assumptions, and running times. However, almost all prior work on this topic made a seemingly innocent assumption: that Alice has access to a trusted computer with a proper implementation of the protocol. The Snowden revelations show us that, in fact, powerful adversaries can and will corrupt users' machines in order to compromise their security. And, (presumably) accidental vulnerabilities are regularly found in popular cryptographic software, showing that users cannot even trust implementations that were created honestly. This leads to the following (seemingly absurd) question: ``Can Alice securely send a message to Bob even if she cannot trust her own computer?!'' Bellare, Paterson, and Rogaway recently studied this question. They show a strong lower bound that in particular rules out even semantically secure public-key encryption in their model. However, Mironov and Stephens-Davidowitz recently introduced a new framework for solving such problems: reverse firewalls. A secure reverse firewall is a third party that ``sits between Alice and the outside world'' and modifies her sent and received messages so that even if the her machine has been corrupted, Alice's security is still guaranteed. We show how to use reverse firewalls to sidestep the impossibility result of Bellare et al., and we achieve strong security guarantees in this extreme setting. Indeed, we find a rich structure of solutions that vary in efficiency, security, and setup assumptions, in close analogy with message transmission in the classical setting. Our strongest and most important result shows a protocol that achieves interactive, concurrent CCA-secure message transmission with a reverse firewall---i.e., CCA-secure message transmission on a possibly compromised machine! Surprisingly, this protocol is quite efficient and simple, requiring only four rounds and a small constant number of public-key operations for each party. It could easily be used in practice. Behind this result is a technical composition theorem that shows how key agreement with a sufficiently secure reverse firewall can be used to construct a message-transmission protocol with its own secure reverse firewall.

PPSS is a central primitive introduced by Bagherzandi et al [BJSL10] which allows a user to store a secret among n servers such that the user can later reconstruct the secret with the sole possession of a single password by contacting t+1 servers for t<n. At the same time, an attacker breaking into t of these servers - and controlling all communication channels - learns nothing about the secret (or the password). Thus, PPSS schemes are ideal for on-line storing of valuable secrets when retrieval solely relies on a memorizable password. We show the most efficient Password-Protected Secret Sharing (PPSS) to date (and its implied Threshold-PAKE scheme), which is optimal in round communication as in Jarecki et al [JKK14] but which improves computation and communication complexity over that scheme requiring a single per-server exponentiation for the client and a single exponentiation for the server. As with the schemes from [JKK14] and Camenisch et al [CLLN14], we do not require secure channels or PKI other than in the initialization stage. We prove the security of our PPSS scheme in the Universally Composable (UC) model. For this we present a UC definition of PPSS that relaxes the UC formalism of [CLLN14] in a way that enables more efficient PPSS schemes (by dispensing with the need to extract the user's password in the simulation) and present a UC-based definition of Oblivious PRF (OPRF) that is more general than the (Verifiable) OPRF definition from [JKK14] and is also crucial for enabling our performance optimization.

Numerous electronic cash schemes have been proposed over the years ranging from Ecash, Mondex to Millicent. However none of these schemes have been adopted by the financial institutions as an alternative to traditional paper based currency. The Ecash scheme was the closest to a system that mimicked fiat currency with the property that it provided anonymity for users when buying coins from the Bank and spending them at a merchant premises (from the Bank's perspective). However Ecash lacked one crucial element present in current fiat based systems i.e., the ability to continuously spend or transfer coins within the system. In this paper we propose an extension to the Ecash scheme which allows for the anonymous transfer of coins between users without the involvement of a trusted third party. We make use of a powerful technique which allows for distributed decision making within the network - namely the Bitcoin blockchain protocol. Combined with the proof-of-work technique and the classical discrete logarithm problem we are able to continuously reuse coins within our system, and also prevent double-spending of coins without revealing the identities of the users.

In this document we present an overview of the background to and goals of the Password Hashing Competition (PHC) as well as the design of its winner, Argon2, and its security requirements and properties.

Recently an unlinkable version of the U-Prove attribute-based credential scheme was proposed at Financial Crypto '14. Unfortunately, the new scheme is forgeable: if sufficiently many users work together then they can construct new credentials, containing any set of attributes of their choice, without any involvement of the issuer. In this note we show how they can achieve this and we point out the error in the unforgeability proof.

The increasing availability and use of biometric data for authentication and other purposes leads to situations when sensitive biometric data is to be handled or used in computation by entities who may not be fully trusted or otherwise are not authorized to have full access to such data. This calls for mechanisms of provably protecting biometric data while still allowing the computation to take place. This work is motivated by the problem of privacy-preserving matching of two fingerprints (used for secure fingerprint authentication or identification) using traditional minutia-based representation of fingerprints that leads to the most discriminative (i.e., accurate) fingerprint comparisons. Unlike previous work in the security literature, we would like to focus on algorithms that are guaranteed to find the maximum number of minutiae that can be paired together between two fingerprints leading to more accurate comparisons. To address this problem, we formulate it as a flow network problem and reduce it to finding maximum matching size in bipartite graphs. The resulting problem is in turn reduced to computing the rank of a (non-invertible) matrix, formed as a randomized adjacency matrix of the bipartite graph. We then provide data-oblivious algorithms for matrix rank computation and consecutively finding maximum matching size in a bipartite graph and also extend the algorithms to solve the problem of accurate fingerprint matching. These algorithms lead to their secure counterparts using standard secure two-party or multi-party techniques as we show later in this work. Lastly, we implement secure fingerprint matching in the secure two-party computation setting using garbled circuit evaluation techniques. Our experimental results demonstrate that the techniques are very efficient, leading to performance similar to that of other fastest secure fingerprint matching techniques, despite higher complexity of our solution that higher accuracy demands.

Symmetric Searchable Encryption (SSE) is a very efficient and practical way for data owners to out- source storage of a database to a server while providing privacy guarantees. Such SSE schemes enable clients to encrypt their database while still performing queries for retrieving documents matching some keyword. This functionality is interesting to secure cloud storage, and efficient schemes have been de- signed in the past. However, security against malicious servers has been overlooked in most previous constructions and these only addressed security against honest-but-curious servers. In this paper, we study and design the first efficient SSE schemes provably secure against mali- cious servers. First, we give lower bounds on the complexity of such verifiable SSE schemes. Then, we construct generic solutions matching these bounds using efficient verifiable data structures. Finally, we modify an existing SSE scheme that also provides forward secrecy of search queries, and make it prov- ably secure against active adversaries, without increasing the computational complexity of the original scheme.

In the cloud computing era, in order to avoid the computational burdens, many recommendation service providers tend to outsource their collaborative filtering computations to third-party cloud servers. In order to protect service quality and privacy for end users, both the integrity of computation results and the confidentiality of original dataset need to be guaranteed. In this paper, we analyze two integrity verification approaches by Vaidya et al. and demonstrate their performances. In particular, we analyze the verification via auxiliary data approach which is only briefly mentioned in the original paper, and demonstrate the experimental results (with better performances). We then propose a new solution to outsource all computations of the weighted Slope One algorithm in multi-server setting and provide experimental results. We finally discuss the possibility of using homomorphic encryption to achieve both integrity and confidentiality guarantees.

We propose a computationally secure and non-interactive verifiable secret sharing scheme that can be efficiently constructed from any monotone Boolean circuit. By non-interactive we mean that the dealer needs to be active only once, where he posts a public message as well as a private message to each shareholder. In the random oracle model, we can even avoid interaction between shareholders. By efficient, we mean that we avoid generic zero-knowledge techniques. Such efficient constructions were previously only known from linear secret sharing schemes (LSSS). It is believed that the class of access structures that can be handled with polynomial size LSSS is incomparable to the class that can be recognized by polynomial size monotone circuits, so in this sense we extend the class of access structures with efficient and non-interactive VSS.

While threshold signature schemes have been presented before, there has never been an optimal threshold signature algorithm for DSA. Due to the properties of DSA, it is far more difficult to create a threshold scheme for it than for other signature algorithms. In this paper, we present a breakthrough scheme that provides a threshold DSA algorithm that is efficient and optimal. We also present a compelling application to use our scheme: securing Bitcoin wallets. Bitcoin thefts are on the rise, and threshold DSA is necessary to secure Bitcoin wallets. Our scheme is the first general threshold DSA scheme that does not require an honest majority and is useful for securing Bitcoin wallets.

In recent years, a new approach has been developed for verifying security protocols with the aim of combining the benefits of symbolic attackers and the benefits of unconditional soundness: the technique of the computationally complete symbolic attacker of Bana and Comon (BC). In this paper we argue that the real breakthrough of this technique is the recent introduction of its version for indistinguishability because, with the extensions we introduce here, for the first time, there is a computationally sound symbolic technique that is syntactically strikingly simple, to which translating standard computational security notions is a straightforward matter, and that can be effectively used for verification of not only equivalence properties, but trace properties of protocols as well. We first fully develop the core elements of this newer version by introducing several new axioms. We illustrate the power and the diverse use of the introduced axioms on simple examples first. We introduce an axiom expressing the Decisional Diffie-Hellman property. We analyze the Diffie-Hellman key exchange, both in its simplest form and an authenticated version as well. We provide computationally sound verification of real-or-random secrecy of the Diffie-Hellman key exchange protocol for multiple sessions, without any restrictions on the computational implementation other than the DDH assumption. We also show authentication for a simplified version of the station-to-station protocol using UF-CMA assumption for digital signatures. Finally, we axiomatize IND-CPA, IND-CCA1 and IND-CCA2 security properties and illustrate their usage.

Secret handshakes (SH) scheme is a key agreement protocol between two members of the same group. Under this scheme two members share a common key if and only if they both belong to the same group. If the protocol fails none of the parties involved get any idea about the group affiliation of the other. Moreover if the transcript of communication is available to a third party, she/he does not get any information about the group affiliation of communicating parties. The concept of SH was given by Balfanz in 2003 who also gave a practical SH scheme using pairing based cryptography. The protocol proposed by Balfanz uses one time credential to insure that handshake protocol performed by the same party cannot be linked. Xu and Yung proposed SH scheme that achieve unlinkability with reusable credentials. In this paper, a new unlinkable secret handshakes scheme is presented. Our scheme is constructed from the ZSS signature and inspired on an identity based authenticated key agreement protocol, proposed by McCullagh et al. In recently proposed work most of unlinkable secret handshake schemes have either design flaw or security flaw, we proved the security of proposed scheme by assuming the intractability of the bilinear inverse Diffie-Hellman and k-CAA problems.

We study the problem of how to efficiently outsource a sensitive computation on secret inputs to a number of untrusted workers, under the assumption that at least one worker is honest. In our setting there are a number of clients $C_1,\ldots,C_n$ with inputs $x_1,\ldots,x_n$. The clients want to delegate a secure computation of $f(x_1,\ldots,x_n)$ to a set of untrusted workers $W_1,\ldots,W_m$. We want do so in such a way that as long as there is at least one honest worker (and everyone else might be actively corrupted) the following holds: * the privacy of the inputs is preserved; * output of the computation is correct (in particular workers cannot change the inputs of honest clients). We propose a solution where the clients' work is minimal and the interaction pattern simple (one message to upload inputs, one to receive results), while at the same time reducing the overhead for the workers to a minimum. Our solution is generic and can be instantiated with any underlying reactive MPC protocol where linear operations are ``for free''. In contrast previous solutions were less generic and could only be instantiated for specific numbers of clients/workers.

Typically, secure channels are constructed from an authenticated key exchange (AKE) protocol, which authenticates the communicating parties based on long-term public keys and establishes secret session keys. In this paper we address the partial leakage of long-term secret keys of key exchange protocol participants due to various side-channel attacks. Security models for two-party authenticated key exchange protocols have developed over time to provide security even when the adversary learns certain secret values. This paper combines and extends the advances of security modelling for AKE protocols addressing more granular partial leakage of long-term secrets of protocol participants.

BIP70 is a community-accepted Payment Protocol standard that governs how merchants and customers perform payments in Bitcoin. This standard is supported by most major wallets and the two dominant Payment Processors: Coinbase and BitPay, who collectively provide the infrastructure for accepting Bitcoin as a form of payment to more than 100,000 merchants. In this paper, we present new attacks on the Payment Protocol, which affect all BIP70 merchants. The Silkroad Trader attack highlights an authentication vulnerability in the Payment Protocol while the Marketplace Trader attack exploits the refund policies of existing Payment Processors. Both attacks have been experimentally verified on real-life merchants using a modified Bitcoin wallet. The attacks have been acknowledged by both Coinbase and Bitpay with temporary mitigation measures put in place. However, to fully address the identified issues will require revising the BIP70 standard. We present a concrete proposal to revise BIP70 by providing the merchant with publicly verifiable evidence to prevent both attacks.

We design in this paper the first attribute-based cryptosystems that work in the classical Discrete Logarithm, pairing-free, setting. The attribute-based signature scheme can be seen as an extension of Schnorr signatures, with adaptive security relying on the Discrete Logarithm Assumption, in the random oracle model. The attribute-based encryption schemes can be seen as extensions of ElGamal cryptosystem, with adaptive security relying on the Decisional Diffie-Hellman Assumption, in the standard model. The proposed schemes are secure only in a bounded model: the systems admit $L$ secret keys, at most, for a bound $L$ that must be fixed in the setup of the systems. The efficiency of the cryptosystems, later, depends on this bound $L$. Although this is an important drawback that can limit the applicability of the proposed schemes in some real-life applications, it turns out that the bounded security of our key-policy attribute-based encryption scheme (in particular, with $L=1$) is enough to implement the generic transformation of Parno, Raykova and Vaikuntanathan at TCC'2012. As a direct result, we obtain a protocol for the verifiable delegation of computation of boolean functions, which does not employ pairings or lattices, and whose adaptive security relies on the Decisional Diffie-Hellman Assumption.

The availability of vast amounts of data is changing how we can make medical discoveries, predict global market trends, save energy, and develop new educational strategies. In certain settings such as Genome Wide Association Studies or deep learning, the sheer size of data (patient files or labeled examples) seems critical to making discoveries. When data is held distributedly by many parties, as often is the case, they must share it to reap its full benefits. One obstacle to this revolution is the lack of willingness of different entities to share their data, due to reasons such as possible loss of privacy or competitive edge. Whereas cryptographic works address the privacy aspects, they shed no light on individual parties' losses and gains when access to data carries tangible rewards. Even if it is clear that better overall conclusions can be drawn fom collaboration, are individual collaborators better off by collaborating? Addressing this question is the topic of this paper. Our contributions are as follows. * We formalize a model of $n$-party collaboration for computing functions over private inputs in which the participants receive their outputs in sequence, and the order depends on their private inputs. Each output ``improves'' on all previous outputs according to a score function. * We say that a mechanism for collaboration achieves a \emph{collaborative equilibrium} if it guarantees a higher reward for all participants when joining a collaboration compared to not joining it. We show that while in general computing a collaborative equilibrium is NP-complete, we can design polynomial-time algorithms for computing it for a range of natural model settings. When possible, we design mechanisms to compute a distribution of outputs and an ordering of output delivery, based on the $n$ participants' private inputs, which achieves a collaborative equilibrium. The collaboration mechanisms we develop are in the standard model, and thus require a central trusted party; however, we show that this assumption is not necessary under standard cryptographic assumptions. We show how the mechanisms can be implemented in a decentralized way by $n$ distrustful parties using new extensions of classical secure multiparty computation that impose order and timing constraints on the delivery of outputs to different players, in addition to guaranteeing privacy and correctness.

A Universal Circuit (UC) is a circuit that can simulate any circuit of a maximum size, given its description as input. In this work, we look back at Valiant's universal circuit construction from Valiant (STOC 1976). Although it yields asymptotically optimal UC, and has implications for important problems in cryptography such as ''private function evaluation'' (PFE) and ''cryptographic program obfuscation'', somewhat surprisingly, no implementations of the construction exist. We provide a more approachable description, improve its constant factors, and put forth the first complete implementation. We observe that our improved implementation of Valiant's UC performs better than estimated and in fact, is almost always smaller than UC construction of Kolesnikov and Schneider (FC 2008). The UC circuits generated by our implementation can be used for benchmarking MPC protocols, and provide a point of comparison for any future PFE. We also observe, for the first time, that the same construction can be adapted to yield size optimized \emph{universal arithmetic circuit} (UAC).

Reputation systems are crucial for distributed applications in which users have to be made accountable for their actions, such as e-commerce websites. However, existing systems often disclose the identity of the raters, which might deter honest users from posting reviews, out of fear of retaliation from the ratees. While many privacy-preserving reputation systems have been proposed, none of them was at the same time truly decentralized, trustless, and suitable for real world usage in, for example, e-commerce applications. After discussing the weaknesses and shortcoming of existing solutions, we will present our own blockchain-based trustless reputation system, and analyze its correctness and the security guarantees it promises.

The notion of oblivious transfer with hidden access control policies (HACOT) was recently proposed by Camenisch et al.~(Public-Key Cryptography~2011). This primitive allows a user to anonymously query a database where each record is protected by a hidden attribute-based access control policy. At each query, the user either learns the value of a single record if the attributes in his key satisfy the policy, or the mere fact that his attributes do not satisfy the policy. The database, even when colluding with the key issuer, learns nothing about the identity of the user, the index or the access policy of the record, or whether access was granted or denied. At the same time, the database can keep an eye on the overall access frequency to prevent the data from being ``crawled''. In this paper, we present a new HACOT scheme which is more efficient and offers more expressive policies than the scheme presented by Camenisch et al. We construct our HACOT protocol based on a hidden ciphertext-policy attribute-based encryption (HP-ABE) scheme by Nishide et al.: users are issued HACOT decryption keys based on HP-ABE attributes and HACOT records are encrypted under HP-ABE policies. However, as we will see, this simple approach does not work and we need to extend the Nishide et al.\ scheme as follows. First, we add protocols that allows users to verify that the public key of the issuer and ciphertexts are correctly formed. Second, we reserve one attribute and give the corresponding decryption key only to the database. Thereby users can no longer decrypt records by themselves but require the help of the database. Third, we provide a joint decryption protocol between the user and the database, so that the database does not learn which ciphertext is decrypted. The latter will also allow one to optionally add revocation of the users' access. We prove our construction secure by a reduction to the security of Nishide et al.'s scheme, the Symmetric External Diffie-Hellman (SXDH) and Simultaneous Flexible Pairing (SFP) assumptions.

We present a set of new, efficient, universally composable two-party protocols for evaluating reactive arithmetic circuits modulo n, where n is a safe RSA modulus of unknown factorization. Our protocols are based on a homomorphic encryption scheme with message space $Z_n$, zero-knowledge proofs of existence, and a novel "mixed" trapdoor commitment scheme. Our protocols are proven secure against adaptive corruptions (assuming secure erasures) under standard assumptions in the CRS model (without random oracles). Our protocols appear to be the most efficient ones that satisfy these security requirements. In contrast to prior protocols, we provide facilities that allow for the use of our protocols as building blocks of higher-level protocols. An additional contribution of this paper is a universally composable construction of the variant of the Dodis-Yampolskiy oblivious pseudorandom function in a group of order n as originally proposed by Jarecki and Liu.

Protecting user data entails providing authenticated users access to their data. The most prevalent and probably also the most feasible approach to the latter is by username and password. With password breaches through server compromise now reaching billions of affected passwords, distributing the password files and user data over multiple servers is not just a good idea, it is a dearly needed solution to a topical problem. Threshold password-authenticated secret sharing (TPASS) protocols enable users to share secret data among a set of servers so that they can later recover that data using a single password. No coalition of servers up to a certain threshold can learn anything about the data or perform an offline dictionary attack on the password. Several TPASS protocols have appeared in the literature and one is even available commercially. Although designed to tolerate corrupted servers, unfortunately none of these protocols provide details let alone security proofs about the steps that need to be taken when a compromise actually occurs and how to proceed. Indeed, they consider static corruptions only which for instance does not model real world attacks by hackers. We provide the first TPASS protocol that is provably secure against adaptive server corruptions. Moreover, our protocol contains an efficient recovery procedure allowing one to re-initialize servers to recover from corruption. We prove our protocol secure in the universal composability model where servers can be corrupted adaptively at any time; the users' passwords and secrets remain safe as long as both servers are not corrupted at the same time. Our protocol does not require random oracles but does assume that servers have certified public keys.

Exciting new capabilities of modern trusted hardware technologies allow for the execution of arbitrary code within environments completely isolated from the rest of the system and provide cryptographic mechanisms for securely reporting on these executions to remote parties. Rigorously proving security of protocols that rely on this type of hardware faces two obstacles. The first is to develop models appropriate for the induced trust assumptions (e.g., what is the correct notion of a party when the peer one wishes to communicate with is a specific instance of an an outsourced program). The second is to develop scalable analysis methods, as the inherent stateful nature of the platforms precludes the application of existing modular analysis techniques that require high degrees of independence between the components. We give the first steps in this direction by studying three cryptographic tools which have been commonly associated with this new generation of trusted hardware solutions. Specifically, we provide formal security definitions, generic constructions and security analysis for attested computation, key-exchange for attestation and secure outsourced computation. Our approach is incremental: each of the concepts relies on the previous ones according to an approach that is quasi-modular. For example we show how to build a secure outsourced computation scheme from an arbitrary attestation protocol combined together with a key-exchange and an encryption scheme.

As big data collection and analysis becomes prevalent in today’s computing environments there is a growing need for techniques to ensure security of the collected data. To make matters worse, due to its large volume and velocity, big data is commonly stored on distributed or shared computing resources not fully controlled by the data owner. Thus, tools are needed to ensure both the confidentiality of the stored data and the integrity of the analytics results even in untrusted environments. In this chapter, we present several cryptographic approaches for securing big data and discuss the appropriate use scenarios for each. We begin with the problem of securing big data storage. We first address the problem of secure block storage for big data allowing data owners to store and retrieve their data from an untrusted server. We present techniques that allow a data owner to both control access to their data and ensure that none of their data is modified or lost while in storage. However, in most big data applications, it is not sufficient to simply store and retrieve one’s data and a search functionality is necessary to allow one to select only the relevant data. Thus, we present several techniques for searchable encryption allowing database- style queries over encrypted data. We review the performance, functionality, and security provided by each of these schemes and describe appropriate use-cases. However, the volume of big data often makes it infeasible for an analyst to retrieve all relevant data. Instead, it is desirable to be able to perform analytics directly on the stored data without compromising the confidentiality of the data or the integrity of the computation results. We describe several recent cryptographic breakthroughs that make such processing possible for varying classes of analytics. We review the performance and security characteristics of each of these schemes and summarize how they can be used to protect big data analytics especially when deployed in a cloud setting. We hope that the exposition in this chapter will raise awareness of the latest types of tools and protections available for securing big data. We believe better understanding and closer collaboration between the data science and cryptography communities will be critical to enabling the future of big data processing.

As low-cost RFID tags become more and more ubiquitous, it is necessary to design ultralightweight RFID authentication protocols to prevent possible attacks and threats. We reevaluate Ahmadian et al.’s desynchronization attack on the ultralightweight RFID authentication protocol with permutation (RAPP). Our results are twofold: (1) we demonstrate that the probability of the desynchronization between the tag and the reader is 15/64 instead of 1/4 as claimed, when RAPP uses Hamming weight-based rotation; (2) we further improve the original attack and make the desynchronization more efficient.

In the setting of secure multiparty computation, a set of mutually distrusting parties wish to securely compute a joint function. It is well known that if the communication model is asynchronous, meaning that messages can be arbitrarily delayed by an unbounded (yet finite) amount of time, secure computation is feasible if and only if at least two-thirds of the parties are honest, as was shown by Ben-Or, Canetti, and Goldreich [STOC'93] and by Ben-Or, Kelmer, and Rabin [PODC'94]. The running-time of all currently known protocols depends on the function to evaluate. In this work we present the first asynchronous MPC protocol that runs in constant time. Our starting point is the asynchronous MPC protocol of Hirt, Nielsen, and Przydatek [Eurocrypt'05, ICALP'08]. We integrate \emph{threshold fully homomorphic encryption} in order to reduce the interactions between the parties, thus completely removing the need for the expensive \emph{king-slaves} approach taken by Hirt et al.. Initially, assuming an honest majority, we construct a constant-time protocol in the asynchronous Byzantine agreement (ABA) hybrid model. Using a concurrent ABA protocol that runs in constant expected time, we obtain a constant expected time asynchronous MPC protocol, secure facing static malicious adversaries, assuming t<n/3.

We present the first information-theoretic steganographic protocol with an asymptotically optimal ratio of key length to message length that operates on arbitrary covertext distributions with constant min-entropy. Our results are also applicable to the computational setting: our stegosystem can be composed over a pseudorandom generator to send longer messages in a computationally secure fashion. In this respect our scheme offers a significant improvement in terms of the number of pseudorandom bits generated by the two parties in comparison to previous results known in the computational setting. Central to our approach for improving the overhead for general distributions is the use of combinatorial constructions that have been found to be useful in other contexts for derandomization: almost $t$-wise independent function families.

Recently, Farasha et al. proposed an efficient user authentication and key agreement scheme for heterogeneous wireless sensor network tailored for the Internet of Things environment. By using BAN-logic and AVISPA tools, they confirm the security properties of the proposed scheme. However, after analyzing, we determine that the scheme could not resist the smart card loss password guessing attack, which is one of the ten basic requirements in a secure identity authentication using smart card, assisted by Liao et al. Therefore, we modify the method to include the desired security functionality, which is significantly important in a user authentication system using smart card.

The problem of verifiable data streaming (VDS) considers a client with limited computational and storage capacities that streams an a-priori unknown number of elements to an untrusted server. The client may retrieve and update any outsourced element. Other parties may verify each outsourced element's integrity using the client's public-key. All previous VDS constructions incur a bandwidth and computational overhead on both client and server side, which is at least logarithmic in the number of transmitted elements. We propose two novel, fundamentally different approaches to constructing VDS. The first scheme is based on a new cryptographic primitive called Chameleon Vector Commitment (CVC). A CVC is a trapdoor commitment scheme to a vector of messages where both commitments and openings have constant size. Using CVCs we construct a tree-based VDS protocol that has constant computational and bandwidth overhead on the client side. The second scheme shifts the workload to the server side by combining signature schemes with cryptographic accumulators. Here, all computations are constant, except for queries, where the computational cost of the server is linear in the total number of updates.

A new security protocol of {\it virtual proof of reality} (VP) is recently proposed by Ruhrmair {\it et al.} The VP allows one party, the prover, making a physical statement to the other party, the verifier, over a digital communication channel without using any secret keys except the message sent between these two parties. The physical statement could be a physical feature---eg. temperature---or phenomena---eg. destruction---of the hardware in the prover's system. We present two applications---secure key exchange and secure goods supply chain---building on the VP of temperature, location, and destruction. Moreover, we experimentally demonstrate the first electrical circuit-based VP of destruction through the proposed hardware security primitive---a hybrid memristor and physical unclonable function (memristor-PUF) architecture, which takes advantage of the PUF extracted from static variations of CMOS devices inherent to the fabrication process and dynamic variations attributed to switching variabilities of nano memristors.

In this paper the Security Evaluated Standardized Password Authenticated Key Exchange (SESPAKE) protocol is proposed (this protocol is approved in the standardization system of the Russian Federation) and its cryptographic properties are analyzed. The SESPAKE protocol includes a key agreement step and a key authentication step. We define new indistinguishability-based adversary model with a threat of false authentication that is an extension of the original indistinguishability-based model up to the case of protocols with authentication step without key diversification. We prove the protocol security under two types of threats: a classic threat of distinguishing a generated session key from a random string and a threat of false authentication. This protocol is the first password authenticated key exchange protocol (PAKE) protocol without key diversification for a full version of which a security proof has been obtained. The paper also contains a brief review of the known results dedicated to analysis of cryptographic properties of PAKE protocols.

We initiate the study of provably secure remote memory attestation. We present two protocols offering various efficiency and security trade-offs that detect the presence of injected malicious code in remotely- stored heap memory. While our solutions offer protection only against a specific class of attacks, our novel formal security definitions are general enough to cover a wide range of attacks and settings, and should be useful for further research on the subject.